Wang, Shih‐Hsiu J.

Abstract Our understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) has grown exponentially, thanks to significant investments by the National Institute on Aging (NIA). This article celebrates the 40th anniversary of the NIA's Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers, highlighting the pivotal role of neuropathology as the bedrock for neurodegeneration research. Neuropathology has championed the key principles of proteinopathy, selective vulnerability, and stereotypic spread. Furthermore, neuropathologic studies advanced our understanding of ADRD prevalence, heterogeneity, clinical–pathological correlations, and genetic underpinnings, spurring biomarker development for target engagement and disease monitoring. Disease‐modifying therapies for AD were inspired and informed by neuropathology. The neuropathology community is poised to refine diagnostics, leveraging digital pathology and integrating genetics and pathomics to enhance subtyping for novel precision medicine approaches. Despite some common misconceptions and logistical challenges, neuropathology continues to be a critical component of the ADRD research infrastructure, serving as a key bridge between allied basic and clinical sciences. Highlights We celebrate 40 years of NIA‐funded ADRCs and their contributions through neuropathology studies that have significantly advanced our understanding and treatment of ADRD. Neuropathology uncovers principles of neurodegenerative disease: proteinopathy, selective vulnerability, and stereotypic spread, informing diagnostics and therapies. Development of AD biomarkers with reference to neuropathology enhances accuracy in diagnosis and monitoring, paving the way for targeted disease‐modifying therapies. Integration of digital pathology, genetics, and novel tools in neurodegeneration research promises advanced precision medicine approaches and refined diagnostics. Misconceptions and logistical challenges to neuropathological research are addressed to improve understanding and collaboration.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Few African American (AA) donors have been included in post mortem Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies compared to European‐ancestry (EA) individuals. METHODS We generated transcriptome‐wide bulk pre‐frontal cortex (PFC) gene expression data from 125 AA donors with neuropathologically determined AD and 82 AA controls. RESULTS Transcriptome‐wide significant differential expression was observed with 482 genes. The most significant, ADAMTS2 , showed 1.52 times higher expression in AD cases ( p = 2.96x10 −8 ). Comparison of findings with those from a recent gene expression study of EA brain donors revealed substantial concordance, including ADAMTS2 . Other associations not observed in EA results may be especially relevant to AD risk in the AA population. Examination of AA AD GWAS‐implicated variants identified several expression quantitative trait loci. CONCLUSION This first large‐scale AA brain AD gene expression study identified many differentially expressed genes, including ADAMTS2 , and supports gene expression as a molecular pathway underlying the impact of several AA AD risk variants. Highlights We performed the largest African American brain tissue Alzheimer's disease (AD) gene expression study. Expression differences for 482 genes, notably ADAMTS2 , were study‐wide significant. Many significant differentially expressed genes are involved in energy metabolism. Several previously known AD‐associated variants in African Americans are eQTLs. These results advance knowledge of the genetic basis of AD in the AA population.

AbstractBackgroundAlthough the rate of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in African‐ancestry (AA) Americans is higher than that of persons from European‐ancestry (EA) populations, AA participants have been underrepresented in AD neuropathological studies.MethodUtilizing the AD Research Centers (ADRC) infrastructure, we obtained AA donor pre‐frontal cortex (PFC) tissue from brain repositories of 12 ADRC and generated bulk RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) data for 179 samples that met QC and inclusion criteria. Previously generated PFC RNAseq data were obtained for 28 additional AA donors from the Columbia University ADRC. Differential gene expression was evaluated among 125 donors with a neuropathological diagnosis of AD (NIA‐Reagan intermediate or high likelihood) and 82 neuropathologically confirmed controls using regression models including covariates for age at death, sex, cell‐type frequencies, and RNA integrity number (RIN) calculated with Limma. FDR‐corrected p‐values (padj) were calculated to control for the 33,611 genes examined.ResultA total of 482 genes surpassed the multiple‐testing threshold. The most significant, ADAMTS2 (p = 2.96 × 10‐8, padj = 0.001), showed increased expression in AD cases (see Table/Figure). We note that ADAMTS2 was differentially expressed in a prior EA study of neuropathologically confirmed AD cases and controls (Panitch et al. Molecular Psychiatry 2021). Additionally, a recent analysis of cognitive resilience in EA neuropathological AD cases identified a strong association with ADAMTS2 (See Li et al. AAIC2024 abstract). Of the differentially expressed genes observed in the Panitch et al. EA study, 385 (35%) were nominally significant,65 (5.8%) were corrected significant, and most (89%) of these genes had the same effect direction in the AA cohort. Some of the observed associations appear to be AA specific (e.g., EFR3B, IRS4, and CA12; see Table). Additionally, we found nominally significant (p<0.05) associations with expression of APOE (Log2 fold change [L2FC = ‐0.20, p = 0.012) and several other established AD genes including SORL1 (L2FC = ‐0.10, p = 0.014) and IGF1R(L2FC = 0.11, p = 0.0013).ConclusionThis largest‐ever (to our knowledge) gene expression study of AD in postmortem brain tissue from AA donors implicates many more genes as having a role in AD in this population than previously identified in genome‐wide association studies and provides insight into trans‐ancestry differences risk for AD.

Abstract Methylation profiling of brain tumors has revealed novel clusters whose biological and clinical significance is unknown. These include three entities termed by the 12.5 version of the Heidelberg methylation classifier as adult-type diffuse high grade glioma, IDH-wildtype, subtype B (HGG_B), subtype E (HGG_E), and subtype F (HGG_F). We have identified 75 cases belonging to these groups: HGG_B (25 cases, 32% female), HGG_E (40 cases, 42% female), and HGG_F (18 cases, 33% female). Although originally characterized as “adult-type,” we find that 70% of HGG_E cases are pediatric, with a median age at diagnosis of 11 years. HGG_B cases are predominantly seen in young adults, and HGG_F in older adults. The histology varies among methylation classes, with HGG_B cases demonstrating high-grade, predominantly astrocytic, morphology, while HGG_E cases demonstrate high-grade glial histology with distinct nuclear features, and HGG_F cases show highly infiltrative but lower grade glial morphology. Patient outcome data obtained to date shows a collective median survival exceeding 5 years, suggesting re-consideration of the proposed grading for these tumors. MGMT promoter methylation differs across the HGG_B (0%), HGG_E (12%), and HGG_F (0%) subtypes. Mutational analyses show enrichment of TERT promoter mutations in the HGG_F group, while HGG_E samples are enriched for tumors with POLE mutations and elevated tumor mutation burden. HGG_E tumors show epigenetic similarity to pediatric high-grade diffuse gliomas (pedHGG_RTK1A); we therefore propose that HGG_E be considered a pediatric-type HGG. HGG_B tumors show demographic and genomic similarities to high-grade astrocytomas with piloid features, including a subset of cases with CDKN2A/2B loss and ATRX mutation. HGG_F separate into two groups dictated by brain location, and despite the presence of TERT promoter mutations, appear distinct from GBMs. Overall, our work represents an initial effort to understand the morphologic, genomic and clinical characteristics of these previously uncharacterized subtypes of gliomas.