Wang, Danny J J

Abstract INTRODUCTION M0 images were missing in Siemens ASL data in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, prohibiting cerebral blood flow (CBF) quantification. METHODS A conditional latent diffusion model was trained and evaluated on in‐house datasets, then applied to the Siemens data in ADNI‐3. Regional CBF differences by Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages, their accuracy for AD classification, and CBF trajectory slopes were compared between generated data (Siemens) and acquired data (General Electric). RESULTS The diffusion model generated M0 images with high fidelity (SSIM = 0.918 ± 0.023, PSNR = 31.361 ± 2.537) and minimal CBF bias (mean difference is 0.21 ± 1.58 mL/100 g/min). Both generated and acquired CBF showed similar spatial patterns and decreasing trends with AD progression in specific AD‐related regions. Generated CBF also improved accuracy in classifying AD stages compared to qualitative perfusion images. CONCLUSION This study shows the potential of diffusion models for imputing missing modalities in large‐scale studies exploring the use of ASL as a biomarker of AD. Highlights Using latent diffusion model, we can generate M0 image from control image in arterial spin labeling (ASL) with high fidelity. The generated M0 can be used for cerebral blood flow (CBF) quantification in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative dataset. The performance of classification between Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and cognitive normal people is better when using generated CBF maps than using non‐quantitative perfusion images. ASL CBF decreases with AD progression in key AD‐related brain regions.

Objective To establish a framework for validating candidate biomarkers of cerebral small vessel diseases (SVD) associated with cognitive impairment and characterize individuals enrolled by the MarkVCID2 consortium under this framework. Methods Participants age 60 to 90 years were enrolled across 17 MarkVCID2 sites. Recruitment was targeted to enrich in cognitive symptoms (mild dementia, mild cognitive impairment, subjective cognitive decline), defined risk factors (diabetes mellitus, advanced hypertension), and Black/African American, White, and Hispanic/Latino subgroups. Enrolled participants underwent baseline visits that included cognitive testing, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biofluid collection. Provisional risk for SVD‐related cognitive decline was estimated primarily by baseline cognitive symptoms plus SVD risk factors. Adjudicated risk status was estimated by cognitive symptoms plus presence of moderate‐to‐severe white matter hyperintensities, microbleeds, or lacunes on baseline MRI. Results MarkVCID2 enrolled 1883 individuals age 73.4 ± 7.5 years, 65.0% female, 24.2% Hispanic, and 27.1% non‐Hispanic Black. Among enrollees, 44.8% were provisionally designated high‐risk. After baseline MRI, 48.5% were categorized as adjudicated high‐risk status, with substantial recategorization both from low‐ to high‐risk (primarily because of MRI lesions without SVD risk factors) and high‐ to low‐risk (primarily suspected cognitive impairment at screening not confirmed by baseline testing). Interpretation MarkVCID2 baseline data indicate successful enrollment of diverse individuals enriched in factors associated with SVD‐related cognitive decline. Changes over 3 years of longitudinal follow‐up will be analyzed to validate the candidate biomarkers for 2 projected contexts of use: subject selection (identifying likelihood of future SVD progression) and study outcome (efficiently measuring SVD progression). ANN NEUROL 2026;99:449–458

Abstract Increasing evidence recognizes Alzheimer's disease (AD) as a multifactorial and heterogeneous disease with multiple contributors to its pathophysiology, including vascular dysfunction. The recently updated AD Research Framework put forth by the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association describes a biomarker‐based pathologic definition of AD focused on amyloid, tau, and neuronal injury. In response to this article, here we first discussed evidence that vascular dysfunction is an important early event in AD pathophysiology. Next, we examined various imaging sequences that could be easily implemented to evaluate different types of vascular dysfunction associated with, and/or contributing to, AD pathophysiology, including changes in blood‐brain barrier integrity and cerebral blood flow. Vascular imaging biomarkers of small vessel disease of the brain, which is responsible for >50% of dementia worldwide, including AD, are already established, well characterized, and easy to recognize. We suggest that these vascular biomarkers should be incorporated into the AD Research Framework to gain a better understanding of AD pathophysiology and aid in treatment efforts.