Philip, Philip

PURPOSE This randomized, open-label trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine with those of gemcitabine for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01964430 ). METHODS We assigned 866 treatment-naive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m 2 ) + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 ) or gemcitabine alone to one 30-40 infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of six 28-day cycles. The primary end point was independently assessed disease-free survival (DFS). Additional end points included investigator-assessed DFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven of 432 patients and 310 of 434 patients completed nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine and gemcitabine treatment, respectively. At primary data cutoff (December 31, 2018; median follow-up, 38.5 [interquartile range [IQR], 33.8-43 months), the median independently assessed DFS was 19.4 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 18.8 months (gemcitabine; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.063; P = .18). The median investigator-assessed DFS was 16.6 (IQR, 8.4-47.0) and 13.7 (IQR, 8.3-44.1) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.965; P = .02). The median OS (427 events; 68% mature) was 40.5 (IQR, 20.7 to not reached) and 36.2 (IQR, 17.7-53.3) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 to 0.996; P = .045). At a 16-month follow-up (cutoff, April 3, 2020; median follow-up, 51.4 months [IQR, 47.0-57.0]), the median OS (511 events; 81% mature) was 41.8 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 37.7 months (gemcitabine; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.687 to 0.973; P = .0232). At the 5-year follow-up (cutoff, April 9, 2021; median follow-up, 63.2 months [IQR, 60.1-68.7]), the median OS (555 events; 88% mature) was 41.8 versus 37.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.678 to 0.947; P = .0091). Eighty-six percent ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) and 68% (gemcitabine) of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Two patients per study arm died of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSION The primary end point (independently assessed DFS) was not met despite favorable OS seen with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine.

Abstract Background: A wide range of cancers, including pancreatic cancer, display altered expression of amino acid transporter LAT-1. LAT-1 overexpression has been shown to be an important prognostic factor and predicts chemo resistance in pancreatic cancer (Kaira K, 2012; Altan B, 2018). Radiolabeled amino acids for PET imaging, including 3-18F-l-α-methyl-tyrosine ([18F] FAMT), have successfully leveraged cancer’s aberrant LAT1 expression and amino acid uptake for decades. SM-88 is a denatured D/L racemic form of α-methyl-tyrosine designed for selective uptake and disruption of protein synthesis in cancer cells, as well as disruption of catecholamine production via inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase. Catecholamines have been reported to potentially have a role in driving pancreatic cancer progression and changes in the tumor immune status (Renz B, Cancer Cell 2018; Calvani M, Oncotarget 2014). Initial clinical and preclinical results with SM-88 indicate that this agent could pose a novel approach in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Methods and Results: Initial xenograft models of human gastrointestinal cancers using monotherapy SM-88 showed a >50% decrease in tumor growth at three weeks of treatment (p<0.05). Ongoing preclinical experiments are testing the full pharmacodynamic effects of SM-88 on pancreatic cancer cells, as well as potential effects on the tumor microenvironment due to catecholamine interruption. In results from the ongoing phase 2 trial of SM-88 in heavily pretreated metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, SM-88 has shown monotherapy antitumor activity based on RECIST 1.1 criteria. Additionally, 16/24 patients demonstrated a reduction in circulating tumor cells, with the median nadir decline of 63%. LAT1 has been reported to be important in EMT transition and mesenchymal cell survival (Holldorsson S, Cancer letters 2017); examination of the impact of SM-88 on this important emerging biomarker is ongoing. Conclusion: Altered amino acid (LAT1) metabolism has been shown to be a negative prognosticator in pancreatic cancer outcomes and progression. Targeting LAT1 and amino acid pathways has been identified as a therapeutic approach in multiple cancers (Fuchs BC, Semin Ca Biol 2005). Initial and ongoing studies of SM-88 may clarify the potential utility of this approach in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Citation Format: Martin Fernandez-Zapico, Dae Won Kim, Philip Philip, Alexander Vandell, Jonathan Eckard, Ron Korn, Giuseppe Del Priore, Diane Simeone. Therapeutic potential of targeting amino acid metabolism in pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Advances in Science and Clinical Care; 2019 Sept 6-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(24 Suppl):Abstract nr B15.