Jalal, Shadia I.

Gastric cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improve survival, and enhance the quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies have demonstrated encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Gastric Cancer highlights recommendations for biomarker testing and discusses updates for the treatment of advanced disease, including peritoneal carcinoma as only disease and unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

Cancers originating in the esophagus or esophagogastric junction constitute a major global health problem. Esophageal cancers are histologically classified as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma, which differ in their etiology, pathology, tumor location, therapeutics, and prognosis. In contrast to esophageal adenocarcinoma, which usually affects the lower esophagus, esophageal SCC is more likely to localize at or higher than the tracheal bifurcation. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1, has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with locally advanced esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers focuses on the management of recurrent or metastatic disease.

404 Background: Concurrent chemoradiation(CRT) followed by esophagectomy is a standard of care for locally advanced esophageal(LA-EAC) and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Approximately 50% of patients(pts) experience disease relapse within the 1st yr after treatment(tx) completion. No adjuvant tx has been shown to improve survival in these pts. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have activity in metastatic PD-L1 positive EAC. Preclinical studies have shown radiation +/- chemotherapy upregulate PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial evaluating safety and efficacy of durvalumab(durva) in pts with LA-EAC and GEJ adenocarcinoma who have residual disease in surgical specimen after neoadjuvant CRT and R0 resection. Pts received durva 1500mg IV every 4 weeks for up to 1yr. Results: 24 pts were enrolled from 4/2016-1/2018(median age: 60yrs (range, 43-70). 18 received carbo/paclitaxel and 6 received cis/5-FU concurrently with radiation. Staging at diagnosis: T2N0(n = 3, 12.5%), T2N2(n = 3, 12.5%),T3N0(n = 6, 25%), T3N1(n = 6, 25%), T3N2(n = 4, 17%), T3N3(n = 1, 4%), T3Nx(n = 1, 4%).19 pts(79%) had positive lymph nodes(LNs) at the time of surgery following CRT. 12 pts completed 1yr of tx, 12 came off tx because of relapse(6), AEs(5), and consent withdrawal(1). Most common AEs were fatigue(n = 8, 33.3%) and nausea(n = 6, 25%). 3pts (12.5%) developed grade 3 irAEs: pneumonitis(1), hepatitis(1), colitis(1). At median follow up of 21.9mo(range, 1.7-23.9mo), 11 pts have relapsed: 9 distant and 2 locoregional. Two of 3 pts with grade 3 irAEs are alive and disease free at 17 and 23 mo respectively. 1-yr RFS and OS were 79.2% and 95.5%, respectively. RFS at 26 mo was 20.6%. Overall mOS and mOS after relapse were 28.1mo(range, 22.9-28.1) and 11.1 mo(range, 0.1-11.3mo) respectively. The study was expanded to enroll 14 additional pts who are currently undergoing tx. Conclusions: Adjuvant durvalumab following trimodality therapy for LA-EAC and GEJ adenocarcinoma is safe with improvement in 1-yr RFS to 79.2% compared to historical rate of 50%. RFS was 20.6% at 26 months. Evaluation of predictive biomarkers of RFS with durva is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02639065.

4009 Background: Interim analysis of a global, phase 2 KEYNOTE-059 study (NCT02335411) reported manageable safety and promising antitumor activity for pembro alone or pembro + chemo in pts with G/GEJ cancer. Here we report long-term efficacy and safety data of all cohorts. Methods: Pts with recurrent or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled in 3 cohorts. Cohort 1 pts (PD-L1–positive or –negative) received pembro alone after ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Cohort 2 pts (PD-L1–positive or –negative) received pembro + cisplatin (80 mg/m2 day 1) + 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 days 1-5 Q3W) or capecitabine (in Japan only, 1000 mg/m2 twice daily) as first-line. Cohort 3 pts (PD-L1–positive, combined positive score ≥1% using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay) received pembro alone as first-line. All pts received pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 2 years. End points included safety, ORR, DOR, and OS. Results: At data cutoff (Aug 8, 2018), median (range) follow-up was 6 (1-38), 14 (2-40), and 21 (2-36) months for cohorts 1 (n = 259), 2 (n = 25), and 3 (n = 31), respectively. In cohort 1, confirmed ORR (95% CI) was 11.6% (8-16) overall, 15.5% (10-22) in PD-L1–positive, and 6.4% (3-13) in PD-L1–negative tumors. In cohort 2, confirmed ORR was 60.0% (39-79) overall, 73.3% (45-92) in PD-L1–positive, and 37.5% (9-76) in PD-L1–negative tumors. In cohort 3, confirmed ORR was 25.8% (12-45). Median (range) DOR in months was 16.1 (2-35+), 4.6 (3-37+), and not reached (2.1-32.5+) in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. OS at 1 year/2 years was 24.6%/12.5%, 52%/32%, and 63.6%/40.1% in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In cohorts 1, 2, and 3, grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) incidence was 46 (18%), 20 (80%), and 8 (26%) respectively. TRAEs led to discontinuation in 6 (2%) and 3 (12%) pts in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, and to death in 2 (1%) pts in cohort 1. No TRAEs led to discontinuation or death in cohort 3. Conclusions: These updated results demonstrate manageable safety, durable clinically meaningful activity of pembro in heavily pretreated pts, and promising efficacy of first-line pembro (alone or + chemo) in pts with advanced G/GEJ cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02335411.

723 Background: The US FDA approved pembro for treating pts with 1) recurrent locally advanced or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, whose disease has progressed on or after ≥2 prior therapies and whose tumors express PD-L1 (combined positive score [CPS] ≥1), and 2) unresectable or metastatic, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) solid tumors that have progressed after prior therapy and who have no fitting options. We report Asian subgroup analyses from cohort 1 of KEYNOTE-059 (NCT02335411), a global, phase 2 study in advanced G/GEJ cancer. Methods: Eligible pts had measurable recurrent or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma whose disease has progressed on ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Pts received pembro 200 mg Q3W up to 2 y. PD-L1+ tumors had a CPS ≥1. Primary end points were ORR (RECIST 1.1, by central review) and safety. Results: Cohort 1 enrolled 259 pts; 57% had PD-L1+ tumors. MSI status was evaluable in 174 tumor samples; of these, 7 were MSI-H. At data cutoff (4/21/2017), median (range) follow-up was 6 mo (1-25). Overall ORR was 12% (95% CI, 8-17) and median (range) DOR was 14 mo (2-19+). PFS6-mo rate was 15% and OS6-mo rate was 46%. In pts with PD-L1+ tumors, ORR was 16% (95% CI, 11-23) and median (range) DOR was 14 mo (3+-19+). In pts with PD-L1+ tumors, PFS6-mo rate was 20% and OS6-mo rate was 50%. In pts with MSI-H tumors, ORR was 57% (95% CI, 18-90) and median (range) DOR was not reached (5-14+ mo). In cohort 1, 41 pts were Asian and 218 pts were non-Asian. PD-L1+ tumors occurred in 42% of Asian pts and 60% of non-Asian pts. ORR was 12% (95% CI, 2-36) in Asian pts with PD-L1+ tumors and 17% (95% CI, 11-24) in non-Asian pts with PD-L1+ tumors. One of 7 pts with MSI-H tumors was Asian; this pt had CR. Grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 17% and 18% of Asian and non-Asian pts, similar to the overall cohort. Conclusions: Pembro showed durable clinical benefit in previously treated pts with advanced G/GEJ cancer, especially those with PD-L1+ or MSI-H tumors. Safety and efficacy were similar in Asian and non-Asian pts. These findings highlight pembro as a standard treatment option in Asian and non-Asian pts with advanced G/GEJ cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02335411.

4003 Background: Pembro has shown promising antitumor activity and manageable safety in a phase 1 study of pts with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. We conducted a global, multicohort, phase 2 study of pembro in pts with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer (KEYNOTE-059;NCT02335411). Methods: Cohort 1 enrolled 259 pts, aged ≥18 y with measurable recurrent or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma who had progressed on ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens and had ECOG PS 0-1. Pts received pembro 200 mg Q3W up to 2 y or up to disease progression, investigator/pt decision to withdrawal, or unacceptable toxicity. PD-L1+pts had expression in ≥1% tumor or stromal cells using IHC (22C3 antibody). Primary end points: ORR (RECIST 1.1, by central review), safety, and tolerability. Results: Of 259 pts in cohort 1, 76.4% were men; median age was 62.0 y. 51.7% and 48.3% received pembro as 3rd-line (3L) and 4L+ therapy, respectively. 57.1% had PD-L1+ tumors. At data cutoff (Oct 19, 2016), median duration of follow-up was 5.4 mo (range, 0.5 to 18.7). Overall ORR (CR + PR) was 11.2% (95% CI, 7.6-15.7); 1.9% of pts (95% CI, 0.6-4.4) had CR, 9.3% had PR (95% CI, 6.0-13.5), 17% (95% CI, 12.6-22.1) had SD, and 55.6% (95% CI, 49.3-61.7) had PD. Median DOR was 8.1 mo (range, 1.4+ to 15.1+). ORR was 14.9% (95% CI, 9.4-22.1) in 3L pts and 7.2% (95% CI, 3.3-13.2) in 4L+. In PD-L1+ pts, ORR was 15.5% (95% CI, 10.1-22.4) with 2.0% (95% CI, 0.4-5.8) CR and 13.5% (95% CI, 8.5-20.1) PR; in PD-L1– pts, ORR was 5.5% (95% CI, 2.0-11.6), with 1.8% (95% CI, 0.2-6.5) CR and 3.7% (95% CI, 1.0-9.1) PR. In 3L pts with PD-L1+ tumors, ORR was 21.3% (95% CI, 12.7-32.3), with 4.0% (95% CI, 0.8-11.2) CR; in 3L pts with PD-L1– tumors, ORR was 6.9% (95% CI, 1.9-16.7), with 3.4% (95% CI, 0.4-11.9) CR. Grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 43 pts (16.6%). TRAEs led to discontinuation in 2 pts (abnormal LFT, bile duct stenosis) and were fatal in 2 pts (acute kidney injury, pleural effusion). Conclusions: Pembro showed encouraging efficacy and manageable safety after ≥2 prior lines of therapy in pts with advanced G/GEJ cancer in this large phase 2 trial. Survival and additional biomarker data, including MSI status, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02335411.