Citations

This consensus by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disease Focused Panel provides an updated imaging-based definition of small bowel Crohn disease stricture for CT and MR enterography.

Abstract Background & Aims Pregnancy can be a complex and risk-filled event for women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). High-quality studies in this population are lacking, with limited data on medications approved to treat IBD during pregnancy. For patients, limited knowledge surrounding pregnancy impacts pregnancy rates, medication adherence, and outcomes. Limited provider knowledge leads to highly varied practices in care affected by local dogma, available resources, individual interpretation of the literature, and fear of harming the fetus. The variations in guidelines by different societies and countries reflect this and lead to confusion for physicians and patients alike. The Global Consensus Consortium is a group of 39 IBD and content experts and 7 patient advocates from 6 continents who convened to review and assess current data and come to an agreement on best practices based on these data. Methods The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) process was used when sufficient published data were available and the RAND (Research and Development) process in those instances where expert opinion was needed to guide consistent practice. Recommendations were informed by the guiding principle that maternal health best supports infant health. Results The topics were divided into ten categories with 34 GRADE recommendations and 35 consensus statements. Conclusions Overall, the goal of the group was to provide data-driven and practical guidance to improve the care of women with IBD around the globe based on the best available research.

Purpose: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia in older adults, is often treated with cryoballoon ablation (CBA) or laser balloon ablation (LBA) when refractory to medication. We used real-world patient data to investigate differences in arrhythmia-free survival, procedure and fluoroscopy times, and complications between these techniques. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study of 178 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF referred for first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), 103 underwent CBA, and 75 underwent LBA. Recurrence was defined as any atrial arrhythmia of > 30 seconds’ duration after a three-month blanking period. Complications at 30 days were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate arrhythmia-free survival at one year for both groups. Categorical variables were expressed as n (%) and continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation or median (Q1, Q3). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with exception to left atrial volume index (CBA 32.2 ± 10.9 ml/m2; LBA 36.0 ± 11.0 ml/m2, p = 0.047). History of stroke was higher in CBA (13.6% vs 2.7%; p = 0.012), as was coronary artery disease (35.0% vs 14.7%, p = 0.002). Median fluoroscopy and procedure times (min) were significantly shorter in LBA (24.2 vs 31.6, p = 0.004; 141.0 vs 210.0, p < 0.0001, respectively). One-year arrhythmia-free survival rates were similar (CBA 79.1% vs LBA 78.7%, p = 0.934), as were total complication rates (21.4% vs 16.0%, p = 0.289), including rates of transient ischemic attack/stroke and vascular complications. Conclusions: In patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI, CBA and LBA were equally efficacious at one year and demonstrated acceptably low complication rates. LBA was associated with reduced procedure time and fluoroscopy exposure.

Abstract Aims Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening and preventive care in the early postpartum are recommended for women with prior gestational diabetes (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), certain barriers limit access to such services. We conducted a scoping review to summarize evidence on the barriers and facilitators of CVD prevention services among women with prior GDM or HDP. Methods and results A comprehensive search strategy was used to search articles published in three databases (Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase). Studies published in English or French that investigated and reported barriers or facilitators to postpartum CVD screening and preventive care among women with previous GDM and HDP were included. Out of 18 565 studies we screened, 29 studies (12 qualitative, 17 quantitative) were included. Main individual level barriers including lack of knowledge, health, and emotional factors were identified. Competing priorities, lack of family/friend support, and mistrust of healthcare providers were the most reported interpersonal level barriers, while gaps in communication were the most significant organizational barrier, and gaps in insurance coverage was the most reported system barrier. Individual level facilitators included a personal desire for better health and availability of postpartum programmes, and the most reported interpersonal facilitator was women's commitment to modelling a healthy lifestyle for their children. Organizational level facilitators were access to primary care providers and follow-up visit reminders, and programme availability in native languages. Conclusion Women with prior GDM or HDP face significant barriers to accessing postpartum CVD prevention services. These barriers ranged from individual-level knowledge gaps to system-level healthcare disparities.

Background and Objectives: Heart failure (HF) represents a major public health challenge worldwide, with rising prevalence, high morbidity and mortality rates, and substantial healthcare costs. Non-invasive telemonitoring has emerged as a promising adjunct in HF management, yet its clinical effectiveness remains unclear. Materials and Methods: In this systematic review, we summarize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between 2004 and 2024 examining the efficacy of non-invasive telemonitoring on mortality, readmission, and quality of life (QoL) in HF. In addition, we characterize the heterogeneity of features of different telemonitoring interventions. Results: In total, 32 RCTs were included, comprising 13,294 participants. While some individual studies reported benefits, non-invasive telemonitoring demonstrated mixed effects on mortality, readmission rates, and QoL. The most common modality for interfacing with patients was by mobile application (53%), followed by web portals (22%), and stand-alone devices (19%). Periodic feedback (63%) was more common than continuous feedback (31%) or on-demand feedback (6%). Clinician reviews of patient telemonitoring data was event-triggered (44%) more commonly than based on a prespecified timeline (38%). In most designs (90%), patients played a passive role in telemonitoring. Conclusions: Non-invasive telemonitoring interventions for HF exhibited considerable variation in duration and system design and had a low rate of patient engagement. Future work should focus on identifying telemonitoring-responsive subgroups and refining telemonitoring strategies to complement traditional HF care.

ABSTRACTBackground and ObjectivesMedicaid reimbursement to physicians has been demonstrated to be lower than reimbursement from Medicare and private insurance. Studies on Medicaid reimbursement for orthopedic oncology procedures, however, are limited. This study compares Medicaid reimbursement rates to Medicare for 38 common musculoskeletal oncology procedures and assesses variability among states.MethodsWe collected 38 current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for commonly performed orthopedic oncology procedures. Medicare rates were obtained from the 2023 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid physician (CMS) fee schedule. Medicaid rates were collected from electronic state website fee schedules. Reimbursement for the two insurance types were compared with state and national averages. Dollar differences were adjusted for work relative value units (RVU) to ascertain procedural variability. The Medicare Wage Index, representing differences in wages across states, was used to adjust medicaid rates to compare more accurately to medicare. Coefficient of variation values, calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the mean, were calculated to assess variation among procedures.ResultsMedicaid reimbursed orthopedic oncologists 22.1% less than medicare on average, increasing to 33.0% when adjusting for wage differences. State Medicaid reimbursement ranged from 37% to 131% of Medicare, with 38 states reimbursing less than Medicare on average. The coefficient of variation for Medicaid procedures ranged from 0.24 to 0.46, indicating wide variability among states and procedures, while for Medicare, the coefficient of variation was low at 0.06 to 0.07.ConclusionsMedicaid reimbursement for common orthopedic oncology procedures is substantially lower and more variable than Medicare, despite the often urgent nature of these surgeries. Disparities in reimbursement may impact access to care for this population, highlighting the need for policy reform.

Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) is a transformative intervention for adolescents with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, offering benefits that extend beyond auditory rehabilitation to encompass psychosocial and functional outcomes. Despite growing global evidence, there is limited data on the impact of CIs on quality of life (QoL) in low- and middle-income settings, particularly from the adolescent’s perspective. Objective: To evaluate the quality of life of adolescents with unilateral cochlear implants and to assess the influence of demographic and contextual factors on perceived QoL outcomes in a Pakistani cohort. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 110 adolescents aged 10–19 years with at least 12 months of unilateral CI use were recruited from four rehabilitation centers in Lahore, Pakistan. Participants completed the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and a structured demographic questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and inferential analyses compared GBI scores across gender, implant side, and educational placement, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean GBI total score was 38.6 (SD 11.4), with significant improvements observed across general, social support, and physical health domains (all p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in QoL outcomes by gender, side of implantation, or school type. Strong associations were observed between general well-being and social support. Conclusion: Unilateral cochlear implantation yields substantial, multidimensional quality-of-life benefits for adolescents, independent of demographic or educational context. Integration of psychosocial support and inclusive practices is essential for maximizing post-implant outcomes.

ABSTRACT Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT, Osler‐Weber‐Rendu disease) is the second most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide, affecting approximately 1 in 5000 people. Development of disease‐modifying and efficacious hemostatic agents to treat HHT has finally begun after decades without such medical therapies. However, the lack of consensus on standardized severity definitions, outcome criteria, and terminology remains a major obstacle to clinical investigation and therapeutic development in HHT. Additionally, with the ongoing repurposing of antiangiogenic agents and emerging development of novel HHT‐specific therapies, comparative clinical trials are expected in the future. Therefore, to end the problematic heterogeneity hindering these efforts, the Global Research and Medical Advisory Board (GRMAB) of the Cure HHT Foundation, an international group of recognized HHT experts, convened a conference of expert HHT clinician‐investigators from within GRMAB as well as invited external experts in HHT and bleeding disorders generally, patients with HHT, and patient advocates to define standard terminology and definitions for outcomes and severity classification for bleeding and anemia in HHT. These criteria and definitions should be adopted by regulators, investigators, and the pharmaceutical industry in the development and performance of interventional clinical trials and cohort studies to allow improved comparability between clinical trials, facilitate communication between clinicians and investigators, improve therapeutic guideline development, and provide a standardized framework for regulatory agencies. Search Strategy and Selection Criteria Evidence for this report was systematically identified and evaluated utilizing two search strategies in Ovid MEDLINE, described in full detail in the Appendix, pp.4–13. The searches were conducted on January 7, 2025. The titles and abstracts of each record were reviewed, and the inclusion criteria were applied to all search results to identify full text articles to be retrieved for further review. All retrieved full texts were then reviewed to reach a final determination if a study met the inclusion criteria. Included references were then compiled into evidence tables, which were then utilized by the International Consensus Report Working Group throughout the development of report recommendations.