Deal, Jennifer A.

Introduction: Diabetes, a modifiable risk factor for dementia, is thought to impart increased risk of dementia through cerebral small vessel disease. While the importance of diabetes in midlife is well-documented, the influence of different glycemic levels, duration of diabetes, and Alzheimer’s disease genetic risk (apolipoprotein [ APOE ] ε4 genotype) in late-life on dementia risk remains uncertain. This could have implications for individualized prevention strategies. In this study, we investigated whether a higher glycemic level and longer duration of diabetes in late-life is associated with a higher risk of dementia, and whether associations vary by APOE ε4 genotype. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort analysis with the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study using up to 11 years of follow-up (baseline, 2011-2013). We defined diabetes as glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA 1c ) ≥6.5%, self-reported physician diagnosis, or use of any diabetes medication. Among those with diabetes, we categorized participants as having a lower glycemic level (HbA 1c <7%) or higher level (HbA 1c ≥7%), and duration as short (<5 years) or long (≥5 years). We estimated hazard ratios (HR) for incident dementia by HbA 1c levels and by diabetes duration in separate multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. We tested for statistical multiplicative interaction on the relative risk of dementia by fitting interaction terms between diabetes measures and APOE ε4 genotype in separate regression models. Results: In 5030 participants without dementia (mean age, 75.4 years; 58.6% female; 21% Black; 28% with diabetes), there were 1167 (23.2%) incident dementia cases over a median follow-up of 9.0 years. Compared to no diabetes, a lower glycemic level and higher level were both associated with elevated dementia risk ( P -trend <.0001; Table). A higher glycemic level was associated with an elevated risk of dementia relative to a lower level (HR=1.47 [95% CI: 1.22-1.77]; Table). Compared to no diabetes, both shorter duration and longer duration were associated with an increase in dementia risk ( P -trend <.0001; Table). Longer duration was associated with an increased risk of dementia relative to shorter duration (HR=1.57 [95% CI: 1.24-1.98]; Table). Associations for glycemic level and diabetes duration did not significantly differ by APOE ε4 genotype (all P >.05). Conclusions: Diabetes management in older adults that includes lower glycemic goals may help reduce dementia risk.

Objective We investigated potential racial disparities in the effects of audiometric hearing loss and its treatment on dementia and mortality among 3,602 older adults aged 68–89 years, 22% of whom were self-identified Black race. Methods Adjudicated all-cause dementia was determined using neurocognitive test data, proxy reports, and surveillance of hospital records and death certificates. Audiometric hearing loss, defined as the better-ear averaged pure-tone threshold (0.5–4 kHz), was categorized using clinical cutpoints. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models included hearing loss–race interaction terms. Results Dementia risk associated with moderate-to-severe hearing loss did not differ by race [Black participants: hazard ratio (HR): 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05, 2.61; White participants: HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.51; P -interaction = 0.92]. However, moderate-to-severe hearing loss was associated with a 2.3-fold increase in mortality among Black participants only (95% CI: 1.17, 4.60). Conclusions Our findings emphasize the importance of including minoritized populations in hearing treatment research to build an evidence base for policy development and clinical decision-making. Hearing loss affects the health of both Black and White Americans. Racial disparities in hearing healthcare should be addressed to advance health equity for all older adults.

Abstract Background The Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) randomized trial ( n = 977;ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03243422) demonstrated that hearing intervention slowed 3‐year cognitive decline by 48% among a subgroup of participants. To further investigate differences by treatment with respect to cognitive benefit, we tested the hypothesis that hearing intervention is associated with improved neurodegeneration blood biomarkers 3‐years post‐randomization and assessed whether combining biomarkers and cognitive results improved power in the trial design. Method The ACHIEVE study is a multicenter, parallel‐arm, randomized trial (hearing intervention vs health education control) on 3‐year cognitive decline among adults 70–84years with untreated hearing loss and without substantial cognitive impairment. Participants were recruited from two populations: (1) a long‐standing cardiovascular health observational study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities [ARIC]), and (2) de novo community volunteers. Plasma was collected in year 3 in a subsample ( n = 540) while ARIC participants ( n = 164) also had baseline plasma. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light (NfL) neurodegenerative biomarkers were derived using the Alamar CNS protein panel. Regression models estimated the association of treatment with 3‐year biomarkers and global cognitive differences in the combined sample and by recruitment source and annualized change from baseline in the ARIC sample. We included a simple composite score of the standardized outcomes (Table 2). Result Among the subsample, baseline characteristics were balanced by treatment. There were no significant differences on 3‐year neurodegeneration biomarker levels by treatment in the combined (Table 1) or de novo groups (Table 2). Among ARIC participants, intervention resulted in lower 3‐year GFAP (mean:‐0.415;95%CI:‐0.712,‐0.118) and NfL (mean:‐0.349;95%CI:‐0.652,‐0.046) (Table 2). Annualized change from baseline analyses among ARIC participants (Table 3) revealed intervention was associated with a slower rate of cognitive decline (difference‐in‐means:0.059;95%CI:0.018,0.100) and a slower rate of increase in GFAP (difference‐in‐means: ‐0.060;95%CI:‐0.112,‐0.009). Differences in estimates suggest combined score, relative to cognition alone, may increase power in clinical trials that show a positive effect (ARIC subgroup: p = 0.02vs. 0.08[Table 2] and p = 0.0009vs.0.048[Table 3]). Conclusion Hearing intervention was associated with positive 3‐year effects on neurodegeneration blood biomarkers in ARIC participants which parallels cognitive decline results. Results provides objective evidence of brain changes following hearing intervention and potential signal of a more powerful combined outcome approach for future brain health clinical trials.

ImportanceMidlife vascular risk factors are associated with an elevated risk of dementia. However, the total contribution of vascular risk factors in midlife and late life with incident dementia is uncertain.ObjectiveTo quantify the proportion of incident dementia attributable to modifiable vascular risk factors measured in midlife and late life and to examine differences by apolipoprotein ε4 genotype, self-reported race, and sex.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a prospective cohort analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study using 33 years of follow-up (1987-2020). The setting included ARIC field centers (Jackson, Mississippi; Forsyth County, North Carolina; Minneapolis suburbs, Minnesota; Washington County, Maryland). Study baseline in Black and White participants with complete exposure and covariate data was set by age at risk factor measurement (45-54 years, 55-64 years, and 65-74 years). Data were analyzed from August 2023 to December 2024.ExposuresHypertension (systolic blood pressure [BP] ≥130 mm Hg, diastolic BP ≥80 mm Hg, or use of medication for BP), diabetes (fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL, nonfasting glucose ≥200 mg/dL, self-reported physician’s diagnosis, or use of any diabetes medication), and current smoking (self-reported).Main Outcomes and MeasuresIncident dementia. Population attributable fractions were estimated by age 80 years, and separately after 80 years, from having at least 1 vascular risk factor by age at risk factor measurement.ResultsA total of 7731 participants were included in analysis of risk factors measured at age 45 to 54 years (4494 female [58%]; 2207 Black [29%]; 5524 White [71%]), 12 274 contributed to analysis of risk factors measured at age 55 to 64 years (6698 female [55%]; 2886 Black [24%]; 9388 White [76%]), and 6787 contributed to analysis of risk factors measured at age 65 to 74 years (3764 female [56%], 1375 Black [20%]; 5412 White [80%]). There were 801, 995, and 422 dementia cases by 80 years, respectively. The fraction of dementia by 80 years attributable to at least 1 vascular factor at age 45 to 54 years was 21.8% (95% CI, 14.3%-29.3%), at 55 to 64 years was 26.4% (95% CI, 19.1%-33.6%), and at 65 to 74 years was 44.0% (95% CI, 30.9%-57.2%). Attributable fractions for these factors were higher in apolipoprotein ε4 noncarriers at age 55 years and older (range, 33.3%-61.4%), Black individuals at age 45 years and older (range, 25.5%-52.9%), and female individuals at age 55 years and older (range, 29.2%-51.3%). Only 2% to 8% of dementia cases after 80 years were attributable to these factors.Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this cohort study suggest that between 22% and 44% of incident dementia cases by 80 years in the ARIC study were attributed to midlife and late-life vascular risk factors. Assuming causal relationships, maintaining optimal vascular health across the life course could mitigate a sizeable proportion of dementia risk by 80 years.

Introduction: Vascular risk factors of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking in midlife (45-64 years) and possibly early late-life (65-74 years) are associated with increased risk of dementia. Current estimates of population attributable risk for dementia assume vascular factors are independent and do not interact to increase risk of dementia, which may underestimate the combined impact of vascular risk reduction on dementia incidence. In this study, we evaluated the joint association and interaction of vascular risk factors on risk of dementia. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort analysis using the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study using up to 33 years of follow-up (1987-2020). We used age as baseline (45-54 years, n=7,731; 55-64 years, n=12,273; and 65-74 years, n=6,660). We defined hypertension as systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mm Hg, or anti-hypertension medication use. We defined diabetes as fasting glucose level ≥126 mg/dL, non-fasting glucose ≥200 mg/dL, self-reported physician diagnosis, or use of any diabetes medication. Current smoking was self-reported. We investigated additive and multiplicative interactions for combinations of vascular risk factors on incident (adjudicated) dementia by age 80 using joint effect variables in Cox regression models stratified by age of risk factor measurement (45-54 years, 55-64 years, or 65-74 years). For interaction analyses, parameter values >1 indicate positive interaction (synergy) and values <1 indicate negative interaction (antagonism). Results: In participants with risk factors measured in these baseline age strata, there were 801 (10%), 995 (8%), and 422 (6%) cases of incident dementia by age 80, respectively. Hypertension and diabetes exhibited positive interactions on the additive and multiplicative scales in midlife (Figure 1). Diabetes and smoking in midlife had positive additive interaction (value >1, Figure 2). All vascular risk factor combinations in late-life had negative interactions on the multiplicative scale (values <1, Figures 1-3). Conclusions: Hypertension with diabetes and diabetes with smoking, all measured in midlife, interact to increase risk of dementia by age 80. The overall impact of reducing midlife vascular risk factors on incident dementia could be sizeable. These findings highlight the importance of multifactor interventions addressing combinations of vascular risk factors for dementia prevention strategies.

Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents a stage between cognitively normal and Alzheimer's disease. Despite much published research on MCI, there continues to be a knowledge gap of volumetric brain changes in MCI versus cognitively normal (CN) in racially diverse, community-based samples. Objective The study aimed to understand differences in volume of selected brain regions in individuals with MCI versus those who are cognitively normal. Methods This was a cross-sectional study with 1835 participants, which sampled all cognitively impaired participants (n = 667) and a subsample of cognitively normal participants from the ARIC neurocognitive study (ARIC-NCS). All individuals underwent a brain MRI. Two models (5 versus 22 regions of interest [ROI]) were built to analyze differences in brain volume between cognitively normal and MCI, and among 3 cognitive domains (memory, language, executive function). Using previous visits data, we estimated the standard deviations of 20-year cognitive decline equivalent to the difference in brain volume between MCI and CN. Results Every lobe was significantly smaller in individuals with MCI, with the largest difference observed in the temporal lobe. Moreover, there was a significant difference between MCI and CN in every subregion within the temporal lobe. The difference in volume between CN and MCI was equivalent to the total brain volume difference associated with a 1.24 standard deviation greater long-term cognitive decline. Conclusions Loss of volume in all cortical lobes, but particularly in the temporal lobe, was associated with MCI. Additionally, significant volume differences were observed in the temporal lobe in all three cognitive domains.

AbstractBackgroundMidlife vascular risk factors are associated with an increased risk of dementia. However, the overall contribution of modifiable vascular risk factors in midlife and late‐life to dementia remains unclear. In this study, we quantified population attributable fractions, which account for risk factor prevalence and strength of relative risks, of incident dementia from vascular risk factors measured in midlife and early late‐life.MethodWe used 33 years of prospective cohort data in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Incident dementia (community surveillance and algorithmic diagnosis with expert clinical adjudication) was ascertained from baseline (1987‐1989) through December 31, 2020. We quantified population attributable fractions of incident dementia by age 80 from the combination of hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥130, diastolic blood pressure ≥80, or use of medication), diabetes (fasting glucose ≥126, non‐fasting glucose ≥200, self‐reported physician diagnosis of diabetes, or use of medication for diabetes/insulin), and self‐reported current cigarette smoking (at least one risk factor versus none) measured at different ages (45‐54 [n = 7,731], 55‐64 [n = 12,273]; 65‐74 [n = 6,660]). We also computed attributable fractions stratified by sex, apolipoprotein ε4 genotype, and self‐reported race.ResultThe prevalence of having one or more of the vascular risk factors was 61.6% (95% CI: 60.5, 62.7%) at age 45‐54 and increased to 77.5% (95% CI: 76.5, 78.5%) by age 65‐74. Population attributable fractions of dementia increased from 22.7% (95% CI: 15.3, 30.1%) for vascular risk factors measured at age 45‐54 to 45.4% (95% CI: 32.5, 58.3%) for vascular risk factors assessed at age 65‐74 (see Figure). Attributable fractions were larger in females, participants without apolipoprotein ε4 alleles, and Black participants (Figure).ConclusionBetween 23% to 45% of incident dementia cases by age 80 were attributed to a combination of hypertension, diabetes, or current smoking up through age 74. Attributable fractions for the combined impact of vascular risk varied by key demographics. Public health strategies targeting modifiable vascular risk factors could reduce dementia risk and increase healthy lifespan.

AbstractBackgroundPrior longitudinal studies among older adults have documented associations between hearing loss and changes in brain morphology. Whether interventions involving hearing aids can reduce age‐related atrophy is unknown. A substudy within the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE, Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03243422) randomized controlled trial tested the effect of a best‐practices hearing intervention versus health education control on three‐year change in cortical thickness among older adults with hearing loss.MethodThe ACHIEVE study enrolled 977 community‐dwelling adults aged 70‐84 years at baseline (2018‐2019) with untreated hearing loss (better ear pure tone average [0.5‐4 kHz] ≥30 and <70 dB HL) and without substantial cognitive impairment from four sites across the U.S. (Jackson, MS, Forsyth County, NC, Minneapolis, MN, Washington County, MD). Participants were randomized to a hearing intervention (provision of hearing aids and related technologies, counseling, and education) or a health education control (individual sessions with a health educator covering topics relevant to chronic disease and disability prevention). Three‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 3 Tesla Siemens scanners in a subsample of 445 participants at the ACHIEVE baseline and three‐year follow‐up. Linear mixed effects models were used in intention‐to‐treat analyses to estimate three‐year change in cortical thickness. All models adjusted for baseline measures of hearing loss, recruitment source, site, age, sex, and education. Missing outcome and covariate data was imputed to mitigate bias caused by informative attrition.ResultAt baseline, 224 participants were women (50.3%), 52 participants were Black (11.7%), and the mean (SD) age was 76.4 (4.0) years old (Table 1). Compared to the health education control, the hearing intervention exhibited a nominally protective effect on three‐year change in average cortical thickness (Figure 1). The greatest effect size for cortical thickness was observed in the occipital lobe, while the smallest effect size was detected in the temporal lobe. Statistically significant effects were detected in the pars orbitalis, rostral anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate, and isthmus cingulate (Figure 2).ConclusionHearing aid use may reduce decline in cortical thickness among older adults. The effects of hearing aids may be greatest in regions other than those associated with the auditory cortex.