Back to Authors

Roussos, Panos

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4640-6239

Mayo Clinic

No affiliation available

Citations 2

Optimizing Control Definitions in Opioid Use Disorder Genetic Research Using Electronic Health Records
Niarchou, Maria , Tsai, Ellen , Jennings, Mariela, Faucon, Annika, Lee, Hyunjoon, Tubbs, Justin D. , Roussos, Panos, Ge, Tian, Crist, Richard C. , Vickers‐Smith, Rachel, Edenberg, Howard, Moore, Amy, Webb, Bradley T. , Johnson, Eric, Workgroup, PsycheMERGE Substance Use Disorder, Smoller, Jordan W., Davis, Lea K., Coombes, BJ, Voloudakis, Georgios, Burstein, David , Mallard, TT, Troiani, Vanessa , Sanchez‐Roige, Sandra, Roussos, Panos , Johnson, Eric O. , Tsai, Ellen L , Tubbs, Justin D , Roussos, Panagiotis , Ge, Tian , Crist, Richard C , Vickers-Smith, Rachel , Moore, Amy , Johnson, Eric O , Kember, Rachel L , Voloudakis, Georgios , Burstein, David , Troiani, Vanessa , Sanchez-Roige, Sandra , Faucon, Annika B. , Singh, Kritika , Kember, Rachel L. , Smoller, Jordan W. , Davis, Lea Karatheodoris , Voloudakis, Georgios , Mallard, Travis T.

Addiction Biology | January 19, 2026 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/adb.70094 Get It

ABSTRACT Amidst the opioid crisis, understanding the genetic basis of opioid use disorder (OUD) is crucial for identifying biological mechanisms and intervention points. However, genome‐wide association studies (GWASs) have been hampered by inadequate sample sizes and often the use of control populations not assessed for prior opioid exposure. Because opioid exposure is a prerequisite for the development of OUD, consideration of exposure history in controls is important. Electronic health record data (EHR) paired with genomic information allow a broader sampling of patients with OUD and exposed controls. We leveraged data across two healthcare systems to evaluate the impact of using controls not screened for opioid exposure (‘generic’) versus minimally opioid‐exposed control (‘exposed’). First, at the phenotypic level, we conducted phenome‐wide association studies (PheWAS) to compare the medical comorbidity profiles of OUD cases when using generic versus exposed controls. While PheWAS results for OUD‐related comorbidities were more pronounced when using the generic group, 83% of the disease associations were overlapping and of similar effect sizes. Second, at the genetic level, we conducted GWAS (cases vs. generic; cases vs. exposed) and assessed differences in genetic correlations and degrees of phenotypic misclassification. Genetic results were concordant across control groups based on heritability (generic: 0.16 ± 0.07 vs. 0.10 ± 0.07), associations with the coding OPRM1 variant rs1799971 ( p generic = 8.83E‐03 vs. p exposed = 1.83E‐02) and genetic correlations with prior OUD GWAS ( r g‐generic = 0.83 ± 0.26 vs. r g‐exposed = 0.78 ± 0.27). Although GWASs were limited by sample size ( N generic = 6269, N exposed = 6365), compared to an independent OUD GWAS ( N = 425 944), the dilution value for the two GWAS was not different from 1, suggesting no major impact of phenotypic misclassification. This study represents the first effort to enhance OUD genetic research through optimization of control definitions using EHR data. Generic controls ascertained within the US health systems, where exposure to prescription opioids is high, offer a practical alternative for genetic studies of OUD.
Transcriptome and epigenome landscape of human cortical development modeled in organoids
Amiri, Anahita , Coppola, Gianfilippo , Scuderi, Soraya , Wu, Feinan , Roychowdhury, Tanmoy , Liu, Fuchen , Pochareddy, Sirisha , Shin, Yurae , Safi, Alexias , Song, Lingyun , Sousa, André M. M. , Crawford, Gregory E. , Šestan, Nenad , Abyzov, Alexej , Vaccarino, Flora M. , An, Joon‐Yong , Armoskus, Christoper, Beach, Thomas G., Belmont, Judson, Bendl, Jaroslav , Borrman, Tyler , Brown, Leanne, Brown, Miguel , Brown, Mimi, Brunetti, Tonya M. , Burke, Emily E., Chae, Yooree, Charney, Alexander W. , Cherskov, Adriana , Choi, Jinmyung , Clarke, Declan , Valle, Diane M. Del , Devillers, Olivia, Dracheva, Stella , Emani, Prashant S. , Evgrafov, Oleg V. , Fitzgerald, Dominic , Flatow, Elie, Francoeur, Nancy , Fullard, John F. , Gao, Tianliuyun , Geschwind, Daniel H. , Giase, Gina , Goodman, Thomas, Grennan, Kay, Gu, Mengting , Hadjimichael, Evi , Hahn, Chang-Gyu, Haroutunian, Vahram , Huey, Jack , Ivanov, Nikolay A. , Jacobov, Rivka, Jiang, Yan , Jiang, Yi , Kassim, Bibi, Kefi, Amira , Kleiman, Joel E., Knowles, James A. , Kozlenkov, Alexey , Li, Zhen , Lipska, Barbara K., Mangravite, Lara M. , Mariani, Jessica , Mattei, Eugenio , Miller, Daniel J. , Moore, J. Russell, Peters, Mette A. , Pinto, Dalila , Polioudakis, Damon, Ray, Mohana, Reddy, Timothy E. , Rhie, Suhn K. , Santpere, Gabriel , Sheppard, Brooke , Shi, Xu , Shieh, Annie W. , Shin, Joo Heon , Spitsyna, Valeria N. , Szatkiewicz, Jin , Szekely, Anna , Wang, Yongjun , Weissman, Sherman M., Weng, Zhiping , White, Kevin P. , Willsey, Jeremy A., Witt, Heather , Won, Hyejung , Xia, Yan , Xu, Min , Yang, Mo , Zandi, Peter P. , Zhang, Jing , Zharovsky, Elizabeth , Sousa, André M M , Gerstein, Mark , Crawford, Gregory E , Sestan, Nenad , Abyzov, Alexej , Vaccarino, Flora M , Del Valle, Diane M , Zhu, Ying , Gerstein, Mark , Akbarian, Schahram , Ashley‐Koch, Allison E. , Bryois, Julien , Camarena, Adrian , Carlyle, Becky Catherine , Chen, Chao , Cheng, Lijun , Collado‐Torres, Leonardo , Dai, Rujia , Torre-Ubieta, Luis de la , Farnham, Peggy , Gandal, Michael J. , Garrett, Melanie E , Girdhar, Kiran Kumar , Giusti‐Rodríguez, Paola , Goes, Fernando , Goodman, Thomas, Gürsoy, Gamze , Hauberg, Mads E. , Hoffman, Gabriel E. , Hyde, Thomas M , Jaffe, Andrew E. , Johnson, Graham D. , Kim, Yunjung , Kitchen, Robert , Li, Mingfeng , Liu, Chunyu , Liu, Shuang , Moore, Jill, Nairn, Angus C. , Navarro, Fábio C. P. , Park, Royce , Pratt, Henry , Price, Amanda J. , Purcaro, Michael J. , Roussos, Panos , Sanders, Stephan , Schreiner, Shannon , Škarica, Mario , State, Matthew W. , Sullivan, Patrick F. , Swarup, Vivek , Tao, Ran , Bakel, Harm van , Wang, Daifeng , Warrell, Jonathan , Webster, Maree J. , Werling, Donna M. , Wiseman, Jennifer R. , Wray, Gregory A. , Yang, Yucheng

Science | December 13, 2018 | Volume: 362 | Issue: 6420 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/science.aat6720 Get It

INTRODUCTION The human cerebral cortex has undergone an extraordinary increase in size and complexity during mammalian evolution. Cortical cell lineages are specified in the embryo, and genetic and epidemiological evidence implicates early cortical development in the etiology of neuropsychiatric disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disabilities, and schizophrenia. Most of the disease-implicated genomic variants are located outside of genes, and the interpretation of noncoding mutations is lagging behind owing to limited annotation of functional elements in the noncoding genome. RATIONALE We set out to discover gene-regulatory elements and chart their dynamic activity during prenatal human cortical development, focusing on enhancers, which carry most of the weight upon regulation of gene expression. We longitudinally modeled human brain development using human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)–derived cortical organoids and compared organoids to isogenic fetal brain tissue. RESULTS Fetal fibroblast–derived hiPSC lines were used to generate cortically patterned organoids and to compare oganoids’ epigenome and transcriptome to that of isogenic fetal brains and external datasets. Organoids model cortical development between 5 and 16 postconception weeks, thus enabling us to study transitions from cortical stem cells to progenitors to early neurons. The greatest changes occur at the transition from stem cells to progenitors. The regulatory landscape encompasses a total set of 96,375 enhancers linked to target genes, with 49,640 enhancers being active in organoids but not in mid-fetal brain, suggesting major roles in cortical neuron specification. Enhancers that gained activity in the human lineage are active in the earliest stages of organoid development, when they target genes that regulate the growth of radial glial cells. Parallel weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) of transcriptome and enhancer activities defined a number of modules of coexpressed genes and coactive enhancers, following just six and four global temporal patterns that we refer to as supermodules, likely reflecting fundamental programs in embryonic and fetal brain. Correlations between gene expression and enhancer activity allowed stratifying enhancers into two categories: activating regulators (A-regs) and repressive regulators (R-regs). Several enhancer modules converged with gene modules, suggesting that coexpressed genes are regulated by enhancers with correlated patterns of activity. Furthermore, enhancers active in organoids and fetal brains were enriched for ASD de novo variants that disrupt binding sites of homeodomain, Hes1, NR4A2, Sox3, and NFIX transcription factors. CONCLUSION We validated hiPSC-derived cortical organoids as a suitable model system for studying gene regulation in human embryonic brain development, evolution, and disease. Our results suggest that organoids may reveal how noncoding mutations contribute to ASD etiology. Summary of the study, analyses, and main results. Data were generated for iPSC-derived human telencephalic organoids and isogenic fetal cortex. Organoids modeled embryonic and early fetal cortex and show a larger repertoire of enhancers. Enhancers could be divided into activators and repressors of gene expression. We derived networks of modules and supermodules with correlated gene and enhancer activities, some of which were implicated in autism spectrum disorders (ASD).