Back to Authors

Winston, Joel S.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-0612

Mayo Clinic

King's College London

Citations 3

Real‐world epilepsy monitoring with ultra‐long‐term subcutaneous electroencephalography: A 15‐month prospective study
Viana, Pedro F. , Biondi, Andrea , Winston, Joel S. , Freestone, Dean R. , Brinkmann, Benjamin H. , Richardson, Mark P. , Duun-Henriksen, Jonas , Biondi, Andrea , Winston, Joel S , Freestone, Dean R , Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas , Brinkmann, Benjamin H , Richardson, Mark P , Viana, Pedro F , Duun‐Henriksen, Jonas , Schulze‐Bonhage, Andreas

Epilepsia | July 19, 2025 | Volume: 66 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 4476-4489

10.1111/epi.18566 Get It

Abstract Objective Novel subcutaneous electroencephalography (sqEEG) systems enable prolonged, near‐continuous cerebral monitoring in real‐world conditions. Nevertheless, the feasibility, acceptability and overall clinical utility of these systems remain unclear. We report on the longest observational study using ultra‐long‐term sqEEG to date. Methods We conducted a 15‐month prospective, observational study including 10 adult people with treatment‐resistant epilepsy. After device implantation, patients were asked to record sqEEG, to use an electronic seizure diary, and to complete acceptability and usability questionnaires. sqEEG seizures were annotated visually, aided by automated detection. Individualized temporal patterns of seizure occurrence were assessed via circadian circular statistics and via Fano factor analysis. Results Over a median duration of 438 days, 10 patients recorded a median 18.8 h/day, totaling 71 984 h of real‐world sqEEG data. Adherence and acceptability remained high throughout the study. Although 754 sqEEG seizures were recorded across patients, more than half (52%) of these were not reported in the patient diary. Of the 140 (27%) diary reports not associated with an identifiable sqEEG seizure, the majority (68%) were reported as seizures with preserved awareness. The sqEEG to diary F1 agreement score was highly variable, ranging from .06 to .97. Patient‐specific patterns of circadian seizure occurrence and seizure clustering were found, including several relevant discrepancies between sqEEG and diary. Significance We demonstrate feasibility and high acceptability of ultra‐long‐term (months–years) sqEEG monitoring. These systems help provide real‐world, more objective seizure counting compared to patient diaries. It is possible to objectively monitor individual temporal fluctuations of seizure occurrence.
Seizure forecasting using minimally invasive, ultra‐long‐term subcutaneous EEG: Generalizable cross‐patient models
Attia, Tal Pal , Viana, Pedro F. , Nasseri, Mona , Duun‐Henriksen, Jonas , Biondi, Andrea , Winston, Joel S. , Martins, Isabel Pavão , Nurse, Ewan S. , Dümpelmann, Matthias , Worrell, Gregory A. , Schulze‐Bonhage, Andreas , Brinkmann, Benjamin H. , Richardson, Mark P. , Pal Attia, Tal , Pavão Martins, Isabel , Freestone, Dean R , Brinkmann, Benjamin H , Richardson, Mark P , Nurse, Ewan , Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas , Dümpelmann, Matthias , Worrell, Gregory A , Duun-Henriksen, Jonas , Biondi, Andrea , Winston, Joel S , Viana, Pedro F , Freestone, Dean R. , Kjaer, Troels W

Epilepsia | April 20, 2022 | Volume: 64 | Issue: S4 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/epi.17265 Get It

Abstract This study describes a generalized cross‐patient seizure‐forecasting approach using recurrent neural networks with ultra‐long‐term subcutaneous EEG (sqEEG) recordings. Data from six patients diagnosed with refractory epilepsy and monitored with an sqEEG device were used to develop a generalized algorithm for seizure forecasting using long short‐term memory (LSTM) deep‐learning classifiers. Electrographic seizures were identified by a board‐certified epileptologist. One‐minute data segments were labeled as preictal or interictal based on their relationship to confirmed seizures. Data were separated into training and testing data sets, and to compensate for the unbalanced data ratio in training, noise‐added copies of preictal data segments were generated to expand the training data set. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the training data were used to normalize all data, preserving the pseudo‐prospective nature of the analysis. Different architecture classifiers were trained and tested using a leave‐one‐patient‐out cross‐validation method, and the area under the receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance classifiers. The importance of each input signal was evaluated using a leave‐one‐signal‐out method with repeated training and testing for each classifier. Cross‐patient classifiers achieved performance significantly better than chance in four of the six patients and an overall mean AUC of 0.602 ± 0.126 (mean ± SD). A time in warning of 37.386% ± 5.006% (mean ± std) and sensitivity of 0.691 ± 0.068 (mean ± std) were observed for patients with better than chance results. Analysis of input channels showed a significant contribution ( p < .05) by the Fourier transform of signals channels to overall classifier performance. The relative contribution of input signals varied among patients and architectures, suggesting that the inclusion of all signals contributes to robustness in a cross‐patient classifier. These early results show that it is possible to forecast seizures training with data from different patients using two‐channel ultra‐long‐term sqEEG.
Seizure forecasting using minimally invasive, ultra‐long‐term subcutaneous electroencephalography: Individualized intrapatient models
Viana, Pedro F. , Attia, Tal Pal , Duun‐Henriksen, Jonas , Biondi, Andrea , Winston, Joel S. , Martins, Isabel Pavão , Nurse, Ewan S. , Dümpelmann, Matthias , Schulze‐Bonhage, Andreas , Richardson, Mark P. , Brinkmann, Benjamin H. , Pal Attia, Tal , Nasseri, Mona , Duun-Henriksen, Jonas , Biondi, Andrea , Winston, Joel S , Pavão Martins, Isabel , Nurse, Ewan , Dümpelmann, Matthias , Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas , Freestone, Dean R , Kjaer, Troels W , Richardson, Mark P , Brinkmann, Benjamin H , Viana, Pedro F , Freestone, Dean R.

Epilepsia | April 8, 2022 | Volume: 64 | Issue: S4 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/epi.17252 Get It

Abstract Objective One of the most disabling aspects of living with chronic epilepsy is the unpredictability of seizures. Cumulative research in the past decades has advanced our understanding of the dynamics of seizure risk. Technological advances have recently made it possible to record pertinent biological signals, including electroencephalogram (EEG), continuously. We aimed to assess whether patient‐specific seizure forecasting is possible using remote, minimally invasive ultra‐long‐term subcutaneous EEG. Methods We analyzed a two‐center cohort of ultra‐long‐term subcutaneous EEG recordings, including six patients with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy monitored for 46–230 days with median 18 h/day of recorded data, totaling >11 000 h of EEG. Total electrographic seizures identified by visual review ranged from 12 to 36 per patient. Three candidate subject‐specific long short‐term memory network deep learning classifiers were trained offline and pseudoprospectively on preictal (1 h before) and interictal (>1 day from seizures) EEG segments. Performance was assessed relative to a random predictor. Periodicity of the final forecasts was also investigated with autocorrelation. Results Depending on each architecture, significant forecasting performance was achieved in three to five of six patients, with overall mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of .65–.74. Significant forecasts showed sensitivity ranging from 64% to 80% and time in warning from 10.9% to 44.4%. Overall, the output of the forecasts closely followed patient‐specific circadian patterns of seizure occurrence. Significance This study demonstrates proof‐of‐principle for the possibility of subject‐specific seizure forecasting using a minimally invasive subcutaneous EEG device capable of ultra‐long‐term at‐home recordings. These results are encouraging for the development of a prospective seizure forecasting trial with minimally invasive EEG.