Beckett, Nathan

Background: Medicaid reimbursement to physicians is often perceived to be lower than Medicare, but little is known about orthopaedic foot and ankle reimbursement. This study sought to compare Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for the 20 most common foot and ankle procedures. Methods: Medicare reimbursement rates for common foot and ankle codes were obtained from the online Centers for Medicare & Medicaid fee schedule, while Medicaid rates were found from individual state fee schedule websites. Medicaid rates were compared by state and pooled to obtain national differences. The Medicare Wage Index was used to adjust Medicaid rates by state wages to ensure a more accurate comparison. Variability between states was measured using state percentages of Medicare and coefficient of variation values. Results: Medicaid reimbursed physicians higher than Medicare in 31 states overall, with average reimbursement ranging from 37% to 324% of Medicare. Nationally, Medicaid reimbursed 8.8% higher than Medicare, but Medicare reimbursed 3.7% higher when adjusted for the Medicare Wage Index. The Current Procedural Terminology ( CPT ) codes with the highest ratio of Medicaid to Medicare reimbursement were CPT 28002 for incision and drainage of the foot (176.6%) and CPT 28820 for toe amputation (167.6%). Five codes had lower relative Medicaid reimbursement on average: CPT 27687 for repair procedures on the leg and ankle joint, CPT 28810 for amputation procedures on the foot and toes, CPT 28010 for toe tenotomy, CPT 28005 for incision procedures on the foot and toes, and CPT 28470 for closed treatment of a metatarsal fracture. The coefficient of variation values ranged from 0.34 to 0.84 in the Medicaid group and 0.40 to 0.78 in the adjusted group, indicating high variability between states and between procedures. Conclusion: Medicaid reimbursement is highly inconsistent between states, ranging from 37% to 324% of Medicare. Medicaid reimbursed more than Medicare overall, which is in contrast with most published findings that tend to show higher reimbursement for Medicare when compared to Medicaid. When adjusting for wage differences between states, Medicare reimbursed slightly higher than Medicaid. Level of Evidence: Level IV, economic analysis.

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between cannabis use and postoperative complications following ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using a large national insurance database from 2010 to 2022 was conducted. All patients who underwent ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis with at least 2 years’ follow-up were included. Patients were divided into 4 groups: cannabis-only users, tobacco-only users, cannabis and tobacco users, and nonuser controls. Groups were matched 1:4 with nonuser controls based on demographic variables and comorbidities. Also, both cannabis and tobacco users were matched 1:4 with tobacco-only users based on demographics and comorbidities. Medical complications within 90 days of surgery and surgery-specific complications within 2 years were compared between groups with multivariable logistic regressions. Results: Compared with nonuser controls, cannabis users only were not at increased risk of 90-day medical complications or 2-year surgical complications. Tobacco use alone was associated with increased risk of postoperative admission (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.21-1.43) and emergency department (ED) utilization (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.48-1.66) within 90 days as well as infection (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.18-1.30), hardware removal (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18), nonunion (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.27-1.40), and wound dehiscence (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27-1.49) within 2 years of surgery compared with nonuser controls. Compared with tobacco-only use, combined cannabis and tobacco use was associated with increased risk of ED visits within 90 days (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.30-1.62) and nonunion within 2 years of surgery (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.35). Conclusion: These findings suggest that although cannabis use alone was not associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications, its concurrent use with tobacco was linked to greater rates of adverse outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective case control study.

Purpose To use the All of Us database to investigate barriers to health care access for patients with meniscus tears and to examine how specific demographic, socioeconomic, and health‐related factors independently influence their health care utilization. Methods The National Institutes of Health All of Us database was queried for patient data between March 2017 and March 2023 to form a cohort of patients with meniscal tears. Patients with meniscal tears were identified using Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine clinical terms. All patients with self‐reported meniscus tears were included, with no exclusion criteria to ensure a diverse representation of underrepresented individuals. Patient responses to the “Healthcare Access and Utilization Survey” were analyzed across 4 domains: “delayed care,” “could not afford care,” “skipped medication,” and “have not seen a provider in over one year.” Results In total, 5,671 survey respondents with meniscal tears were included for analysis from a population of 436,000 eligible records. Among them, 27.7% reported delayed care, 23.9% were unable to afford care, 11.8% skipped medication, and 2.0% had not seen a provider in over a year. Patients with annual incomes under $50,000 were more likely to delay care (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; P < .001), be unable to afford care (OR, 1.73; P < .001), or skip medications (OR, 1.79; P < .001). Younger age than the cohort mean of 65.4 years, female sex, and poor physical and mental health were associated with impaired access in at least 1 care domain. Conclusions Over one‐fourth of patients with a diagnosis of meniscus tear who responded to the All of Us “Healthcare Access and Utilization Survey” reported difficulties with access to care across 4 domains, with those of low income, younger age, female sex, and poor mental or physical health experiencing significant barriers to care. Clinical Relevance This research can inform strategies for equitable treatment of meniscal injuries by highlighting disparities in orthopaedic care access and utilization.

Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Objective: The objective of this study was to quantify the rates of complication following surgical treatment for symptomatic degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis and to examine the association between slip reduction and complication rates. Summary of Background Data: It is unclear if the degree of spondylolisthesis reduction during lumbar spine fusion in adults influences the rate of surgical complications. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 1-level and 2-level adult fusion patients with degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis. The degree of reduction and complications were calculated, and complication rates between those with and without reduction were compared. Results: The surgical reduction was improved by 1 Meyerding grade in 56.5% of the 140 patients included in this analysis. Of those patients, 60% had a grade 1 spondylolisthesis. In addition, 62.5% of grade 2 slips had an improvement by 1 grade. Surgical reduction during lumbar fusion did not result in a higher rate of complications compared with in situ fusion. Conclusions: During 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusion for degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis, a 1-grade reduction of the slip was achieved in 56% of patients in this retrospective case series. Reduction of the spondylolisthesis was not associated with a higher rate of complication when compared with in situ fusion. Level of Evidence: Level IV.