Julsgaard, Mette

Abstract Background JAK inhibitors (JAKi) are small molecules that cross the placenta from early pregnancy.1 Evidence on the safety of in utero JAKi exposure remains limited, particularly regarding pregnancy outcomes, infant infections, vaccine responses, and early development.2, 3 Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective study within the ECCO CONFER network, including pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exposed to tofacitinib (TOFA), upadacitinib (UPA), or filgotinib (FILGO). Data were collected from 22 centers across 16 countries and included maternal characteristics, disease activity, medication patterns, and pregnancy and infant outcomes. Results Among 55 JAKi exposed pregnancies, 21 (38.2%) were unplanned and 30 (54.6%) had active disease. Nine women (16.4%) initiated JAKi during pregnancy. Overall, 38 (69.1%) received TOFA, 15 (27.3%) UPA, and 2 (3.6%) FILGO; 39 (70.9%) continued treatment throughout pregnancy. JAKi discontinuation in 1st-2nd trimester led to disease activity in 9/16 cases (56.3%). Maternal complication risk was low: no DVT or (pre) eclampsia occurred; three cases of premature rupture of membranes (GA 34–37) and four required hospitalizations due to infection or other complications. A total of 10 abortions occurred - five spontaneous (9.1%) and five induced (9.1%), including three due to concern about JAKi exposure. Among 45 live births, two infants (3.6%) were preterm, four (7.3%) small for gestational age, and two (3.6%) had Apgar <7 at 5 minutes. No congenital abnormalities were reported. Infant follow-up findings are summarized in Table 1. One-third of breastfeeding women continued JAKi postpartum. A high adherence rate to the national immunization schedule was seen. Eight (19.5%) received the live BCG-vaccine within the first 30 days of life. No adverse events followed live or inactivated vaccines, and no malignancies were observed. Conclusion In this global cohort of JAKi-exposed pregnancies in women with IBD, maternal complication rates were low, and no increased risk of adverse outcomes among live births was identified. While disease activity was common, particularly following discontinuation of JAKi, infant outcomes - including development, infection risk, and vaccine response - were reassuring. These findings provide important preliminary safety data to inform decision-making regarding JAKi use in pregnancy, though prospective studies are needed to confirm long-term safety. References: 1.Fein KC, Arral ML, Kim JS, et al. Placental drug transport and fetal exposure during pregnancy is determined by drug molecular size, chemistry, and conformation. J Control Release 2023;361:29–39. 2.Torres J, Chaparro M, Julsgaard M, et al. European Crohn’s and Colitis Guidelines on Sexuality, Fertility, Pregnancy, and Lactation. J Crohns Colitis 2023;17:1–27. 3.Mahadevan U, Seow CH, Barnes EL, et al. Global Consensus Statement on the Management of Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2025;epub ahead of print. Conflict of interest: Julsgaard, Mette: No conflict of interest Baunwall, Simon MD: No conflict of interest Seow, Cynthia: No conflict of interest Duricova, Dana: No conflict of interest Kane, Sunanda: No conflict of interest Zacharias, Neha: No conflict of interest Leong, Rupert: No conflict of interest Cremer, Anneline: No conflict of interest Kok, Klaartje: No conflict of interest Kagramanova, Anna Valeryevna: No conflict of interest Pipek, Barbora: No conflict of interest Candido, Kristina: No conflict of interest Cooney, Rachel: No conflict of interest Filip, Rafal: No conflict of interest Kiudelis, Vytautas: No conflict of interest Konečný, Michal: No conflict of interest Paramsothy, Sudarshan: No conflict of interest Pugliese, Daniela: No conflict of interest Oliveira Santana Silva, Genoile: Honoraria - Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, Ferring, Takeda. Research - Abivax, Takeda, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Sanofi, Polpharma. Advisory board - Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, MSD. Savarino, Edoardo Vincenzo: No conflict of interest Smolovic, Brigita: No conflict of interest Vieujean, Sophie: No conflict of interest Wei, Shu Chen: No conflict of interest Mahadevan-Velayos, Uma: No conflict of interest

Background & aims Pregnancy can be a complex and risk filled event for women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). High-quality studies in this population are lacking, with limited data on medications approved to treat IBD during pregnancy. For patients, limited knowledge surrounding pregnancy impacts pregnancy rates, medication adherence, and outcomes. Limited provider knowledge leads to highly varied practices in care affected by local dogma, available resources, individual interpretation of the literature, and fear of harming the fetus. The variations in guidelines by different societies and countries reflect this and lead to confusion for physicians and patients alike. The Global Consensus Consortium is a group of 39 IBD and content experts and 7 patient advocates from 6 continents who convened to review and assess current data and come to an agreement on best practices based on these data. Methods The GRADE process was used when sufficient published data were available and the RAND process in those instances where expert opinion was needed to guide consistent practice. Recommendations were informed by the guiding principle that maternal health best supports infant health. Results The topics were divided into ten categories with 34 GRADE recommendations and 35 Consensus statements. Conclusions Overall, the goal of the group was to provide data-driven and practical guidance to improve the care of women with IBD around the globe based on the best available research.

Abstract Background & Aims Pregnancy can be a complex and risk-filled event for women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). High-quality studies in this population are lacking, with limited data on medications approved to treat IBD during pregnancy. For patients, limited knowledge surrounding pregnancy impacts pregnancy rates, medication adherence, and outcomes. Limited provider knowledge leads to highly varied practices in care affected by local dogma, available resources, individual interpretation of the literature, and fear of harming the fetus. The variations in guidelines by different societies and countries reflect this and lead to confusion for physicians and patients alike. The Global Consensus Consortium is a group of 39 IBD and content experts and 7 patient advocates from 6 continents who convened to review and assess current data and come to an agreement on best practices based on these data. Methods The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) process was used when sufficient published data were available and the RAND (Research and Development) process in those instances where expert opinion was needed to guide consistent practice. Recommendations were informed by the guiding principle that maternal health best supports infant health. Results The topics were divided into ten categories with 34 GRADE recommendations and 35 consensus statements. Conclusions Overall, the goal of the group was to provide data-driven and practical guidance to improve the care of women with IBD around the globe based on the best available research.

ABSTRACT Background & Aims Pregnancy can be a complex and risk filled event for women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). High‐quality studies in this population are lacking, with limited data on medications approved to treat IBD during pregnancy. For patients, limited knowledge surrounding pregnancy impacts pregnancy rates, medication adherence, and outcomes. Limited provider knowledge leads to highly varied practices in care affected by local dogma, available resources, individual interpretation of the literature, and fear of harming the fetus. The variations in guidelines by different societies and countries reflect this and lead to confusion for physicians and patients alike. The Global Consensus Consortium is a group of 39 IBD and content experts and 7 patient advocates from 6 continents who convened to review and assess current data and come to an agreement on best practices based on these data. Methods The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) process was used when sufficient published data were available and the RAND process in those instances where expert opinion was needed to guide consistent practice. Recommendations were informed by the guiding principle that maternal health best supports infant health. Results The topics were divided into ten categories with 34 GRADE recommendations and 35 consensus statements. Conclusions Overall, the goal of the group was to provide data‐driven and practical guidance to improve the care of women with IBD around the globe based on the best available research.

Introduction: Pregnancy can be a complex and risk filled event for women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). High-quality studies in this population are lacking, with limited data on medications approved to treat IBD during pregnancy. For patients, limited knowledge surrounding pregnancy impacts pregnancy rates, medication adherence, and outcomes. Limited provider knowledge leads to highly varied practices in care affected by local dogma, available resources, individual interpretation of the literature, and fear of harming the fetus. The variations in guidelines by different societies and countries reflect this and lead to confusion for physicians and patients alike. The Global Consensus Consortium is a group of 39 IBD and content experts and 7 patient advocates from 6 continents who convened to review and assess current data and come to an agreement on best practices based on these data. Methods: The GRADE process was used when sufficient published data were available and the RAND process in those instances where expert opinion was needed to guide consistent practice. Recommendations were informed by the guiding principle that maternal health best supports infant health. Results: The topics were divided into 10 categories with 34 GRADE recommendations and 35 Consensus statements. Discussion: Overall, the goal of the group was to provide data-driven and practical guidance to improve the care of women with IBD around the globe based on the best available research.

Abstract Background & Aims Pregnancy can be a complex and risk-filled event for women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). High-quality studies in this population are lacking, with limited data on medications approved to treat IBD during pregnancy. For patients, limited knowledge surrounding pregnancy impacts pregnancy rates, medication adherence, and outcomes. Limited provider knowledge leads to highly varied practices in care affected by local dogma, available resources, individual interpretation of the literature, and fear of harming the fetus. The variations in guidelines by different societies and countries reflect this and lead to confusion for physicians and patients alike. The Global Consensus Consortium is a group of 39 IBD and content experts and 7 patient advocates from 6 continents who convened to review and assess current data and come to an agreement on best practices based on these data. Methods The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) process was used when sufficient published data were available and the RAND (Research and Development) process in those instances where expert opinion was needed to guide consistent practice. Recommendations were informed by the guiding principle that maternal health best supports infant health. Results The topics were divided into ten categories with 34 GRADE recommendations and 35 consensus statements. Conclusions Overall, the goal of the group was to provide data-driven and practical guidance to improve the care of women with IBD around the globe based on the best available research.