Luchini, Claudio

Abstract Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) have an age-adjusted incidence of 1.5 per 100,000 people, with a notable rise in the incidence of small (≤2 cm) non-functional PanNETs (NF-PanNETs) in recent decades. While surgery is traditionally the preferred treatment for localized NF-PanNETs, active surveillance is now an accepted management strategy for tumors smaller than 2 cm due to their relatively benign behavior. However, this approach has not yet been fully integrated into routine clinical practice. There is considerable histopathological heterogeneity observed in NF-PanNETs, which results in significant variability in clinical presentation, behavior and treatment outcomes. Hence, tumor size alone does not provide sufficient certainty regarding a benign clinical course for decision-making. Although studies advocate for incorporating WHO grade into clinical prognostic assessments, this marker also has limitations. Several established tissue-based markers, such as ATRX and DAXX alterations, alternative lengthening of telomeres, and copy number variations, can be used for PanNET subtyping and correlate with metastatic risk. Combining these markers with traditional histopathological parameters may yield a more comprehensive and accurate prognostic assessment. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of current prognostication methods for small NF-PanNETs and highlights recently established prognostic markers, along with the requirements for their implementation into routine clinical practice. It also proposes practical solutions to address the challenges associated with the immediate integration of these biomarkers into routine care.

Currently, there are no internationally accepted consensus guidelines for pathologic evaluation of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens. The Neoadjuvant Therapy Working Group of Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society was formed in 2018 to review grossing protocols, literature, and major issues and to develop recommendations for pathologic evaluation of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens. The working group generated the following recommendations: (1) Systematic and standardized grossing and sampling protocols should be adopted for pancreatectomy specimens for treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). (2) Consecutive mapping sections along the largest gross tumor dimension are recommended to validate tumor size by histology as required by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) cancer protocol. (3) Tumor size of treated PDACs should be measured microscopically as the largest dimension of tumor outer limits that is bound by viable tumor cells, including intervening stroma. (4) The MD Anderson grading system for tumor response has a better correlation with prognosis and better interobserver concordance among pathologists than does the CAP system. (5) A case should not be classified as a complete response unless the entire pancreas, peripancreatic tissues, ampulla of Vater, common bile duct, and duodenum adjacent to the pancreas are submitted for microscopic examination. (6) Future studies on tumor response of lymph node metastases, molecular and/or immunohistochemical markers, as well as application of artificial intelligence in grading tumor response of treated PDAC are needed. In summary, systematic, standardized pathologic evaluation, accurate tumor size measurement, and reproducible tumor response grading to neoadjuvant therapy are needed for optimal patient care. The criteria and discussions provided here may provide guidance towards these goals.