Liu, Gang

Arterial stiffness predicts cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. Ultrasound elastography methods that measure wave velocity have promise for evaluating the stiffness of blood vessels in vivo. However, vessel geometry modulates wave velocity by inducing geometric dispersion. Here, we compare Young's modulus E estimates obtained using in vivo wave velocity measurements and techniques that either do or do not consider geometry to ex vivo reference E values from mechanical testing . An acoustic radiation force was applied to generate propagating waves in the right common carotid artery (N = 9) and external jugular vein (N = 10) of anesthetized pigs. Vessels were imaged with ultrafast ultrasound to measure wave motion. Group velocity cg was estimated from wave motion using a Radon transform. E was estimated from cg using a bulk media assumption which neglects geometry, as well as the Moens–Korteweg equation and a semi-analytical finite element model, which consider geometry. Pigs were euthanized and vessels were excised. Ring-shaped samples were extracted and tested in a uniaxial tension setup to obtain reference E values for comparison with E values obtained from wave-based techniques. Techniques considering geometry exhibited higher correlation with reference E values, underscoring the need to incorporate geometry for accurate vascular elastography assessments.

As a follow‐up to genome‐wide association analysis of common variants associated with ovarian carcinoma (cancer), our study considers seven well‐known ovarian cancer risk factors and their interactions with 28 genome‐wide significant common genetic variants. The interaction analyses were based on data from 9971 ovarian cancer cases and 15,566 controls from 17 case–control studies. Likelihood ratio and Wald tests for multiplicative interaction and for relative excess risk due to additive interaction were used. The top multiplicative interaction was noted between oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use (ever vs. never) and rs13255292 (p value = 3.48 × 10−4). Among women with the TT genotype for this variant, the odds ratio for OCP use was 0.53 (95% CI = 0.46–0.60) compared to 0.71 (95%CI = 0.66–0.77) for women with the CC genotype. When stratified by duration of OCP use, women with 1–5 years of OCP use exhibited differential protective benefit across genotypes. However, no interaction on either the multiplicative or additive scale was found to be statistically significant after multiple testing correction. The results suggest that OCP use may offer increased benefit for women who are carriers of the T allele in rs13255292. On the other hand, for women carrying the C allele in this variant, longer (5+ years) use of OCP may reduce the impact of carrying the risk allele of this SNP. Replication of this finding is needed. The study presents a comprehensive analytic framework for conducting gene–environment analysis in ovarian cancer.