Back to Authors

Thrower, Sara

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9915-7443

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Citations 2

Pregnancy, cancer, and radiation—a modern refresher
Kisling, Kelly , Meyers, Sandra M. , Richardson, Susan, Chapman, Christina , Dupere, Justine M , Eliason, Grace, Evans, Suzanne, Lee, Young, Masten, Jeffrey, Maues, Julia, Newman, Rachel, Silosky, Mike, Song, Catherine, Yashar, Catheryn, Thrower, Sara , Lee, Young , Evans, Suzanne B. , Millman, Rebecca , Chapman, Christina , Dupere, Justine , Evans, Suzanne , Juang, Titania , Lee, Young , Maues, Julia , Newman, Rachel , Silosky, Mike , Thrower, Sara , Milman, Rebecca , Maués, Julia , Yashar, Catheryn M.

JNCI Cancer Spectrum | January 24, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jncics/pkag007 Get It

Abstract Cancer occurs in ∼1 per 1000 pregnancies; thousands of patients may require radiation procedures for diagnosis and treatment each year in the United States alone. This rare but high-risk scenario, coupled with fear of radiation, has created ambiguity in the ideal management of pregnant patients. Without a comprehensive guide for the use of radiation in imaging and treatment for pregnant cancer patients, it is difficult for providers to offer optimal patient-centered care without introducing disparities. The goal of this paper is to provide guidance on the use of radiation for screening, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of cancer, while highlighting gaps in existing knowledge and guidelines. The intention is that physicians, medical physicists, and patients could use this document as a resource for shared decision-making, ensuring safe and effective practice. A team of physicians and medical physicists with expertise in imaging, radiotherapy, and maternal fetal medicine was assembled, along with a patient advocate and lawyer. Existing guidelines and recent literature were reviewed. Authors also drew from their experience where published guidance was lacking. The resulting document discusses best practice to guide use of radiation for cancer, as well as patient-centered care management and legal considerations. Overall, it is possible to safely and effectively deliver radiation to pregnant patients in numerous circumstances. Use of radiation or other modalities should be discussed through shared decision-making with the physician and patient, contextualizing the maternal and fetal risk from treatments. Healthcare providers should support wide access to reproductive healthcare to allow equitable, evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare.
Multi‐energy computed tomography and material quantification: Current barriers and opportunities for advancement
Jacobsen, Megan C. , Thrower, Sara , Court, Laurence E. , Tamm, Eric P. , Cody, Dianna D. , Layman, Rick R. , Thrower, Sara , Ger, Rachel , Leng, Shuai , Brock, Kristy K. , Cressman, Erik N. K.

Medical Physics | May 26, 2020 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 3752-3771

10.1002/mp.14241 Get It

Computed tomography (CT) technology has rapidly evolved since its introduction in the 1970s. It is a highly important diagnostic tool for clinicians as demonstrated by the significant increase in utilization over several decades. However, much of the effort to develop and advance CT applications has been focused on improving visual sensitivity and reducing radiation dose. In comparison to these areas, improvements in quantitative CT have lagged behind. While this could be a consequence of the technological limitations of conventional CT, advanced dual‐energy CT (DECT) and photon‐counting detector CT (PCD‐CT) offer new opportunities for quantitation. Routine use of DECT is becoming more widely available and PCD‐CT is rapidly developing. This review covers efforts to address an unmet need for improved quantitative imaging to better characterize disease, identify biomarkers, and evaluate therapeutic response, with an emphasis on multi‐energy CT applications. The review will primarily discuss applications that have utilized quantitative metrics using both conventional and DECT, such as bone mineral density measurement, evaluation of renal lesions, and diagnosis of fatty liver disease. Other topics that will be discussed include efforts to improve quantitative CT volumetry and radiomics. Finally, we will address the use of quantitative CT to enhance image‐guided techniques for surgery, radiotherapy and interventions and provide unique opportunities for development of new contrast agents.