Back to Authors

Van Ligten, Matthew J

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.

Citations 2

Exercise, nutrition, and psychological support for kidney cancer: a scoping review
Briggs, Logan , Gill, Vikram S., Ligten, Matthew J. Van, Beck, Kelsey L., Sinha, D.T. , Choudry, Mouneeb, Bain, Paul , Quillen, Jaxon , Abdul‐Muhsin, Haidar, Andrews, Paul E. , Briggs, Logan G , Van Ligten, Matthew J, Sinha, Debarshi, Dodoo, Christopher A, Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar M , Trinh, Quoc-Dien , Parke, Sara C. , Gill, Vikram S., Ligten, Matthew J. Van, Beck, Kelsey L., Alkhatib, Khalid Y. , Dodoo, Christopher , Pierorazio, Phillip , Trinh, Quoc‐Dien , Psutka, Sarah P.

BJU International | January 19, 2026 | Volume: 137 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 579-595

10.1111/bju.70134 Get It

Objectives To comprehensively review the available literature on prehabilitation and rehabilitation exercise, nutrition, and psychological support interventions for patients with kidney cancer (KC), to summarise the clinically relevant efficacy and cost‐effectiveness of interventions, to expose key knowledge gaps, and to inform future investigations and initiatives. Methods This review was performed according to the per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews Guidelines. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing programmes of prehabilitation or rehabilitation, exercise, psychological support, or nutrition components in patients with KC or KC caregivers from January 2004 to March 2022. Statistically significant positive (SS+) and negative (SS−) results were summarised. Results The systematic search yielded 10 968 records including 18 RCTs, involving 2774 unique subjects, 706 of whom were KC patients/survivors. None included caregivers or assessed cost‐effectiveness. Two interventions were implemented before surgery, one was implemented prior to initiation of systemic therapy, eight were implemented during systemic or radiation therapy, three were implemented after treatment, while implementation time was not specified for four interventions. Conclusion Most (14/18) RCTs involving exercise, nutrition, psychological support, or prehabilitative or rehabilitative programmes for KC performed to date demonstrated SS+ results. The evidence was most robust regarding previously evaluated psychological support, especially mindfulness‐based interventions (9/10 studies demonstrating SS+ improvement in primary outcomes), followed by therapeutically valid exercise with/without psychological support (5/8 RCTs demonstrated efficacy), then nutrition or pharmacological interventions (2/5 demonstrated efficacy). Level 1 evidence supports counselling patients and referral to mindfulness‐based psychological therapy along with physical therapy or physical medicine and rehabilitation, as well as consideration of preoperative carbohydrate drinks. No studies have examined impact on caregivers, or cost‐effectiveness, which are both critical areas for future study.
Prehabilitative/rehabilitative exercise, nutrition, and psychological support for bladder cancer: A scoping review of randomized clinical trials
Parke, Sara C. , Beck, Kelsey L., Sinha, Debarshi, Ligten, Matthew J. Van, Bain, Paul , Tyson, Mark D. , Abdul‐Muhsin, Haidar , Quillen, Jaxon , Luigi, Arthur Jason De , Branstiter, Nikki L., Briggs, Logan G , Parke, Sara C , Gill, Vikram, Van Ligten, Matthew J, Quillen, Jaxon K, Dodoo, Christopher A, Psutka, Sarah P , Briggs, Logan , Sinha, Debarshi, Gill, Vikram S. , Dodoo, Christopher , Trinh, Quoc‐Dien , Psutka, Sarah P.

Cancer | November 3, 2024 | Volume: 131 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/cncr.35608 Get It

Abstract The study of prehabilitation and rehabilitation ([p]rehabilitation) to alleviate the sequelae of bladder cancer and its treatment has generated numerous opportunities to improve the quality of life of bladder cancer survivors. The authors conducted a scoping review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to identify knowledge gaps in and research directions for (p)rehabilitative support for those affected by bladder cancer. The authors systematically searched six databases and synthesized key findings from RCTs conducted from January 1, 2004, through March 15, 2022, that enrolled participants with bladder cancer, survivors, or caregivers in outpatient (p)rehabilitative programs (e.g., exercise, nutrition, or psychological support). Outcomes were characterized according to eight prespecified, clinically relevant categories. The search retrieved 10,968 records, 27 of which met the inclusion criteria, and 24 described unique RCTs with 2471 enrolled participants. Of 24 interventions, 17 (71%) yielded statistically significant results for the outcome of interest. Only one RCT included a cost‐effectiveness analysis, and only two characterized the efficacy of interventions for caregivers. Of 11 RCTs involving psychological support, eight yielded statistically significant results, as did nine of 11 RCTs with physical exercise interventions, three of four RCTs with educational interventions, three of four RCTs with nutritional support interventions, one of two RCTs with pharmacologic medications, and zero of one RCT with physical therapy. The most promising interventions for inclusion in multimodal, personalized (p)rehabilitation programs included exercise, stress management training, cognitive training, smoking and alcohol cessation counseling, immunonutrition, stoma education, and penile rehabilitation. Further studies of the cost effectiveness and efficacy for caregivers of such interventions are needed. Plain Language Summary In a scoping review of all randomized clinical trials involving prehabilitative or rehabilitative diet, exercise, and psychological support interventions for patients with bladder cancer, survivors, and their caregivers, 17 of 24 (71%) interventions yielded statistically significant improvements in the outcome of interest. Clinicians should consider implementing such interventions for those affected by bladder cancer.