Jiang, Kening

Abstract Introduction Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a potentially modifiable risk factor for the prevention of dementia, of which Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause. However, there is a lack of longitudinal evidence relating SDB to AD pathology >20 years later. We examined the association between late-midlife SDB and late-life brain β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition—a hallmark of AD—assessed approximately 23 years later. Methods The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study is an ongoing prospective cohort study initiated in 1987. Participants at two ARIC sites (Washington County, Maryland; Minneapolis, Minnesota) with primarily White participants also completed polysomnography (PSG) in the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) in 1995-98. SDB measures included apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; number of apneas + hypopneas with ≥3% oxygen desaturation/hour of sleep), arousal index, and percentage of total sleep time in apnea, in hypopnea, and with oxygen saturation < 90%. A subset of participants completed florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) scans through several ARIC ancillary studies (2011-2025 including the ARIC Sleep-PET study). We defined Aβ deposition as a global standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) >1.2 (vs. SUVR ≤1.2). We used Poisson regression with robust standard errors to estimate relative risk (RR) of Aβ deposition by SDB, adjusting for demographics and vascular risk factors, and applied inverse probability attrition weighting to account for selective drop-out. Results Among 186 dementia-free participants (mean age=59 years at PSG and 82 years at PET scan, 58% female, 98% White), every 10% increase in total sleep time in hypopnea was associated with higher risk of Aβ deposition (RR=1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 1.91). When compared to no SDB (AHI < 5), moderate to severe SDB (AHI ≥15) was associated with elevated Aβ deposition (RR=2.36, 95% CI: 1.22, 4.57); mild SDB (AHI 5 to < 15) was not (RR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.53, 2.07). Conclusion SDB in late midlife was associated with greater risk of Aβ deposition approximately 23 years later. SDB may play a role in the early stages of AD pathogenesis. Future longitudinal studies are needed to optimize strategies for screening and treating SDB for dementia prevention. Support (if any) Supported in part by RF1AG050745.

Objective We investigated potential racial disparities in the effects of audiometric hearing loss and its treatment on dementia and mortality among 3,602 older adults aged 68–89 years, 22% of whom were self-identified Black race. Methods Adjudicated all-cause dementia was determined using neurocognitive test data, proxy reports, and surveillance of hospital records and death certificates. Audiometric hearing loss, defined as the better-ear averaged pure-tone threshold (0.5–4 kHz), was categorized using clinical cutpoints. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models included hearing loss–race interaction terms. Results Dementia risk associated with moderate-to-severe hearing loss did not differ by race [Black participants: hazard ratio (HR): 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05, 2.61; White participants: HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.51; P -interaction = 0.92]. However, moderate-to-severe hearing loss was associated with a 2.3-fold increase in mortality among Black participants only (95% CI: 1.17, 4.60). Conclusions Our findings emphasize the importance of including minoritized populations in hearing treatment research to build an evidence base for policy development and clinical decision-making. Hearing loss affects the health of both Black and White Americans. Racial disparities in hearing healthcare should be addressed to advance health equity for all older adults.

Purpose: Population-based evidence in the interrelationships among hearing, brain structure, and cognition is limited. This study aims to investigate the cross-sectional associations of peripheral hearing, brain imaging measures, and cognitive function with speech-in-noise performance among older adults. Method: We studied 602 participants in the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ancillary study, including 427 ACHIEVE baseline (2018–2020) participants with hearing loss and 175 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study Visit 6/7 (2016–2017/2018–2019) participants with normal hearing. Speech-in-noise performance, as outcome of interest, was assessed by the Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) test (range: 0–30; higher = better). Predictors of interest included (a) peripheral hearing assessed by pure-tone audiometry; (b) brain imaging measures: structural MRI measures, white matter hyperintensities, and diffusion tensor imaging measures; and (c) cognitive performance assessed by a battery of 10 cognitive tests. All predictors were standardized to z scores. We estimated the differences in QuickSIN associated with every standard deviation ( SD ) worse in each predictor (peripheral hearing, brain imaging, and cognition) using multivariable-adjusted linear regression, adjusting for demographic variables, lifestyle, and disease factors (Model 1), and, additionally, for other predictors to assess independent associations (Model 2). Results: Participants were aged 70–84 years, 56% female, and 17% Black. Every SD worse in better-ear 4-frequency pure-tone average was associated with worse QuickSIN (−4.89, 95% confidence interval, CI [−5.57, −4.21]) when participants had peripheral hearing loss, independent of other predictors. Smaller temporal lobe volume was associated with worse QuickSIN, but the association was not independent of other predictors (−0.30, 95% CI [−0.86, 0.26]). Every SD worse in global cognitive performance was independently associated with worse QuickSIN (−0.90, 95% CI [−1.30, −0.50]). Conclusions: Peripheral hearing and cognitive performance are independently associated with speech-in-noise performance among dementia-free older adults. The ongoing ACHIEVE trial will elucidate the effect of a hearing intervention that includes amplification and auditory rehabilitation on speech-in-noise understanding in older adults. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25733679

Abstract Background Hearing loss is a risk factor for dementia; whether the association is causal or due to a shared pathology is unknown. We estimated the association of brain β-amyloid with hearing, hypothesizing no association. As a positive control, we quantified the association of hearing loss with neurocognitive test performance. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities-Positron Emission Tomography study data. Amyloid was measured using global cortical and temporal lobe standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) calculated from florbetapir-positron emission tomography scans. Composite global and domain-specific cognitive scores were created from 10 neurocognitive tests. Hearing was measured using an average of better-ear air conduction thresholds (0.5–4 kHz). Multivariable-adjusted linear regression estimated mean differences in hearing by amyloid and mean differences in cognitive scores by hearing, stratified by race. Results In 252 dementia-free adults (72–92 years, 37% Black race, and 61% female participants), cortical or temporal lobe SUVR was not associated with hearing (models adjusted for age, sex, education, and APOE ε4). Each 10 dB HL increase in hearing loss was associated with a 0.134 standard deviation lower mean global cognitive factor score (95% CI: −0.248, −0.019), after adjustment for demographic and cardiovascular factors. Observed hearing-cognition associations were stronger in Black versus White participants. Conclusions Amyloid is not associated with hearing, suggesting that pathways linking hearing and cognition are independent of this pathognomonic Alzheimer’s-related brain change. This is the first study to show that the impact of hearing loss on cognition may be stronger in Black versus White adults.

Abstract Hearing loss is a risk factor for dementia; whether this association differs by race is unknown. Although hearing loss is less prevalent in Blacks than Whites, we hypothesized the hearing loss-dementia relationship is stronger in Blacks. All-cause dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were adjudicated using longitudinal cognitive data. Hearing was measured using pure tone better-ear thresholds (0.5-4 kHz). Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates and included an interaction term between hearing and race. In 3,605 participants from a population-based cohort (68-89 years, 23% Black, 59% female), estimates for 7-year dementia risk per 10 decibels increase in hearing loss were stronger in Blacks (hazard ratio [HR]:1.24, 95% Confidence Interval (CI):1.07,1.43) than Whites (HR:1.07; 95%CI:0.96,1.19). Hearing loss is a risk factor for dementia in Black Americans. These findings emphasize the need to address existing racial disparities in hearing healthcare.

Abstract Speech-in-noise performance is fundamental to daily communications and comprehensive characterization is needed. We studied 590 dementia-free participants aged 70-84 years, including 428 hearing-impaired participants from the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) study baseline (2018-19), which is a randomized controlled trial partially nested within the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, and 162 normal-hearing ARIC Visit 6/7 (2016-17/2018-19) participants. The Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) test was used to measure speech-in-noise performance. Predictors included (1) Four-frequency better-ear pure-tone average (PTA); (2) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures (total and lobar volumes, diffusion tensor imaging, white matter hyperintensities); (3) Global and domain-specific (language, memory, executive function) cognitive performance. All predictors were standardized to Z-scores. We used multivariable-adjusted linear regression, adjusting for demographic and disease covariates. PTA and cognitive performance, but not MRI measures, were independently associated with speech-in-noise performance, with PTA explaining the largest variance, indicating the promising role of hearing aids.

AbstractBackgroundPrior evidence has suggested associations between hearing loss and smaller brain volumes particularly in the temporal lobe where the primary auditory cortex is located, probably due to changes in cortical organization associated with reduced auditory stimulation. Evidence regarding associations of central auditory processing with brain volumes is relatively limited. The study aims to investigate cross‐sectional associations of central auditory processing with brain volumes in older adults.MethodWe studied 587 cognitively normal (Mini‐Mental State Exam ≥23 if high school degree or less and ≥25 if above high school degree) older adults (mean age: 77±4 years, 56% female, 17% black), including 426 with hearing loss from the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) baseline (2018‐19), which is an ancillary randomized controlled trial of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study and 161 with normal hearing, comparable age and cognitive status from the ARIC Visit 6/7 (2016‐17/2018‐19). Brain volumes were measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and were transformed to z‐scores. Central auditory processing was measured by the Quick Speech‐in‐Noise (QuickSIN) test. Total scores range from 0 to 30 with lower scores indicating worse speech‐in‐noise performance. Multivariable‐adjusted linear regression was used to estimate cross‐sectional differences in standardized brain volumes associated with differences in QuickSIN score. Models adjusted for age, sex, race, education, cohort, body mass index, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, intracranial volume, and pure‐tone average.ResultEvery 5‐point decrease in QuickSIN score (worse performance) was associated with smaller volumes of the temporal lobe (‐0.07SD, 95% CI: ‐0.13, ‐0.01). QuickSIN score was also associated with subregions of the temporal lobe related to auditory processing, memory and emotion, including amygdala (‐0.13SD, 95% CI: ‐0.21, ‐0.04), middle (‐0.08SD, 95% CI: ‐0.15, ‐0.00) and superior temporal gyri (‐0.08SD, 95% CI: ‐0.15, ‐0.01).ConclusionPoorer central auditory processing was associated with smaller temporal lobe volumes, including but not limited to subregions important for auditory processing. The ongoing collection of ACHIEVE data with longitudinal MRI data will facilitate understanding of association between hearing loss and brain atrophy as well as the potential promising effects of hearing treatment in mitigating brain aging.

Abstract We investigated the cross-sectional associations of speech-in-noise performance with magnetic resonance imaging brain volumes among 588 cognitively normal participants (77±4 years, 56% female) from the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders Study (randomized trial embedded in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study) baseline in 2018-19 (N=427, with hearing loss) and ARIC (N=161, normal hearing) Visit 6/7 in 2016-17/2018-19. Central auditory processing was measured by Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) test; range: 0 to 30, lower scores=worse performance. In models adjusted for demographic and disease covariates, every 5-point decrease in QuickSIN score was associated with smaller volumes of the temporal lobe overall (-0.07SD, 95% CI:-0.13,-0.01) as well as subregions including but not limited to those important for auditory processing (amygdala:-0.13SD, 95% CI:-0.21,-0.04; middle temporal gyrus:-0.08SD, 95% CI:-0.15,-0.00; superior temporal gyrus:-0.08SD, 95% CI:-0.15,-0.01). Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these observed associations.