Camelo‐Piragua, Sandra

Abstract Methylation profiling of brain tumors has revealed novel clusters whose biological and clinical significance is unknown. These include three entities termed by the 12.5 version of the Heidelberg methylation classifier as adult-type diffuse high grade glioma, IDH-wildtype, subtype B (HGG_B), subtype E (HGG_E), and subtype F (HGG_F). We have identified 75 cases belonging to these groups: HGG_B (25 cases, 32% female), HGG_E (40 cases, 42% female), and HGG_F (18 cases, 33% female). Although originally characterized as “adult-type,” we find that 70% of HGG_E cases are pediatric, with a median age at diagnosis of 11 years. HGG_B cases are predominantly seen in young adults, and HGG_F in older adults. The histology varies among methylation classes, with HGG_B cases demonstrating high-grade, predominantly astrocytic, morphology, while HGG_E cases demonstrate high-grade glial histology with distinct nuclear features, and HGG_F cases show highly infiltrative but lower grade glial morphology. Patient outcome data obtained to date shows a collective median survival exceeding 5 years, suggesting re-consideration of the proposed grading for these tumors. MGMT promoter methylation differs across the HGG_B (0%), HGG_E (12%), and HGG_F (0%) subtypes. Mutational analyses show enrichment of TERT promoter mutations in the HGG_F group, while HGG_E samples are enriched for tumors with POLE mutations and elevated tumor mutation burden. HGG_E tumors show epigenetic similarity to pediatric high-grade diffuse gliomas (pedHGG_RTK1A); we therefore propose that HGG_E be considered a pediatric-type HGG. HGG_B tumors show demographic and genomic similarities to high-grade astrocytomas with piloid features, including a subset of cases with CDKN2A/2B loss and ATRX mutation. HGG_F separate into two groups dictated by brain location, and despite the presence of TERT promoter mutations, appear distinct from GBMs. Overall, our work represents an initial effort to understand the morphologic, genomic and clinical characteristics of these previously uncharacterized subtypes of gliomas.

Abstract BACKGROUND Neuro-oncology has grown tremendously since 2010, marked by increasing society membership, specialized clinical expertise, and new journals. Yet, modest improvement in racial/ethnic diversity amongst clinical trial participants, researchers and clinicians led us to conduct a survey identifying opportunities to enhance diversity and inclusiveness amongst neuro-oncology professionals. METHODS Summer 2020, the Women and Diversity Committee of the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) distributed an anonymous online survey to members and affiliates (European Association of Neuro-Oncology, Asian Society for Neuro-Oncology, Society for Neuro-Oncology Latin America and Society for Neuro-Oncology Sub-Saharan Africa). The survey captured personal and professional characteristics, biases, effective mentorship qualities, career success metrics, and suggested field/society changes. Results were analyzed by geography, profession, age, racial/ethnic and sexual identity. Standard descriptive statistics characterized the study population. RESULTS The 386 respondents were predominantly female (58%) with a median age range of 40-49 years (31%), White (65%), and SNO members (97%). Most worked in North America (77%) in a research profession (67%). A majority of White respondents reported never experiencing biases (64%), while the majority of non-White respondents reported unconscious biases/microaggressions, followed by a lack of/limited mentorship. Qualitative assessments showcased that personal/professional success metrics were linked to needed improvements in diversity and inclusion efforts within the neuro-oncology community. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of racial/ethnic biases and poor mentorship rates amongst underrepresented groups in neuro-oncology is high and potentially linked to the limited diverse representation amongst members and affiliates. These findings warrant a swift implementation of equity and inclusion practices within the neuro-oncology field.

Abstract Background Neuro-oncology has grown tremendously since 2010, marked by increasing society membership, specialized clinical expertise, and new journals. Yet, modest improvement in racial/ethnic diversity amongst clinical trial participants, researchers, and clinicians led us to conduct a survey to identify opportunities to enhance diversity and inclusiveness amongst neuro-oncology professionals. Methods In summer 2020, the Women and Diversity Committee of the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) distributed an anonymous online survey to members and affiliates including the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), Asian Society for Neuro-Oncology (ASNO), Society for Neuro-Oncology Latin America (SNOLA) and Society for Neuro-Oncology Sub-Saharan Africa (SNOSSA). The survey captured personal and professional characteristics, biases, effective mentorship qualities, career service metrics, and suggested field/society changes. Results were analyzed by geography, profession, age, racial/ethnic, and sexual identity. Standard descriptive statistics characterized the study population. Results The 386 respondents were predominantly female (58%) with a median age range of 40–49 years (31%), White (65%), and SNO members (97%). Most worked in North America (77%) in a research profession (67%). A majority of White respondents reported never experiencing biases (64%), while the majority of non-White respondents reported unconscious biases/microaggressions, followed by a lack of/limited mentorship. Qualitative assessments showcased that personal/professional success metrics were linked to needed improvements in diversity and inclusion efforts within the neuro-oncology field. Conclusions The prevalence of racial/ethnic biases and poor mentorship rates amongst underrepresented groups in neuro-oncology is high and potentially linked to the limited diverse representation amongst members and affiliates. These findings warrant a swift implementation of equity and inclusion practices within the neuro-oncology field.

AimsMucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC) are the most common malignant neoplasms of salivary glands, but are uncommon in other sites. Salivary gland MEC are most frequently associated with CRTC1–MAML2 translocations. Exceedingly rare MEC of the breast demonstrate a basal‐like and often triple (oestrogen and progesterone receptor, HER2)‐negative immunophenotype, with a single case previously reported to show MAML2 rearrangement, although the fusion partner was not known. Comprehensive genomic studies of breast MEC are lacking. In this study, we analysed the immunophenotype and molecular landscape of two breast MEC to elucidate the pathogenesis of these rare tumours.Methods and resultsTwo breast MEC were subjected to capture‐based next‐generation DNA sequencing of 479 cancer‐related genes. The presence of the CRTC1–MAML2 fusion transcript was interrogated by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction. In addition, the immunoprofiles of breast MEC were compared to salivary gland MEC. Both breast MEC harboured CRTC1–MAML2 fusions. In contrast to most triple‐negative breast carcinomas of no special type, the mutational burden of MEC was very low, with one case demonstrating only an inactivating SETD2 mutation, and the other harbouring no somatic variants in genes on the panel. No copy number alterations were identified. The immunoprofiles of breast and salivary gland MEC were overlapping, but not identical.ConclusionsThe findings highlight MEC as a breast cancer subtype more closely related to its salivary gland counterpart than to basal‐like/triple‐negative breast cancers of no special type.

AbstractAnaplasia may be identified in a subset of tumors with a presumed pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) component or piloid features, which may be associated with aggressive behavior, but the biologic basis of this change remains unclear. Fifty‐seven resections from 36 patients (23 M, 13 F, mean age 32 years, range 3–75) were included. A clinical diagnosis of NF1 was present in 8 (22%). Alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) was assessed by telomere‐specific FISH and/or CISH. A combination of immunohistochemistry, DNA sequencing and FISH were used to study BRAF, ATRX, CDKN2A/p16, mutant IDH1 p.R132H and H3‐K27M proteins. ALT was present in 25 (69%) cases and ATRX loss in 20 (57%), mostly in the expected association of ALT+/ATRX‐ (20/24, 83%) or ALT‐/ATRX+ (11/11, 100%). BRAF duplication was present in 8 (of 26) (31%). H3‐K27M was present in 5 of 32 (16%) cases, all with concurrent ATRX loss and ALT. ALT was also present in 9 (of 11) cases in the benign PA precursor, 7 of which also had ATRX loss in both the precursor and the anaplastic tumor. In a single pediatric case, ALT and ATRX loss developed in the anaplastic component only, and in another adult case, ALT was present in the PA‐A component only, but ATRX was not tested. Features associated with worse prognosis included subtotal resection, adult vs. pediatric, presence of a PA precursor preceding a diagnosis of anaplasia, necrosis, presence of ALT and ATRX expression loss. ALT and ATRX loss, as well as alterations involving the MAPK pathway, are frequent in PA with anaplasia at the time of development of anaplasia or in their precursors. Additionally, a small subset of PA with anaplasia have H3‐K27M mutations. These findings further support the concept that PA with anaplasia is a neoplasm with heterogeneous genetic features and alterations typical of both PA and diffuse gliomas.