Al‐Hilli, Zahraa

Importance Limited granular data exist on breast cancer in transgender, nonbinary, and/or gender-diverse (TGD) individuals. Objective To describe patient demographic and tumor clinicopathological variables, clinically relevant risk factors, method of breast cancer detection, treatment characteristics, and locoregional outcomes and to estimate a 5-year breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS). Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study obtained data on patients treated from 1990 to 2023 from 22 US academic medical centers using institutional databases, electronic medical records, and tumor registries. Included participants were TGD individuals 18 years or older with stage 0 to IV breast cancer. A comparative breast cancer cohort was selected from the 2016 to 2021 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) breast cancer dataset. Data were analyzed from January to October 2025. Exposure Breast cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures Estimated 5-year BCSS and locoregional recurrence rates. Wilcoxon rank sum and χ 2 tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate 5-year BCSS. Results A total of 112 TGD persons (median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 42.5 [36.5-51.0] years; 104 individuals [92.9%] were assigned female at birth) with breast cancer and 1 with bilateral disease were included in the analysis. Forty-three patients (38.4%) used gender-affirming hormone therapy before diagnosis. Among the entire cohort, 58 patients (51.8%) detected their own breast cancer, 68 (60.7%) had a familial breast cancer history, and 16 (14.3%) had a pathogenic germline variant. Tumors were predominantly hormone receptor positive (96 [85.7%]) and early stage (29 [25.7%] ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]; 51 [45.1%] stage I). The TGD cohort, compared with patients with breast cancer in the SEER dataset (N = 480 915), was younger (median [IQR] age, 42.5 [36.5-51.0] years vs 62.0 [52.0-72.0] years), had a higher proportion of persons assigned male at birth (8 [7.1%] vs 3522 [0.7%]), more often had progesterone receptor–positive disease (89 [79.5%] vs 335 491 [69.8%]), and presented with earlier-stage disease (eg, DCIS: 29 [25.9%] vs 79 604 [16.6%]). With a median (IQR) follow-up time for the TGD cohort of 38 (24-74) months, 5-year BCSS was favorable at 96.2% (95% CI, 85.3%-99.0%). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study of TGD patients with breast cancer found that this population was young and often detected their own tumors via self-examination, suggesting opportunities to improve early detection through screening for individuals at elevated risk. Although short-term BCSS appeared favorable, prospective research is essential to define evidence-based guidelines and elucidate long-term outcomes.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate are intended to serve as a resource for health care providers to identify individuals who may benefit from cancer risk assessment and genetic counseling and testing; help guide decisions related to genetic testing; and facilitate a multidisciplinary approach in the comprehensive care of individuals at increased risk for hereditary breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. The current guidelines focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer and recommended approaches to genetic counseling/testing and care strategies in individuals with these P/LP variants associated with increased risk of these cancers. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding screening for prostate cancer and pancreas cancer, as well as testing criteria for nonepithelial ovarian cancer.

Importance Oral tamoxifen citrate benefits women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), but concern about toxic effects has limited acceptance. Previous pilot studies have suggested transdermal 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel has equivalent antiproliferative efficacy to oral tamoxifen, with low systemic exposure. Objective To demonstrate that 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel applied to the breast skin is noninferior to oral tamoxifen in its antiproliferative effect in DCIS lesions. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized, double-blind, phase 2 preoperative window trial was performed at multicenter breast surgery referral practices from May 31, 2017, to January 27, 2021. Among 408 women with estrogen receptor–positive DCIS who were approached, 120 consented and 100 initiated study treatment. The most common reasons for nonparticipation were surgical delay, disinterest in research, and concerns about toxic effects. Data were analyzed from January 26, 2021, to October 5, 2022. Intervention Random assignment to oral tamoxifen citrate, 20 mg/d, and gel placebo or 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel, 2 mg/d per breast, and oral placebo, for 4 to 10 weeks, followed by DCIS resection. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was absolute change in DCIS Ki-67 labeling index (Ki67-LI). Secondary end points included 12-gene DCIS Score, breast tissue tamoxifen metabolite concentrations, tamoxifen-responsive plasma protein levels, and patient-reported symptoms. Noninferiority of Ki67-LI reduction by 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel was tested using analysis of covariance; within- and between-arm comparisons were performed with paired t tests for mean values or the Wilcoxon rank sum test for medians. Results Of 90 participants completing treatment (mean [SD] age, 55 [11] years; 8 [8.9%] Asian, 16 [17.8%] Black, 8 [8.9%] Latina, and 53 [58.9%] White), 15 lacked residual DCIS in the surgical sample, leaving 75 evaluable for the primary end point analysis (40 in the oral tamoxifen group and 35 in the 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel group). Posttreatment Ki67-LI was 3.3% higher (80% CI, 2.1%-4.6%) in the 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel group compared with the oral tamoxifen group, exceeding the noninferiority margin (2.6%). The DCIS Score decreased more with oral tamoxifen treatment (−16 [95% CI, −22 to −9.4]) than with 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel (−1.8 [95% CI, −5.8 to 2.3]). The median 4-hydroxytamoxifen concentrations deep in the breast were nonsignificantly higher in the oral tamoxifen group (5.7 [IQR, 4.0-7.9] vs 3.8 [IQR, 1.3-7.9] ng/g), whereas endoxifen was abundant in the oral tamoxifen group and minimal in the 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel group (median, 13.0 [IQR, 8.9-20.6] vs 0.3 [IQR, 0-0.3] ng/g; P < .001). Oral tamoxifen caused expected adverse changes in plasma protein levels and vasomotor symptoms, with minimal changes in the transdermal group. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, antiproliferative noninferiority of 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel to oral tamoxifen was not confirmed, potentially owing to endoxifen exposure differences. New transdermal approaches must deliver higher drug quantities and/or include the most potent metabolites. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02993159

The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer, including BRCA1 , BRCA2 , CDH1 , PALB2 , PTEN , and TP53 , and recommended approaches to genetic counseling/testing and care strategies in individuals with these P/LP variants. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize important updates regarding: (1) a new section for transgender, nonbinary and gender diverse people who have a hereditary predisposition to cancer focused on risk reduction strategies for ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer; and (2) testing criteria and management associated with TP53 P/LP variants and Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Abstract Background: Adjuvant oral tamoxifen (TAM) benefits women with DCIS, but toxicity concerns have limited its acceptance. Transdermal therapy with 4-hydroxy tamoxifen (4-OHT) gel applied to the breast skin is a possible solution. Previous pilot data suggest equivalent anti-proliferative efficacy of TAM and 4-OHT gel, but minimal systemic exposure with transdermal therapy. We report a prospective double blinded randomized phase 2 trial comparing TAM to 4-OHT gel in women with DCIS. Methods: 107 women with estrogen receptor positive (≥10%) DCIS were randomized to TAM (20 mg/day + placebo gel) or 4-OHT gel (2mg 4-OHT gel/breast, bilaterally + oral placebo), for 4-10 weeks prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was reduction in DCIS Ki67 labeling index (LI). Secondary endpoints included the 12-gene DCIS Score assay (Exact Sciences), breast tissue and plasma concentrations of 4-OHT and endoxifen, TAM-responsive circulating proteins, and patient reported symptoms (Breast Eight Symptom Scale). We estimated that 80 evaluable participants would provide 80.5% power to establish non-inferiority of 4-OHT, defined as relative Ki67-LI decline >35% and absolute decline >2.6%, with one-sided 𝛼=0.10. Non-inferiority of 4-OHT gel for Ki67-LI reduction was tested using an ANCOVA model. Statistical comparisons within- and between-arms were calculated with paired t-test and Welch Two Sample t-test, respectively. Results: 72 of 87 women adhered to the protocol, and were evaluable for the primary endpoint (39 TAM and 33 4-OHT gel). Mean treatment duration was 47 days for TAM and 44 days for 4-OHT gel (p=0.2). The median absolute decline in Ki67 labeling index was significant in the oral TAM (-3.7%, p< 0.001) but not in 4-OHT gel arm (-1.3%, p=0.2) (p=0.002). Ki67 results following menopausal stratification also favored the TAM arm: (-1.3%; p=0.06 in 37 premenopausal women and -3.7%; p=0.02 in 35 postmenopausal women). Similarly, DCIS score showed a significantly greater reduction in the TAM (-14, p< 0.001) but not in the 4-OHT gel arm (-4, p=0.1). Tissue 4-OHT concentrations were non-significantly higher in the TAM arm and were similar between superficial and deep sampling locations (superficial 6.1 and 4.2 ng/g for TAM and 4-OHT gel, respectively, p= 0.55; deep 5.7 and 3.8 ng/g, respectively, p= 0.06), whereas plasma 4-OHT concentration was markedly lower in the gel group (2 ng/mL and 0.24 ng/mL for TAM and 4-OHT gel, respectively, P < 0.001). Endoxifen was abundant in plasma (11 ng/mL) and deep tissue (13 ng/g) of the TAM arm, but present in trace amounts in the 4-OHT gel arm (undetectable in plasma and 0.31 ng/g in tissue; p < 0.001). Circulating TAM responsive markers (insulin like growth factor 1, sex hormone binding globulin, von Willebrand factor, and protein S total) and vasomotor symptoms were significantly and unfavorably modulated by TAM, but not by 4-OHT gel therapy. Conclusions: The non-inferiority of transdermal 4-OHT gel to Tam in terms of anti-proliferative effect in DCIS lesions was not demonstrated at the doses used for this study. DCIS Score analysis gave similar results. Tissue 4-OHT concentration in 4-OHT gel and Tam-treated subjects was roughly similar. However, endoxifen exposure was higher with oral TAM therapy and may partially explain the observed differences in major endpoints. In future studies, use of higher 4-OHT gel doses, longer duration of treatment, or different formulation may overcome these. Citation Format: Oukseub Lee, Xinlei Mi, Yanfei Xu, Luis Blanco, Azza M. Akasha, Kelly Benante, Shanshan Zhang, Carissa LaBoy, Thomas Helland, Melissa Pilewskie, Amy Degnim, Zahraa Al-Hilli, Amanda L. Amin, E Shelley Hwang, Joseph M. Guenther, Simon Steinar Hustad, Demirkan B. Gursel, Masha Kocherginsky, Gunnar Mellgren, Eileen Dimond, Marjorie Perloff, Brandy M. Heckman-Stoddard, Seema Khan. PD15-12 A pre-surgical window trial of oral tamoxifen versus transdermal 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel in women with estrogen receptor positive duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD15-12.

AbstractSurgical trials in breast cancer have catalyzed contemporary trial design for solid organ cancers and are a prime example of surgeons taking the lead in clinical trial design. Surgeons have lead trials that have improved patient outcomes and quality of life without sacrificing oncologic safety. We have evolved from radical mastectomy to breast conservation and sentinel node biopsy. Contemporary trial design in breast cancer now focus on personalizing care based on tumor genomics

e19407 Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a continuous improvement process aimed at reducing time to treatment on minimizing the number of days spent to complete pre-treatment visits and the associated costs for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. Methods: System-wide initiatives were implemented in 2015 to minimize time to treatment initiation (TTI), by incorporating lean process strategies and enhanced coordination. Patient and treatment information was obtained through an IRB-approved registry for the years 2015 and 2018. Average number of days spent to complete visits, TTI, and associated patient costs including driving expenses, parking, food, childcare, and lost wages were calculated and compared between the years 2015 and 2018. Results: In 2015, the median TTI was 43.5 days and the average number of separate days spent to attend multidisciplinary visits prior to first treatment was 1.86. These were reduced to 29 days and 1.52 visits, respectively, in 2018 (p < 0.0001 for both). When evaluating treatment visits by surgical procedure, the average number of visits was reduced regardless of surgical procedure. The average number of visits was highest for patients undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction (2.34 in 2015, reduced to 1.65 in 2018, p < 0.0001). A single visit to complete treatment planning was associated with patient costs of $249 as compared with multiple trips costing $491 for 2 visits and up to $1,226 for 5 visits. Conclusions: In breast cancer patients, implementing a continuous improvement process to reduce time to treatment was associated with fewer visits required prior to treatment initiation, resulting in lower patient costs.

SummaryBackgroundIn patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN‐1), pancreaticoduodenal (PD) neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are associated with early mortality, yet the best treatment strategy remains uncertain.AimTo assess patient important outcomes (mortality and metastasis) of PD‐NETs and predictors of outcomes in patients with MEN‐1.MethodsRetrospective cohort of patients with MEN‐1 who attended the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN from 1997 to 2014.ResultsWe identified 287 patients with MEN‐1; 199 (69%) patients had 217 PD‐NETs. Among those with a PD‐NETs, 129 (65%) had surgery of which 90 (70%) had their primary surgery performed at Mayo Clinic. The median postoperative follow‐up was 8 years during which 13 (14%) patients died. The mean (±standard deviation) age of death was 51 (±9) years. Tumour size, metastasis at surgery or tumour type were not predictive of mortality, but for every year older at surgery, the odds of metastasis increased by 6%. Surgery was not performed in 70 (35%) patients. Among those who were observed/medically managed without known metastatic disease, mean tumour growth was 0·02 cm/year (range, −0·13–0·4 cm/year). Four patients (7%) died at a median age of 77 (range, 51–89) years.ConclusionPD‐NETs are common in patients with MEN‐1 and are associated with early mortality even after surgical intervention. Active surveillance is a viable option in nonaggressive PD‐NETs, although definitive factors identifying such patients are lacking. Therefore, counselling regarding risks and benefits of current treatment options remains integral to the care of patients with MEN‐1.