Adam, Henderson

Primary sternal osteomyelitis (PSO) is an exceptionally rare infection of the sternum, typically occurring in the context of trauma, surgery or immunocompromise. We report the case of a previously healthy adolescent boy in his second decade of life presenting with fever, chest pain and localised tenderness without any identifiable risk factors. Initial workup, including a chest X-ray and echocardiogram, was unremarkable, but persistent bacteraemia with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus prompted further imaging. MRI revealed sternal osteomyelitis with a small parasternal abscess. The patient was successfully treated with intravenous antibiotics alone, avoiding surgical intervention. This case highlights the importance of thorough physical examination and maintaining a high index of suspicion for PSO in patients with unexplained fever and chest wall tenderness, even in the absence of traditional risk factors. Early diagnosis and targeted therapy are essential to optimise outcomes in this rare condition.

Abstract Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) is a motion-sparing surgical alternative to wrist arthrodesis for patients with radiocarpal arthritis, but prior reports have indicated that its utilization remains limited. This study aimed to quantify Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for TWA, along with utilization trends for the procedure using Medicare data. Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates for three TWA Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes—25446 (TWA), 25332 (TWA with interposition), and 25449 (revision TWA)—were collected for all states except Tennessee for the year 2024 and compared with each other. Prior Medicare rates from 2000 to 2023 were also obtained, adjusted for inflation to represent 2024 dollars, and analyzed for reimbursement trends with a two-tailed t-test between average inflation-adjusted 2000 and 2024 reimbursement. Utilization data from 2000 to 2022 were obtained from the Medicare Part B database. Medicaid reimbursement averaged 16.8% less than Medicare across the three TWA codes, with high variability between states. Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement decreased by an average of 44.2% from 2000 to 2024, with the greatest decline seen in CPT 25446 (TWA) with a 45.1% decrease. Reimbursement for all three codes had decreased significantly from 2000 to 2024 via the two-tailed t-test. Besides an initial dramatic fall from 2000 to 2021 for revision TWA, Medicare utilization gradually increased, with 25332 (TWA with interposition) being the most commonly billed code. TWA reimbursement has decreased significantly over the past two decades for Medicare. Current Medicaid reimbursement is substantially less than Medicare. Although utilization has increased modestly, low reimbursement, along with a variety of other factors, may contribute to a limited adoption of TWA. Addressing these disincentives may encourage further innovation and technological development in TWA.

Background: Total wrist arthrodesis is a well-established procedure providing pain relief and stability for patients with symptomatic radiocarpal arthritis refractory to nonoperative measures. Little research exists on reimbursement and utilization trends for this procedure. This study aimed to characterize Medicare reimbursement trends for total wrist arthrodesis, along with trends in Medicare utilization and comparison with Medicaid reimbursement. Methods: Medicare reimbursement for Current Procedural Terminology codes 25800, 25805, and 25810 were collected from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Fee Schedule from 2000 to 2025. Rates were inflation-adjusted to 2025 dollars, and percentage changes were calculated. Medicare utilization trends from 2000 to 2022 were analyzed using CMS Part B data. Most recent Medicaid reimbursement was collected from online state fee schedules and compared with 2025 Medicare rates, with additional analyses of variability and adjustment for work Relative Value Units. Results: Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for total wrist arthrodesis decreased by 49.1% from 2000 to 2025 ( P < .0001), averaging a 1.96% annual decline. Utilization trends remained stable, with wrist arthrodesis with iliac or other autograft (CPT 25810) being the most commonly billed procedure. Medicaid reimbursed 13.6% less than Medicare on average, with substantial state variability, ranging from 44.7% (New Hampshire) to 135.4% (Alaska) of Medicare reimbursement. Conclusion: Reimbursement for total wrist arthrodesis has declined significantly despite stable utilization in the Medicare population. Medicaid reimbursement is consistently lower and highly variable by state, potentially impacting access to care. Given the effectiveness of wrist arthrodesis, policymakers should advocate for equitable reimbursement for this procedure.

ABSTRACTBackground and ObjectivesMedicaid reimbursement to physicians has been demonstrated to be lower than reimbursement from Medicare and private insurance. Studies on Medicaid reimbursement for orthopedic oncology procedures, however, are limited. This study compares Medicaid reimbursement rates to Medicare for 38 common musculoskeletal oncology procedures and assesses variability among states.MethodsWe collected 38 current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for commonly performed orthopedic oncology procedures. Medicare rates were obtained from the 2023 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid physician (CMS) fee schedule. Medicaid rates were collected from electronic state website fee schedules. Reimbursement for the two insurance types were compared with state and national averages. Dollar differences were adjusted for work relative value units (RVU) to ascertain procedural variability. The Medicare Wage Index, representing differences in wages across states, was used to adjust medicaid rates to compare more accurately to medicare. Coefficient of variation values, calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the mean, were calculated to assess variation among procedures.ResultsMedicaid reimbursed orthopedic oncologists 22.1% less than medicare on average, increasing to 33.0% when adjusting for wage differences. State Medicaid reimbursement ranged from 37% to 131% of Medicare, with 38 states reimbursing less than Medicare on average. The coefficient of variation for Medicaid procedures ranged from 0.24 to 0.46, indicating wide variability among states and procedures, while for Medicare, the coefficient of variation was low at 0.06 to 0.07.ConclusionsMedicaid reimbursement for common orthopedic oncology procedures is substantially lower and more variable than Medicare, despite the often urgent nature of these surgeries. Disparities in reimbursement may impact access to care for this population, highlighting the need for policy reform.

Background: Medicaid reimbursement to physicians is often perceived to be lower than Medicare, but little is known about orthopaedic foot and ankle reimbursement. This study sought to compare Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for the 20 most common foot and ankle procedures. Methods: Medicare reimbursement rates for common foot and ankle codes were obtained from the online Centers for Medicare & Medicaid fee schedule, while Medicaid rates were found from individual state fee schedule websites. Medicaid rates were compared by state and pooled to obtain national differences. The Medicare Wage Index was used to adjust Medicaid rates by state wages to ensure a more accurate comparison. Variability between states was measured using state percentages of Medicare and coefficient of variation values. Results: Medicaid reimbursed physicians higher than Medicare in 31 states overall, with average reimbursement ranging from 37% to 324% of Medicare. Nationally, Medicaid reimbursed 8.8% higher than Medicare, but Medicare reimbursed 3.7% higher when adjusted for the Medicare Wage Index. The Current Procedural Terminology ( CPT ) codes with the highest ratio of Medicaid to Medicare reimbursement were CPT 28002 for incision and drainage of the foot (176.6%) and CPT 28820 for toe amputation (167.6%). Five codes had lower relative Medicaid reimbursement on average: CPT 27687 for repair procedures on the leg and ankle joint, CPT 28810 for amputation procedures on the foot and toes, CPT 28010 for toe tenotomy, CPT 28005 for incision procedures on the foot and toes, and CPT 28470 for closed treatment of a metatarsal fracture. The coefficient of variation values ranged from 0.34 to 0.84 in the Medicaid group and 0.40 to 0.78 in the adjusted group, indicating high variability between states and between procedures. Conclusion: Medicaid reimbursement is highly inconsistent between states, ranging from 37% to 324% of Medicare. Medicaid reimbursed more than Medicare overall, which is in contrast with most published findings that tend to show higher reimbursement for Medicare when compared to Medicaid. When adjusting for wage differences between states, Medicare reimbursed slightly higher than Medicaid. Level of Evidence: Level IV, economic analysis.

Purpose To compare Medicaid and Medicare rates for the 20 most commonly billed orthopaedic sports medicine procedures. Methods Medicaid reimbursement rates were obtained from state‐specific fee schedules. Medicare rates were collected from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule, along with relative value units for each procedure. State rates were compared using averages and dollar differences. Reimbursement rates were adjusted for cost of living using the Medicare Wage Index. Variability between states and between procedures was assessed using coefficients of variation. Results Mean Medicaid reimbursement was lower than that of Medicare for 19 of the 20 procedures. In total, Medicaid reimbursed surgeons 14.9% less when data were unadjusted and 26.0% less when data were adjusted for cost of living. Variation in Medicare rates between states was constant, with a coefficient of variation of 0.06. For Medicaid, the coefficients of variation ranged from 0.27 to 0.70 for unadjusted data and from 0.35 to 0.69 for adjusted data. Conclusions On average, Medicaid reimburses orthopaedic sports medicine specialists less than does Medicare, with substantial variability between states. Adjustment for cost of living increases the percentage difference and the variability between states’ Medicaid reimbursement rates. Level of Evidence Level IV, economic analysis.

Abstract ➤ The COVID-19 pandemic created a persistent surgical backlog in elective orthopedic surgeries. ➤ Artificial intelligence (AI) uses computer algorithms to solve problems and has potential as a powerful tool in health care. ➤ AI can help improve current and future orthopedic backlogs through enhancing surgical schedules, optimizing preoperative planning, and predicting postsurgical outcomes. ➤ AI may help manage existing waitlists and increase efficiency in orthopedic workflows.

BACKGROUND: Apelin is an endogenous prepropeptide that regulates cardiac homeostasis and various physiological processes. Intravenous injection has been shown to improve cardiac contractility in patients with heart failure. However, its short half-life prevents studying its impact on left ventricular remodeling in the long term. Here, we aim to study whether microparticle-mediated slow release of apelin improves heart function and left ventricular remodeling in mice with myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: A cardiac patch was fabricated by embedding apelin-containing microparticles in a fibrin gel scaffold. MI was induced via permanent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery in adult C57BL/6J mice followed by epicardial patch placement immediately after (acute MI) or 28 days (chronic MI) post-MI. Four groups were included in this study, namely sham, MI, MI plus empty microparticle-embedded patch treatment, and MI plus apelin-containing microparticle-embedded patch treatment. Cardiac function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. Cardiomyocyte morphology, apoptosis, and cardiac fibrosis were evaluated by histology. Cardioprotective pathways were determined by RNA sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and Western blot. RESULTS: The level of endogenous apelin was largely reduced in the first 7 days after MI induction and it was normalized by day 28. Apelin-13 encapsulated in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microparticles displayed a sustained release pattern for up to 28 days. Treatment with apelin-containing microparticle-embedded patch inhibited cardiac hypertrophy and reduced scar size in both acute and chronic MI models, which is associated with improved cardiac function. Data from cellular and molecular analyses showed that apelin inhibits the activation and proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts by preventing transforming growth factor-β–mediated activation of Smad2/3 (supporessor of mothers against decapentaplegic 2/3) and downstream profibrotic gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microparticles prolonged the apelin release time in the mouse hearts. Epicardial delivery of the apelin-containing microparticle-embedded patch protects mice from both acute and chronic MI-induced cardiac dysfunction, inhibits cardiac fibrosis, and improves left ventricular remodeling.

OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to evaluate the variability of Medicaid reimbursement and compare it with Medicare reimbursement using the 20 most commonly billed orthopaedic trauma Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes nationwide. The authors anticipate significant variability between states and hypothesize that Medicaid payment will be significantly less than Medicare payment. METHODS: The top 20 most common orthopaedic trauma surgery procedural codes were identified from a previous analysis performed by Haglin et al. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule was used to determine reimbursement rates from Medicare, and state Medicaid fee schedules were used to determine reimbursement rates for Medicaid. State Medicaid rates were compared with their corresponding Medicare rates to determine a dollar difference. In addition, the dollar difference for each CPT code was divided by its respective physician relative value unit. This was used to acknowledge the possible variability in the complexity of orthopaedic procedures and the related physician effort. The Medicare Wage Index was used to adjust Medicaid rates based on the cost of living for the state as well. Coefficients of variation were calculated to represent overall variability in Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement rates. RESULTS: The mean reimbursement rates for Medicaid were lower for all 20 procedures compared with Medicare. On average, Medicaid reimbursed 16.0% less than Medicare and 29.6% less when adjusting for cost of living. MCD reimbursed at a higher rate than MCR for all procedures in only 9 states (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, and South Dakota) while 38 states reimbursed at a lower rate than MCR, on average. The coefficient of variation ranged from 0.24 to 0.34 for the Medicaid unadjusted group and from 0.35 to 0.46 for the Medicare Wage Index–adjusted group. By contrast, the Medicare group was consistent at 0.06 for all 20 procedures. The average dollar difference across the 20 CPT codes for Medicaid reimbursement compared with Medicare reimbursement ranged from −$76.89 to −$225.17, and the dollar difference per relative value unit ranged from −$5.96 to −$15.16. CONCLUSIONS: This study found a high amount of variation between state Medicaid reimbursement rates and average rates that were significantly lower than Medicare reimbursement rates for the top 20 most used orthopaedic trauma CPT codes as identified by Haglin et al. The discrepancy in reimbursement was increased when Medicaid rates were adjusted for state cost of living. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.