Gill, Vikram S.

Background: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) has undergone numerous changes to promote care for patients at high social risk. However, the effect of these changes on surgeon MIPS performance and caseload selection remains unclear. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate how orthopaedic surgeon MIPS scores, demographics, practice characteristics, and patient populations varied on the basis of patient social risk in 2017 compared with 2021. Methods: CMS data were utilized to examine U.S. orthopaedic surgeons. Surgeons were placed into social-risk quintiles on the basis of the proportion of their patients who were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, with the highest quintile representing the highest social risk. Demographics, practice location characteristics, patient data, and MIPS performance were assessed for the years 2017 and 2021. Differences between social-risk quintiles were assessed utilizing chi-square, Student t, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results: In 2017, surgeons with caseloads at the highest, compared with the lowest, social risk had lower MIPS performance scores (mean [and standard deviation], 66.0 ± 37.6 versus 70.1 ± 33.5; p < 0.001). However, in 2021, orthopaedic surgeons with caseloads at the highest, compared with the lowest, social risk had significantly higher MIPS performance scores (mean, 88.7 ± 16.9 versus 81.5 ± 18.3; p < 0.001). In terms of demographics, in 2021, orthopaedic surgeons with caseloads at the highest, compared with the lowest, social risk were more often women (9.2% versus 3.6%; p < 0.001), more often had a DO degree (11.2% versus 6.6%; p < 0.001), more recently graduated from medical school (mean, 23.0 ± 12.9 versus 25.7 ± 10.9 years; p < 0.001), and worked in areas with higher Distressed Communities Index (DCI) distress scores (mean, 56.9 ± 27.3 versus 35.1 ± 25.2; p < 0.001). Similar findings were present in 2017. Conclusions: The addition of the Complex Patient Bonus to the MIPS in 2020 may have reduced performance inequities in MIPS scoring for surgeons with caseloads at high social risk. However, the demographics and practice patterns of the orthopaedic surgeons caring for populations at the highest social risk remained consistent between years. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Purpose To evaluate which patient factors are associated with specific metrics of poor access to care in patients with a rotator cuff tear (RCT). Methods The All of Us Database was utilized to form a cohort of patients with RCT between May 2018 and May 2023. Patients with a diagnosis of RCT using Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine clinical terms were included. The association of RCT diagnosis and patient‐specific factors on self‐reported outcomes of “delayed care,” “could not afford care,” “skipped medication,” and “have not seen provider in more than 1 year” were analyzed. Statistical tests performed were univariate regression and multivariable logistic regression. Results In total, 4,265 patients with RCT who completed the access to care survey were included. In the RCT cohort, 26.7% reported delayed care, 24.9% reported an inability to afford care, 12.1% reported skipped medications, and 1.7% reported not seeing a provider in more than 1 year. Multivariable analysis of patient treatment and demographic features revealed younger age, female sex, lower income, poor physical health, and poor mental health to be strongly associated with higher reported rates of delayed care, inability to afford care, and skipped medications. History of rotator cuff repair, marital status, and sexual orientation were not associated with reported poor access to care. Conclusions A quarter of patients with rotator cuff tears report delays in overall medical care and inability to afford care. Among patients diagnosed with RCT, patients of younger age, female sex, low income, and poor physical and mental health have higher odds of decreased access to health care. Clinical Relevance Health care disparities and access to care are topics that should be investigated to reduce them.

Background Value-based care payment and delivery models such as the recently implemented Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) aim to both provide better care for patients and reduce costs of care. Gender disparities across orthopaedic surgery, encompassing reimbursement, industry payments, referrals, and patient perception, have been thoroughly studied over the years, with numerous disparities identified. However, differences in MIPS performance based on orthopaedic surgeon gender have not been comprehensively evaluated. Questions/purposes After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as experience, geography, group size, and Medicare beneficiary characteristics, does MIPS performance differ between men and women orthopaedic surgeons? Methods The Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners and the Physician Compare databases were queried for years 2017, the first year MIPS was incorporated, and 2021, the most recent year with MIPS data published, to identify all physicians with a self-reported specialty of orthopaedic surgery. Together, these databases include all physicians who submitted at least 11 Medicare claims each year. Physician gender, US census region, years in practice, group practice size, billing practices, and patient demographic characteristics were collected for each surgeon. The MIPS Performance database was used to extract an overall MIPS performance score for each surgeon for each year. Payment adjustments, which are determined based on overall MIPS performance score, were derived for each surgeon based on the thresholds published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Payment adjustments include a negative adjustment, neutral adjustment, positive adjustment, or exceptional performance bonus and are associated with different thresholds each year. Statistical differences based on surgeon gender were assessed utilizing chi-square tests for categorical data, Student t-test for parametric continuous data, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for nonparametric continuous data. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze the relationship between surgeon gender and MIPS performance. Results After controlling for other patient and surgeon variables, woman gender was associated with a slightly increased MIPS performance score in 2021 (β 1.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 3.00]; p = 0.047). However, this finding was statistically fragile, with the lower bound 95% CI being very close to the line of no difference. No association between surgeon gender and MIPS performance score was found in 2017 (β 2.2 [95% CI -0.5 to 4.9]; p = 0.11). Additionally, no relationship was found between gender and receiving either an exceptional performance MIPS bonus or a MIPS penalty in either year. Conclusion Women orthopaedic surgeons scored slightly higher on the MIPS in 2021, after controlling for surgeon and patient variables, despite providing care for a higher percentage of dual Medicare-Medicaid eligible patients and more medically complex patients. However, this finding was statistically fragile, with a small effect size, a 95% CI close to 0, and no consistent association in MIPS performance in 2017. Additionally, with no differences in MIPS performance bonuses or penalties, the clinical monetary impact of this difference may be minimal. Clinical Relevance The observed association between surgeon gender and MIPS performance scores in 2021, with women orthopaedic surgeons achieving slightly higher scores, raises interesting questions about potential differences in practice behaviors, communication styles, care quality, or other unmeasured variables. These findings may reflect true differences in how care is delivered or documented as scored by the MIPS. However, given the small effect size, statistical fragility, and inconsistency across years, there is a chance that this finding may be spurious. That being so, future research should aim to validate or refute these findings by examining a broader range of variables including documentation practices, practice behaviors, institutional differences, potential systemic biases in scoring methodologies, and patient outcomes. Understanding whether these differences are true is important to ensure that performance metrics like MIPS accurately and equitably reflect care quality.

Purpose To use the All of Us database to investigate barriers to health care access for patients with meniscus tears and to examine how specific demographic, socioeconomic, and health‐related factors independently influence their health care utilization. Methods The National Institutes of Health All of Us database was queried for patient data between March 2017 and March 2023 to form a cohort of patients with meniscal tears. Patients with meniscal tears were identified using Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine clinical terms. All patients with self‐reported meniscus tears were included, with no exclusion criteria to ensure a diverse representation of underrepresented individuals. Patient responses to the “Healthcare Access and Utilization Survey” were analyzed across 4 domains: “delayed care,” “could not afford care,” “skipped medication,” and “have not seen a provider in over one year.” Results In total, 5,671 survey respondents with meniscal tears were included for analysis from a population of 436,000 eligible records. Among them, 27.7% reported delayed care, 23.9% were unable to afford care, 11.8% skipped medication, and 2.0% had not seen a provider in over a year. Patients with annual incomes under $50,000 were more likely to delay care (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; P < .001), be unable to afford care (OR, 1.73; P < .001), or skip medications (OR, 1.79; P < .001). Younger age than the cohort mean of 65.4 years, female sex, and poor physical and mental health were associated with impaired access in at least 1 care domain. Conclusions Over one‐fourth of patients with a diagnosis of meniscus tear who responded to the All of Us “Healthcare Access and Utilization Survey” reported difficulties with access to care across 4 domains, with those of low income, younger age, female sex, and poor mental or physical health experiencing significant barriers to care. Clinical Relevance This research can inform strategies for equitable treatment of meniscal injuries by highlighting disparities in orthopaedic care access and utilization.

Abstract The study of prehabilitation and rehabilitation ([p]rehabilitation) to alleviate the sequelae of bladder cancer and its treatment has generated numerous opportunities to improve the quality of life of bladder cancer survivors. The authors conducted a scoping review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to identify knowledge gaps in and research directions for (p)rehabilitative support for those affected by bladder cancer. The authors systematically searched six databases and synthesized key findings from RCTs conducted from January 1, 2004, through March 15, 2022, that enrolled participants with bladder cancer, survivors, or caregivers in outpatient (p)rehabilitative programs (e.g., exercise, nutrition, or psychological support). Outcomes were characterized according to eight prespecified, clinically relevant categories. The search retrieved 10,968 records, 27 of which met the inclusion criteria, and 24 described unique RCTs with 2471 enrolled participants. Of 24 interventions, 17 (71%) yielded statistically significant results for the outcome of interest. Only one RCT included a cost‐effectiveness analysis, and only two characterized the efficacy of interventions for caregivers. Of 11 RCTs involving psychological support, eight yielded statistically significant results, as did nine of 11 RCTs with physical exercise interventions, three of four RCTs with educational interventions, three of four RCTs with nutritional support interventions, one of two RCTs with pharmacologic medications, and zero of one RCT with physical therapy. The most promising interventions for inclusion in multimodal, personalized (p)rehabilitation programs included exercise, stress management training, cognitive training, smoking and alcohol cessation counseling, immunonutrition, stoma education, and penile rehabilitation. Further studies of the cost effectiveness and efficacy for caregivers of such interventions are needed. Plain Language Summary In a scoping review of all randomized clinical trials involving prehabilitative or rehabilitative diet, exercise, and psychological support interventions for patients with bladder cancer, survivors, and their caregivers, 17 of 24 (71%) interventions yielded statistically significant improvements in the outcome of interest. Clinicians should consider implementing such interventions for those affected by bladder cancer.

Purpose To evaluate how arthroscopic meniscectomy utilization, reimbursement, physician billing practices, and patient populations have changed within the Medicare population from 2013 to 2021 at a national level and regional level. Methods The Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners database was queried for all episodes of 2‐compartment and single‐compartment arthroscopic meniscectomy between 2013 and 2021. Utilization per 10,000 beneficiaries and average inflation‐adjusted reimbursement were assessed. Physician practice styles, measured through changes in the services billed, and Medicare beneficiary demographic characteristics were extracted each year. The Kruskal‐Wallis test was performed to compare regions. Results Between 2013 and 2021, two‐compartment meniscectomy utilization per 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries declined by 54.9% and single‐compartment meniscectomy utilization declined by 54.2%. Average reimbursement declined by 9.3% and 12.5% for 2‐compartment meniscectomy and single‐compartment meniscectomy, respectively. In 2021, the South had the highest utilization of both 2‐compartment (3.8/10,000) and single‐compartment (4.7/10,000) meniscectomies while having the lowest average reimbursement for 2‐compartment meniscectomy ($383.02, P < .001). Nationally, the average number of beneficiaries per surgeon performing single‐compartment meniscectomy declined by 3.8% whereas the average number of billable services performed per beneficiary increased by 46.6%. The comorbidity risk score of these patients decreased by 8.7%, with the West having the healthiest patients in 2021. Conclusions Meniscectomy utilization and reimbursement have been declining nationally within the Medicare population. Surgeons in the South performed the most meniscectomies while having among the lowest reimbursement. The practice patterns of surgeons performing meniscectomies have been changing, with surgeons performing nearly 50% more total billable services per beneficiary while performing fewer unique billable services. Additionally, the patient population of surgeons who perform meniscectomy was healthier in 2021 than in 2013. Clinical Relevance This study highlights changes in meniscectomy utilization and reimbursement over time in the face of changing evidence of meniscectomy use in elderly patients and new Medicare legislature regarding reimbursement.

Purpose To systematically review the existing literature on the functional performance of athletes at the time of return‐to‐sport (RTS) clearance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed. The inclusion criteria were original research reports with study populations of athletes who had undergone ACLR and had undergone objective functional testing immediately after clearance to RTS. Functional testing was stratified by hop tests, strength tests, kinetic assessment, and kinematic assessment, and data were extracted from each study using a standardized template. Results Of the 937 unique studies identified, 46 met the inclusion criteria. The average time between ACLR and functional testing was 7.9 months among the included studies. In 10 of 17 studies, patients were found to have an average quadriceps strength limb symmetry index of less than 90%. However, only 2 of 12 studies found the average hop test limb symmetry index to be less than 90%. Kinematics included reduced knee flexion angle and increased trunk flexion on landing in ACLR patients compared with matched controls. On evaluation of kinetics, ACLR patients showed reduced peak vertical ground reaction force, lower peak knee extension and knee flexion moments, and altered energy absorption contribution compared with matched controls. Conclusions This systematic review suggests that athletes show functional deficits at the time of RTS at an average of 7.9 months after ACLR. Traditional functional tests, such as strength and hop tests, are not able to accurately identify patients who continue to show deficits. The most common biomechanical deficits that persist after RTS clearance include diminished peak knee extension moment, decreased knee flexion angle, increased trunk flexion angle, reduced vertical ground reaction force, and increased hamstring central activation ratio during various functional gait and landing tasks. Level of Evidence Level III, systematic review of Level I to III studies.

Purpose To systematically review the relationship between functional testing at the time of return to sport (RTS) and short‐term outcomes, such as second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and return to a preinjury level of sport, among athletes who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies examining athletes who underwent functional RTS testing and were followed for at least 12 months following ACLR. Studies were screened by 2 reviewers. A standardized template was used to extract information regarding study characteristics, ACLR information, functional test results, and risk factors associated with retear or reduced RTS. Results Of the 937 studies identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria. The average time between ACLR and RTS testing was 8.5 months. Single leg hop for distance performance had no association with retear risk in any study and no association with RTS rates in most studies. Quadriceps strength had conflicting results in relation to retear risk, whereas it had no relationship with RTS rates. Rates of reinjury and RTS were similar between patients who passed and did not pass combined hop and strength batteries. Asymmetric knee extension and hip moments, along with increased knee valgus and knee flexion angles, demonstrated increased risk of retear. Conclusions Individual hop and strength tests that are often used in RTS protocols following ACLR may have limited and inconsistent value in predicting ACL reinjury and reduced RTS when used in isolation. Combined hop and strength test batteries also demonstrate low sensitivity and negative predictive value, highlighting conflicting evidence to suggest RTS testing algorithm superiority. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level I‐IV studies.

Objectives: Injuries to the foot and ankle are more common in National Basketball Association (NBA) basketball compared to other professional sports. The goal of this study is to report the incidence and associated risk factors of foot and ankle injuries in the NBA athletes. Methods: Foot and ankle injury data from the 2015-16 through 2020-21 NBA seasons was queried and verified using a publicly available database. The truncated 2019-20 season was omitted from this study due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcome was the incidence of foot and ankle injuries, reported per 1000 game exposures (GEs). Secondary analysis was performed to identify risk factors for ankle injuries through bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression of player demographics, performance statistics, injury characteristics, and previous lower extremity injuries. Additionally, factors influencing the length of absence were assessed via negative binomial regression. Results: There were 728 structural foot and ankle injuries (5.34 per 1000 GEs) sustained by NBA players over 5 NBA seasons, with sprain/strain as the most common injury type (4.27 per 1000 GEs) (Table 1). The majority of ankle injury events (55%) resulted in 2-10 game absences (Table 4). The likelihood of sustaining an ankle injury was significantly associated with a greater number of games played, previous upper leg injury, and more games missed due to injury (Table 2). Increased length of absence due to ankle injury was significantly associated with greater height, minutes per game, usage rate, points per game, total rebounds per game, and a prior history of foot, ankle, and knee injuries (Table 3). Conclusions: The incidence of foot and ankle injuries was 5.34 per 1000 GEs in professional basketball players. Games played and previous history of upper leg injuries were found to be risk factors for ankle injuries. Factors associated with physiologic burden such as minutes per game and usage rate were associated with an increased severity of injury. [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

Background: Ankle injuries are more common in the National Basketball Association (NBA) compared with other professional sports. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to report the incidence and associated risk factors of ankle injuries in NBA athletes. It was hypothesized that factors associated with an increased physiologic burden, such as minutes per game (MPG), usage rate, and associated lower extremity injury, would be associated with increased ankle injury risk and time loss. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Ankle injury data from the 2015-2016 through 2020-2021 NBA seasons were evaluated. The truncated 2019-2020 season due to the COVID-19 pandemic was omitted. The primary outcome was the incidence of ankle injuries, reported per 1000 game-exposures (GEs). Secondary analysis was performed to identify risk factors for ankle injuries through bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression of player demographic characteristics, performance statistics, injury characteristics, and previous lower extremity injuries. Factors influencing the time loss after injury were assessed via a negative binomial regression analysis. Results: A total of 554 ankle injuries (4.06 injuries per 1000 GEs) were sustained by NBA players over 5 NBA seasons, with sprain/strain the most common injury type (3.71 injuries per 1000 GEs). The majority of ankle injury events (55%) resulted in 2 to 10 game absences. The likelihood of sustaining an ankle injury was significantly associated with a greater number of games played ( P = .029) and previous injury to the hip, hamstring, or quadriceps ( P = .004). Increased length of absence due to ankle injury was associated with greater height ( P = .019), MPG ( P < .001), usage rate ( P = .025), points per game ( P = .011), and a prior history of foot ( P = .003), ankle ( P < .001), and knee injuries ( P < .001). Conclusion: The incidence of ankle injuries was 4.06 per 1000 GEs in professional basketball players. Games played and prior history of hip, hamstring, or quadriceps injuries were found to be risk factors for ankle injuries. Factors associated with physiologic burden such as MPG and usage rate were associated with an increased time loss after injury.