Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

2153 citation(s) found for "Ma, Anna".

Genetic susceptibility to radiation-induced breast cancer after Hodgkin lymphoma
Winden, Annemieke W. J. Opstal‐van, Haan, Hugoline G. de , Hauptmann, Michael , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Russell, Nicola S. , Janus, Cécile P.M. , Krol, Augustinus D. G. , Baan, Frederieke H. van der , Bruin, Marie L. De , Eggermond, Anna M. van, Haiman, Christopher A., Sawyer, Elinor J. , Hooning, Maartje J. , Peto, Julian , Orr, Nick , Easton, Douglas F. , Strong, Louise C. , Cooke, Rosie, Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Leeuwen, Flora E. van , de Haan, Hugoline G , De Bruin, Marie L , Dennis, Joe , Pharoah, Paul D P , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Broeks, Annegien , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Cox, Angela , Devilee, Peter , Couch, Fergus J. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Aleman, Berthe M.P. , Bhatia, Smita , Robison, Leslie L. , Sawyer, Elinor J , Orr, Nick

Blood | December 21, 2018 | Volume: 133 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1130-1139

10.1182/blood-2018-07-862607 | PMID 30573632 Get It

AbstractFemale Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated with chest radiotherapy (RT) have a very high risk of breast cancer. The contribution of genetic factors to this risk is unclear. We therefore examined 211 155 germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for gene-radiation interaction on breast cancer risk in a case-only analysis including 327 breast cancer patients after chest RT for HL and 4671 first primary breast cancer patients. Nine SNPs showed statistically significant interaction with RT on breast cancer risk (false discovery rate, <20%), of which 1 SNP in the PVT1 oncogene attained the Bonferroni threshold for statistical significance. A polygenic risk score (PRS) composed of these SNPs (RT-interaction-PRS) and a previously published breast cancer PRS (BC-PRS) derived in the general population were evaluated in a case-control analysis comprising the 327 chest-irradiated HL patients with breast cancer and 491 chest-irradiated HL patients without breast cancer. Patients in the highest tertile of the RT-interaction-PRS had a 1.6-fold higher breast cancer risk than those in the lowest tertile. Remarkably, we observed a fourfold increased RT-induced breast cancer risk in the highest compared with the lowest decile of the BC-PRS. On a continuous scale, breast cancer risk increased 1.4-fold per standard deviation of the BC-PRS, similar to the effect size found in the general population. This study demonstrates that genetic factors influence breast cancer risk after chest RT for HL. Given the high absolute breast cancer risk in radiation-exposed women, these results can have important implications for the management of current HL survivors and future patients.
Genetic Data from Nearly 63,000 Women of European Descent Predicts DNA Methylation Biomarkers and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk
Yang, Yaohua , Wu, Lang , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Lu, Yingchang , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia, Li, Bingshan , Ye, Fei , Banerjee, Susana , Benı́tez, Javier , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Chen, Kexin , DeFazio, Anna , Dörk, Thilo , Eccles, Diana M., Edwards, Digna Velez, Fasching, Peter A. , Fortner, Renée T. , Gayther, Simon A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus , Huntsman, David G. , Kar, Siddhartha , Kelemen, Linda E. , Koushik, Anita , Lambrechts, Diether , Le, Nhu D. , Levine, Douglas A. , Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Matsuo, Keitaro , May, Taymaa, McNeish, Iain A. , Menon, Usha , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Moorman, Patricia G. , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Ness, Roberta B., Olsson, Håkan , Onland‐Moret, N. Charlotte , Park, Sue K. , Paul, James , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Phelan, Catherine M., Pike, Malcolm C. , Ramus, Susan J. , Ríboli, Elio , Rodríguez‐Antona, Cristina , Romieu, Isabelle, Sandler, Dale P. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Shan, Kang, Sieh, Weiva , Stampfer, Meir J. , Sutphen, Rebecca , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Szafron, Lukasz M. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Webb, Penelope M. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Woo, Yin Ling , Wu, Anna H. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Sellers, Thomas A. , Long, Jirong , Eccles, Diana , Lambrechts, Diether , Chen, Kexin , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Brenton, James D , Chang-Claude, Jenny , Fazio, Anna de , Dennis, Joe , Fasching, Peter A , Fortner, Renée T , Giles, Graham G , Harris, Holly R , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , Kjaer, Susanne K , Koushik, Anita , McNeish, Iain A , Menon, Usha , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Nevanlinna, H , Park, Sue K , Paul, James , Ramus, Susan J , Rodríguez-Antona, Cristina , Sandler, Dale P , Szafron, Lukasz M , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , Webb, Penelope M , Wolk, Alicja , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Eccles, Diana , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Moysich, Kirsten , Matsuo, Keitaro , Heitz, Florian , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Benitez, Javier , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Kar, Siddhartha , Riboli, Elio , Goodman, Marc T , Cai, Qiuyin , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia , Berchuck, Andrew , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Bjørge, Line , Brenton, James D. , Bützow, Ralf C. , Campbell, Ian , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Edwards, Digna R. Velez , Giles, Graham G. , Glasspool, Rosalind , Gronwald, Jacek , Harris, Holly R. , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Karlan, Beth Y. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Modugno, Francesmary , Nevanlinna, Heli , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Shan, Kang, Siddiqui, Nadeem , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , White, Emily , Willett, Walter C. , Wolk, Alicja , Li, Yan , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Zheng, Wei , Yang, Yaohua

Cancer Research | December 17, 2018 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 505-517

10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2726 | PMID 30559148 Get It

Abstract DNA methylation is instrumental for gene regulation. Global changes in the epigenetic landscape have been recognized as a hallmark of cancer. However, the role of DNA methylation in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. In this study, high-density genetic and DNA methylation data in white blood cells from the Framingham Heart Study (N = 1,595) were used to build genetic models to predict DNA methylation levels. These prediction models were then applied to the summary statistics of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ovarian cancer including 22,406 EOC cases and 40,941 controls to investigate genetically predicted DNA methylation levels in association with EOC risk. Among 62,938 CpG sites investigated, genetically predicted methylation levels at 89 CpG were significantly associated with EOC risk at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P < 7.94 × 10−7. Of them, 87 were located at GWAS-identified EOC susceptibility regions and two resided in a genomic region not previously reported to be associated with EOC risk. Integrative analyses of genetic, methylation, and gene expression data identified consistent directions of associations across 12 CpG, five genes, and EOC risk, suggesting that methylation at these 12 CpG may influence EOC risk by regulating expression of these five genes, namely MAPT, HOXB3, ABHD8, ARHGAP27, and SKAP1. We identified novel DNA methylation markers associated with EOC risk and propose that methylation at multiple CpG may affect EOC risk via regulation of gene expression. Significance: Identification of novel DNA methylation markers associated with EOC risk suggests that methylation at multiple CpG may affect EOC risk through regulation of gene expression.
Perspectives on ethnic and racial disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Update and areas of immediate need
Quiroz, Yakeel T. , Albensi, Benedict C. , Astell, Arlene , Babiloni, Claudio , Bahar‐Fuchs, Alex , Bowman, Gene L. , Chételat, Gaël , Ciro, Carrie , Cohen, Ann D. , Dilworth‐Anderson, Peggye, Dreux, Simone, Edland, Steven D. , Esbensen, Anna J. , Ewers, Michael , Fargo, Keith N. , Fortea, Juan , González, Héctor M. , Gustafson, Deborah , Head, Elizabeth , Hendrix, James A. , Hofer, Scott M. , Johnson, Leigh , Jutten, Roos J. , Kilborn, Kerry, Martins, Ralph N. , Morris, Martha Clare , Murray, Melissa E. , Parra, Mario A. , Roe, Catherine M. , Santos, Octavio A. , Scarmeas, Nikolaos , Schneider, Lon S. , Schupf, Nicole , Sikkes, Sietske A.M. , Snyder, Heather M. , Sohrabi, Hamid R. , Strydom, André , Muñiz‐Terrera, Graciela , Teunissen, Charlotte E. , Lent, Debora Melo van , Weinborn, Michael , Wesselman, Linda M.P. , Arenaza-Urquijo, Eider, Teunissen, Charlotte E , Fortea, Juan , Murray, Melissa E , Babulal, Ganesh M. , Arenaza‐Urquijo, Eider M. , Bell, J. Simon , Brickman, Adam M. , Dodge, Hiroko Hayama , Evered, Lisbeth Anne , Gonzalez, Hector M , Lanctôt, Krista L. , Manly, Jennifer J. , Mielke, Michelle M. , Oh, Esther S , Rissman, Robert A. , Stern, Yaakov , Tang, Yi , Wilcock, Donna M. , Zetterberg, Henrik , O’Bryant, Sid E. , Head, Elizabeth , Cohen, Annie

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 13, 2018 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 292-312

10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.009 | PMID 30555031 Get It

Abstract Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) are a global crisis facing the aging population and society as a whole. With the numbers of people with ADRDs predicted to rise dramatically across the world, the scientific community can no longer neglect the need for research focusing on ADRDs among underrepresented ethnoracial diverse groups. The Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment (ISTAART; alz.org/ISTAART ) comprises a number of professional interest areas (PIAs), each focusing on a major scientific area associated with ADRDs. We leverage the expertise of the existing international cadre of ISTAART scientists and experts to synthesize a cross‐PIA white paper that provides both a concise “state‐of‐the‐science” report of ethnoracial factors across PIA foci and updated recommendations to address immediate needs to advance ADRD science across ethnoracial populations.
Transcriptome and epigenome landscape of human cortical development modeled in organoids
Amiri, Anahita , Coppola, Gianfilippo , Scuderi, Soraya , Wu, Feinan , Roychowdhury, Tanmoy , Liu, Fuchen , Pochareddy, Sirisha , Shin, Yurae , Safi, Alexias , Song, Lingyun , Sousa, André M. M. , Crawford, Gregory E. , Šestan, Nenad , Abyzov, Alexej , Vaccarino, Flora M. , An, Joon‐Yong , Armoskus, Christoper, Beach, Thomas G., Belmont, Judson, Bendl, Jaroslav , Borrman, Tyler , Brown, Leanne, Brown, Miguel , Brown, Mimi, Brunetti, Tonya M. , Burke, Emily E., Chae, Yooree, Charney, Alexander W. , Cherskov, Adriana , Choi, Jinmyung , Clarke, Declan , Valle, Diane M. Del , Devillers, Olivia, Dracheva, Stella , Emani, Prashant S. , Evgrafov, Oleg V. , Fitzgerald, Dominic , Flatow, Elie, Francoeur, Nancy , Fullard, John F. , Gao, Tianliuyun , Geschwind, Daniel H. , Giase, Gina , Goodman, Thomas, Grennan, Kay, Gu, Mengting , Hadjimichael, Evi , Hahn, Chang-Gyu, Haroutunian, Vahram , Huey, Jack , Ivanov, Nikolay A. , Jacobov, Rivka, Jiang, Yan , Jiang, Yi , Kassim, Bibi, Kefi, Amira , Kleiman, Joel E., Knowles, James A. , Kozlenkov, Alexey , Li, Zhen , Lipska, Barbara K., Mangravite, Lara M. , Mariani, Jessica , Mattei, Eugenio , Miller, Daniel J. , Moore, J. Russell, Peters, Mette A. , Pinto, Dalila , Polioudakis, Damon, Ray, Mohana, Reddy, Timothy E. , Rhie, Suhn K. , Santpere, Gabriel , Sheppard, Brooke , Shi, Xu , Shieh, Annie W. , Shin, Joo Heon , Spitsyna, Valeria N. , Szatkiewicz, Jin , Szekely, Anna , Wang, Yongjun , Weissman, Sherman M., Weng, Zhiping , White, Kevin P. , Willsey, Jeremy A., Witt, Heather , Won, Hyejung , Xia, Yan , Xu, Min , Yang, Mo , Zandi, Peter P. , Zhang, Jing , Zharovsky, Elizabeth , Sousa, André M M , Gerstein, Mark , Crawford, Gregory E , Sestan, Nenad , Abyzov, Alexej , Vaccarino, Flora M , Del Valle, Diane M , Zhu, Ying , Gerstein, Mark , Akbarian, Schahram , Ashley‐Koch, Allison E. , Bryois, Julien , Camarena, Adrian , Carlyle, Becky Catherine , Chen, Chao , Cheng, Lijun , Collado‐Torres, Leonardo , Dai, Rujia , Torre-Ubieta, Luis de la , Farnham, Peggy , Gandal, Michael J. , Garrett, Melanie E , Girdhar, Kiran Kumar , Giusti‐Rodríguez, Paola , Goes, Fernando , Goodman, Thomas, Gürsoy, Gamze , Hauberg, Mads E. , Hoffman, Gabriel E. , Hyde, Thomas M , Jaffe, Andrew E. , Johnson, Graham D. , Kim, Yunjung , Kitchen, Robert , Li, Mingfeng , Liu, Chunyu , Liu, Shuang , Moore, Jill, Nairn, Angus C. , Navarro, Fábio C. P. , Park, Royce , Pratt, Henry , Price, Amanda J. , Purcaro, Michael J. , Roussos, Panos , Sanders, Stephan , Schreiner, Shannon , Škarica, Mario , State, Matthew W. , Sullivan, Patrick F. , Swarup, Vivek , Tao, Ran , Bakel, Harm van , Wang, Daifeng , Warrell, Jonathan , Webster, Maree J. , Werling, Donna M. , Wiseman, Jennifer R. , Wray, Gregory A. , Yang, Yucheng

Science | December 13, 2018 | Volume: 362 | Issue: 6420 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/science.aat6720 | PMID 30545853 Get It

INTRODUCTION The human cerebral cortex has undergone an extraordinary increase in size and complexity during mammalian evolution. Cortical cell lineages are specified in the embryo, and genetic and epidemiological evidence implicates early cortical development in the etiology of neuropsychiatric disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disabilities, and schizophrenia. Most of the disease-implicated genomic variants are located outside of genes, and the interpretation of noncoding mutations is lagging behind owing to limited annotation of functional elements in the noncoding genome. RATIONALE We set out to discover gene-regulatory elements and chart their dynamic activity during prenatal human cortical development, focusing on enhancers, which carry most of the weight upon regulation of gene expression. We longitudinally modeled human brain development using human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)–derived cortical organoids and compared organoids to isogenic fetal brain tissue. RESULTS Fetal fibroblast–derived hiPSC lines were used to generate cortically patterned organoids and to compare oganoids’ epigenome and transcriptome to that of isogenic fetal brains and external datasets. Organoids model cortical development between 5 and 16 postconception weeks, thus enabling us to study transitions from cortical stem cells to progenitors to early neurons. The greatest changes occur at the transition from stem cells to progenitors. The regulatory landscape encompasses a total set of 96,375 enhancers linked to target genes, with 49,640 enhancers being active in organoids but not in mid-fetal brain, suggesting major roles in cortical neuron specification. Enhancers that gained activity in the human lineage are active in the earliest stages of organoid development, when they target genes that regulate the growth of radial glial cells. Parallel weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) of transcriptome and enhancer activities defined a number of modules of coexpressed genes and coactive enhancers, following just six and four global temporal patterns that we refer to as supermodules, likely reflecting fundamental programs in embryonic and fetal brain. Correlations between gene expression and enhancer activity allowed stratifying enhancers into two categories: activating regulators (A-regs) and repressive regulators (R-regs). Several enhancer modules converged with gene modules, suggesting that coexpressed genes are regulated by enhancers with correlated patterns of activity. Furthermore, enhancers active in organoids and fetal brains were enriched for ASD de novo variants that disrupt binding sites of homeodomain, Hes1, NR4A2, Sox3, and NFIX transcription factors. CONCLUSION We validated hiPSC-derived cortical organoids as a suitable model system for studying gene regulation in human embryonic brain development, evolution, and disease. Our results suggest that organoids may reveal how noncoding mutations contribute to ASD etiology. Summary of the study, analyses, and main results. Data were generated for iPSC-derived human telencephalic organoids and isogenic fetal cortex. Organoids modeled embryonic and early fetal cortex and show a larger repertoire of enhancers. Enhancers could be divided into activators and repressors of gene expression. We derived networks of modules and supermodules with correlated gene and enhancer activities, some of which were implicated in autism spectrum disorders (ASD).
AACR White Paper: Shaping the Future of Cancer Prevention – A Roadmap for Advancing Science and Public Health
Lippman, Scott M. , Abate‐Shen, Cory , Maresso, Karen L. Colbert, Colditz, Graham A. , Dannenberg, Andrew J. , Davidson, Nancy E. , Szabó, Éva , Giuliano, Anna R. , Hait, William N., Lee, J. Jack, Kensler, Thomas W. , Kramer, Barnett S., Schmitz, Kathryn H. , Hawk, Ernest T. , Lee, J. Jack , Limburg, Paul, Colditz, Graham A , Schmitz, Kathryn H , Szabo, Eva , Lee, J Jack , Maresso, Karen Colbert , Disis, Mary Lenora , DuBois, Raymond N. , Lee, J. Jack, Limburg, Paul J. , Maitra, Anirban , Martı́nez, Marı́a Elena , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Vilar, Eduardo , Abate-Shen, Cory

Cancer Prevention Research | December 10, 2018 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 735-778

10.1158/1940-6207.capr-18-0421 | PMID 30530635 Get It

Abstract The recent pace, extent, and impact of paradigm-changing cancer prevention science has been remarkable. The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) convened a 3-day summit, aligned with five research priorities: (i) Precancer Atlas (PCA). (ii) Cancer interception. (iii) Obesity-cancer linkage, a global epidemic of chronic low-grade inflammation. (iv) Implementation science. (v) Cancer disparities. Aligned with these priorities, AACR co-led the Lancet Commission to formally endorse and accelerate the NCI Cancer Moonshot program, facilitating new global collaborative efforts in cancer control. The expanding scope of creative impact is perhaps most startling—from NCI-funded built environments to AACR Team Science Awarded studies of Asian cancer genomes informing global primary prevention policies; cell-free epigenetic marks identifying incipient neoplastic site; practice-changing genomic subclasses in myeloproliferative neoplasia (including germline variant tightly linked to JAK2 V617F haplotype); universal germline genetic testing for pancreatic cancer; and repurposing drugs targeting immune- and stem-cell signals (e.g., IL-1β, PD-1, RANK-L) to cancer interception. Microbiota-driven IL-17 can induce stemness and transformation in pancreatic precursors (identifying another repurposing opportunity). Notable progress also includes hosting an obesity special conference (connecting epidemiologic and molecular perspectives to inform cancer research and prevention strategies), co-leading concerted national implementation efforts in HPV vaccination, and charting the future elimination of cancer disparities by integrating new science tools, discoveries and perspectives into community-engaged research, including targeted counter attacks on e-cigarette ad exploitation of children, Hispanics and Blacks. Following this summit, two unprecedented funding initiatives were catalyzed to drive cancer prevention research: the NCI Cancer Moonshot (e.g., PCA and disparities); and the AACR-Stand Up To Cancer bold “Cancer Interception” initiative.
Cumulative network-meta-analyses, practice guidelines and actual prescriptions of drug treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a study protocol for cumulative network meta-analyses and meta-epidemiological study
Kataoka, Yuki , Luo, Yan , Chaimani, Anna , Ōnishi, Akira , Kimachi, Miho , Tsujimoto, Yasushi , Murad, M. Hassan , Li, Tianjing , Cipriani, Andrea , Furukawa, Toshi A. , Murad, Mohammad Hassan, Murad, M Hassan , Furukawa, Toshi A

BMJ Open | December 5, 2018 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 12 | Pages: e023218

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023218 | PMID 30518583 Get It

Introduction Cumulative network meta-analysis (NMA) is a method to provide a global comparison of multiple treatments with real-time update to evidence users. Several studies investigated the ranking of cumulative NMA and the recommendations of practice guidelines. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has evaluated the cumulative NMA ranking and prescription patterns. Here, we present a protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation to compare the results of cumulative NMA with the recommendations in postmenopausal osteoporosis practice guidelines and with the actual prescriptions. Method and analysis We will use the data of primary trials from the upcoming postmenopausal osteoporosis clinical practice guideline of the Endocrine Society. We will conduct cumulative NMA using all eligible trials and generate hierarchy of treatment rankings by using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. We will search practice guidelines in relevant society websites. Two review authors will extract the practice recommendations. We will use data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, a US representative sample of the non-institutionalised population, to determine the prescription patterns. Ethics and dissemination Because all data will be retrieved from public databases, institutional review board approval is not required. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present key findings at conferences. Trial registration number UMIN000031894: Pre-results.
A comprehensive gene–environment interaction analysis in Ovarian Cancer using genome‐wide significant common variants
Jensen, Allan , Wiensch, Ashley , Lee, Alice W. , Ness, Roberta B., Salvatore, Maxwell , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Whittemore, Alice S. , Sieh, Weiva , Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Rossing, Mary Anne, Webb, Penelope M. , Terry, Kathryn L. , Fortner, Renée T. , Menon, Usha , Gayther, Simon A. , Wu, Anna H. , Song, Honglin , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Thompson, Pamela J., Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Le, Nhu D. , Wentzensen, Nico, Trabert, Britton , Høgdall, Estrid , Huntsman, David G. , Pike, Malcolm C. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Salvatore, Maxwell , Anton-Culver, Hoda , Goode, Ellen L , Fortner, Renée T , Wu, Anna H. , Cramer, Daniel W , Modugno, Francesmary , Trabert, B , Pike, Malcolm C , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Tworoger, Shelley S , Webb, Penelope M , Jensen, Allan , Menon, Usha , Brooks-Wilson, Angela R , Sieh, Weiva , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Estrid , Goodman, Marc T , Kim, Sehee , Wang, Miao , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Liu, Gang , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Olson, Sara H. , Berchuck, Andrew , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Giles, Graham G. , Ziogas, Argyrios , Bandera, Elisa V. , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Milne, Roger L. , Winham, Stacey J. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Modugno, Francesmary , Harris, Holly R. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Mukherjee, Bhramar

International Journal of Cancer | November 30, 2018 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2192-2205

10.1002/ijc.32029 | PMID 30499236 Get It

As a follow‐up to genome‐wide association analysis of common variants associated with ovarian carcinoma (cancer), our study considers seven well‐known ovarian cancer risk factors and their interactions with 28 genome‐wide significant common genetic variants. The interaction analyses were based on data from 9971 ovarian cancer cases and 15,566 controls from 17 case–control studies. Likelihood ratio and Wald tests for multiplicative interaction and for relative excess risk due to additive interaction were used. The top multiplicative interaction was noted between oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use (ever vs. never) and rs13255292 (p value = 3.48 × 10−4). Among women with the TT genotype for this variant, the odds ratio for OCP use was 0.53 (95% CI = 0.46–0.60) compared to 0.71 (95%CI = 0.66–0.77) for women with the CC genotype. When stratified by duration of OCP use, women with 1–5 years of OCP use exhibited differential protective benefit across genotypes. However, no interaction on either the multiplicative or additive scale was found to be statistically significant after multiple testing correction. The results suggest that OCP use may offer increased benefit for women who are carriers of the T allele in rs13255292. On the other hand, for women carrying the C allele in this variant, longer (5+ years) use of OCP may reduce the impact of carrying the risk allele of this SNP. Replication of this finding is needed. The study presents a comprehensive analytic framework for conducting gene–environment analysis in ovarian cancer.
Pediatric cancer care professionals’ experiences with an interprofessional communication intervention.
Das, Porag Jeet , Revette, Anna , Tulsky, James A. , Feraco, Angela M. , McCarthy, Sarah , Wolfe, Joanne

Journal of Clinical Oncology | November 28, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 34_suppl | Pages: 53-53

10.1200/jco.2018.36.34_suppl.53 Get It

53 Background: The National Academy of Medicine recommends interprofessional collaboration to promote optimal patient- and family-centered care. We sought to understand whether medical and psychosocial professionals who participated in an interprofessional communication intervention perceived it as distinct from usual clinical care. Methods: Our intervention targeted “medical” (physicians, nurse practitioners) and “psychosocial” (social workers, psychologists) professionals. It consisted of an interprofessional family conference, using a structured conversation guide, conducted during the first 6 months of a child’s cancer care. Conferences aimed to enable families to share hopes and worries and ask questions about their child’s care. Clinicians received a 60-minute training focused on communication skills, such as eliciting families’ hopes and worries, and suggested approaches to collaborating during conferences. Clinicians participated in debriefing interviews after each conference (range 1-3). Three of us conducted thematic analysis of interview data. Results: Twenty-two professionals (6 attending MDs, 4 fellow MDs, 8 NPs, and 8 psychosocial clinicians) gave 34 interviews. Medical and psychosocial professionals described interprofessional family conferences as distinct from usual practice patterns, largely due to their interprofessional colleagues’ presence. This co-presence contributed to “being on the same page.” Conferences sometimes bred a new understanding of a family’s needs and consequent care changes. However, both medical and psychosocial professionals noted that psychosocial professionals often were not vocal contributors to the conference. Some psychosocial clinicians reported being unsure of “the rules.” Conclusions: An interprofessional communication intervention promoted shared understanding between interprofessional colleagues. However, medical professionals were described as more vocal, perhaps due to insufficient role clarity or medical dominance.
Functional Analysis and Fine Mapping of the 9p22.2 Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Locus
Buckley, Melissa A., Woods, Nicholas T. , Mendoza-Fandiño, Gustavo, Lawrenson, Kate , Hazelett, Dennis J. , Najafabadi, Hamed S. , Gjyshi, Anxhela, Carvalho, Renato S. , Lyra, Paulo C. , Shen, Howard C., Yang, Ally , Earp, Madalene A. , Yoder, Sean J., Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Ramus, Susan J. , Phelan, Catherine M., Coetzee, Gerhard A., Hughes, Timothy R. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Gayther, Simon A. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Lu, Karen H. , Goodman, Marc T. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Jakubowska, Anna , Dörk, Thilo , Matsuo, Keitaro , Menon, Usha , Terry, Kathryn L. , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Ekici, Arif B. , Chen, Y. Ann , Eccles, Diana , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Lambrechts, Diether , Jensen, Allan , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Sieh, Weiva , Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Liang, Dong , Woo, Yin Ling , McNeish, Iain A. , Lambrechts, Diether , Lawrenson, Kate , Hazelett, Dennis J , Najafabadi, Hamed S , Coetzee, Simon G , Ramus, Susan J , Noushmehr, Houtan , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , McNeish, Iain A , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Jensen, Allan , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Lissowska, Jolanta , Brooks-Wilson, Angela R , Matsuo, Keitaro , Jakubowska, Anna , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Ekici, Arif B , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Goodman, Marc T , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Coetzee, Simon G. , Yoder, Sean , Risch, Harvey A. , Noushmehr, Houtan , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Morais Lyra, Paulo Cilas

Cancer Research | November 28, 2018 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 467-481

10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-3864 | PMID 30487138 Get It

Abstract Genome-wide association studies have identified 40 ovarian cancer risk loci. However, the mechanisms underlying these associations remain elusive. In this study, we conducted a two-pronged approach to identify candidate causal SNPs and assess underlying biological mechanisms at chromosome 9p22.2, the first and most statistically significant associated locus for ovarian cancer susceptibility. Three transcriptional regulatory elements with allele-specific effects and a scaffold/matrix attachment region were characterized and, through physical DNA interactions, BNC2 was established as the most likely target gene. We determined the consensus binding sequence for BNC2 in vitro, verified its enrichment in BNC2 ChIP-seq regions, and validated a set of its downstream target genes. Fine-mapping by dense regional genotyping in over 15,000 ovarian cancer cases and 30,000 controls identified SNPs in the scaffold/matrix attachment region as among the most likely causal variants. This study reveals a comprehensive regulatory landscape at 9p22.2 and proposes a likely mechanism of susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Significance: Mapping the 9p22.2 ovarian cancer risk locus identifies BNC2 as an ovarian cancer risk gene. See related commentary by Choi and Brown, p. 439