Citations

ABSTRACT Background Although kidney biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing immune checkpoint inhibitors–associated acute interstitial nephritis (ICI-AIN), several promising urinary biomarkers have emerged as potential non-invasive diagnostics. Notably, recent studies have highlighted tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), CXC motif chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL-9) and others as potential biomarkers to help distinguish ICI-AIN from other causes of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, a direct systematic comparison between these two biomarkers in a cohort of patients undergoing immunotherapy has not been performed. Methods We prospectively enrolled a cohort of ICI-treated cancer patients who developed AKI (including both ICI-AIN and ICI-Non-AIN AKI), as well as those without AKI, referred to as the internal validation cohort. Urinary CXCL-9 and TNF-α were measured across all groups using the human Quantikine ELISA Kit. We externally validated our findings in a cohort of biopsy proven ICI-AIN patients from Spain, referred to as the external validation cohort. Results Urinary CXCL-9 levels were significantly higher in ICI-AIN patients from Mayo (n = 40) compared with those with ICI-Non-AIN AKI (n = 36) and ICI-treated patients without AKI (n = 16) (both P ≤ .0001); these findings were confirmed in the validation cohort from Spain (n = 19) with P-values of .0008 and <.0001, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for urinary CXCL-9 distinguishing ICI-AIN biopsy proven (combined from both cohorts, n = 45) from ICI-Non-AIN AKI was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.74–0.92), while for urinary TNF-α the AUC was 0.63 (0.51–0.75). Conclusions Increased urinary CXCL-9 was superior to TNF-α as a biomarker for the non-invasive diagnosis of ICI-AIN, even after prior corticosteroid exposure, highlighting its promise as clinical diagnostic tool.

Abstract INTRODUCTION The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling family plays a role in neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Previous work has shown widespread effects of the members FLT1 , FLT4 , and VEGFB on AD outcomes. However, these analyses have focused within the non‐Hispanic White (NHW) population. METHODS The goal of this study was to analyze the effects of the VEGF family in underrepresented populations, leveraging large and diverse bulk RNA sequencing and tandem mass tag–mass spectrometry (TMT‐MS) proteomic data. Outcomes included measures of AD pathology and diagnosis. RESULTS Within underrepresented populations, we replicated previously reported effects of FLT1 and FLT4 , whereby higher protein abundance was observed in the AD brain and was associated with higher neuropathology burden. In stratified analyses, these associations were largely consistent across race and ethnicity. DISCUSSION This multi‐omic study on the role of the VEGF family in AD emphasizes the need for more representative studies focused on therapeutic targets for AD. Highlights Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genes and proteins were quantified in four different brain regions. Samples included participants from four different populations. Previously observed effects were replicated in diverse populations. This study is the largest multi‐omic study of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genes among Alzheimer's disease (AD) participants from diverse populations.

Abstract Background: As with most Sub-Saharan African countries, Nigeria has a rising incidence of cancer, with disproportionate mortality rates. The financial burden of cancer care often results in catastrophic healthcare spending, leading to treatment refusal, disruption, and discontinuation. This is particularly significant in Nigeria, where nearly all patients are uninsured, and out-of-pocket costs often exceed households’ ability to pay. Financial Navigation Programs (FNPs) have been shown to mitigate treatment-related financial toxicity in cancer care and reduce treatment abandonment, but there is a paucity of high-quality data on this intervention in resource-constrained settings. Here, we present a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a novel FNP in Nigeria. Methods: We designed the COST-FIN trial, a multi-site pragmatic single-blinded randomized controlled trial of newly diagnosed (<6 weeks from diagnosis) adults (≥18 years) with breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer at two tertiary cancer centers in Nigeria. Participants (n=200) will be randomized (1:1) to either the intervention (FNP) or the control arm and followed for 12 months. Data on key individual, treatment, and financial parameters will be collected via structured interviews and chart abstraction at baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up. In addition, participants randomized to the FNP will receive a tailored financial literacy assessment, financial planning support, and enhanced access to resources by trained financial navigators. Primary and secondary outcomes are Financial Catastrophe (FC) and Financial Distress (FD), respectively. Exploratory outcomes will include cost-related non-adherence and cost-effectiveness of the program. An interim analysis will be conducted when 50% of the estimated accruals reach 6 months of follow-up, with crossover if compelling evidence of benefit is demonstrated at that time point. All participants will be followed for 12 months from recruitment. Discussion: This first-of-its-kind study will provide evidence on the role of FNP in potentially eliminating financial barriers to cancer care in Nigeria. Given the country’s renewed interest in cancer control through the passage of the National Cancer Control Plan, findings from this study have the potential to influence policy reform and set the stage for further studies to evaluate the scalability and implementation of similar interventions in resource-limited settings. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06630962. Oct 8, 2024 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06630962)

ABSTRACT Approximately 10% of patients with Ewing sarcoma (EwS) have pathogenic germline variants. Here, we report two cases: first, a novel germline pathogenic variant in partner and localizer of BRCA2 ( PALB2) in a patient with a late EwS relapse. Its impact on homologous recombination is demonstrated, and breast cancer risk is discussed. Second, we report a pathogenic germline variant in RAD50 in a patient with a rare prostate primary EwS and later concurrent relapsed EwS and therapy‐related acute myeloid leukemia (tAML) with two rare KMT2A translocations. Understanding rare pathogenic germline variants and the impact on cancer behavior, response to treatment and treatment‐associated toxicities is important for patients.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome, predominantly affecting women. Psychological distress is common pre- and post-SCAD, yet sex-specific patterns remain understudied. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine sex differences in the psychological distress of patients with SCAD. METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with SCAD within the past 3 years, confirmed by coronary angiography, were recruited from 6 Canadian hospitals between April 2022 and January 2025. Participants completed questionnaires assessing sociodemographics and validated measures of psychological distress: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 for generalized anxiety, Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire for cardiac-related anxiety, and PTSD Checklist-5 for posttraumatic stress symptoms. Sex differences were analyzed using t tests for continuous variables and χ 2 tests for categorical variables. Multivariable linear regression models assessed the association between sex and psychological distress, adjusting for age, pre-SCAD mental health diagnosis, and employment status. RESULTS: Among 326 patients (92.9% women; mean age=53.3±11.1 years), women reported higher rates of preexisting mental health conditions (29.2% versus 8.7%; P =0.035). Post-SCAD women reported higher mean scores than men on the Patient-Health-Questionnaire-9, Cardiac-Anxiety-Questionnaire, and PTSD Checklist-5 (all P <0.05). Female sex was associated with greater depressive (B=2.94; P =0.010), cardiac anxiety (B=7.09; P =0.008), and posttraumatic stress symptoms (B=5.94; P =0.048) after adjustment. Clinically significant symptoms were more common in women versus men: 25.1% versus 0% (depression), 21.5% versus 4.4% (anxiety), 54.8% versus 26.1% (cardiac anxiety), and 15.5% versus 0% (posttraumatic stress). CONCLUSIONS: Both women and men experience clinically significant cardiac anxiety following SCAD, but women report a greater psychological burden, including more preexisting mental health conditions and twice the distress after SCAD. These results underscore the importance of routine psychological screening and timely intervention to support mental health and recovery outcomes, particularly among women.

Abstract Purpose: Head and neck (HN) radiotherapy contour quality directly impacts local control (LC) and survival; however, few departments peer review (PR) contours prior to radiotherapy planning (RTP). This study reports outcomes of a single institution’s formal HN contour PR process. Methods: A formal HN contour PR process was implemented. Prior to RTP, HN radiation oncologists reviewed contours, provided feedback and assigned contour grades as follows: R0 (no change), R1 (minor revision, not high risk) or R2 (major revision; high risk). The PR task was completed and the contour grade was recorded. Cochran-Armitage trend test was performed. Results: Pilot PR process was performed over a 7-month period for 88 patients, followed by a maintenance phase. Contours were graded as follows: R0 ( N = 51), R1 ( N = 20) and R2 ( N = 17). Over time, the number of R2 revisions decreased ( p = 0.0001); month 1 ( N = 7), month 2 ( N = 3), month 3 ( N = 5), month 4 ( N = 2) and months 5–7 ( N = 0). Conversely, the number of R0 revisions improved over time ( p = 0.0203); month 1 ( N = 5), months 2–3 ( N = 9), month 4 ( N = 5), month 5 ( N = 8), month 6 ( N = 12) and month 7 ( N = 3). Each radiation oncologist demonstrated reduction in R2 revisions during the pilot. During maintenance, all 3 radiation oncologists demonstrated low rates of R2 revisions of less than 3 cases per year. Conclusion: Incorporation of HN contour PR into routine clinical workflow is feasible. The collective experience of multiple high-volume HN radiation oncologists led to improved contour quality in the pilot for each radiation oncologist and continued to ensure high quality in the maintenance phase.

Abstract Aims Cardiogenic shock (CS) is often treated with catecholamines titrated to an adequate target mean arterial pressure (MAP) while minimizing adverse effects. We aim to assess the optimal catecholamine dose/MAP balance in heart failure-associated CS (HF-CS). Methods Patients with HF-CS were retrospectively enrolled from 16 tertiary centres in 5 European countries (2016–2021; NCT03313687). Dosage was quantified by inotropic scores (epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dobutamine). Associations of baseline and seven-day summarized dosage with intensive care unit (ICU) discharge (mixed-effects logistic regression) and 30-day mortality (Cox regression) were analysed. Potential catecholamine/MAP target ratios for optimized outcomes were assessed in models adjusted for age, sex, pH, lactate and prior resuscitation, stratified by centre. Results N = 704 patients: median age 63 years, 74% male, 34% post-resuscitation, median lactate 5.2 mmol/l. Of these, 53% were discharged from ICU, 48% died within 30 days. Higher inotropic scores independently predicted a lower probability of ICU discharge (baseline score: OR 0.78 [95%-CI 0.69–0.88]; summarized score: OR 0.46 [0.38–0.56]; both P &lt; .001) and higher risk of 30-day mortality (baseline score: HR 1.27 [1.15–1.40], summarized score HR 1.83 [1.60–2.09]; both P &lt; .001). A score/MAP ratio &lt;0.403 µg/kg/min/mmHg was associated with higher ICU discharge odds (ceiling effect); a &lt; 0.426 µg/kg/min/mmHg with lower 30-day mortality hazards (no ceiling effect). Lowering catecholamine doses by accepting reduced MAP targets was linked to better outcomes. Conclusion In HF-CS, higher catecholamine support independently associates with worse outcomes. Accepting lower blood pressure targets to reduce catecholamine dosage may improve outcomes. Validation in randomized controlled trials is urgently needed.