Back to Authors

Jin, Zhao-Hui

0000-0002-4615-3075

Mayo Clinic

Medical Oncology

Citations 4

The Impact of Patient, Disease, and Social Determinants of Health on Receipt of Nonoperative Management for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma
Rummel, Keaton , Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Merrell, Kenneth W. , Mathis, Kellie L. , Waddle, Mark R. , Haddock, Michael G. , Callaghan, Cameron M. , Rummel, Keaton A , Callaghan, Cameron M , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Jin, Zhao-Hui , Xie, Hao , McKenna, Nicholas P. , Jethwa, Krishan R.

American Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 22, 2025 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 105-112

10.1097/coc.0000000000001243 Get It

Objectives: For locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (R-ACA), a nonoperative management (NOM) approach has emerged as a guideline-supported treatment option. However, the variables associated with NOM receipt are unknown. Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with stage 1 to 3 R-ACA managed with curative intent from 2004 to 2018. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving NOM versus surgery. The secondary outcome was survival among NOM patients. Results: A total of 128,297 patients were included. In all, 115,888 (90.3%) received surgery and 12,409 (9.7%) received NOM. Receipt of NOM was associated with age above 70, Charlson-Deyo score of 0, race (Black, Asian or Pacific Islander, or other vs. White), insurance status, geographical region, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2012-2018 vs. 2004-2011), tumor grade 1 versus ≥ 2, clinical T-stage ≥ 2, and clinical N1 or N2 versus N0. In the NOM cohort, poorer overall survival was associated with age 70 and above, male sex, Charlson-Deyo score ≥ 1, insurance status, geographical region, rural urban density versus metro/urban, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2004-2011 vs. 2012-2018), clinical T4 versus T1, clinical N1 or N2 versus N0, grade 3 versus 1, treatment with a radiotherapy dose <45 Gy versus 45 to 54 Gy, and omission of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Several demographic factors and social determinants of health were associated with receipt of NOM and overall survival. With the increasing utilization of NOM, it will be important to understand the drivers of treatment decisions and influences on access to the desired treatment approach.
Efficacy of perioperative and neoadjuvant therapies in gastric and gastroesophageal (GEJ) adenocarcinoma (AC): A network meta-analysis.
Anjum, Muhammad Umair , Naqvi, Syed Arsalan Ahmed , Jajja, Salman Ayub, Raina, Ammad, Afzal, Muhammad Umar, Faisal, Kunwer Sufyan , Segovia, Diana I. , Yoon, Harry H. , Starr, Jason S. , Ahn, Daniel H. , Afzal, Muhammad Umar, Jin, Zhao-Hui , Usón, Pedro Luiz Serrano , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16157 Get It

e16157 Background: The optimal treatment for resectable gastric/GEJ AC is unclear due to limited direct comparisons among chemotherapy and chemoradiation regimens. Addressing this gap is critical to improve patient outcomes. We performed this network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine the relative efficacy of multimodality regimens for resectable gastric/GEJ AC. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and CENTRAL were searched from inception till September 20, 2024, to identify phase III trials evaluating perioperative/neoadjuvant systemic therapy ± radiation in resectable gastric/GEJ AC. Primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A frequentist NMA was conducted to compare hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI for each outcome. Relative treatment rankings were assessed using P-scores. Results: Fifteen trials (8,072 patients) were analyzed. pFLOT (perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) ranked highest for DFS in the overall population (P score 91%) (Table), significantly outperforming surgery alone (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38-0.60) and nCROSS (neoadjuvant paclitaxel, carboplatin and radiotherapy) (0.67, 0.56-0.81). For OS, nPLF+nCRT(EP) (neoadjuvant cisplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil for induction, followed by etoposide, cisplatin, and radiotherapy) (P score 90%) and pFLOT (P score 87%) were the top regimens, with pFLOT significantly outperforming surgery alone (0.57, 0.45-0.72), and nCROSS (0.73, 0.60-0.89). Adding neoadjuvant chemoradiation to pFLOT provided no additional OS (1.14, 0.76-1.72) or DFS (1.22, 0.83-1.82) benefit. Similarly, adding pembrolizumab to perioperative chemotherapy (CF/CX) (cisplatin and fluorouracil/capecitabine) was not superior to pFLOT in terms of DFS (1.10, 0.71-1.69) or OS (1.09, 0.69-1.72). Conclusions: pFLOT demonstrated superior efficacy in resectable gastric/GEJ AC, surpassing surgery alone, nCROSS, and other perioperative regimens. The additive role of immunotherapy to pFLOT requires further investigation to refine patient selection and optimize outcomes. Regimen Overall Population GEJ cohort OS DFS OS DFS nPLF+nCRT(EP) 1 (90) 2 (84) 1 (85) NA pFLOT 2 (87) 1 (91) 2 (79) 2 (88) pPembrolizumab+CF/CX 3 (75) 3 (81) 5 (41) - nECX 4 (61) 5 (55) - - pCF 5 (59) 8 (51) 3 (72) - pECF/ECX 6 (47) 6 (55) 7 (40) 3 (57) nECX+aCRT(CX) 7 (45) 7 (52) 9 (31) - nCF 8 (42) 10 (28) 6 (40) - nCROSS 9 (41) 9 (35) 8 (34) 4 (43) pECF/ECX/FLOT+nCRT(F/X) 10 (38) 4 (57) 4 (72) 1 (90) nCRT(CF) 11 (9) 11 (6) - 5 (14) Surgery 12 (7) 12 (5) 10 (5) 6 (9) Data reported as rank (P-score). Abbreviations: n: neoadjuvant; p: perioperative; ECX: epirubicin + cisplatin + capecitabine; CF: cisplatin + fluorouracil; ECF: epirubicin + cisplatin + fluorouracil; aCRT(CX): adjuvant radiotherapy + cisplatin + capecitabine; CRT(F/X): fluorouracil/capecitabine + radiotherapy; CRT(CF): cisplatin + fluorouracil + radiotherapy.
Abstract CT269: First-in-human trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using CRISPR-engineered tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in which the intracellular immune checkpoint CISH is inhibited
Choudhry, Modassir, Folsom, Timothy D., Rathmann, Blaine, DeFeo, Anthony P. , Kim, Ji Hyun , Sumstad, Darin , Klebanoff, Christopher A. , Ladner, Katherine J., Sarkari, Akshat , McIvor, R. Scott , Rao, Madhuri , Ankeny, Jacob S. , Khalifa, Mahmoud A. , Chauhan, Anil , Dixit, Ajay , Weber, Daniel , Byrne‐Steele, Miranda, Henley, Tom , McKenna, David H. , Johnson, M. J. , Webber, Beau R. , Webber, Beau R , Lou, Emil , Starr, Timothy K. , Bell, Jason B , Slipek, Nicholas J. , Jin, Zhao-Hui , Murray, Thomas A. , Miller, Jeffrey S. , Jensen, Eric Hans , Spilseth, Benjamin , Provenzano, Paolo P. , Pan, Wenjing , Moriarity, Branden S.

Cancer Research | April 25, 2025 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 8_Supplement_2 | Pages: CT269-CT269

10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-ct269 Get It

Abstract Background: Given the dramatic rise in incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults, there remain limited treatment options effective in metastatic disease. Although T cell-based therapies have been successful in treating highly antigenic cancers, like melanoma and lung, they have not yet been shown to induce consistent and durable tumor regression in common epithelial malignancies, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). CISH (Cytokine inducible SH2 containing protein) is a novel intracellular checkpoint target demonstrating PD-L1 ligand independent mechanisms of enhanced anti-cancer activity. Given that CISH is not currently tractable via antibody or small molecule drug modalities, we employed CRISPR for precise inhibition of CISH in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Here, we provide the first clinical report of safety and anti-tumor activity of CISH edited TILs in 12 patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancers (NCT04426669), including a clinical complete response (CR) in a young-adult patient with immunotherapy-refractory mCRC. Methods: Tumors were surgically resected for TIL harvest, followed by a rapid expansion protocol and CRISPR/Cas9 knockout (KO) CISH. CISH KO, neoantigen-reactive TILs were expanded, then infused following non-myeloablative lymphocyte depleting (LD) chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide & fludarabine) followed by high-dose IL-2. To establish mechanistic attribution of the CR, we used iR-RepSeq+ for serial analysis of the TCR immune repertoire. Results: Our CRISPR engineering led to KO of CISH in T cells with high-efficiency (&gt;90%) without detectable off-target editing. We safely dosed patients at all five dose levels (range: 1.91e8 to 9.93e10 cells). No dose-limiting toxicities attributable to the CISH-KO TIL product were observed. Adverse events were consistent with established risks of LD chemotherapy, IL-2, or disease progression. A durable ongoing complete response (&gt;21 months) was achieved in a patient with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) mCRC refractory to anti-PD1/CTLA-4 combination therapy. Conclusions: We provide the first clinical report of CISH checkpoint targeting via genetically modified T cell therapy, with complete response in a patient with mCRC. Persistence and expansion of unique TCR clonotypes detected in neoantigen responsive TIL was temporally consistent with spikes in CISH edited alleles detected by NGS assay; in the patient with CR, four of the clonotypes exhibiting prolonged persistence greater than one-year post-infusion exhibited significantly reduced or undetectable expression of CISH compared to the total infused TIL population. Given these findings, further investigation of CISH checkpoint inhibition, via gene and cell therapy, and next-generation small molecule drugging modalities, is underway. Citation Format: Emil Lou, Modassir S. Choudhry, Timothy K. Starr, Timothy Folsom, Jason Bell, Blaine Rathmann, Anthony P. DeFeo, Ji Hyun Kim, Nicholas Slipek, Zhaohui Jin, Darin Sumstad, Christopher A. Klebanoff, Katherine Ladner, Akshat Sarkari, R Scott McIvor, Thomas A. Murray, Jeffrey Miller, Madhuri Rao, Eric Jensen, Jacob Ankeny, Mahmoud A. Khalifa, Anil Chauhan, Benjamin Spilseth, Ajay Dixit, Paolo P. Provenzano, Wenjing Pan, Daniel Weber, Miranda Byrne-Steele, Tom Henley, David H. McKenna, Matthew J. Johnson, Beau R. Webber, Branden S. Moriarity. First-in-human trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using CRISPR-engineered tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in which the intracellular immune checkpoint CISH is inhibited [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT269.
Systemic treatment post curative-intent intervention based on tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA result for oligometastatic colorectal cancer.
Siripoon, Teerada , O’Donnell, Conor, Naleid, Nikolas , Atwell, Thomas D. , Mitchell, Jessica L. , Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Mathis, Kellie L. , Shawki, Sherief , Starlinger, Patrick , Thiels, Cornelius A. , Warner, Susanne G. , Jethwa, Krishan R. , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Mahipal, Amit , Jin, Zhao-Hui

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 12, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 23_suppl | Pages: 84-84

10.1200/jco.2024.42.23_suppl.84 Get It

84 Background: Local therapies potentially offer a curative approach for patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The effectiveness of systemic chemotherapy following definitive local treatment in this setting is not well-defined. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) might guide management strategies after curative-intent local treatment. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective study of patients with CRC who underwent curative-intent local therapy to an isolated site of metastatic disease and had post-intervention tumor-informed ctDNA (Signatera) testing. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Clinical characteristics, including ctDNA results, were collected and evaluated. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to calculate and compare disease-free survival (DFS). Factors associated with DFS were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Results: 45 patients were included with median age of 59 years, 62% being male, 91% white, and 53% with stage IV disease at diagnosis. 37% of the patients had RAS mutations, no patient had BRAF mutation, and 2.2% patient had mismatch repair deficient disease. Isolated liver metastases were present in 80% of patients, lung metastases in 11% and other sites in 9%. 44 patients received chemotherapy prior to definitive treatment, with a median treatment duration of 16 weeks. ctDNA tests were done prior to local therapy in 23 patients, with 14 cases (61%) testing positive. Definitive treatment included resection (58%), ablation (13%), radiotherapy (4%), and multimodality (25%). Post-definitive treatment chemotherapy was administered to 24 (53%) patients. ctDNA positivity following definitive therapy was observed in 10 patients (22%), which was associated with a poorer prognosis, with a median DFS of 5.3 months compared to 21.3 months for the ctDNA-negative group (p<0.001). These findings were confirmed on multivariate analysis. In patients who had negative ctDNA after definitive local treatment, median DFS was 14.9 months for those who received post-intervention chemotherapy versus 21.3 months for those without post-intervention chemotherapy (p=0.835). Conclusions: Patients with negative ctDNA results following definitive local therapy for isolated metastatic CRC have better prognosis. Post-intervention chemotherapy in this group of patients was not associated with improved DFS. ctDNA guided omission of post-intervention chemotherapy following curative-intent local treatment of oligometastatic CRC warrants further study. [Table: see text]