Still, Carolyn H.

Abstract BACKGROUND Adherence to study medications is crucial to evaluating treatment effects in clinical trials. To assess whether in the SPRINT trial, adherence and cardiovascular outcomes are associated regardless of intervention assignment. METHODS This study included 9,361 participants aged ≥50 years, recruited from 102 clinics. Participants were randomized to a Standard Treatment Group (targeted systolic blood pressure [SBP] <140 mm Hg) or an Intensive Treatment Group (targeted SBP <120 mm Hg) and followed for incident cardiovascular events until the study was halted early for benefit. The 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was administered at baseline, and at the 12- and 48-month (or close out) visit. RESULTS Adjusting for covariates, there was no association between the baseline 8-item MMAS-8 and the likelihood of the primary composite endpoint, any of the secondary endpoints, or blood pressure (BP) control. Low adherence was associated with a higher body mass index, SBP, diastolic BP, and Patient Health Questionnaire, and high adherence was associated with a higher Montreal Cognitive Assessment. There was no difference in the MMAS-8 over time by treatment arm assignment. For the primary outcome (a composite of myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes), baseline odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the Low vs. Medium and vs. High; and, for Medium vs. High MMAS-8 were 1.02 (0.82–1.28), 1.07 (0.85–1.34), and 1.05 (0.88–1.250). CONCLUSIONS In SPRINT, medication adherence as measured using the MMAS-8 was not associated with outcomes or BP control.

AbstractBackgroundHypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease including stroke, small vessel disease, and dementia. The Systolic blood PRessure INTervention (SPRINT) randomized trial prospectively evaluated the effects of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control (target SBP<120mmHg) versus standard control (SBP<140mmHg) on cardiovascular outcomes in individuals without baseline diabetes or stroke, and included cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements. Previous studies with much smaller sample sizes and shorter duration suggested stable CBF in response to intensive treatment (SBP<125mmHg) [1], but long term effects are unknown. We evaluated the long‐term effects of intensive blood pressure treatment on CBF.MethodWhole brain CBF was measured at 3T using pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeled (ASL) perfusion MRI at baseline and after 3.9±0.3 years. Total white matter lesion (WML) load was measured from Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery T2 MRI. Data from 324 subjects with adequate ASL scan quality acquired from 6 sites were included.ResultDemographics and scanner specific CBF values are provided in Table 1. The intensive treatment group was older (p=0.01), but was otherwise similar to the standard group at baseline. There was a significant effect on the longitudinal CBF change (p=0.006) of the intensive treatment (5.7% increase) compared to the standard treatment (4.0% decrease, Fig 1). Secondary analysis showed a significant increase in age‐adjusted fractional CBF for the intensive treatment group (p<0.001) with no change (p=0.24) in the standard treatment group. Change in CBF was not associated with change in WML.ConclusionSustained intensive antihypertensive treatment does not reduce whole brain CBF, in fact it showed an increase in whole brain CBF relative to standard therapy. While improved CBF might contribute to the reduced WML progression observed in the intensive‐therapy group versus standard therapy in SPRINT[2], we did not observe a direct correlation between CBF changes and WML changes. References: (1) Croall et al. JAMA‐Neurol,2018; (2) Nasrallah et al., JAMA‐Neurol, 2019.