Miller, Kathy

Abstract Background The PALLAS trial investigated the addition of palbociclib to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy reduces breast cancer recurrence. This pre-specified analysis was conducted to determine whether adjuvant palbociclib benefited patients diagnosed with lower risk stage IIA disease compared to those with higher stage disease. Methods PALLAS was an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial, representing a public-private partnership between Pfizer, the Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group and, the U.S. ALLIANCE Foundation. Patients diagnosed with stage II-III, hormone-receptor-positive, HER2/neu negative breast cancer who were within 12 months of diagnosis, and had completed all definitive therapy aside from endocrine therapy, which was started within 6 months prior to study entry. All patients were required to submit a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor block. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive standard adjuvant endocrine therapy (of physicians’ choice) for at least 5 years with or without 2 years of Palbociclib, administered orally at a starting dose of 125 mg daily, given for 21 days followed by a 7-day break. Results A total of 5,796 patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (including 1,010 with stage IIA) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 50 months for stage IIA patients and 43.1 months overall. In the stage IIA cohort, four-year iDFS in the palbociclib arm was 92.9% versus 92.1% for ET alone (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.48–1.19, p = 0.23). There was no differential benefit by histologic grade, chemotherapy receipt, age, or anatomic/clinical risk. Additionally, no benefit to palbociclib was seen in this cohort in invasive breast cancer-free survival (iBCFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), or overall survival (OS). For the stage IIB/III patients, 4-year iDFS was 85.3% for palbociclib + ET versus 83.6% for ET alone (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77–1.07, p = 0.24). Conclusions and Relevance: While there were substantial differences in outcome for stage IIA versus IIB/III patients at 4 years of follow-up, the addition of 2 years of palbociclib did not improve outcomes for patients, regardless of stage. Trial Registration: The study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov on July 31, 2015, and was assigned the clinical trial number (NCT02513394).

390216 Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors have become standard of care for advanced hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy (ET), with one approved for high-risk patients (pts) in the adjuvant setting. The PALLAS Trial investigated the addition of palbociclib to adjuvant ET in pts with stage II-III breast cancer. Stage IIA patients were specifically enrolled to evaluate the potential benefit of using palbociclib with adjuvant ET pts diagnosed at lower risk who may have more indolent disease. Methods: In the prospective, randomized, phase III PALLAS trial, pts with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant ET for at least 5 years with or without 2 years of palbociclib (125 mg orally once daily, days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle). ET was of provider’s choice. Stage IIA enrollment was capped at 1,000 patients. While the primary end point of the overall study was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for the entire cohort, there was a preplanned analysis of recurrence and survival endpoints in the stage IIA cohort. Outcomes were compared between arms using stratified log-rank tests and Cox models (stratification factors: chemotherapy and age ≤ 50). Results: Among 5,796 pts enrolled at 406 centers in 21 countries worldwide between 9/1/2015 and 11/30/2018, a total of 1,010 stage IIA pts were enrolled. The protocol-defined number of events occurred at a median follow-up of 50 months for this subgroup (43.1 months for the overall study). Median age within this subgroup was 54 (range 29-85 yrs), and 410 (40.6%) were pre/perimenopausal, 506 (50.1%) T2/N0 (vs T0-1/N1), 272 (26.9%) grade 3 (vs. grade1/2), and 561 (55.5%) received chemotherapy. iDFS events occurred in 31 of 503 (6.2%) pts who received palbociclib plus ET and in 45 of 507 (8.9%) pts who received ET alone, resulting in a statistically nonsignificant difference in iDFS at 4 years (92.9% vs. 92.1%; hazard ratio, 0.75; CI, 0.48 to 1.19; P = .23). Nonsignificant differences were also observed for invasive breast cancer-free, distant recurrence-free, and locoregional cancer-free survival. No significant differences in iDFS were observed in subgroups including age group, receipt of chemotherapy, tumor grade, and clinical risk (T1/N1 vs. T2/N0).Conclusions: In this preplanned analysis of the stage IIA cohort of the PALLAS trial, the addition of adjuvant palbociclib to standard ET did not improve outcomes over ET alone, suggesting no benefit from the agent in reducing the incidence of early relapse in pts with lower-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Future analyses will incorporate genomic risk and other molecular patterns from the extensive transPALLAS correlative program. Additional follow-up (10-year minimum) is also underway to assess the impact of palbociclib exposure on late recurrence in HR+ disease. Clinical trial information: NCT02513394.

Abstract Background: Quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients (pts) can be greatly impacted by initial treatment and ongoing therapy, particularly if side effects and symptoms are not well tolerated. The PALLAS trial investigated whether the addition of 2 years of palbociclib (palbo) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) over adjuvant ET alone. We report on the main patient-reported outcome (PRO) quality of life (QOL) and symptom severity results of this trial by treatment arm. Methods: PALLAS is an ongoing multicenter, open label phase 3 trial that enrolled hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, stage II-III breast cancer patients at 406 cancer centers across 21 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 2 years of palbo (125mg/day, 3 weeks on 1 week off) plus ongoing provider or patient-choice adjuvant ET (palbo+ET) versus ongoing ET alone. The primary study endpoint was iDFS. Treatment with palbo in all pts stopped at the time of the second interim analysis (5/2020) due to futility; all pts then moved to follow up. The PRO analyses were triggered for completion after awareness of the pre-specified 469 iDFS cases in November 2020. Eight PRO endpoints were measured serially (i.e., day 1 of each monthly cycle for the first 3 months, then every 3 months for the first 2 years, and once at year 3). The endpoints were the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QOL score, the Brief Fatigue Inventory score, the modified Brief Pain Inventory severity and pain interference scores, the EORTC QLQ-BR23 alopecia score, and the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial hot flash symptoms, vaginal problems, and musculoskeletal pain scores. Linear mixed models compared the average difference between arms across time points during the initial 2-year treatment period adjusting for cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) PRO scores, demographic and clinical variables. The average differences between arms (palbo+ET vs ET alone) and the two-sided (1-[0.05/8]) x 100% confidence intervals, adjusted for multiple comparisons, were calculated. Analysis of covariance compared the average between-arm differences by endpoint at 3 years. Results: The PRO intention to collect population included 4688 (81%) of the overall trial pts, and was clinically and demographically representative of the remaining 1073 pts. Each analysis population, with measures at C1D1 and at least 1 post-C1D1 assessment for each PRO endpoint, comprised ≥ 89% of the 4688 pts and the proportions were similar between arms. After adjustment for baseline covariates, on average, no clinically important differences between arms were observed for any of the eight endpoints over the 2 year treatment period (Table 1). All effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold. These PRO results were similar at the 3 year time point. Conclusions: No clinically significant differences in either patient-reported QOL or symptom severity were found, on average, between participants in the two PALLAS treatment arms while either taking palbo+ET or ET alone, or after study-wide termination of palbo. In general, the addition of palbociclib in the adjuvant breast cancer setting did not contribute to increased symptom burden within this survivorship population. Further analyses will examine the relationship between PROs and treatment discontinuation by arm and study time point. Support: AFT, Pfizer, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Table 1.Results of the Patient-Reported QOL and Symptom Severity Analyses Between the Two Treatment Arms During the First 2 Years of PALLASPRO Endpoint *Palbo + ET Adjusted average score (95% CI)ET alone Adjusted average score (95% CI)Average Difference + (Palbo + ET vs ET alone)[99.38% CI] Clinically ++ Important DifferenceEORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL71.7 (71.2, 72.2)74.0 (73.5, 74.5)-2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)**NoBrief Fatigue Inventory Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.1 (2.0, 2.1)0.2 (0.1, 0.3)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Severity Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.4 (2.4, 2.5)-0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Interference Score1.7 (1.6, 1.7)1.7 (1.6, 1.7)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoEORTC QLQ-BR23 Alopecia1.4 (1.4, 1.4)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)0.1 (0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Hot Flash Symptoms1.2 (1.2, 1.3)1.2 (1.2, 1.3)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Vaginal Problems0.8 (0.8, 0.8)0.8 (0.7, 0.8)0.0 (0.0, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Musculoskeletal Pain1.2 (1.2, 1.2)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)-0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)No* For the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL subscale, higher scores indicate better QOL. For all other PRO endpoints, higher scores indicate worse symptom levels. ** The lower bound of the one-sided CI (adjusted for multiple comparisons) was -3.3. Because the lower limit is greater than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -3.44, non-inferiority of palbo+ET relative to ET-alone was concluded. The non-inferiority margin corresponds to a 0.2 SD in the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health/QOL score. +The average difference was adjusted for the following baseline covariates: Cycle 1 day 1 score, region (if applicable), age category, first adjuvant ET, race, ethnicity, N-stage, T-stage, histological grade, PgR, prior chemotherapy, ECOG Performance Status. ++Based on each instrument’s published clinically relevant cut-offs, if available. After calculating Cohen’s d treatment effect sizes, (i.e. by dividing the average difference by the ET-alone arm standard deviation from cycle 1 day 1), all effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold, and would not be considered clinically important. Citation Format: Michelle Joy Naughton, David Zahrieh, Michael Gnant, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Julie Lemieux, Jun J Mao, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Eileen Shinn, Marija Balic, Christoph Thomssen, Jane Neisel, Manuel Ruiz-Echarri, Sibylle Loibl, Claudine Isaacs, David Cameron, Fernando Manuel Henao Carrasco, Matthew Goetz, Viktor Wette, Gustavo Werutsky, Hope Rugo, Marcus Vetter, Ling-Ming Tseng, Kathy Miller, Florian Fitzal, Juan Miguel Gil Gil, Haeseong Park, Barbro Linderholm, Emilio Bajetta, Zoneddy Dayao, Aleix Prat, Karin Ehrhardt, Otto Metzger, Amal Arahmani, Ernest Law, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey, Alex Zoroufy, Amylou Dueck, Dominik Hlauschek, Angela DeMichele, Erica Mayer. Quality of life and symptom severity in the PALLAS randomized trial of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (AFT-05) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-01.

Abstract Background: A significant number of patients with breast cancer may develop chest wall recurrence, which can be difficult to treat, and is associated with a poor prognosis. Given the inflammatory nature of chest wall disease, and the association of chest wall disease with lymphovascular invasion, we hypothesized that immunotherapy may be beneficial in this setting. Furthermore, combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy may have a synergistic effect; indeed, the combination of the anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody, pembrolizumab, with chemotherapy has been approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Consequently, in this study, we are evaluating the combination of pembrolizumab/carboplatin vs. carboplatin alone for chest wall recurrence. Trial design: This is a phase II study of patients with chest wall disease from breast cancer. Patients are randomized in a 2:1 manner to pembrolizumab/carboplatin x 6 cycles (Arm A) with the option to continue pembrolizumab +/- carboplatin after 6 cycles (Arm Ax) vs. carboplatin alone (Arm B) with the option to cross-over to pembrolizumab +/- carboplatin on progression (Arm Bx). Carboplatin is dosed at AUC 5 IV every 3 weeks, and pembrolizumab at 200 mg IV every 3 weeks. Trastuzumab may be continued with study treatment in patients with HER2 positive disease. Imaging scans (CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and bone scan) occur at baseline and every 3 cycles. Chest wall biopsies and peripheral blood is collected at baseline and after completing 2 cycles of treatment for correlative studies. Eligibility criteria: Patients must have chest wall disease from breast cancer. Distant metastases are allowed. TNBC, hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative disease (after 2 prior hormone therapies), and HER2 positive disease (progressed on standard HER2 directed treatment) are eligible. Any number of prior lines of chemotherapy are acceptable, including a prior platinum chemotherapy in the absence of disease progression on the platinum. Specific Aims: Primary aim is to determine disease control rate in the chest wall and other distant sites at 18 weeks of treatment with RECIST 1.1. Secondary aims including determining toxicity, progression-free survival, response based on irRECIST, and response based on tumor PD-L1 expression. Exploratory aims include studying changes in: 1) immune composition of tumor and peripheral blood, 2) peripheral blood cell-free DNA and circulating tumor cells, 3) soluble PD-L1 expression, and 4) association of MYC with PD-1 and immune markers, based on preclinical data demonstrating that MYC upregulates these markers. Statistical Methods: 84 patients (Arm A: 56, Arm B: 28) are being enrolled at 7 sites in the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium. The study is powered to identify a 20% difference in disease control rates between Arms A and B (HR 0.52, α= 0.10, ß=0.20). A futility analysis will occur for Arm B after 18 patients are enrolled to allow for early closure if lack of efficacy. Accrual: Present accrual is 57 patients (Arm A: 39, Arm B: 18). (NCT03095352). This trial is partly funded by grants from Merck and University of California San Francisco. Contact information: Neelima Vidula, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, nvidula@mgh.harvard.edu Citation Format: Neelima Vidula, Rita Nanda, Kathy Miller, Leisha Emens, Vandana Abramson, Ben Park, Minetta C. Liu, Andrei Goga, Hope Rugo. Randomized phase II trial of pembrolizumab/carboplatin vs. carboplatin alone for breast cancer with chest wall recurrence: TBCRC044 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-18-08.