Lin, Eugenia

ABSTRACTBackground and ObjectivesMedicaid reimbursement to physicians has been demonstrated to be lower than reimbursement from Medicare and private insurance. Studies on Medicaid reimbursement for orthopedic oncology procedures, however, are limited. This study compares Medicaid reimbursement rates to Medicare for 38 common musculoskeletal oncology procedures and assesses variability among states.MethodsWe collected 38 current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for commonly performed orthopedic oncology procedures. Medicare rates were obtained from the 2023 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid physician (CMS) fee schedule. Medicaid rates were collected from electronic state website fee schedules. Reimbursement for the two insurance types were compared with state and national averages. Dollar differences were adjusted for work relative value units (RVU) to ascertain procedural variability. The Medicare Wage Index, representing differences in wages across states, was used to adjust medicaid rates to compare more accurately to medicare. Coefficient of variation values, calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the mean, were calculated to assess variation among procedures.ResultsMedicaid reimbursed orthopedic oncologists 22.1% less than medicare on average, increasing to 33.0% when adjusting for wage differences. State Medicaid reimbursement ranged from 37% to 131% of Medicare, with 38 states reimbursing less than Medicare on average. The coefficient of variation for Medicaid procedures ranged from 0.24 to 0.46, indicating wide variability among states and procedures, while for Medicare, the coefficient of variation was low at 0.06 to 0.07.ConclusionsMedicaid reimbursement for common orthopedic oncology procedures is substantially lower and more variable than Medicare, despite the often urgent nature of these surgeries. Disparities in reimbursement may impact access to care for this population, highlighting the need for policy reform.

Background: Although it is well established that the type of organism can be a risk factor for failure in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), no study to date has examined the impact of the number of positive cultures on treatment outcomes in patients undergoing 2-stage exchange. The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine the prognostic utility of multiple positive cultures at resection as a predictor of failure following reimplantation. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study identified 437 patients with chronic knee PJI who had undergone 2-stage exchange arthroplasty with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up following reimplantation. PJI was defined with use of the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Patients with culture-negative PJI were excluded (n = 138). Treatment failure was defined as either any reoperation for infection or PJI-related mortality. Multivariable regression controlling for risk factors for failure after a 2-stage arthroplasty was performed to determine whether ≥2 positive intraoperative cultures at resection can predict outcomes following reimplantation when compared with a single positive culture. Results: Two hundred and ninety-nine patients were included. At a mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 2.6 years, 48 patients (16.1%) experienced failure. Patients who had a failure were more likely to have had a longer interstage interval (p = 0.038) and were also more likely to have had ≥2 positive cultures at the time of resection arthroplasty (95.8% versus 75.3%; p = 0.001). On regression analysis, ≥2 positive cultures at resection was the only variable that was identified as a risk factor for failure following reimplantation in both the univariate (odds ratio [OR], 7.55 [95% CI, 2.24 to 47.0]; p = 0.006) and multivariable models (OR, 8.12 [95% CI, 2.31 to 51.9]; p = 0.005). Conclusions: This is the first study to examine the impact of the number of positive cultures on outcomes in patients with PJI. We found that the presence of ≥2 positive cultures at resection was an indicator of a poor prognosis and resulted in a greater than eightfold increase in the risk of treatment failure in patients undergoing a 2-stage exchange. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: The Latarjet and other bony augmentation procedures are commonly used to treat anterior shoulder instability in the setting of significant glenoid bone loss. Although several fixation strategies have been reported, the biomechanical strength of these techniques remains poorly understood. Purpose: To perform a systematic review of the biomechanical strength of glenoid bony augmentation procedures for anterior shoulder instability. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify biomechanical studies evaluating various fixation strategies for coracoid and other bone transfer procedures for anterior shoulder instability. Biomechanical results included load to failure with both compression and traction forces, stiffness, and cyclic displacement. The quality of included articles was assessed based on the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale. Results: A total of 21 biomechanical studies comprising 486 specimens were included. The number of screws used and the addition of washers were found to significantly increase rigidity and load to failure. The comparison of fixation techniques demonstrated mixed results in load to failure between screw and alternative constructs including suture buttons and suture anchors. However, studies that tested graft displacement consistently found more graft displacement in buttons compared with screws. The median and mean of the QUACS scale were both 12, with a range of 10-13. Conclusion: Biomechanical studies consistently demonstrated that when glenoid bone grafts were fixed with screws, the number of screws and use of washers significantly increased construct rigidity and load to failure. Different metal screw materials and sizes did not consistently demonstrate a significant difference in biomechanical strength. There are mixed results when comparing suture buttons to screw fixation. The evaluated studies revealed that all double metal screw constructs and the majority of suture button and anchor constructs were able to withstand the glenohumeral load reflective of activities of daily living using a 150-N threshold.

Background: Because of growing concerns regarding repeated head trauma, in 2016, the United States Soccer Federation (USSF) banned headers for athletes aged ≤10 years and limited athletes aged 11 to 13 years to practicing headers for 30 minutes per week. Purpose: To assess whether the USSF header policy was associated with fewer soccer-related concussions after the 2015 season. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: A retrospective cohort from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was assessed. Age, sex, and injury type were extracted for all soccer-related emergency department visits between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2023. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were used to assess concussions as a percentage of all soccer-related injuries based on sex, age group (6-9, 10-13, and 14-17 years), and year. The following time frames were assessed: 2012-2015, 2016-2019, and 2020-2023. Results: The proportion of concussions decreased from 8.2% of all soccer-related injuries in 2012-2015 to 6.1% in 2020-2023 ( P < .01). The relative risk reduction for soccer-related concussions presenting to an emergency department in 2020-2023 compared with 2012-2015 was 25.6%. Overall, the proportion of concussions among 10- to 13-year-old and 14- to 17-year-old players was higher than for 6- to 9-year-old players (6.6% and 8.9% vs 4.9%, respectively; P < .01). Despite having a lower frequency of soccer-related injuries overall, female players had a greater proportion of concussions than male players (9.6% vs 6.2% of all soccer-related injuries; P < .01). In the multiple regression analysis, injuries that occurred in 2020-2023 were associated with lower odds of concussion compared with 2012-2015 (odds ratio [OR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.69-0.81]). Compared with 6- to 9-year-old and male players, the 10- to 13-year-old (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.16-1.45]), 14- to 17-year-old (OR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.61-1.99]), and female players (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.43-1.63]) were associated with higher odds of concussion. Conclusion: A 25.6% reduction in the relative risk of presenting to the emergency department with a soccer-related concussion was found when comparing 2020-2023 (after USSF header policy implementation) with 2012-2015 (before policy implementation). The USSF youth soccer header policy may improve player safety by reducing head impacts in the pediatric population.