Zante, Annemieke van

AimsMucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC) are the most common malignant neoplasms of salivary glands, but are uncommon in other sites. Salivary gland MEC are most frequently associated with CRTC1–MAML2 translocations. Exceedingly rare MEC of the breast demonstrate a basal‐like and often triple (oestrogen and progesterone receptor, HER2)‐negative immunophenotype, with a single case previously reported to show MAML2 rearrangement, although the fusion partner was not known. Comprehensive genomic studies of breast MEC are lacking. In this study, we analysed the immunophenotype and molecular landscape of two breast MEC to elucidate the pathogenesis of these rare tumours.Methods and resultsTwo breast MEC were subjected to capture‐based next‐generation DNA sequencing of 479 cancer‐related genes. The presence of the CRTC1–MAML2 fusion transcript was interrogated by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction. In addition, the immunoprofiles of breast MEC were compared to salivary gland MEC. Both breast MEC harboured CRTC1–MAML2 fusions. In contrast to most triple‐negative breast carcinomas of no special type, the mutational burden of MEC was very low, with one case demonstrating only an inactivating SETD2 mutation, and the other harbouring no somatic variants in genes on the panel. No copy number alterations were identified. The immunoprofiles of breast and salivary gland MEC were overlapping, but not identical.ConclusionsThe findings highlight MEC as a breast cancer subtype more closely related to its salivary gland counterpart than to basal‐like/triple‐negative breast cancers of no special type.

Objectives/HypothesisHuman papillomavirus (HPV)‐positive and HPV‐negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) are distinct disease entities. Prognostic factors specific to each entity have not been adequately explored. Goals for this study were: 1) to determine whether HPV‐positive and HPV‐negative OPSCCs have distinct prognostic factors, and 2) to explore the prognostic significance of sex and race in OPSCC after HPV stratificationStudy DesignRetrospective case series.MethodsA retrospective review of 239 incident OPSCC patients from 1995 to 2012, treated at Johns Hopkins and University of California–San Francisco was conducted. Women and nonwhite races were oversampled. All analyses were stratified by tumor HPV in situ hybridization status. The effects of sex and race on survival were considered in Kaplan‐Meier and unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression models.ResultsOne hundred thirty‐four (56.1%) OPSCC patients were HPV positive. On univariate analysis, women had better overall survival than men among HPV‐positive (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20‐1.07; P = .06) but not HPV‐negative (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.43‐1.24; P = .24) OPSCCs. On multivariate analysis, women with HPV‐positive OPSCCs remained at lower risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.12‐0.96; P = .04). Survival did not vary significantly by race among HPV‐positive patients. Among HPV‐negative patients, Hispanic patients had significantly better survival in unadjusted (HR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08‐0.91; P = .04) but not adjusted (aHR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.11‐7.36; P = .94) analysis.ConclusionsWomen with HPV‐positive OPSCC may have improved overall survival compared to men. Sex does not play a prognostic role in HPV‐negative OPSCC. There are no differences in prognosis by race among HPV‐positive or HPV‐negative patients.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, E288–E296, 2018