Sharrett, A. Richey

Abstract INTRODUCTION Associations of arterial stiffness, measured through pulse wave velocity (PWV), with incident dementia may be driven by age‐related structural changes to the arterial wall or by elevated blood pressure. METHODS Dementia‐free White or Black participants in the community‐based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort study with measures of PWV were examined. The associations of carotid‐femoral PWV (cfPWV) and total, structural, and load‐dependent PWV with dementia were estimated using Poisson regression models and Cox proportional hazards models. Dementia cases were defined by physician‐adjudicated review, telephone interviews, hospitalization records, and death certificates. RESULTS Of 4818 participants included in the study population (mean age: 75 years; 41% male, 21% Black), 1067 (22%) developed dementia over a median follow‐up of 9.0 years. Higher cfPWV, total PWV, structural PWV, and load‐dependent PWV were associated with greater dementia risk. DISCUSSION Both structural and pressure‐related arterial stiffness mechanisms may underlie the link between PWV and dementia.

Abstract Introduction Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a potentially modifiable risk factor for the prevention of dementia, of which Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause. However, there is a lack of longitudinal evidence relating SDB to AD pathology >20 years later. We examined the association between late-midlife SDB and late-life brain β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition—a hallmark of AD—assessed approximately 23 years later. Methods The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study is an ongoing prospective cohort study initiated in 1987. Participants at two ARIC sites (Washington County, Maryland; Minneapolis, Minnesota) with primarily White participants also completed polysomnography (PSG) in the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) in 1995-98. SDB measures included apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; number of apneas + hypopneas with ≥3% oxygen desaturation/hour of sleep), arousal index, and percentage of total sleep time in apnea, in hypopnea, and with oxygen saturation < 90%. A subset of participants completed florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) scans through several ARIC ancillary studies (2011-2025 including the ARIC Sleep-PET study). We defined Aβ deposition as a global standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) >1.2 (vs. SUVR ≤1.2). We used Poisson regression with robust standard errors to estimate relative risk (RR) of Aβ deposition by SDB, adjusting for demographics and vascular risk factors, and applied inverse probability attrition weighting to account for selective drop-out. Results Among 186 dementia-free participants (mean age=59 years at PSG and 82 years at PET scan, 58% female, 98% White), every 10% increase in total sleep time in hypopnea was associated with higher risk of Aβ deposition (RR=1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 1.91). When compared to no SDB (AHI < 5), moderate to severe SDB (AHI ≥15) was associated with elevated Aβ deposition (RR=2.36, 95% CI: 1.22, 4.57); mild SDB (AHI 5 to < 15) was not (RR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.53, 2.07). Conclusion SDB in late midlife was associated with greater risk of Aβ deposition approximately 23 years later. SDB may play a role in the early stages of AD pathogenesis. Future longitudinal studies are needed to optimize strategies for screening and treating SDB for dementia prevention. Support (if any) Supported in part by RF1AG050745.

Introduction: Diabetes, a modifiable risk factor for dementia, is thought to impart increased risk of dementia through cerebral small vessel disease. While the importance of diabetes in midlife is well-documented, the influence of different glycemic levels, duration of diabetes, and Alzheimer’s disease genetic risk (apolipoprotein [ APOE ] ε4 genotype) in late-life on dementia risk remains uncertain. This could have implications for individualized prevention strategies. In this study, we investigated whether a higher glycemic level and longer duration of diabetes in late-life is associated with a higher risk of dementia, and whether associations vary by APOE ε4 genotype. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort analysis with the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study using up to 11 years of follow-up (baseline, 2011-2013). We defined diabetes as glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA 1c ) ≥6.5%, self-reported physician diagnosis, or use of any diabetes medication. Among those with diabetes, we categorized participants as having a lower glycemic level (HbA 1c <7%) or higher level (HbA 1c ≥7%), and duration as short (<5 years) or long (≥5 years). We estimated hazard ratios (HR) for incident dementia by HbA 1c levels and by diabetes duration in separate multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. We tested for statistical multiplicative interaction on the relative risk of dementia by fitting interaction terms between diabetes measures and APOE ε4 genotype in separate regression models. Results: In 5030 participants without dementia (mean age, 75.4 years; 58.6% female; 21% Black; 28% with diabetes), there were 1167 (23.2%) incident dementia cases over a median follow-up of 9.0 years. Compared to no diabetes, a lower glycemic level and higher level were both associated with elevated dementia risk ( P -trend <.0001; Table). A higher glycemic level was associated with an elevated risk of dementia relative to a lower level (HR=1.47 [95% CI: 1.22-1.77]; Table). Compared to no diabetes, both shorter duration and longer duration were associated with an increase in dementia risk ( P -trend <.0001; Table). Longer duration was associated with an increased risk of dementia relative to shorter duration (HR=1.57 [95% CI: 1.24-1.98]; Table). Associations for glycemic level and diabetes duration did not significantly differ by APOE ε4 genotype (all P >.05). Conclusions: Diabetes management in older adults that includes lower glycemic goals may help reduce dementia risk.

Objective We investigated potential racial disparities in the effects of audiometric hearing loss and its treatment on dementia and mortality among 3,602 older adults aged 68–89 years, 22% of whom were self-identified Black race. Methods Adjudicated all-cause dementia was determined using neurocognitive test data, proxy reports, and surveillance of hospital records and death certificates. Audiometric hearing loss, defined as the better-ear averaged pure-tone threshold (0.5–4 kHz), was categorized using clinical cutpoints. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models included hearing loss–race interaction terms. Results Dementia risk associated with moderate-to-severe hearing loss did not differ by race [Black participants: hazard ratio (HR): 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05, 2.61; White participants: HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.51; P -interaction = 0.92]. However, moderate-to-severe hearing loss was associated with a 2.3-fold increase in mortality among Black participants only (95% CI: 1.17, 4.60). Conclusions Our findings emphasize the importance of including minoritized populations in hearing treatment research to build an evidence base for policy development and clinical decision-making. Hearing loss affects the health of both Black and White Americans. Racial disparities in hearing healthcare should be addressed to advance health equity for all older adults.

Introduction: Plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), including amyloid-β (Aβ42/Aβ40), phosphorylated tau (p-tau181), neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have shown strong reliability in predicting dementia risk. White matter hyperintensities (WMH) represent a major vascular contributor to dementia. We investigated how plasma biomarkers of AD interact with WMH on MRI to influence incident dementia risk. Methods: We included dementia-free participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study who underwent MRI and plasma biomarker assessment at Visit 5 (2011–2013). WMH was quantified and considered continuously (log-transformed and standardized), and in tertiles. Plasma biomarkers were log-base-2-transformed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate dementia risk over 10 years associated with plasma biomarkers and WMH, independently and multiplicatively. Models were adjusted for demographic variables (age, sex, race, and education), vascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, smoking status, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate), and APOE ε4 status. Results: Among 1,538 participants (aged 67- 90 years, 29% Black), 30% ( N = 462) developed dementia over the 10-year follow-up period. For every doubling of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 , indicating lower amyloid burden, dementia risk decreased, while doubling of p-tau 181 , NfL, and GFAP were each associated with increased dementia risk, in separate models; each of these associations was independent of WMH (Table 1). Additionally, dementia risk increased per SD increase in WMH, independent of each plasma biomarker. Although no multiplicative interaction terms reached statistical significance (p<0.05), there was suggestive evidence that Aβ42/Aβ40 and GFAP have smaller effect sizes on dementia risk in subgroups at the highest WMH tertile (p-interactions<0.10; see Table 2). Discussion: Plasma biomarkers and WMH independently predict dementia risk over 10 years, though there remained limited evidence of multiplicative effects. Plasma biomarkers may be less important for dementia risk in individuals who also have extensive WMH. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating both AD-specific plasma markers as well as indicators of cerebral small vessel disease, such as WMH, into dementia risk profiling.

Abstract The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study started in 1987‐1989 (visit 1), when participants from four U.S. communities were 45‐64yo. Participants have been seen at up to 10 additional in‐person visits with annual/semi‐annual telephone calls to ascertain clinical events, hospitalizations, and other health outcomes. In 2011‐2013, at ARIC visit 5, the ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC‐NCS) was initiated for surviving participants, incorporating neuropsychological assessments at multiple in‐person visits and informant interviews to support cognitive adjudication. A subset of participants have undergone brain MRI with measurement of brain volumes, cortical thickness, arterial disease and vascular lesions, with a smaller subset having brain florbetapir PET. Blood‐based Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers are available at multiple visits along with extensive measurement of vascular risk factors, vascular markers, and ‐omic (e.g.genomic and proteomic) data. This presentation will focus on the available data in ARIC, the methods underlying its collection and subsequent analysis, and some of the primary contributions of this study to the field. With 37 years of follow‐up, a great strength of ARIC is the ability to evaluate risk factors in midlife; ARIC studies have supported an association of midlife hypertension, diabetes, physical inactivity, and other vascular risk factors with reduced dementia risk, even among those with increased genetic risk for dementia. ARIC studies have demonstrated associations between stroke and dementia, and have linked vascular risk factors with blood‐based and imaging biomarkers of AD‐related dementias. ARIC has demonstrated the importance of hearing loss in dementia risk, and a subset of ARIC participants were recruited into (and were those who most benefited from the intervention of) the ACHIEVE study of hearing aid use for reduction of dementia. Proteomic studies have identified markers of dementia risk when evaluated in midlife. Recently, ARIC data informed updated estimates on lifetime risk of dementia, where it was estimated that among individuals surviving beyond age 55, 42% would develop dementia over their lifetime through age 95. ARIC studies continue to focus on risk factors for dementia, particularly now in the oldest old, and on contributors to cognitive reserve and resilience. ARIC follows a model of data sharing and broad collaboration.

Purpose: Population-based evidence in the interrelationships among hearing, brain structure, and cognition is limited. This study aims to investigate the cross-sectional associations of peripheral hearing, brain imaging measures, and cognitive function with speech-in-noise performance among older adults. Method: We studied 602 participants in the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ancillary study, including 427 ACHIEVE baseline (2018–2020) participants with hearing loss and 175 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study Visit 6/7 (2016–2017/2018–2019) participants with normal hearing. Speech-in-noise performance, as outcome of interest, was assessed by the Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) test (range: 0–30; higher = better). Predictors of interest included (a) peripheral hearing assessed by pure-tone audiometry; (b) brain imaging measures: structural MRI measures, white matter hyperintensities, and diffusion tensor imaging measures; and (c) cognitive performance assessed by a battery of 10 cognitive tests. All predictors were standardized to z scores. We estimated the differences in QuickSIN associated with every standard deviation ( SD ) worse in each predictor (peripheral hearing, brain imaging, and cognition) using multivariable-adjusted linear regression, adjusting for demographic variables, lifestyle, and disease factors (Model 1), and, additionally, for other predictors to assess independent associations (Model 2). Results: Participants were aged 70–84 years, 56% female, and 17% Black. Every SD worse in better-ear 4-frequency pure-tone average was associated with worse QuickSIN (−4.89, 95% confidence interval, CI [−5.57, −4.21]) when participants had peripheral hearing loss, independent of other predictors. Smaller temporal lobe volume was associated with worse QuickSIN, but the association was not independent of other predictors (−0.30, 95% CI [−0.86, 0.26]). Every SD worse in global cognitive performance was independently associated with worse QuickSIN (−0.90, 95% CI [−1.30, −0.50]). Conclusions: Peripheral hearing and cognitive performance are independently associated with speech-in-noise performance among dementia-free older adults. The ongoing ACHIEVE trial will elucidate the effect of a hearing intervention that includes amplification and auditory rehabilitation on speech-in-noise understanding in older adults. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25733679

Background: Olfactory identification (OI) impairment appears early in the course of Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD), prior to detectable cognitive impairment. However, the neuroanatomical correlates of impaired OI in cognitively normal older adults (CN) and persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are not fully understood. Objective: We examined the neuroanatomic correlates of OI impairment in older adults from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS). Methods: Our sample included 1,600 older adults without dementia who completed clinical assessment and structural brain imaging from 2011 to 2013. We characterized OI impairment using the 12-item Sniffin’ Sticks odor identification test (score ≤6). We used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and region of interest (ROI) analyses to examine the neuroanatomic correlates of impaired OI in CN and MCI, after adjusting for potential confounders. Analyses were also separately stratified by race and sex. Results: In CN, OI impairment was associated with smaller amygdala gray matter (GM) volume ( p < 0.05). In MCI, OI impairment was associated with smaller GM volumes of the olfactory cortex, amygdala, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, and insula (ps < 0.05). Differential associations were observed by sex in MCI; OI impairment was associated with lower insular GM volumes among men but not among women (p-interaction = 0.04). There were no meaningful interactions by race. Conclusion: The brain regions associated with OI impairment in individuals without dementia are specifically those regions known to be the primary targets of AD pathogenic processes. These findings highlight the potential utility of olfactory assessment in the identification and stratification of older adults at risk for AD.