Heaphy, Christopher M

Abstract Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) have an age-adjusted incidence of 1.5 per 100,000 people, with a notable rise in the incidence of small (≤2 cm) non-functional PanNETs (NF-PanNETs) in recent decades. While surgery is traditionally the preferred treatment for localized NF-PanNETs, active surveillance is now an accepted management strategy for tumors smaller than 2 cm due to their relatively benign behavior. However, this approach has not yet been fully integrated into routine clinical practice. There is considerable histopathological heterogeneity observed in NF-PanNETs, which results in significant variability in clinical presentation, behavior and treatment outcomes. Hence, tumor size alone does not provide sufficient certainty regarding a benign clinical course for decision-making. Although studies advocate for incorporating WHO grade into clinical prognostic assessments, this marker also has limitations. Several established tissue-based markers, such as ATRX and DAXX alterations, alternative lengthening of telomeres, and copy number variations, can be used for PanNET subtyping and correlate with metastatic risk. Combining these markers with traditional histopathological parameters may yield a more comprehensive and accurate prognostic assessment. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of current prognostication methods for small NF-PanNETs and highlights recently established prognostic markers, along with the requirements for their implementation into routine clinical practice. It also proposes practical solutions to address the challenges associated with the immediate integration of these biomarkers into routine care.

AbstractAnaplasia may be identified in a subset of tumors with a presumed pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) component or piloid features, which may be associated with aggressive behavior, but the biologic basis of this change remains unclear. Fifty‐seven resections from 36 patients (23 M, 13 F, mean age 32 years, range 3–75) were included. A clinical diagnosis of NF1 was present in 8 (22%). Alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) was assessed by telomere‐specific FISH and/or CISH. A combination of immunohistochemistry, DNA sequencing and FISH were used to study BRAF, ATRX, CDKN2A/p16, mutant IDH1 p.R132H and H3‐K27M proteins. ALT was present in 25 (69%) cases and ATRX loss in 20 (57%), mostly in the expected association of ALT+/ATRX‐ (20/24, 83%) or ALT‐/ATRX+ (11/11, 100%). BRAF duplication was present in 8 (of 26) (31%). H3‐K27M was present in 5 of 32 (16%) cases, all with concurrent ATRX loss and ALT. ALT was also present in 9 (of 11) cases in the benign PA precursor, 7 of which also had ATRX loss in both the precursor and the anaplastic tumor. In a single pediatric case, ALT and ATRX loss developed in the anaplastic component only, and in another adult case, ALT was present in the PA‐A component only, but ATRX was not tested. Features associated with worse prognosis included subtotal resection, adult vs. pediatric, presence of a PA precursor preceding a diagnosis of anaplasia, necrosis, presence of ALT and ATRX expression loss. ALT and ATRX loss, as well as alterations involving the MAPK pathway, are frequent in PA with anaplasia at the time of development of anaplasia or in their precursors. Additionally, a small subset of PA with anaplasia have H3‐K27M mutations. These findings further support the concept that PA with anaplasia is a neoplasm with heterogeneous genetic features and alterations typical of both PA and diffuse gliomas.