Windham, B. Gwen

Background: Hypertension and systemic inflammation are independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. While hypertension is a known risk factor for left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, the role of inflammation in LV structural changes remains unclear. It is also uncertain whether concomitant inflammation and hypertension ("inflammatory hypertension") exacerbate LV hypertrophy. Research Question: Is inflammatory hypertension associated with increased LV mass index (LVMI) compared to hypertension without inflammation? Methods: We analyzed baseline data from Black adults enrolled in the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) cohort in Jackson, Mississippi. Inflammation was defined by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) >3 mg/L, and hypertension as systolic blood pressure (SBP) >130 mmHg. Participants were classified into four groups: noninflammatory-normotensive (reference group), noninflammatory-hypertensive, inflammatory-normotensive, and inflammatory-hypertensive. The primary outcome was LVMI, assessed by echocardiography. Associations between groups and LVMI were evaluated using generalized estimating equations to account for familial clustering and adjusted for covariates including age, sex, education, smoking status, body mass index, number of antihypertensive medications, statin use, cholesterol, and diabetes. Results: Among 1,027 participants (mean age 64 ± 8.5 years; 71% women), baseline LVMI differed by inflammation-hypertension status. Compared with the LVMI in noninflammatory-normotensive cohort (n=108; 74.5 g/m 2 [70.4–78.6]), significantly higher LVMI was observed in noninflammatory-hypertensive (n=343; 83.6 g/m 2 [81.3–85.9], p<0.001) and inflammatory-hypertensive groups (n=497; 84.7 g/m 2 [82.8–86.7], p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between inflammatory-hypertensive and noninflammatory-hypertensive groups (84.7 vs 83.6 g/m 2 )(p=0.460). The inflammatory-normotensive cohort also did not differ from the reference group (74.9 g/m 2 [70.2–79.5], p=0.901). Secondary analyses using elevated IL-6 to define inflammation yielded similar findings ( Figure 1 ). Conclusion: In individuals with inflammatory hypertension, hypertension appears to be the primary driver of LV hypertrophy. Further studies in larger, diverse populations are needed to definitively evaluate the potential additive effect of inflammatory hypertension on LV remodeling.

Objective To establish a framework for validating candidate biomarkers of cerebral small vessel diseases (SVD) associated with cognitive impairment and characterize individuals enrolled by the MarkVCID2 consortium under this framework. Methods Participants age 60 to 90 years were enrolled across 17 MarkVCID2 sites. Recruitment was targeted to enrich in cognitive symptoms (mild dementia, mild cognitive impairment, subjective cognitive decline), defined risk factors (diabetes mellitus, advanced hypertension), and Black/African American, White, and Hispanic/Latino subgroups. Enrolled participants underwent baseline visits that included cognitive testing, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biofluid collection. Provisional risk for SVD‐related cognitive decline was estimated primarily by baseline cognitive symptoms plus SVD risk factors. Adjudicated risk status was estimated by cognitive symptoms plus presence of moderate‐to‐severe white matter hyperintensities, microbleeds, or lacunes on baseline MRI. Results MarkVCID2 enrolled 1883 individuals age 73.4 ± 7.5 years, 65.0% female, 24.2% Hispanic, and 27.1% non‐Hispanic Black. Among enrollees, 44.8% were provisionally designated high‐risk. After baseline MRI, 48.5% were categorized as adjudicated high‐risk status, with substantial recategorization both from low‐ to high‐risk (primarily because of MRI lesions without SVD risk factors) and high‐ to low‐risk (primarily suspected cognitive impairment at screening not confirmed by baseline testing). Interpretation MarkVCID2 baseline data indicate successful enrollment of diverse individuals enriched in factors associated with SVD‐related cognitive decline. Changes over 3 years of longitudinal follow‐up will be analyzed to validate the candidate biomarkers for 2 projected contexts of use: subject selection (identifying likelihood of future SVD progression) and study outcome (efficiently measuring SVD progression). ANN NEUROL 2026;99:449–458

AbstractBackgroundMidlife vascular risk factors are associated with an increased risk of dementia. However, the overall contribution of modifiable vascular risk factors in midlife and late‐life to dementia remains unclear. In this study, we quantified population attributable fractions, which account for risk factor prevalence and strength of relative risks, of incident dementia from vascular risk factors measured in midlife and early late‐life.MethodWe used 33 years of prospective cohort data in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Incident dementia (community surveillance and algorithmic diagnosis with expert clinical adjudication) was ascertained from baseline (1987‐1989) through December 31, 2020. We quantified population attributable fractions of incident dementia by age 80 from the combination of hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥130, diastolic blood pressure ≥80, or use of medication), diabetes (fasting glucose ≥126, non‐fasting glucose ≥200, self‐reported physician diagnosis of diabetes, or use of medication for diabetes/insulin), and self‐reported current cigarette smoking (at least one risk factor versus none) measured at different ages (45‐54 [n = 7,731], 55‐64 [n = 12,273]; 65‐74 [n = 6,660]). We also computed attributable fractions stratified by sex, apolipoprotein ε4 genotype, and self‐reported race.ResultThe prevalence of having one or more of the vascular risk factors was 61.6% (95% CI: 60.5, 62.7%) at age 45‐54 and increased to 77.5% (95% CI: 76.5, 78.5%) by age 65‐74. Population attributable fractions of dementia increased from 22.7% (95% CI: 15.3, 30.1%) for vascular risk factors measured at age 45‐54 to 45.4% (95% CI: 32.5, 58.3%) for vascular risk factors assessed at age 65‐74 (see Figure). Attributable fractions were larger in females, participants without apolipoprotein ε4 alleles, and Black participants (Figure).ConclusionBetween 23% to 45% of incident dementia cases by age 80 were attributed to a combination of hypertension, diabetes, or current smoking up through age 74. Attributable fractions for the combined impact of vascular risk varied by key demographics. Public health strategies targeting modifiable vascular risk factors could reduce dementia risk and increase healthy lifespan.

Abstract Background Relationships of midlife inflammation with late‐life mobility and influences of chronic health conditions, race, and social determinants of health (SDoH) on these relationships are poorly understood. Methods Among 4758 community‐dwelling participants (41% men, 20% Black), high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured over 20+ years: in midlife at study visit 2 (V2: 1990–1992, 47–68 years); at V4 (1996–1998, 53–74 years); and with concurrent late‐life 4‐m gait speed at V5 (2011–2013, 67‐88 years, mean 75 years). SDoH measures included race, the national‐rank area deprivation index, education, and income. We examined associations of late‐life gait speed with midlife hsCRP (V2 continuous and clinically high ≥3 mg/L), with 20‐year hsCRP history from midlife (V2–V5 average continuous hsCRP and clinically high ≥3 mg/L) and with inflammation accumulation (visits and years with high hsCRP). Regression models adjusted for demographic, cardiovascular, and SDoH measures; effect modification by the presence of other common chronic conditions (obesity, diabetes, hypertension) and race were examined, with and without accounting for SDoH. Results High midlife hsCRP was associated with slower late‐life gait speed, even among those without chronic conditions in midlife: −4.6 cm/s (95% CI: −6.4, −2.8). Importantly, sustained high hsCRP was associated with a 20‐year slowing of −10.0 cm/s (−14.9, −5.1) among those who never experienced obesity, diabetes, or hypertension over the 20‐year period. Associations were similar between Black participants, −3.8 cm/s (−6.9, −0.7) and White participants −3.3 (−4.5, −2.2) per interquartile range of midlife hsCRP; effect modifications by chronic conditions and race were unsupported throughout. Results were robust to accounting for SDoH or otherwise; however, worse SDoH was associated with higher inflammation and slower gait speed in both Black and White participants. Conclusions Inflammation in midlife may contribute to clinically meaningful late‐life slowing of gait speed, even among otherwise healthy‐appearing adults and regardless of race and socioeconomic disadvantage. Regular monitoring and interventions for inflammation may be warranted from midlife.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONThe fraction of dementia attributable to hypertension might vary depending on the age of the population considered and the age through which dementia occurs.METHODSIn the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, we quantified population attributable fractions (PAF) of dementia by age 80 and 90 from hypertension assessed at ages of 45–54 (n = 7572), 55–64 (n = 12,033), 65–74 (n = 6561), and 75–84 (n = 2086).RESULTSThe PAF for dementia by age 80 from all non‐normal blood pressure at ages 45–54 was 15.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.9%–22.3%), 19.1% (95% CI = 9.9%–26.9%) at ages 55–64, and 19.9% (95% CI = −4.4%–38.5%) at ages 65–74. The strongest PAFs were from stage 2 hypertension (11.9%–21.3%). For dementia by age 90, PAFs from non‐normal blood pressure up through age 75 were smaller (10.9%–13.8%), and non‐significant by age 75–84.DISCUSSIONInterventions targeting hypertension even in early late life might reduce a sizeable proportion of dementia.Highlights We estimated prospective population attributable risks of dementia for hypertension. 15%–20% of dementia cases by age 80 are from non‐normal blood pressure (BP). Associations between hypertension and dementia persisted through age 75. Midlife to early late‐life BP control might reduce a large proportion of dementia.

Abstract Background This study aimed to examine if the association of cerebral perfusion with gait speed differs across systolic blood pressure (SBP) and age. Methods Cerebral perfusion was measured via arterial spin labeled (ASL)-MRI among community-dwelling adults aged 31–94 years in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Usual gait speed was assessed over 5.6 meters on an electronic mat. Sex- and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted linear regression models estimated cross-sectional gait speed associations with ASL and modifying effects of age and SBP using 3-way and 2-way interaction terms between continuous age, SBP, and ASL. Results report estimated differences in gait speed per standard deviation (SD) lower ASL for exemplar SBPs and ages. Results Among 479 participants (mean age 67.6 years; 44% women; mean gait speed 1.17 m/s), ASL relations to gait speed varied by age (ASL-x–age interaction: p = .001) and SBP (ASL-x–SBP interaction: p = .009). At an SBP of 120 mmHg, each SD lower ASL was associated with a 0.04 m/s (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01, 0.07) slower gait speed at 65 years, 0.07 m/s (0.04, 0.10) at 75 years, and 0.09 m/s (0.05, 0.13) at 85 years. At an SBP of 140 mmHg, ASL associations with gait speed were attenuated to 0.01 (−0.01, 0.04), 0.04 (0.02, 0.06), and 0.06 (0.04, 0.09) m/s slower gait speed at ages 65, 75, and 85, respectively. Conclusion Poorer cerebral perfusion is associated with clinically meaningful slower gait speeds, particularly with older age, while higher perfusion markedly attenuates age differences in gait speed.

Background: Compared to those with natural nocturnal blood pressure (BP) decreases, those lacking nocturnal BP decreases (“non-dippers”) are at greater risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Substantial evidence also supports a role of chronic systemic inflammation in the pathogenesis of CVD. The purpose of this study was to examine associations of markers of inflammation with two common definitions of BP dipping status using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (AMBP) readings. Methods: AMBP monitoring and assays of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), e-selectin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2), and a selection of thirteen other inflammatory-pathway biomarkers were performed in 722 participants (mean age 64 [range 42-83] years, 36% men, 39% black, 83% hypertensive) in the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) Study (2001-2004). Non-dippers were classified using two common definitions: (1) nocturnal systolic and diastolic BP both decreased by <10% compared to daytime values [“dual non-dippers”, n=161 (22%)], and (2) nocturnal SBP decreased by <10% [“systolic non-dippers”, n=380 (53%)]. Logistic regressions, fit with generalized estimating equations to account for sibship clustering, yielded odds ratios (OR) of dipping status for log-transformed inflammatory biomarkers, adjusted for age, race, and sex. Results: IL-6 (range 0-37 pg/ml) was associated with dual non-dipping status (OR=1.55 [95%CI: 1.03, 2.32] p=0.035), translating into a 55% increase in the likelihood of being a dual non-dipper for every approximate doubling of IL-6. IL-6 (OR=1.63 [1.13, 2.35] p=0.009) and CRP (OR=1.35 [1.08,1.68] p=0.008) overall, as well as e-selectin (OR=0.49 [0.28, 0.87] p=0.014) and TIMP-2 (OR=0.54 [0.30,0.98] p=0.041) in hypertensive subjects were associated with systolic non-dipping status. Conclusions: These results suggest that non-dipping classification should be approached with prudence, as the two different criteria may influence conclusions about predictive marker associations. In addition, markers involved in direct versus inhibitory inflammation pathways may operate differentially across patient subgroups. Our findings support the link between inflammation and non-dipping circadian BP patterns and provide novel information on markers and definitions which may be useful for early detection and subsequent prevention of CVD.