Sharrett, Richey

AbstractBackgroundMidlife vascular risk factors are associated with an increased risk of dementia. However, the overall contribution of modifiable vascular risk factors in midlife and late‐life to dementia remains unclear. In this study, we quantified population attributable fractions, which account for risk factor prevalence and strength of relative risks, of incident dementia from vascular risk factors measured in midlife and early late‐life.MethodWe used 33 years of prospective cohort data in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Incident dementia (community surveillance and algorithmic diagnosis with expert clinical adjudication) was ascertained from baseline (1987‐1989) through December 31, 2020. We quantified population attributable fractions of incident dementia by age 80 from the combination of hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥130, diastolic blood pressure ≥80, or use of medication), diabetes (fasting glucose ≥126, non‐fasting glucose ≥200, self‐reported physician diagnosis of diabetes, or use of medication for diabetes/insulin), and self‐reported current cigarette smoking (at least one risk factor versus none) measured at different ages (45‐54 [n = 7,731], 55‐64 [n = 12,273]; 65‐74 [n = 6,660]). We also computed attributable fractions stratified by sex, apolipoprotein ε4 genotype, and self‐reported race.ResultThe prevalence of having one or more of the vascular risk factors was 61.6% (95% CI: 60.5, 62.7%) at age 45‐54 and increased to 77.5% (95% CI: 76.5, 78.5%) by age 65‐74. Population attributable fractions of dementia increased from 22.7% (95% CI: 15.3, 30.1%) for vascular risk factors measured at age 45‐54 to 45.4% (95% CI: 32.5, 58.3%) for vascular risk factors assessed at age 65‐74 (see Figure). Attributable fractions were larger in females, participants without apolipoprotein ε4 alleles, and Black participants (Figure).ConclusionBetween 23% to 45% of incident dementia cases by age 80 were attributed to a combination of hypertension, diabetes, or current smoking up through age 74. Attributable fractions for the combined impact of vascular risk varied by key demographics. Public health strategies targeting modifiable vascular risk factors could reduce dementia risk and increase healthy lifespan.

AbstractBackgroundAlthough amyloid deposition in the brain is often associated with subsequent dementia risk, not everyone with brain amyloid will develop dementia. This discrepancy illustrates the potential importance that risk factors and lived experiences may have in modifying this association. Compared to participants with low social engagement (SE) in mid‐life, we hypothesized that participants with high mid‐life SE will show a weaker association between amyloid burden and incident dementia.MethodWe included data from 310 non‐demented participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC)‐PET study. Social support and isolation were assessed via interviewer‐administered questionnaires (Visit 2; 1990 – 1992). Based upon categorization of both factors, participants were classified as having high, intermediate, or low mid‐life SE (Table 1). Brain amyloid was evaluated with florbetapir PET (Visit 5; 2011‐2014). Elevated amyloid burden was defined as standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) >1.2 in the global cortex. Incident dementia cases were identified from visit 5 through 2019 through ongoing surveillance utilizing in‐person neurocognitive testing, informant interviews, and hospitalization codes. Relative contributions of mid‐life SE and elevated florbetapir SUVR to incident dementia, independently and with multiplicative interaction terms, were evaluated with Cox regression models, adjusted for demographics, APOEε4 and vascular risk factorsResultAmong 310 participants, 48 developed dementia (median follow‐up: 4.7 years). Mid‐life SE and elevated SUVR each independently predicted dementia risk but did not interact on a multiplicative scale. Participants with high or intermediate mid‐life SE, relative to low mid‐life SE, were less likely to develop dementia (Table 2). Although the interaction between mid‐life SE and elevated SUVR was not significant, stratified models suggested a stronger association between amyloid burden and dementia in participants with high mid‐life SE (Table 3).ConclusionGreater mid‐life SE was associated with lower odds of developing dementia, independent of elevated SUVR. Although protective, there was no strong evidence for effect modification of mid‐life SE on the association between amyloid and dementia risk. Future longitudinal studies evaluating the potential influence of social factors measured throughout the life course are needed to inform our understanding as to what factors may preserve cognition in the presence of elevated brain pathology.

AbstractBackgroundAlthough amyloid deposition in the brain is often associated with subsequent dementia risk, not everyone with brain amyloid will develop dementia. This discrepancy illustrates the potential importance that risk factors and lived experiences may have in modifying this association. Compared to participants with low social engagement (SE) in mid‐life, we hypothesized that participants with high mid‐life SE will show a weaker association between amyloid burden and incident dementia.MethodWe included data from 310 non‐demented participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC)‐PET study. Social support and isolation were assessed via interviewer‐administered questionnaires (Visit 2; 1990 – 1992). Based upon categorization of both factors, participants were classified as having high, intermediate, or low mid‐life SE (Table 1). Brain amyloid was evaluated with florbetapir PET (Visit 5; 2011‐2014). Elevated amyloid burden was defined as standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) >1.2 in the global cortex. Incident dementia cases were identified from visit 5 through 2019 through ongoing surveillance utilizing in‐person neurocognitive testing, informant interviews, and hospitalization codes. Relative contributions of mid‐life SE and elevated florbetapir SUVR to incident dementia, independently and with multiplicative interaction terms, were evaluated with Cox regression models, adjusted for demographics, APOEe4 and vascular risk factorsResultAmong 310 participants, 48 developed dementia (median follow‐up: 4.7 years). Mid‐life SE and elevated SUVR each independently predicted dementia risk but did not interact on a multiplicative scale. Participants with high or intermediate mid‐life SE, relative to low mid‐life SE, were less likely to develop dementia (Table 2). Although the interaction between mid‐life SE and elevated SUVR was not significant, stratified models suggested a stronger association between amyloid burden and dementia in participants with high mid‐life SE (Table 3).ConclusionGreater mid‐life SE was associated with lower odds of developing dementia, independent of elevated SUVR. Although protective, there was no strong evidence for effect modification of mid‐life SE on the association between amyloid and dementia risk. Future longitudinal studies evaluating the potential influence of social factors measured throughout the life course are needed to inform our understanding as to what factors may preserve cognition in the presence of elevated brain pathology.

Background: The most frequent dementias are a mix of Alzheimer’s, vascular and other pathologies which evolve over many years. Our objective is to determine how many years in advance of dementia cognitive scores are affected. Methods: 13,749 dementia-free ARIC participants had a cognitive exam at Visit 2 (1990-1992, mean age 57), 10,813 at Visit 4 (1996-1998), 5,605 at Visit 5 (2011-2013) and 3,516 at Visit 6 (2016-2017). Within 5-year intervals after each visit, we compared the combined mean of three cognitive tests (Delayed Word Recall, Digit Symbol Substitution, and Word Fluency) z-scores at baseline in two groups - participants who were diagnosed with dementia within each interval vs. those who survived to the interval without dementia. Baseline visit z-scores were adjusted for age, gender, race-center and education level in separate linear regression models for each visit. We plotted the adjusted z-score mean [95% confidence interval] by time interval following each visit. Results: Dementia incidence during follow-up yielded 2,981 , 2,397, 961 and 160 cases after Visits 2, 4, 5, and 6 respectively. The three-test combined scores were already significantly lower at 10-15 years before dementia compared to those who did not experience dementia by that period (Figure). As expected at intervals closer to dementia onset the differences between dementia and non-dementia groups increased, up to their widest point of approximately 1 SD at only 0-5 years prior to onset. Delayed Word and Digit Symbol Substitution tests has similar findings while Word Fluency began to decrease only within 5 years prior to dementia onset. Conclusion: We found that the differences in combined cognitive function z-score appeared to be associated with dementia diagnosis as early as 15 years prior to diagnosis. As we got closer to the diagnosis date, the difference in scores of people with and without dementia widened substantially. Periodic testing might allow us to intervene earlier in persons likely to develop dementia.

Abstract Hearing loss is a risk factor for dementia; whether this association differs by race is unknown. Although hearing loss is less prevalent in Blacks than Whites, we hypothesized the hearing loss-dementia relationship is stronger in Blacks. All-cause dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were adjudicated using longitudinal cognitive data. Hearing was measured using pure tone better-ear thresholds (0.5-4 kHz). Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates and included an interaction term between hearing and race. In 3,605 participants from a population-based cohort (68-89 years, 23% Black, 59% female), estimates for 7-year dementia risk per 10 decibels increase in hearing loss were stronger in Blacks (hazard ratio [HR]:1.24, 95% Confidence Interval (CI):1.07,1.43) than Whites (HR:1.07; 95%CI:0.96,1.19). Hearing loss is a risk factor for dementia in Black Americans. These findings emphasize the need to address existing racial disparities in hearing healthcare.

AbstractBackgroundPrior evidence has suggested associations between hearing loss and smaller brain volumes particularly in the temporal lobe where the primary auditory cortex is located, probably due to changes in cortical organization associated with reduced auditory stimulation. Evidence regarding associations of central auditory processing with brain volumes is relatively limited. The study aims to investigate cross‐sectional associations of central auditory processing with brain volumes in older adults.MethodWe studied 587 cognitively normal (Mini‐Mental State Exam ≥23 if high school degree or less and ≥25 if above high school degree) older adults (mean age: 77±4 years, 56% female, 17% black), including 426 with hearing loss from the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) baseline (2018‐19), which is an ancillary randomized controlled trial of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study and 161 with normal hearing, comparable age and cognitive status from the ARIC Visit 6/7 (2016‐17/2018‐19). Brain volumes were measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and were transformed to z‐scores. Central auditory processing was measured by the Quick Speech‐in‐Noise (QuickSIN) test. Total scores range from 0 to 30 with lower scores indicating worse speech‐in‐noise performance. Multivariable‐adjusted linear regression was used to estimate cross‐sectional differences in standardized brain volumes associated with differences in QuickSIN score. Models adjusted for age, sex, race, education, cohort, body mass index, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, intracranial volume, and pure‐tone average.ResultEvery 5‐point decrease in QuickSIN score (worse performance) was associated with smaller volumes of the temporal lobe (‐0.07SD, 95% CI: ‐0.13, ‐0.01). QuickSIN score was also associated with subregions of the temporal lobe related to auditory processing, memory and emotion, including amygdala (‐0.13SD, 95% CI: ‐0.21, ‐0.04), middle (‐0.08SD, 95% CI: ‐0.15, ‐0.00) and superior temporal gyri (‐0.08SD, 95% CI: ‐0.15, ‐0.01).ConclusionPoorer central auditory processing was associated with smaller temporal lobe volumes, including but not limited to subregions important for auditory processing. The ongoing collection of ACHIEVE data with longitudinal MRI data will facilitate understanding of association between hearing loss and brain atrophy as well as the potential promising effects of hearing treatment in mitigating brain aging.

Background: Midlife obesity is associated with dementia in later life, but how the metabolic syndrome (MetS) relates to cognitive change is less understood. We hypothesized that MetS would be more predictive of 6-year cognitive decline than its individual components in a large biethnic cohort (the ARIC study) and that combinations of risk factors would further increase likelihood of change. Methods: The MetS was defined in 1987-89 on 10,687 participants with two cognitive assessments at two time points. In subjects aged 44 to 66, obesity measures included body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WTHR). The main outcome measure was change in 1990-92 to 96-99 of three cognitive tests: Delayed Word Recall (DWR), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and Word Fluency Test (WFT). Linear and logistic regressions were all adjusted for age, combined race-center, sex, education, smoking, drinking, coronary artery disease and prior stroke. Change was measured as the difference divided by the number of years between visits. Results: At baseline, the prevalence of MetS was 22% (mean age 54 years, 27% black, 55% female, and 28% BMI>30 kg/m2). Subjects with MetS performed in the lowest test quintile (adjusted ORs: DWR 1.3 95% CI 1.1-1.4) in 1996-99, and much of this effect size was explained by an elevated WTHR (DWR OR 1.3 CI 1.1-1.5) and diabetes (DWR OR 1.4 CI 1.2-1.7). MetS was not associated with annual cognitive change, and diabetes was the only significant component associated with change (adjusted beta: DWR 0.03 p=.01, DSST 0.2 p<.001, WFT 0.09 p=.01). Conclusion: MetS at ages 44 to 66 was associated with worse cognitive function at follow-up, but not with annual cognitive decline over several years. Elevated WTHR and diabetes explained most of the association of MetS with cognitive function measures, and diabetes with cognitive decline. Until we have a definition of the MetS more based on pathophysiology, the components of the MetS should be the focus of analysis in future studies.

AbstractBackgroundHearing impairment is associated with cognitive decline but whether it is a cause or marker is unknown. We investigated the association of hearing impairment with brain volumes and 8‐year cognitive decline. Because the superior temporal gyrus (STG) is the location of the primary auditory cortex, we stratified results by STG volume to investigate if the association of hearing and cognition differed among participants with and without evidence of possible hearing‐related brain atrophy.MethodWe used data from 1195 community‐dwelling adults (72‐94 years, 61% female, 36% black) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. A composite cognitive score was created from 10 neuropsychological tests administered at 3 study visits spanning 8 years (2011‐13 to 2018‐19). Brain volumes were calculated from structural magnetic resonance imaging scans for 6 regions of interest. Pure tone air conduction hearing thresholds (frequencies 0.5‐4 kHz) were obtained in 2016‐17 and averaged, with better‐ear hearing impairment defined as an average >25 dB. Multivariable‐adjusted linear regression was used to estimate cross‐sectional differences in standardized brain volumes, adjusting for intracranial volume, demographic and clinical covariates. We estimated differences in annual rates of cognitive change by hearing impairment status adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates using linear mixed models; results were stratified by intracranial volume‐adjusted STG volume (below vs. equal to or greater than the median value).ResultThe mean STG volume difference comparing hearing impairment to normal hearing was ‐0.121 standard deviations (SD) (95% CI: ‐0.213, ‐0.028). Overall, the difference in the rate of cognitive decline associated with hearing impairment was ‐0.014 SD (‐0.023, ‐0.005). Hearing was more strongly associated with cognitive decline among participants with smaller STG volumes; rate difference, ‐0.014 SD (‐0.027, ‐0.002) compared to ‐0.008 (‐0.022, 0.006) for participants with larger STG volumes.ConclusionHearing impairment was associated with smaller brain volumes in the primary auditory region, but not with other regions. Our stratified analysis suggests that hearing treatment might be an important possible strategy to delay cognitive decline, even among participants with hearing‐related brain atrophy. Furthermore, the adverse cognitive effects of hearing impairment could potentially be mitigated if early hearing treatment can prevent STG atrophy.

Background: Dementia is increasingly appreciated to have important vascular disease contributions. Albuminuria and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) define chronic kidney disease (CKD) and are related to the risk of its consequences as well as microvascular disease and endothelial damage across multiple vascular beds. We extend previous studies by examining albuminuria and eGFR measured at both mid-life and older age as risk factors for dementia. Methods: We studied 10,876 adult participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study excluding participants with end-stage renal disease, stroke and incident dementia at baseline. We analyzed the adjusted relative hazard of incident dementia as a function of eGFR (linear spine with a knot at 60 ml/min per 1.73m 2 ) and log urinary albumin-creatinine-ratio (UACR) adjusting for age, sex, race, education level, Apolipoprotein E4 level, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, diabetes and hypertension. We used two different baseline visits: (1) Starting in 1996-1999 (Visit 4, age 54-74 years); (2) Starting 2011-2013 (Visit 5, age 70-90 years) with follow-up to 2017. Results: We observed 2,001 dementia cases over 16 years of follow-up (446 after Visit 5). Risk of dementia increased with higher levels of albuminuria with a stronger magnitude at older-age than in midlife ( see table ). Estimated GFR was more weakly associated with dementia (p>0.05 at both baselines). The albuminuria association was consistent across sex and race (p-interaction>0.05). Conclusion: Albuminuria, a marker of kidney disease and endothelial damage, is strongly related to dementia incidence. Albuminuria’s association with dementia is stronger in late-life unlike other vascular risk factors, where the association is weaker at older age.