Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1048 citation(s) found for "Ma, Jin".

Timing the onset of homologous recombination deficiency before breast cancer diagnosis
Andreopoulos, Michail , Niu, Muchun , Zhang, Yang, Gulhan, D. , Zong, Chenghang , Gulhan, Doga , Zhang, Yang, Viswanadham, Vinay , Jin, Hu , Batalini, Felipe , Wulf, Gerburg M. , Park, Peter J. , Głodzik, Dominik

No container title available | October 19, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1101/2025.10.17.683157 Get It

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, whether inherited or somatically acquired, cause homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in tumor cells. The timing of HRD onset in the emerging tumor lineage is unknown. Here, we present HRDTimer, an algorithm to infer the onset of HRD-driven mutagenesis prior to cancer diagnosis. We estimate that HRD arises at 34% of SBS1-based molecular time---corresponding to a median of 8.3 years (IQR 7.1--10.4) prior to diagnosis in triple-negative breast cancers, and 15.0 years (IQR 12.0--20.6) in ER-positive breast cancers. Bulk sequencing reveals accelerated SBS1 accumulation following neoplastic transformation compared to normal tissue, influencing the estimated age of HRD onset. Single-cell duplex sequencing confirms SBS1 acceleration in tumors and further shows that non-tumor cells largely lack the HRD signature, indicating that HRD is rare in pre-malignant cells, even in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Together, our analysis pinpoints the onset of HRD before diagnosis, defining a window for detection and potential interception.
Novel differentially expressed genes and multiple biological pathways for Alzheimer's disease identified in brain tissue from African American donors
Labadorf, Adam , O’Neill, Nicholas K. , Dugger, Brittany N. , Frosch, Matthew P. , Gearing, Marla, Jin, Lee‐Way, Kofler, Julia , Mayeux, Richard , McKee, Ann C. , Miller, Carol A., Murray, Melissa E. , Nelson, Peter T. , Perrin, Richard J. , Tobunluepop, Katarnut, Troncoso, Juan C. , Murray, Melissa E , Dugger, Brittany N , Logue, Mark W. , Dickson, Dennis W. , Flanagan, Margaret E. , Gearing, Marla , Schneider, Julie A. , Stein, Thor D. , Teich, Andrew F. , Wang, Shih‐Hsiu J. , Wang, Zihan , Wolozin, Benjamin , Mez, Jesse , Farrer, Lindsay A.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | October 8, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.70629 | PMID 41059714 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Few African American (AA) donors have been included in post mortem Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies compared to European‐ancestry (EA) individuals. METHODS We generated transcriptome‐wide bulk pre‐frontal cortex (PFC) gene expression data from 125 AA donors with neuropathologically determined AD and 82 AA controls. RESULTS Transcriptome‐wide significant differential expression was observed with 482 genes. The most significant, ADAMTS2 , showed 1.52 times higher expression in AD cases ( p = 2.96x10 −8 ). Comparison of findings with those from a recent gene expression study of EA brain donors revealed substantial concordance, including ADAMTS2 . Other associations not observed in EA results may be especially relevant to AD risk in the AA population. Examination of AA AD GWAS‐implicated variants identified several expression quantitative trait loci. CONCLUSION This first large‐scale AA brain AD gene expression study identified many differentially expressed genes, including ADAMTS2 , and supports gene expression as a molecular pathway underlying the impact of several AA AD risk variants. Highlights We performed the largest African American brain tissue Alzheimer's disease (AD) gene expression study. Expression differences for 482 genes, notably ADAMTS2 , were study‐wide significant. Many significant differentially expressed genes are involved in energy metabolism. Several previously known AD‐associated variants in African Americans are eQTLs. These results advance knowledge of the genetic basis of AD in the AA population.
Utilizing EMR capabilities to improve shared decision-making regarding DPYD pharmacogenomic testing.
Sutton, Joseph , Jazieh, Khalid , Wright, Jessica , Jin, Zhaohui , Anderson, Benjamin O. , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R. , Tevaarwerk, Amyé

JCO Oncology Practice | October 7, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 10_suppl | Pages: 426-426

10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.426 Get It

426 Background: Testing for DPYD gene variations prior to administration of fluoropyrimidines ([FP] e.g. 5-FU or capecitabine) can determine if patients are at risk of significant toxicity and may benefit from dose reduction or elimination of chemotherapy. Barriers to testing include lack of recommendations in US guidelines for routine DPYD testing, absence of insurance coverage, and limitations in provider support. We designed an electronic health record (EHR)-based intervention to support shared decision-making (SDM) between providers and patients regarding DPYD testing. Methods: We built an EHR alert identifying all patients initiating FP without DPYD testing. The alert fired to remind providers upon signing FP. Clinical decision support (CDS) was included in the alert to help with DPYD testing selection along with an educational note template containing the incidence of DPYD deficiency, rationale for testing, test costs, and turnaround time. Interactions with the EHR were recorded to determine why providers declined ordering pharmacogenomic testing. Testing rates and results for patients initiating FP were collected from the EHR. Finally, providers were surveyed to determine the impact of the alert on conversations with patients as well as the utility of the embedded CDS and educational note template. Results: Within the first 8 months after alert activation, 34 patients completed DPYD testing of 444 starting FP (testing rate of 7.7%) vs the baseline testing rate in the 3 months prior to alert go-live of 6.8% (p = 0.86 via chi-squared analysis, two-tailed). Of the 34 patients, 5 were intermediate DPYD metabolizers. Reasons for alert dismissal per provider selection were: “Patient already tolerated prior fluoropyrimidines” (15.7%), “Patient declines” (12.9%), “Will order separately” (5.7%), “Not discussed as not appropriate” (5.3%), and “Not discussed, deferred” (60.4%). Thirty-nine providers (n = 77 eligible) responded to the survey; 22 prescribed FP in their practice and had encountered the alert. 21 (95.5%) of these reported the alert was “Very Useful” or “Somewhat Useful” and 18 (81.8%) used the DPYD testing options available in the alert. Sixteen (72.7%) discussed DPYD testing more frequently with patients as a result of the alert. Barriers to DPYD testing were “Concerned about the impact of lowering FP dosing” and “Lack of knowledge about DPYD testing”, while “Cost of DPYD testing” was scored lowest. Conclusions: Utilizing an EHR alert with embedded CDS had a positive impact on provider awareness and led to more discussions regarding DPYD pharmacogenomic testing with patients in line with current FDA recommendations. Limitations in provider knowledge regarding DPYD testing and concerns about lowering chemotherapy doses posed barriers to ordering testing. Further interventions including additional education are required.
Large language models for bioinformatics
Ruan, Wei, Lyu, Yanjun , Zhang, Jing , Cai, Jiazhang , Lu, Yao , Wang, Tao , Liu, Yufang , Fang, Luyang , Liu, Ziyu , Liu, Zhengliang , Li, Yiwei , Wu, Zihao , Chen, Junhao , Jiang, Hanqi, Yang, Zhenyuan, Liang, Shizhe, Zhang, Wei , Ma, Terry, Dou, Yuan , Zhang, Jianli , Gong, Xinyu , Gan, Qi , Zou, Yusong , Chen, Z. J. , Qian, Yuanxin, Yu, Shuo , Song, Kenan, Sikora, Andrea, Li, Xiang , Wang, Yingfeng , Zhong, Wenxuan, Liu, Rongjie , Huang, Chao , Shen, Ye , Yan, Yajun , Liu, Tianming, Huang, Chao , Song, Kenan , Wang, Peilong, Chen, Jingyuan, Song, Kenan , Ruan, Wei, Shu, Peng , Yang, Ge , Gao, Shang , Wang, Yue , Wang, Peilong , Zhao, Lin , Jiang, Hanqi , Pan, Yi Feng , Chen, Jingyuan , Dou, Yuan, Chen, Z. J. , Qian, Yuanxin, Jin, Lu , Wang, Xianqiao , Sikora, Andrea , Li, Gang , Li, Quanzheng , Zhang, Lu, Abate, Yohannes , He, Lifang , Zhong, Wenxuan, Liu, Wei , Ma, Ping , Zhu, Hongtu , Zhu, Dajiang

Quantitative Biology | September 29, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/qub2.70014 | PMID 41676319 Get It

Abstract With the rapid advancements in large language model technology and the emergence of bioinformatics‐specific language models (BioLMs), there is a growing need for a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape, computational characteristics, and diverse applications. This survey aims to address this need by providing a thorough review of BioLMs, focusing on their evolution, classification, and distinguishing features, alongside a detailed examination of training methodologies, datasets, and evaluation frameworks. We explore the wide‐ranging applications of BioLMs in critical areas such as disease diagnosis, drug discovery, and vaccine development, highlighting their impact and transformative potential in bioinformatics. We identify key challenges and limitations inherent in BioLMs, including data privacy and security concerns, interpretability issues, biases in training data and model outputs, and domain adaptation complexities. Finally, we highlight emerging trends and future directions, offering valuable insights to guide researchers and clinicians toward advancing BioLMs for increasingly sophisticated biological and clinical applications.
The Impact of Patient, Disease, and Social Determinants of Health on Receipt of Nonoperative Management for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma
Rummel, Keaton , Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Merrell, Kenneth W. , Mathis, Kellie L. , Waddle, Mark R. , Haddock, Michael G. , Callaghan, Cameron M. , Rummel, Keaton A , Callaghan, Cameron M , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Jin, Zhao-Hui , Xie, Hao , McKenna, Nicholas P. , Jethwa, Krishan R.

American Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 22, 2025 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 105-112

10.1097/coc.0000000000001243 | PMID 40981478 Get It

Objectives: For locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (R-ACA), a nonoperative management (NOM) approach has emerged as a guideline-supported treatment option. However, the variables associated with NOM receipt are unknown. Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with stage 1 to 3 R-ACA managed with curative intent from 2004 to 2018. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving NOM versus surgery. The secondary outcome was survival among NOM patients. Results: A total of 128,297 patients were included. In all, 115,888 (90.3%) received surgery and 12,409 (9.7%) received NOM. Receipt of NOM was associated with age above 70, Charlson-Deyo score of 0, race (Black, Asian or Pacific Islander, or other vs. White), insurance status, geographical region, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2012-2018 vs. 2004-2011), tumor grade 1 versus ≥ 2, clinical T-stage ≥ 2, and clinical N1 or N2 versus N0. In the NOM cohort, poorer overall survival was associated with age 70 and above, male sex, Charlson-Deyo score ≥ 1, insurance status, geographical region, rural urban density versus metro/urban, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2004-2011 vs. 2012-2018), clinical T4 versus T1, clinical N1 or N2 versus N0, grade 3 versus 1, treatment with a radiotherapy dose <45 Gy versus 45 to 54 Gy, and omission of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Several demographic factors and social determinants of health were associated with receipt of NOM and overall survival. With the increasing utilization of NOM, it will be important to understand the drivers of treatment decisions and influences on access to the desired treatment approach.
MarkVCID2 Consortium for Clinical Validation of Biomarkers of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Validation Framework and Baseline Characteristics
Greenberg, Steven M. , Albert, Marylin S., An, Hongyu , Arfanakis, Konstantinos , Evia, Arnold M , Caprihan, Arvind , Ford, Andria L. , Fornage, Myriam , Day, Gregory S. , Hinman, Jason D. , Kashani, Amir H. , Kramer, Joel H. , Lachner, Christian , Maillard, Pauline , Petersen, Ronald C. , Ringman, John M. , Savitz, Sean I. , Windham, B. Gwen, Zhang, Rong , Tuozzo, Carissa , Singh, Herpreet , Moy, Sue, Okey‐Ewurum, Vilma , Kivisäkk, Pia , Blacker, Deborah , Mazina, Lidiya, Helmer, Karl G. , Wruck, Lisa , Corriveau, Roderick A. , Jicha, Gregory A , Kashani, Amir H , Lachner, Christian , Lee, Jin-Moo , Liu, Peiying , Lu, Hanzhang , Maillard, Pauline , Petersen, Ronald C , Psaty, Bruce M , Ringman, John M , Rosenberg, Gary A. , Satizabal, Claudia L , Seshadri, Sudha , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Wang, Danny J J , Wilcock, Donna M , Tuozzo, Carissa , Singh, Herpreet , Okey-Ewurum, Vilma , Page, Courtney B , Mulder, Hillary , Kivisäkk, Pia , Blacker, Deborah , Mazina, Lidiya , Helmer, Karl G , Wruck, Lisa M , Day, Gregory S , Jicha, Gregory A. , Lee, Jin‐Moo , Liu, Peiying , Lu, Hanzhang , Psaty, Bruce M. , Satizábal, Claudia L. , Schneider, Julie A. , Seshadri, Sudha , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Wang, Danny J.J. , Wilcock, Donna M. , Mulder, Hillary , Schwab, Kristin

Annals of Neurology | September 22, 2025 | Volume: 99 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 449-458

10.1002/ana.78040 | PMID 40977537 Get It

Objective To establish a framework for validating candidate biomarkers of cerebral small vessel diseases (SVD) associated with cognitive impairment and characterize individuals enrolled by the MarkVCID2 consortium under this framework. Methods Participants age 60 to 90 years were enrolled across 17 MarkVCID2 sites. Recruitment was targeted to enrich in cognitive symptoms (mild dementia, mild cognitive impairment, subjective cognitive decline), defined risk factors (diabetes mellitus, advanced hypertension), and Black/African American, White, and Hispanic/Latino subgroups. Enrolled participants underwent baseline visits that included cognitive testing, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biofluid collection. Provisional risk for SVD‐related cognitive decline was estimated primarily by baseline cognitive symptoms plus SVD risk factors. Adjudicated risk status was estimated by cognitive symptoms plus presence of moderate‐to‐severe white matter hyperintensities, microbleeds, or lacunes on baseline MRI. Results MarkVCID2 enrolled 1883 individuals age 73.4 ± 7.5 years, 65.0% female, 24.2% Hispanic, and 27.1% non‐Hispanic Black. Among enrollees, 44.8% were provisionally designated high‐risk. After baseline MRI, 48.5% were categorized as adjudicated high‐risk status, with substantial recategorization both from low‐ to high‐risk (primarily because of MRI lesions without SVD risk factors) and high‐ to low‐risk (primarily suspected cognitive impairment at screening not confirmed by baseline testing). Interpretation MarkVCID2 baseline data indicate successful enrollment of diverse individuals enriched in factors associated with SVD‐related cognitive decline. Changes over 3 years of longitudinal follow‐up will be analyzed to validate the candidate biomarkers for 2 projected contexts of use: subject selection (identifying likelihood of future SVD progression) and study outcome (efficiently measuring SVD progression). ANN NEUROL 2026;99:449–458
First-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab or durvalumab/tremelimumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a real world, multicenter retrospective study
Kournoutas, Ioannis , Marell, Paulina S. , Peersen, Anina, Shah, Priyanshi , VanDommelen, Kyle, Gupta, Garima , Akce, Mehmet , Yang, Ju Dong , Chen, Pin‐Jung , Naleid, Nikolas , Peterson, Nicole , Sahai, Vaibhav , Halfdanarson, Thorvardur, Kankeu, Lionel Fonkoua, Washburn, Leslie, Conboy, Caitlin B. , Goenka, Ajit H. , Thompson, Scott A. , Ahn, Daniel H. , Jatoi, Aminah , Marell, Paulina, Gile, Jennifer , Yang, Ju Dong , Sahai, Vaibhav , Jin, Zhaohui , Fonkoua, Lionel Aurelien A Kankeu , Washburn, Leslie A, Goenka, Ajit, Starlinger, Patrick , Roberts, Lewis, Jatoi, Aminah , Ou, Fang-Shu , Tran, Nguyen , Conboy, Caitlin B , Kamath, Suneel Deepak , Mahipal, Amit , Wee, Wen , Jin, Zhaohui , Fonkoua, Lionel Aurelien Kankeu , Torbenson, Michael , Thompson, Scott, Venkatesh, Sudhakar K. , Starlinger, Patrick , Roberts, Lewis R. , Gores, Gregory J. , Babiker, Hani M. , Borad, Mitesh J. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , McWilliams, Robert R. , Ou, Fang‐Shu

The Oncologist | September 20, 2025 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 11 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/oncolo/oyaf286 | PMID 40973475 Get It

Abstract Background Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is a leading cause of cancer death. FDA-approved first-line systemic therapies include atezolizumab/bevacizumab (atezo/bev) and durvalumab/tremelimumab (durva/treme); however, there is a lack of comparative data. Methods We reviewed outcomes of patients with uHCC who initiated atezo/bev or durva/treme between 2017 and 2024, across six institutions. Overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox models, adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results Four hundred fifty-two uHCC pts were included. Median age: 68 years; 77% male; 81% white. Most common etiologies were viral hepatitis (38.9%) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (19.5%). Disease progression was the primary reason for treatment discontinuation, atezo/bev (56%) and durva/treme (42%). Outcomes were not statistically significant (median OS [month, m]: 14.0 vs 14.6 [P = .66]; median TTD [m]: 4.9 vs 3.9 [P = .42] for atezo/bev vs durva/treme). Outcomes were significantly different between Child-Pugh classes (CP: A, B7, B8/9, C) respectively, median OS(m): 19.0, 6.1, 5.1, 2.0 (P &lt; .001); median TTD(m): 6.1, 2.3, 3.0, 1.3 (P &lt; .001). Conclusions In this real-world study of uHCC, no significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed between atezo/bev and durva/treme in the first-line setting. CP scores were a key prognostic variable with both regimens.
Abstract A050: Role of drug induced nuclear CTSL (nCTSL) in DNA damage response in cancer- therapeutic implications
Jin, Ling, Zhao, Anya, Staub, Julie , Wu, Xinyan , Hou, Xiaonan , VanBlaricom, Jamison L., Aalam, Syed Mohamed Musheer, Oberg, Ann L. , Weroha, S. John , Shridhar, Viji, Ray, Upasana , Thirusangu, Prabhu , Ray, Upasana , Zhao, Anya, Hou, Xiaonan , Aalam, Syed Mohammed Musheer , Lee, Sun Hee , Kannan, Nagarajan , Chien, Jeremy , Kaufmann, Scott H. , Bakkum‐Gamez, Jamie N. , Shridhar, Viji

Cancer Research | September 19, 2025 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 18_Supplement | Pages: A050-A050

10.1158/1538-7445.ovarian25-a050 Get It

Abstract Introduction: Despite treatment advances, ovarian cancer (OC) remains the deadliest gynecological cancer, with a ∼70% mortality rate. OCs initially respond to platinum chemotherapy but often develop resistance. While PARP inhibitors improve relapse-free survival in responsive cases, they do not extend overall survival. This underscores the need for effective combination therapies beyond BRCA status. The lysosomal protein cathepsin L (CTSL) can traffic to the nucleus, where it can regulate DNA repair and serve as a chromatin modifier. We found that nucleoside analog clofarabine (CLF) induces CTSL nuclear trafficking in OC cells. Here we tested the hypothesis that accumulation nuclear CTSL (nCTSL) is a biomarker of sensitivity to DNA damaging therapy in OCs for improved therapeutic options. Methods: To determine the role of CLF induced nuclear CTSL in DNA damage and its synergy with PARP and CRM1 inhibitors in PARP inhibitor–sensitive and –resistant ovarian cancer (OC) cell lines, ex vivo cultures of ascites-derived patient OC cells (OVA-3D spheroids), primary ovarian tumors, and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and validated by colony formation assays. Nuclear CTSL localization was determined in subcellular fractionated lysates by western blots and immunofluorescence cytometry (IFC). Tumor regression was determined in vivo using ex vivo cultures of PDX derived cells. Results: In ovarian cancer (OC) cell lines, CLF monotherapy induced nuclear CTSL (nCTSL) in a subset of models classified as CLF-responsive (CLF-r), sensitizing them to the PARP inhibitors olaparib and rucaparib. In CLF-non-responsive (CLF-nr) models, nCTSL induction and therapeutic synergy were observed only with the CLF+olaparib combination. Synergy was detected in 47% of CLF-r and 24% of CLF-nr patient-derived ascites samples (OVA). Mechanistically, CLF induced nuclear import of CTSL via KPNB1 in CLF-r cells, while this import was triggered by the CLF+olaparib combination in CLF-nr cells. CLF also downregulated the nuclear export protein CRM1 (XPO1) in both groups. Knockdown of CTSL in either CLF-r or CLF-nr cells abrogated sensitivity to the combination. Notably, in 29% of OVA samples classified as CLF-resistant (CLF-Res), CLF failed to suppress CRM1 expression. In these cases, CRM1 inhibition with KPT8602 restored CLF+PARP inhibitor synergy. In vivo, CLF-r and CLF-nr PDX models treated with the combination exhibited increased DNA damage, reduced tumor burden, and extended survival. Conclusion: These findings identify nuclear CTSL (nCTSL) induction as a potential biomarker of response to DNA-damaging therapies. The combination of CLF and olaparib represents a promising strategy to overcome drug resistance in ovarian cancer by promoting CTSL nuclear localization and enhancing DNA damage. Citation Format: Prabhu Thirusangu, Ling Jin, Upasana Ray, Anya Zhao, Julie Staub, Xinyan Wu, Xiaonan Hou, Jamison L. VanBlaricom, Syed Mohamed Musheer Aalam, Sun-Hee Lee, Ann Oberg, Nagarajan Kannan, John Weroha, Jeremy Chien, Scott H. Kaufmann, Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, Viji Shridhar. Role of drug induced nuclear CTSL (nCTSL) in DNA damage response in cancer- therapeutic implications [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2025 Sep 19-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl):Abstract nr A050.
Stratifying lung adenocarcinoma risk with multi-ancestry polygenic risk scores in East Asian never-smokers
Blechter, Batel , Wang, Xiaoyu , Karsonaki, Christiana, Shi, Jianxin , Shiraishi, Kouya , Choi, Jiyeon , Matsuo, Keitaro , Chen, Tzu‐Yu , Kim, Young Tae , Choudhury, Parichoy Pal , Williams, Jacob , Landi, Maria Teresa , Yin, Zhihua , Zhou, Baosen , Seow, Wei Jie , Song, Lei , Chang, I‐Shou , Chien, Li-Hsin , Wong, Maria Pik , Richardson, Brian Douglas , Li, Shilan , Breeze, Charles E. , Bassig, Bryan A. , Sm, Jason Yy Wong, Chung, Lap Ping, Zhang, Xu‐Chao , Caporaso, Neil E. , Chang, Jiang , Ho, Jcm , Momozawa, Yukihide , Kobayashi, Masashi , Okubo, Kenichi , Honda, Takayuki , Kunitoh, Hideo , Watanabe, Shun-ichi, Hamamoto, Ryuji , Goto, Kōichi , Minamiya, Yoshihiro, Wakai, Kenji , Murakami, Yoshinori , Shimizu, Kimihiro , Suzuki, Hiroyuki , Ohtaki, Yoichi , Tanaka, Kazumi , Wu, Tangchun , Wei, Fusheng, Kim, Yeul Hong , Chang, Gee-Chen , Chen, Kuan‐Yu, Chen, Yuh-Min, Park, Jae Yong , Kweon, Sun-Seog, Gao, Yu‐Tang , Schwartz, Ann G. , Gorlov, Ivan , Wu, Xifeng , Yang, Ping , Lam, Stephen , Bojesen, Stig E. , Ji, Bu‐Tian , Wichmann, H. E., Christiani, D.C., Brennan, Paul , McKay, James , Field, John K. , Shete, Sanjay , Marchand, Loı̈c Le, Liu, Geoffrey , Andrew, Angeline S. , Zienolddiny-Narui, Shan, Grankvist, Kjell , Taylor, Fiona, Aldrich, Melinda C. , Jeon, Hyo‐Sung, Hu, Zhibin , Burdett, Laura, Yeager, Meredith, Hutchinson, Amy , Hicks, Belynda , Liu, Jia , Berndt, Sonja I, Wu, Wei , Wang, Junwen , Choi, Jin Eun , Park, Kyong Hwa , Sung, Sook Whan , Tan, Wen , Sihoe, Alan , Choi, Yi Young, Hung, Hsiao-Han , Vermeulen, Roel , Wu, Junjie , Tsai, Fang-Yu , Chan, John K. C., Li, Jihua , Lin, Hsien-Chih, Liu, Jie , Sawada, Norie , Yamaji, Taiki , Wyatt, Kathleen , Qi, T. Y., Li, Xuelian , Ren, Yangwu , Chao, Ann, Zhu, Junjie , Chen, Chih‐Yi , ScD, Chien-Jen Chen, Stevens, Victoria L. , Fraumeni, Joseph F., Lin, Kuang , Walters, Robin G., Chen, Zhengming, Chatterjee, Nilanjan , Gorlova, Olga Y. , Hsiung, Chao A. , Chanock, Stephen J, Rothman, Nathaniel , Kohno, Takashi , Lan, Qing, Kartsonaki, Christiana , Liu, Geoffrey , Field, John K , Matsuo, Keitaro , Wang, Junwen , Bojesen, Stig E , Grankvist, Kjell , Chen, Chih-Yi , Dai, Juncheng , Hung, Rayjean J. , Chen, Kexin , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Choudhury, Parichoy Pal , Lin, Dongxin , Zheng, Wei , Wang, Jiucun , Hu, Wei , Cai, Qiuyin , Hong, Yun‐Chul , Kim, Hee Nam , Wu, Yi-Long Lung Cancer , Richardson, Brian Douglas , Zhang, Tongwu , Wang, Zhaoming , Kim, Jin Hee , Albanes, Demetrius , Shin, Min‐Ho , Chung, Lap-Ping, Yang, Yang , Zheng, Hong , Dai, Hong , Yatabe, Yasushi , Kim, Young‐Chul , Daigo, Yataro , Kamatani, Yoichiro , Kobayashi, Masashi , Hosgood, Howard Dean , WATANABE, Shun-ichi J. , Miyagi, Yohei , Matsumoto, Shingo , Horinouchi, Hidehito , Tsuboi, Masahiro , Takahashi, Atsushi , Goto, Akiteru , Hara, Megumi , Nishida, Yuichiro , Takeuchi, Kenji , Matsuda, Koichi , Murakami, Yoshinori, Suzuki, Hiroyuki , Saito, Motonobu , Machiela, Mitchell J. , Oh, In‐Jae , Lee, Victor , Su, Wu‐Chou , Seow, Adeline , Kweon, Sun-Seog , Liu, Jianjun , Houlston, Richard S. , Tardón, Adonina , Chen, Chu, Johansson, Mattias , Risch, Angela , Bickeböller, Heike , Rennert, Gad , Arnold, Susanne M. , Davies, Michael P.A. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Cox, Angela , Yuan, Jian-Min , Lazarus, Philip J. , Schabath, Matthew B. , Jiang, Shih Sheng , Chen, Chung–Hsing , Hsiao, Chin‐Fu , Yeager, Meredith , Liu, Jia , Berndt, Sonja I. , Li, Yuqing , Kang, Chang Hyun , Wang, Wen‐Chang , Xu, Jun, Guan, Peng , Yu, Chong‐Jen , Yang, Gong , Park, In Kyu , Cheng, Iona C. , Song, Bao, Wyatt, Kathleen , Ma, Hongxia , Zhu, Meng , Wang, Yifan , Qi, Tianchen, Iwasaki, Motoki , Wu, Guoping , Yang, Pan‐Chyr , Walters, Robin G. , Chatterjee, Nilanjan , Amos, Christopher I. , Shen, Hongbing , Rothman, Nathaniel , Lan, Qing , Zhang, Haoyu

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | September 18, 2025 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 231-249

10.1093/jnci/djaf272 | PMID 41032288 Get It

Abstract Background Lung adenocarcinoma in never-smokers is a major public health burden, especially among East Asian women. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are promising for risk stratification but are primarily developed in European-ancestry populations. We aimed to develop and validate single- and multi-ancestry PRSs for East Asian never-smokers to improve lung adenocarcinoma risk prediction. Methods PRSs were developed using genome-wide association study summary statistics from East Asian (8002 cases; 20 782 controls) and European (2058 cases; 5575 controls) populations. Single-ancestry models included a PRS with 25 single nucleotide variants (PRS-25), PRS clumping and thresholding (CT), and LDpred2; multi-ancestry models included LDpred2 plus European PRS-128, PRS-CSx, and clumping and thresholding, super learning, empirical Bayes (CT-SLEB). Performance was evaluated in independent East Asian data from the Female Lung Cancer Consortium and externally validated in the Nanjing Lung Cancer Cohort. We assessed predictive accuracy via area under the curve operating procedure (AUC), with 10-year and (ages 30-80 years) absolute risks estimates. Results The best multi-ancestry PRS, using East Asian and European data via CT-SLEB, outperformed the best East Asian-only (LDpred2; AUC = 0.629, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.618 to 0.641), achieving an AUC of 0.640 (95% CI = 0.629 to 0.653) and odds ratio of 1.71 (95% CI = 1.61 to 1.82) per standard deviation increase. Nanjing Lung Cancer Cohort validation confirmed robust performance (AUC = 0.649, 95% CI = 0.623 to 0.676). The top 20% PRS group had a 3.92-fold higher lung adenocarcinoma risk than the bottom 20%. Further, the top 5% PRS group reached a 6.69% lifetime absolute risk. Notably, this group reached the average population 10-year lung adenocarcinoma risk at age 50 years (0.42%) by age 41 years, 9 years earlier. Conclusions Multi-ancestry PRS approaches enhance lung adenocarcinoma risk stratification in East Asian never-smokers, with consistent external validation, suggesting future clinical utility.
Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 to Identify Preclinical Alzheimer Disease
Janelidze, Shorena, Bali, Divya , Dolado, Anna Orduña , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Rahmouni, Nesrine , Blennow, Kaj, Doré, Vincent , Feizpour, Azadeh , Rowe, Christopher C., Villeneuve, Sylvia , Petersen, Ronald C., Jack, Clifford R. , Groups, ADNI, ALFA, and PREVENT-AD Study, Adegoke, Olusegun, Hussen, Kedir Adem, Aisen, Paul, Ajayi, Adeyinka, Amaza, Hannatu, Apostolova, Liana G. , Ashford, Miriam T. , Ayo, Omobolanle, Bernard, Marie , Bernhardt, Haley, Boatwright, Virginia, Borowski, Bret, Brylska, Magdalena, Buckholtz, Neil, Cabrera, Yuliana, Cairns, Nigel J. , Carrillo, Maria, Choe, Mark, Clanton, Taylor, Conti, Cat, Craft, Hannah, Crawford, Karen , DeCarli, Charles , Benedetto, Joseph Di, Diaz, Adam , Drake, Erin, Faber, Kelley, Felmlee, Joel P. , Fidell, Andrea, Flenniken, Derek , Fockler, Juliet , Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Frank, R.T., Franklin, Erin , Glittenberg, Matt, Gunter, Jeff, Guzmán, Vanessa , Harvey, Danielle, Hedberg, Caitie, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Hoang, Isabella, Jackson, Jonathan , Jagust, William, Jahanshad, Neda , Jenkins, Cecily, Jiménez, Gustavo , Jin, Chengshi , Kachaturian, Zaven, Kaddurah-Daouk, Rima, Kantarci, Kejal, Karlawish, Jason , Khachaturian, Zaven S., Knaack, Alexander , Korecka, Magdalena , Kormos, Adrienne, Germano, Kaori Kubo, Kwang, Winnie, Lacy, Kaci, Landau, Susan, Lopresti, Brian J. , Magana, Fabiola, Mahboubi, Payam, Malone, Ian G., Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Matoush, Leonard, Miller, Melanie J. , Molchan, Susan, Montine, Tom, Moore-Weiss, John, Neu, Scott, Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ogwang, Sheila, Okonkwo, Ozioma, Parkins, Shaniya, Perrin, Richard J. , Petersen, Ronald, Pizzola, Jeremy, Potter, Zoë, Potter, William Z., Rafii, Michael, Raman, Rema , Reyes, Calvin, Reyes, Denise , Robison, Justin , Chen, Stephanie Rossi, Ryan, Laurie, Sachdev, Pallavi, Saito, Naomi , Salazar, Jennifer, Thao, Mai Seng, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Shaw, Leslie M. , Silverberg, Nina, Strong, Joe, Talavera, Sandra , Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Thal, Leon J., Thomas, Lisa , Thompson, Paul , Tosun, Duygu , Trojanowki, John Q., Sacrey, Diana Truran, Villemagne, Victor L. , Walter, Sarah , Wan, Yang , Ward, Chad, Webb, Caitlin, Weiner, Michael W. , Weisensel, Trinity, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Poirier, Judes, Breitner, John C.S. , Badawy, Mohamed , Baril, Andrée‐Ann, Aguilar, Ricardo A, Gorriti, Annabella B, Gispert, Lidia C, Martinez, Alba C, Iglesias, Ruth D, Julian, Sherezade F, Serra, P, González‐Escalante, Armand , Penas, Laura H, Rodriguez, Gema H, Ninou, Jordi H, Gamaz, Laura Iglesias, Knezevic, Iva, Alvarez, Paula M, Diaz, Tania M, Palacios, Eva , Ballester, A, Mendez, Sandra P, Freixedes, Laura Ros, Vila, Aleix S, Harster, Lluis S, Prat, Anna S, Jaramillo, Marc V, Jack, Clifford R , Feizpour, Azadeh , Doré, Vincent , Pichet Binette, Alexa , Salvadó, Gemma , Janelidze, Shorena , Therriault, Joseph , Brum, Wagner Scheeren , Stomrud, Erik , Mattsson, Niklas , Palmqvist, Sebastian , Coomans, Emma M. , Teunissen, Charlotte E. , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Gispert, Juan Domingo , Blennow, Kaj , Alcolea, Daniel , Fortea, Juan , Johnson, Sterling C. , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Schindler, Suzanne E. , Suárez‐Calvet, Marc , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Hansson, Oskar , Groups, ADNI, ALFA, and PREVENT-AD Study, Aisen, Paul , Barnes, Lisa L. , Beckett, Laurel , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Donohue, Michael , Drake, Erin, Erickson, Claire M. , Fletcher, Evan M. , Arani, Arvin , Foroud, Tatiana , Fox, Nick C. , Frank, Richard, González, Hector, Green, Robert C. , Grill, Joshua D. , Harkins, Kristin , Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Jo, Taeho, Kaddurah‐Daouk, Rima , Kantarci, Kejal , Koeppe, Robert A. , Largent, Emily A. , Lee, Edward B. , Lee, Virginia M.‐Y. , Morris, John C. , Nho, Kwangsik T. , Nir, Talia M. , Nudelman, Kelly , Okonkwo, Ozioma, Petersen, Ronald, Rabinovici, Gil D. , Rafii, Michael S. , Reid, Robert, Reyes, Denise, Risacher, Shannon L. , Mindt, Mónica Rivera , Sachdev, Pallavi, Saykin, Andrew J. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Senjem, Matthew L. , Li, Shen , Smith, Stephanie R. , Snyder, Peter J. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Toga, Arthur W. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Yushkevich, Paul A. , Badawy, Mohamed, Baillet, Sylvain , Minguillón, Carolina , Brugulat‐Serrat, Anna , Cacciaglia, Raffaele , Campo, Marta del , Pascual, Maria, Rodríguez‐Fernández, Blanca , Vilor‐Tejedor, Natàlia

JAMA Neurology | September 15, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1122

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3217 | PMID 40952756 Get It

Importance Advances in Alzheimer disease (AD) have shifted research focus to earlier disease stages, necessitating more scalable approaches to identify cognitively unimpaired individuals with amyloid β (Aβ) pathology. Objective To assess the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) for classifying Aβ status in cognitively unimpaired individuals, both as a stand-alone test and in a 2-step approach where positive plasma results were confirmed using a second modality (Aβ positron emission tomography [PET] or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional cohort study used data collected between June 2009 and March 2024. We included 2916 cognitively unimpaired participants from 12 international independent observational cohorts in the US, Europe, Australia, and Canada with available plasma p-tau217 levels and CSF or PET Aβ biomarkers. Performance comparisons between mass spectrometry and immunoassay-based p-tau217 measurements were also performed (n = 964). Exposures Plasma p-tau217 levels measured by immunoassay. Main Outcome and Measures Aβ status, determined by CSF or Aβ PET biomarkers. Results Participants had a mean (SD) age of 66.9 (9.9) years; 971 (33.3%) were Aβ positive by either CSF or PET, 1667 (57.2%) were women, and 1108 (38.1%) carried at least 1 APOE ε4 allele. As a stand-alone test, plasma p-tau217 achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% CI, 74-84) and an overall accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 80-82). In a 2-step workflow, the PPV and accuracy significantly increased to 91% (95% CI, 86-95). While this approach required screening of 677 individuals with plasma p-tau217 to identify 100 Aβ-positive individuals, compared to 536 participants when using PET alone, it reduced the need for PET testing to 124. Immunoassays demonstrated comparable PPVs to mass spectrometry (80% [95% CI, 74-86] vs 85% [95% CI, 81-90]; P = .12) but significantly lower overall accuracy (82% [95% CI, 79-84]% vs 88 [95% CI, 86-90]; P &amp;lt; .001) and true Aβ-positive detection rate (49% [95% CI, 43-55] vs 69% [95% CI, 64-75]; P &amp;lt; .001). Conclusions and Relevance The findings highlight the potential of plasma p-tau217 as a stand-alone test—or when used in a sequential 2-step approach alongside PET or CSF testing—as a cost-effective, scalable, and minimally burdensome strategy for identifying preclinical AD. Tailored screening workflows that incorporate p-tau217 can improve efficiency in participant selection for preclinical AD trials and, in the future, help guide access to disease-modifying treatments.