Back to Authors

Gianni, Luca

0000-0002-2372-9625

Mayo Clinic

Fondazione Michelangelo

Citations 5

Abstract RF4-01: Central Nervous System Outcomes from the Phase III PATINA Trial (AFT-38)
Metzger, Otto, Mandrekar, S. J., Dockter, Travis , Gianni, L., Ciruelos, E., Michele, A. De, Gligorov, J., Lim, E., Loibl, S., Farré, X. Gonzàlez, Lynce, F., Lanzillotti, J, Carey, L., Goel, S., Partridge, A. H., Winer, E. P., Gianni, Luca , Ciruelos, E.M., Gligorov, Joseph , Loibl, S., Farré, X. González, Lynce, Filipa , Carey, L. A., Partridge, Ann H.

Clinical Cancer Research | February 17, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: RF4-01-RF4-01

10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-rf4-01 Get It

Abstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are a major clinical concern in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The PATINA phase III study showed improved PFS with palbociclib added to maintenance anti-HER2/endocrine therapy (44.3 vs. 29.1 months; hazard ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.96; 1-sided P=0.0109). Preclinical and early clinical data suggest palbociclib may have CNS activity. We conducted a pre-specified secondary analysis to evaluate the incidence and timing of CNS progression. Methods CNS progression was defined as the emergence of new intracranial lesions per investigator assessment. Baseline CNS imaging was not mandated but recommended if symptomatic. Competing risks analyses evaluated time from registration to first CNS progression or death (CNS PFS), treating non-CNS progression as a competing event. All randomized patients were included in the primary analysis, regardless of known baseline CNS involvement. Patients with baseline CNS metastases were not censored if progression involved the CNS. A secondary analysis excluded patients with CNS metastases present at baseline. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated and compared using 2-sided Gray’s test. Results Data cutoff for this analysis was on October 15, 2024. 518 participants were enrolled between June 2017 and July 2021, 261 to the palbociclib arm and 257 to the control arm. CNS metastases at baseline were present in 11 patients in the palbociclib arm and 9 patients in the control arm. Among all randomized patients, CNS progression occurred in 35 of 261 (13.4%; 95% CI: 9.5-18.2) in the palbociclib arm and 50 of 257 (19.5%; 95% CI: 14.8-24.8) in the control arm. When excluding patients with CNS metastases at baseline, CNS progression was observed in 32 of 250 (12.8%; 95% CI: 8.9-17.6) in the palbociclib arm and 47 of 248 (19.0%; 95% CI: 14.3-24.4) in the control arm. The median follow-up for patients who were alive and progression-free was 53.5 months. At 36 months, the cumulative incidence of CNS PFS was 13.4% vs. 19.9% for palbociclib versus control (Gray’s test p=0.0386). Importantly, when the analysis was restricted to pts without evidence of CNS disease at baseline (Table 1), —the CNS benefit with palbociclib was maintained (13.0% vs. 19.2% at 36 months, Gray’s test p = 0.0378). Conclusion The addition of palbociclib to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy was associated with a lower incidence of CNS metastases. Among patients without known baseline CNS involvement, the absolute reduction in CNS progression at 36 months was 6.2% in favor of palbociclib. This benefit was observed at 12 months and sustained over 3 years (Table 1). These findings suggest that palbociclib may help delay or prevent CNS involvement in HR+/HER2+ MBC, warranting confirmation in future studies. Citation Format: O. Metzger, S. Mandrekar, T. Dockter, L. Gianni, E. Ciruelos, A. De Michele, J. Gligorov, E. Lim, S. Loibl, X. Gonzàlez Farré, F. Lynce, J. Lanzillotti, L. Carey, S. Goel, A. Partridge, E. Winer. Central Nervous System Outcomes from the Phase III PATINA Trial (AFT-38) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF4-01.
Adjuvant nab -Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Results From a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
Tempero, Margaret A. , Pelzer, Uwe , Oh, Do‐Youn , Li, Chung‐Pin , Tortora, Giampaolo , Chang, Heung-Moon, Lopez, Charles D. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Ko, Andrew H. , Santoro, Armando , Noel, Marcus Smith , Dean, Andrew , Riess, Hanno, Philip, Philip, Moore, Malcolm J. , Goldstein, David , Ferrara, Stefano, Bruchec, Yvan Le, Lu, Brian , Epstein, Richard A. , Vasey, Paul L., Shapiro, Jeremy, Burge, Matthew , Chua, Yu Jo , Harris, Marion , Prager, Gerald W. , Dittrich, Christian , Längle, Friedrich, Philipp‐Abbrederis, Kathrin, Greil, Richard , Stöger, Herbert, Girschikofsky, Michael , Kuehr, Thomas, Laethem, Jean–Luc Van, Laurent, Stéphanie , Ko, Yoo Joung, Dowden, Scot, Kavan, Petr , Tehfe, Mustapha Édouard, Kubala, Eugen, Kohoutek, Milan, Yilmaz, Mette, Parner, Vibeke K., Salminen, Tapio , Soveri, Leena‐Maija , Korkeila, Eija, Taı̈eb, Julien , Artru, Pascal , Guimbaud, Rosine , Turpin, Antony, Kunzmann, Volker , Kreth, Florian, Oettle, Helmut, Karthaus, Meinolf , Folprecht, Gunnar , Kullmann, Frank , Reiser, Marcel , Heinemann, Volker , Wörns, Marcus‐Alexander , Schulz, H. , Garlipp, Benjamin , Chan, Lam Stephen, Juhász, Balázs , Landherr, László, Pintér, Tamás , Kahán, Zsuzsanna , McDermott, Raymond, Power, Derek G. , Siena, Salvatore, Milella, Michèle , Bagalá, Cinzia, Roila, Fausto, Fanello, Silvia, Wilmink, Johanna W. , Groot, Jan Willem de, Creemers, G.J., Rodrigues, Tânia , Tai, David , Mercadé, T. Macarulla, Medina, Manuel Hidalgo, Mena, Alfredo Carrato, Santasusana, Joan Maurel, Oncala, Maria Jose Flor, Martín, Carlos Gómez , Muñoz, Andrés, García, Ruth Vera, Alés, Inmaculada, Rivera, Fernando , Sastre, Javier , Wu, Cheng‐Chung, Tien, Yu‐Wen , Chan, De-Chuan , Hwang, Tsann‐Long , Evans, Jeffry, Wadsley, Jonathan , Chiorean, E. Gabriela , Bendell, Johanna C. , Kindler, Hedy L. , Fernando, Nishan H., Beg, Muhammad Shaalan , LoConte, Noelle K. , Posey, James , Malhotra, Rajat, Sohal, Davendra , Brenner, Warren, Womack, Mark, Seth, Rahul , lyer, Renuka, Bahary, Nathan , Marsh, Robert , Chua, Cynthia C., Reeves, J. N. , Manji, Gulam A. , Sahai, Vaibhav , Messersmith, Wells A. , Zakari, Ahmed, Bullock, Andrea J. , Musher, Benjamin , Kim, Edward , Bajor, David J., Huyck, Tim, Hatoum, Hassan , Xiong, Henry, Pasche, Boris , Lacy, Jill , Olowokure, Olugbenga, Cohn, Allen Lee, Richards, Donald , Martin, Robert C.G. , Paulson, Andrew Scott , Fanta, Paul T. , Krishnamurthi, Smitha , Fuloria, Jyotsna, McDermott, Ray , Turpin, Anthony , O'Reilly, Eileen M , Winter, Jordan Michael , Oh, Do-Youn , Li, Chung-Pin , Tortora, Giampaolo , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Santoro, Armando , Park, Joon Oh , Dean, Andrew , Van Cutsem, Eric , Berlin, Jordan D. , Tabernero, Josep , Biankin, Andrew V , LoConte, Noelle , Taieb, Julien , McDermott, Ray , Prager, Gerald W , Sahai, Vaibhav , O’Reilly, Eileen M. , Frassineti, Giovanni Luca , Shan, Yan‐Shen , Cutsem, Eric Van , Tabernero, Josep , Li, Mingyu , Zhang, George , Biankin, Andrew V. , Reni, Michele , Vasey, Paul, Pavlakis, Nick , Tebbutt, Niall C. , Längle, Friedrich, Dhani, Neesha C. , Tehfe, Mustapha , Pfeiffer, Per , Osterlund, Pia J. , Tougeron, David , Caroli‐Bosc, François‐Xavier , Walter, Thomas , Bachet, Jean‐Baptiste , Block, Andreas, Venerito, Marino , Trojan, Jörg , Lerch, Markus M. , Schulz, Holger, Yau, Thomas , Juhasz, Balazs, Bodoky, Gyorgy , Gianni, Luca , Siena, Salvatore , Falcone, Alfredo , Berardi, Rossana , Costanzo, Francesco Di , Ardizzoni, Andrea , Maiello, Evaristo , Barroso, Eduardo , Sarmento, Cristina, Chee, Cheng Ean , López López, Rafael , Sáez, Berta Laquente, Chan, De‐Chuan , Evans, Jeffry, Corrie, Pippa G. , Cardin, Dana B. , Noonan, Anne M. , George, Thomas J. , Arena, Francis P. , McWilliams, Robert R. , Seth, Rahul, Ramirez, Robert A. , Reeves, James, El-Khoueiry, Anthony B. , Weaver, Robert, Dreicer, Robert , Borad, Mitesh J. , Huyck, Timothy K., Xiong, Henry Q., Oberstein, Paul E.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2007-2019

10.1200/jco.22.01134 Get It

PURPOSE This randomized, open-label trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine with those of gemcitabine for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01964430 ). METHODS We assigned 866 treatment-naive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m 2 ) + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 ) or gemcitabine alone to one 30-40 infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of six 28-day cycles. The primary end point was independently assessed disease-free survival (DFS). Additional end points included investigator-assessed DFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven of 432 patients and 310 of 434 patients completed nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine and gemcitabine treatment, respectively. At primary data cutoff (December 31, 2018; median follow-up, 38.5 [interquartile range [IQR], 33.8-43 months), the median independently assessed DFS was 19.4 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 18.8 months (gemcitabine; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.063; P = .18). The median investigator-assessed DFS was 16.6 (IQR, 8.4-47.0) and 13.7 (IQR, 8.3-44.1) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.965; P = .02). The median OS (427 events; 68% mature) was 40.5 (IQR, 20.7 to not reached) and 36.2 (IQR, 17.7-53.3) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 to 0.996; P = .045). At a 16-month follow-up (cutoff, April 3, 2020; median follow-up, 51.4 months [IQR, 47.0-57.0]), the median OS (511 events; 81% mature) was 41.8 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 37.7 months (gemcitabine; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.687 to 0.973; P = .0232). At the 5-year follow-up (cutoff, April 9, 2021; median follow-up, 63.2 months [IQR, 60.1-68.7]), the median OS (555 events; 88% mature) was 41.8 versus 37.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.678 to 0.947; P = .0091). Eighty-six percent ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) and 68% (gemcitabine) of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Two patients per study arm died of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSION The primary end point (independently assessed DFS) was not met despite favorable OS seen with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine.
Phase IIb double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials for the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients (pts) with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer (BC): Review of the Trials to Investigate the Effects of Sorafenib in BC (TIES) progr
Baselga, José, Gradishar, William J. , Hudis, Clifford A. , Perez, Edith A. , Piccart-Gebhart, M., Schwartzberg, L., Sledge, G. W., Fleming, Thomas R. , Gianni, Luca

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 25, 2020 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e12000-e12000

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e12000 Get It

e12000 Sorafenib is a potent multikinase inhibitor approved by the FDA and EMEA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. As a single agent, sorafenib has been shown to have activity in pts with BC. Here, we review the TIES program, a compilation of currently ongoing investigator-sponsored phase IIb multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that aim to determine the optimal sequencing of pharmacologic agents for the treatment of BC. All studies will combine sorafenib with first- and/or second-line chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy in pts with HER2-negative metastatic or locally advanced BC, enroll 220 pts, stratify pts by visceral vs nonvisceral disease, allow pts with evaluable and measurable disease, and include pts with treated brain metastases. The primary endpoint of all trials will be progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints will be safety, overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and time to progression. Some studies will also assess quality of life, pharmacokinetic sampling, and biomarkers. Additional information on four of the trials is shown below (Table). Patient characteristics and accruals will be reported. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Abstract OT3-02-07: PATINA: A randomized, open label, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of palbociclib + anti-HER2 therapy + endocrine therapy (ET) vs. anti-HER2 therapy + ET after induction treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+)/H
Mandrekar, S. J., Loibl, Sibylle , Mundhenke, Christoph , Seiler, Sabine , Winer, EP, Huang, Chaonan, Goetz, MP, Krop, Ian E. , Delalogue, S, Dockter, Travis , Lanzillotti, J, Ciruelos, Eva, DeMichele, A., Metzger, Otto , Valagussa, Pinuccia , Lim, Elgene , Tripathy, Debu , Carey, Lisa A. , Francis, Prudence A. , Miller, Kathy D. , Prat, Aleix , Loi, Sherene , Gianni, Luca , Vaz-Luís, Inês

Cancer Research | May 11, 2019 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: OT3-02-07-OT3-02-07

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-ot3-02-07 Get It

Abstract Background: Pre-clinical data and results from early phase clinical trials point to synergistic antitumor activity and potential efficacy of palbociclib when given in combination with anti-HER2 therapy (tx). The aim of PATINA is to determine the effect of adding palbociclib to anti-HER2 and ET maintenance after induction tx in the 1st line setting for HR+/HER2+ MBC. Trial Design: The PATINA trial (AFT-38/NCT02947685) is a pivotal, open-label, international, phase III study. Following 6-8 cycles of chemotherapy (taxane or vinorelbine) with anti-HER2 tx for MBC participants will be randomized 1:1 to standard anti-HER2 tx (trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab) in combination with ET with or without palbociclib until disease progression. ET options are either an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. Premenopausal patients (pts) must receive ovarian suppression. The trial is open to men or women with histologically confirmed HR+/HER2+ MBC provided they are without evidence of disease progression by local assessment after induction tx. Total planned accrual is 496 pts. Primary objective is to demonstrate that the combination of palbociclib with anti-HER2 tx plus ET is superior to anti-HER2 tx plus ET alone in prolonging progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary objectives are measures of tumor control, overall survival, safety and Quality of Life. The main translational science objective is to compare PFS estimates according to PIK3CA mutation status. The study has a 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.667 in favor of the palbociclib arm. All pts approached to participate in PATINA will be asked to share remaining biospecimens and clinical data with the Mastering Breast Cancer Initiative. This initiative was created in order to understand the natural history of MBC and how it envolves over time with the aim to develop new treatments for this patient population. Recruitment has started in 07/2017 and is planned for approximately 22 months in 140 sites in Australia, Germany, Italy, France, New Zealand, Spain, and the US. 69 pts have been recruited so far. The study is sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials (AFT) and financially supported by Pfizer Citation Format: Metzger O, Mandrekar S, Loibl S, Mundhenke C, Seiler S, Valagussa P, Lim E, Tripathy D, Winer EP, Huang C, Carey L, Francis P, Miller K, Goetz MP, Prat A, Loi S, Krop I, Gianni L, Delalogue S, Vaz-Luis I, Dockter T, Lanzillotti J, Ciruelos E, DeMichele AM. PATINA: A randomized, open label, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of palbociclib + anti-HER2 therapy + endocrine therapy (ET) vs. anti-HER2 therapy + ET after induction treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-07.