Citations

Abstract Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) is an international working group dedicated to developing standardized recommendations for response assessment in children with central nervous system tumors enrolled on clinical trials. This standardization facilitates easier and more reliable comparison of responses across trials. Since the first RAPNO publication in 2013, response guidelines have been issued for medulloblastoma (MB), low-grade glioma (LGG), high-grade glioma (HGG), diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, ependymoma, and craniopharyngioma. Many of these guidelines have already been incorporated into clinical trials to evaluate their effectiveness and accuracy. RAPNO has always been predicated on the idea that these consensus recommendations will require updates over time as they are applied in practice given technological advancements, evolving treatment approaches, and growing knowledge of disease pathology. A half-day RAPNO symposium sponsored by the Society of Neuro-Oncology was held in San Diego, California, United States, on May 15, 2025. This event coincided with the 8th Biennial Pediatric Society of Neuro-Oncology meeting. The main objectives were to identify ongoing RAPNO challenges, discuss potential updates, and plan future initiatives across 3 specific groups: (1) LGG/Craniopharyngioma, (2) HGG/diffuse midline glioma (DMG)/Ependymoma, and (3) MB and other seeding tumors. This manuscript reviews the symposium proceedings and highlights key topics and challenges discussed, as well as outlining future RAPNO initiatives.

Abstract Background: Two years of adjuvant abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy is approved and guideline-recommended in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, early breast cancer (EBC) at high risk of recurrence. In initial real-world studies, the high rate (>85%) of treatment (tx) persistence beyond 3 months suggests that adjuvant abemaciclib is well-tolerated in routine clinical practice.1,2 Dose reductions were associated with higher persistence in prior studies and clinical trial data have shown that efficacy of abemaciclib was maintained with dose reductions. This study describes 6-month tx persistence and dosing patterns in pts with HR+, HER2-, node-positive EBC initiating abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily (BID). Methods: Retrospective data were accessed from the US de-identified Flatiron Health Research Database. Adults with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, EBC, who initiated abemaciclib 150 mg BID from Jan 2022-Jun 2024 were eligible and further characterized by ≥1 vs no dose reduction. Data cut-off was Dec 2024. Persistence rate was the proportion of pts on abemaciclib >6 months, allowing for ≤60-day medication gap within this period. Time to dose modifications and reasons for discontinuation (DC) were summarized. Subgroup analyses were conducted in pts confirmed as meeting the monarchE high-risk criteria (N2, N3, or N1 plus Grade 3 and/or tumor >5 cm). All analyses were descriptive. Results: Of 1063 eligible pts, median age was 56 years (IQR 47, 65). Most had N1 (48%) or N2 (34%) disease. Median follow-up was 17.5 months (IQR 11, 25). Tx persistence at 6 months was 75%. DC was mostly due to adverse events (AEs; 19%) and <1% due to recurrence. Approximately 50% of pts had ≥1 dose reduction. Persistence was 85% in pts with ≥1 dose reduction and 64% in pts with no dose reductions. 70% of pts who DC’d by 6 months did not have a dose reduction. Median time from start of abemaciclib to first dose change and/or hold was 49 days (IQR 23, 111). During the first 30 days of tx and Days 31-90, DCs due to AEs were lower in pts with dose reductions vs pts with no dose reductions (Table). Persistence and use of dose reductions were similar in pts confirmed as meeting the monarchE high-risk criteria. Conclusion: In US clinical practice, a majority (75%) who initiated adjuvant abemaciclib continued abemaciclib beyond 6 months. Tx persistence was higher among pts with dose reductions relative to those with no dose reductions, and rates of early DCs due to AEs were low in pts with dose reductions. Given that dose reductions in monarchE were not associated with reduced efficacy, these additional real-world data support the use of early dose modifications to improve tolerability and tx persistence for adjuvant abemaciclib in pts with high risk of recurrence. Citation Format: H. Soliman, S. Dent, A. Liepa, V. Stefaniak, M. Huang, T. Sugihara, K. Moreira, K. Hudson, M. Goetz. Treatment Persistence and Dose Modifications in US Patients with HR+, HER2-, Node-Positive, Early Breast Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Abemaciclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-05-09.

Abstract Background: Women with a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene (carriers) are at a high risk of developing ovarian cancer and recommended to undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at an early age resulting in surgical menopause. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the most effective way to mitigate the adverse outcomes of early menopause; however, the safety of MHT on breast cancer risk in this population has not been established. Methods: We conducted a prospective matched analysis of MHT use following menopause (predominantly surgical) and breast cancer risk in BRCA carriers using a matched prospective analysis to emulate a randomized clinical trial. Women without a history of any cancer or bilateral mastectomy and who were enrolled in a longitudinal study with detailed data collection were eligible for inclusion. Women who initiated MHT (exposed) after menopause were matched one-to-one to women who had not initiated MHT (unexposed) by gene, year of birth, and age at menopause, resulting in 676 matched pairs. Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95%CIs (CI) of incident breast cancer associated with MHT use. Results: After a mean follow-up of 5.6 years from the date of first MHT use in the exposed woman, there were 87 incident breast cancer cases in the exposed group (12·9%) and 128 cases in the unexposed group (18·9%) (P = 0·002). Compared to their unexposed match, women who used estrogen (E) experienced a significant decrease in the risk of breast cancer (HR = 0·37; 95%: CI 0·24-0·57). There was no protective (or adverse) effect associated with the use of E plus progestogen (E+P) (HR = 0·94; 95%CI 0·54-1·63), with progestogen alone (P) (HR = 1·14; 95%CI: 0·21-6·22) or with tibolone (HR = 0·57; 95%CI: 0·19-1·69). There were no diagnoses of breast cancer in the 43 women who used a CEE + bazedoxifene. Findings were similar for carriers of either gene mutation. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this represents the largest prospective report of MHT use and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Our findings showed no increase in the risk of breast cancer with the use of MHT, irrespective of gene mutation or formulation. These findings provide an evidence-based approach for the management of women at high-risk of breast cancer who are facing the acute and chronic effects of early surgical menopause. The safe use of MHT by BRCA carriers will continue to be an important research topic as formulations continue to evolve. Citation Format: J. Kotsopoulos, M. Seca, G. Jacek, T. Huzarski, P. Møller, R. H. Kim, C. Singer, B. Karlan, A. Aeilts, T. Ramon y Cajal, T. Pal, A. Eisen, L. Bordeleau, W. Foulkes, N. Tung, F. Couch, S. Neuhausen, D. Zakalik, C. Cybulski, O. Olopade, K. Metcalfe, R. Fruscio, P. Sun, J. Lubinski, S. Narod, Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. Menopausal Hormone Therapy and the Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with a Pathogenic Variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-01.

Abstract Introduction: Hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2- breast cancer (BC) is the most common subtype of BC. Despite advances in chemotherapy and endocrine therapy optimization, local and systemic recurrences frequently occur, especially for patients with node-positive disease. Recent data suggest a subset of patients with this tumor phenotype may benefit from the addition of anti-Programmed Death-1(aPD1) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, T-cell infiltration (TCI), a biomarker of response to aPD1 and chemotherapy, is typically low in this BC subtype. Preclinical models show that combining preoperative radiation therapy (preop RT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors can enhance TCI and anti-tumor immunity. We conducted the first randomized trial to test whether no-, low- or high-dose RT combined with aPD1 increases TCI and improves responses in non-irradiated, metastatic lymph nodes in HR+/HER2- BC (NCT04443348). Materials & Methods: Eligible patients had ER and/or PR≥10%, HER2 negative invasive BC with clipped and biopsy-proven positive axillary node(s), cT1c-T4c, cN1-3, and at least one of the following criteria: grade 3 or grade 1-2 with cN2-N3, Ki67 >20%, or high genomic assay score. Between 2022-2024, 51 patients from 10 centers were randomized to no (0Gy; control arm), low (9Gy) or high (24Gy) doses of preop RT to the primary tumor with concurrent pembrolizumab followed by a 2-week tumor biopsy. Stratification factors were T1c vs. T2-4 and N1 vs. N2-3. Patients subsequently received pembrolizumab with 12 weeks of paclitaxel, followed by 4 cycles of adriamycin-cyclophosphamide (q2wk or q3wk) with pembrolizumab (200 mg q3 wks or 400 mg q6 wks). Surgery and adjuvant therapy followed standard-of-care. Dual co-primary endpoints were 2wk tumor TCI and nodal pathologic complete response (ypN0) at time of definitive surgery. TCI was assessed by multiplex immunofluorescence (pan-cytokeratin, CD3, CD8), using a rank-based Immunoscore (range 0-1), compared to baseline reference biopsies via two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. ypN0 was evaluated non-comparatively. Secondary endpoints included pCR and Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) 0/1. Results: Among 51 patients enrolled, 49 were evaluable for TCI and 48 for the ypN0 endpoint. Median age was 49.5 years (range 23-78). The cohort had a high-risk clinical profile: 92% had cT2-4, 50% N2-3, and 62% grade 3 tumors. Median ER and PR positivity were 90% (20-100) and 68% (1-98), respectively. Multifocal or multicentric tumors were present in 32%. TCI was assessed at 2 weeks post-treatment. The proportion of tumors with TCI in the upper quartile increased with RT dose escalation: 31% (0Gy), 40% (9Gy), and 53% (24Gy). Median TCI scores at 2 weeks were 0.60 (0Gy), 0.56 (9Gy), and 0.82 (24Gy), compared to a median baseline value of 0.50 from untreated reference samples. A statistically significant increase in TCI was observed only in the 24Gy cohort relative to the untreated group (p=0.027). 70.8% underwent mastectomy, with 39.6% receiving immediate reconstruction. 8% experienced G2/3 wound complications, balanced across arms. Median number of lymph nodes removed was 6.5 (1-42). The overall ypN0 rate was 29%, and 24%(0Gy), 29%(9Gy) and 33%(24Gy) per arm. pCR/RCB 0-1 rates were 18%/27% in the entire cohort and 6%/18%(0Gy), 29%/29%(9Gy), and 19%/33%(24Gy), respectively. Conclusion: The addition of 24Gy preop RT to aPD1 significantly increased tumor TCI in HR+/HER2- early-stage BC. Non-irradiated nodal response rates were promising despite over one-third of the study population with grade 1/2 tumors and high disease burden, laying the foundation for a future randomized trial comparing the efficacy of this novel approach against standard of care for node-positive HR+/HER2- BC. Citation Format: G. Gupta, A. Y. Ho, F. Gharibpoor, Y. Abdou, J. D. Anampa, R. C. Blitzblau, B. C. Calhoun, D. L. Casey, S. F. Dent, L. A. Carey, J. R. Bellon, L. E. Warren, J. Lu, T. J. Hieken, A. G. Taghian, A. Bardia, T. Traina, G. Plitas, K. Gallagher, K. Daugherty, A. Thompson, I. Krop, A. Wolff, E. Mittendorf, J. Fox, H. Garber, E. Hwang, A. J. Khan, J. P. Loene, R. Mutter, S. Patil, C. Santa-Maria, B. V. Vincent, J. L. Wright, L. Spring.Primary Results from the HR+/HER2- Cohort of TBCRC-053 (P-RAD): A Randomized Trial of No, Low, or High Dose Preoperative RADiation with Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in Node-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-05.

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Centiloid scale is the standard for amyloid (Aβ) PET quantification in research and clinical settings. However, variability between tracers and scanners remains a challenge. METHODS This study introduces DeepSUVR, a deep learning method to correct Centiloid quantification, by penalizing implausible longitudinal trajectories during training. The model was trained using data from 2,129 participants (7,149 Aβ positron emission tomography [PET] scans) in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle Study of ageing (AIBL)/Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and validated using 15,807 Aβ PET scans from 10,543 participants across 10 external datasets. RESULTS DeepSUVR increased correlation between tracers, and reduced variability in the Aß‐negatives. It showed significantly stronger association with cognition, visual reads, neuropathology, and increased longitudinal consistency between studies. DeepSUVR also increased the effect size for detecting small treatment related slowing of amyloid accumulation in the A4 study. DISCUSSION DeepSUVR substantially advances Aβ PET quantification, outperforming all standard approaches, which is particularly important for clinical decision making and to detect subtle or early changes in Aβ. Highlights Novel artificial intelligence (AI)‐method that penalizes biologically implausible longitudinal trajectories, enabling the model to learn standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) correction factors without requiring longitudinal data at inference time. Improves Centiloid consistency across tracers and studies, significantly enhancing cross‐sectional and longitudinal amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) quantification. DeepSUVR‐derived Centiloids show stronger associations with cognition, visual reads, and neuropathology. Longitudinal variability is reduced three‐ to five‐fold, enabling more reliable tracking of amyloid accumulation and better detection of treatment effects. Novel reference and target masks derived from DeepSUVR replicate most of the model's performance, offering a practical alternative for integration into existing pipelines.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate are intended to serve as a resource for health care providers to identify individuals who may benefit from cancer risk assessment and genetic counseling and testing; help guide decisions related to genetic testing; and facilitate a multidisciplinary approach in the comprehensive care of individuals at increased risk for hereditary breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. The current guidelines focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer and recommended approaches to genetic counseling/testing and care strategies in individuals with these P/LP variants associated with increased risk of these cancers. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding screening for prostate cancer and pancreas cancer, as well as testing criteria for nonepithelial ovarian cancer.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Hodgkin lymphoma provide expert, multidisciplinary recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma. The panel convenes annually to update recommendations based on a review of recently published clinical trials. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Hodgkin Lymphoma focuses on the management of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma in adults aged 18 to 60 years.

Background The role of dose escalation of radiotherapy (RT) in unresectable stage III NSCLC followed by immunotherapy is unclear. The objective of the current study is to investigate if intermediate dose escalation (IDE) is beneficial in stage III NSCLC patients who receive definitive concurrent chemoradiation (dcCRT) followed by immunotherapy. Materials and methods The study used data from the National Cancer database. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the all-cause mortality of patients who received standard RT dose (SD) (60 Gy ± 10%) and IDE (64–74 Gy). Results 47,315 patients were diagnosed in the era before immunotherapy and received dcCRT only, while 4,947 patients were treated with dcCRT and immunotherapy. In the cohort with dcCRT only, patients who received SD had statistically significant worse mortality but clinically minimal difference compared to patients with IDE (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.07-1.12; p<0.0001). In the era of immunotherapy, SD was still associated with worse mortality compared to IDE (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.03-1.33; p=0.02). However, the survival benefit associated with IDE was only restricted to patients who started immunotherapy within six weeks after RT completion (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05-1.6; p=0.01). There was no difference in mortality between SD and IDE among patients who started immunotherapy between 7–10 weeks (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.88-1.45; p=0.35) or >10 weeks after RT completion (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.51-1.07; p=0.11). Conclusion IDE of RT is not needed for patients diagnosed with stage III unresectable NSCLC who receive immunotherapy > six weeks after dcCRT.

Abstract Cancer occurs in ∼1 per 1000 pregnancies; thousands of patients may require radiation procedures for diagnosis and treatment each year in the United States alone. This rare but high-risk scenario, coupled with fear of radiation, has created ambiguity in the ideal management of pregnant patients. Without a comprehensive guide for the use of radiation in imaging and treatment for pregnant cancer patients, it is difficult for providers to offer optimal patient-centered care without introducing disparities. The goal of this paper is to provide guidance on the use of radiation for screening, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of cancer, while highlighting gaps in existing knowledge and guidelines. The intention is that physicians, medical physicists, and patients could use this document as a resource for shared decision-making, ensuring safe and effective practice. A team of physicians and medical physicists with expertise in imaging, radiotherapy, and maternal fetal medicine was assembled, along with a patient advocate and lawyer. Existing guidelines and recent literature were reviewed. Authors also drew from their experience where published guidance was lacking. The resulting document discusses best practice to guide use of radiation for cancer, as well as patient-centered care management and legal considerations. Overall, it is possible to safely and effectively deliver radiation to pregnant patients in numerous circumstances. Use of radiation or other modalities should be discussed through shared decision-making with the physician and patient, contextualizing the maternal and fetal risk from treatments. Healthcare providers should support wide access to reproductive healthcare to allow equitable, evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare.

PURPOSE There is growing scientific interest in incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early phase dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs) to assess tolerability, inform dose selection, and guide later stage trial design. However, research indicates that PRO objectives in DFOTs are often unclear. The Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dose-Finding Trials-Research Objectives Recommendations (OPTIMISE-ROR) project was established to support trialists to effectively incorporate PROs into DFOTs. METHODS Using the Enhancing Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) Network's methodological framework, guideline development included the following: (1) a methodological review of published DFOTs incorporating PROs; (2) candidate item generation, refined through expert consultation; (3) a two-round international multistakeholder Delphi survey (N = 109 in Round 1 [October 2024]; N = 96 in Round 2 [December 2024]); and (4) an independently chaired virtual consensus meeting (N = 31; January 2025) where multidisciplinary, international experts reviewed and voted to finalize items for inclusion. RESULTS Consensus was reached on six recommendations emphasizing three core PRO tolerability concepts: overall side effect impact, symptomatic adverse events, and overall health-related quality of life. The integration of PROs to inform final dose recommendations in dose escalation and optimization trials should be considered, regardless of trial design. The recommendations highlight the importance of PRO data analysis over time and across dose levels, defining PRO research objectives as descriptive or statistically powered, and assessing PRO-related end points to guide end point selection for subsequent studies. CONCLUSION This foundational guidance outlines key PRO research objectives in DFOTs. By facilitating the systematic integration of PROs, this guidance supports the utilization of patient-centered evidence for the tolerability and efficacy assessment of therapies to inform dose escalation, optimization, and regulatory evaluation—ultimately contributing to the development of safer, more effective therapies.