Executive Summary of the American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the Use of Radiation in the Prevention and Treatment of Heterotopic Ossification (HO)
Objectives: To summarize the current evidence for radiation therapy (RT) in the prevention and treatment of heterotopic ossification (HO), including patient selection, optimal RT technique, and associated risks. Methods: This multispecialty-led committee includes radiation oncologists, rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and physical medicine/rehabilitation physicians. Using the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing and study design (PICOTS) framework, evidence regarding treatment outcomes was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA methodology. Eligible studies included prospective and retrospective studies published between January 1, 1980, and November 1, 2025, from Embase, Medline, and PubMed databases. Of the 197 articles identified using the search strategy, 83 were selected for inclusion as evidence, including 27 well-designed studies (phase II randomized and phase III), 16 moderately well-designed studies that account for most common biases (matched cohort and phase II studies), 31 studies with design limitations (retrospective reviews), 2 supplemental studies (not useful as primary evidence), and 7 meta-analyses. Additional studies were included to provide context and were not used to guide recommendations. Well-established RAND-UCLA consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of the treatment options. Results: The results of this analysis demonstrate that in appropriately selected patients, RT is an effective and safe therapy for prophylaxis of HO formation. Conclusions: This systematic review provides consensus guidelines for the use of RT as prophylaxis of HO based on current peer-reviewed evidence in the literature.
Stratified cohorts for biomarker assessment and trial readiness:
TMEM175
,
SCARB2
and
CTSB
in Parkinson’s disease
Abstract Background Lysosomal dysfunction plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD), particularly among GBA1 mutation carriers. Beyond GBA1 , genes such as TMEM175 , SCARB2 , and CTSB identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are also implicated in lysosomal pathways contributing to PD risk, although their functional effects in patients remain unclear. Proteins encoded by these lysosome-related genes have been explored as potential therapeutic targets in experimental models. Biomarker profiles, including clinical measures, α-syn seeding activity, lysosomal proteins, and sphingolipids, may facilitate patient stratification and support therapeutic monitoring in future clinical trials. Aim The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of genetic variants of three lysosomal-related genes ( TMEM175 , SCARB2 , and CTSB ) on biomarker profiles in PD with and without GBA1 variants. Cross-sectional data from two German cohorts: the Tuebingen Parkinson Cohort (TUEPAC) and the DESCRIBE PD cohort of the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases were used as explorative cohorts, and data from Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Parkinson’s Disease (AMP-PD) were used as a validation cohort. The ultimate goal is to provide new data for patient stratification based on genetics, which might serve as a readout for target engagement and treatment efficiency assessment. Methods Three cohorts were analyzed: TUEPAC, DESCRIBE PD, and AMP-PD. TUEPAC and DESCRIBE PD were combined into a single German discovery cohort (TUEPAC-DESCRIBE-PD), while AMP-PD served as an independent validation cohort. Within each cohort, for subgroup analyses, PD patients were classified as the overall PD cohort (PD all ), and further stratified by GBA1 mutation status into PD patients without GBA1 mutations (PD GBA1 _wildtype ), and PD patients carrying GBA1 mutations (PD GBA1 ). We evaluated cognitive and motor function, as well as depression using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale-part I II (UPDRS III), and Beck Depression Inventory-II(BDI-II) scales. Analyzed biomarkers included CSF α-syn seeding activity using seed amplification assay (SAA), CSF lysosomal protein levels of lysosomal integral membrane protein 2 (LIMP2), also known as SCARB2, cathepsin B (CTSB) and lysosome-associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP2), blood-based enzyme activity of the lysosomal glucocerebrosidase (GCase), and CSF sphingolipid profiles. PD patients carrying risk alleles in TMEM175 , SCARB2 , and CTSB were compared to non-carriers. Results Genotype-phenotype correlation analysis in TUEPAC-DESCRIBE-PD and AMP-PD revealed: (1) In PD all , the TMEM175 p.M393T risk variant was nominally associated with decreased cognitive function when adjusted for GBA1 mutation status in TUEPAC-DESCRIBE-PD; this association could not be replicated, although a similar trend was observed in the slightly smaller, but multicentric AMP-PD cohort; TMEM175 p.M393T was not significantly associated with BDI-I I or UPDRS-III scores in either cohort. (2) In PD GBA1 _wildtype , GCase activity was significantly lower in PD patients with SCARB2 rs6812193 risk allele in TUEPAC-DESCRIBE-PD, while a similar but non-significant trend was observed in AMP-PD; (3) In PD all , CSF levels of CTSB were nominally lower in carriers of CTSB rs1293298 risk allele compared to carriers of CTSB rs1293298 protective allele in TUEPAC-DESCRIBE-PD; in PD GBA1 _wildtype , LAMP2 was significantly lower in carriers of CTSB rs1293298 risk allele compared to carriers of CTSB rs1293298 protective allele in TUEPAC-DESCRIBE-PD; (4) In PD all , TMEM175 p.M393T risk allele was nominally associated with altered sphingolipid profiles across both TUEPAC-DESCRIBE-PD and AMP-PD cohorts. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that genetic variants in lysosomal-related genes ( TMEM175 , SCARB2 , and CTSB ) have a functional impact on biomarker profiles in PD patients. Integrating genetic characterization with biochemical profiling provides a framework for patient stratification and may serve as a translational strategy to monitor target engagement and evaluate treatment efficacy in future clinical trials.
Improved Outcomes with TKI Maintenance Following Brexucabtagene Autoleucel in Philadelphia-chromosome ALL
Brexucabtagene-autoleucel (brexu-cel) produces high rates of measurable residual disease-negative (MRD-) complete response (CR) in adults with Philadelphia-chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); however, subsequent relapses remain frequent. It is unclear whether maintenance with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can enhance remission durability. We evaluated outcomes among adults with relapsed/refractory Ph+ ALL who received commercial brexu-cel and achieved MRD- CR across 19 U.S. institutions. Considering TKI maintenance as a time-varying covariate, we analyzed outcomes based on receipt of subsequent TKI maintenance versus no maintenance. Patients receiving consolidative transplantation or non-TKI maintenance were excluded. Fifty-one patients were included: 20 received TKI maintenance and 31 received no maintenance. The use of TKI maintenance was associated with a significantly lower 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse (HR 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.88; p=0.037) which translated into improved progression-free survival (PFS, HR 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.85; p=0.029) and a trend towards improved overall survival (OS, HR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.07-1.62; p=0.18). There was no difference in non-relapse mortality (NRM, HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.12-5.87; p=0.85). This real-world analysis supports the administration of TKI maintenance in Ph+ ALL following achievement of MRD- CR with brexu-cel as a strategy to improve PFS following chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.
Predicting atrial fibrillation in the real world: head-to-head comparison of five risk scores
Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major contributor to stroke risk, yet many cases remain undiagnosed due to its silent and paroxysmal nature. To address this, multiple risk scores have been developed to predict incident AF. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of five widely used clinical AF prediction tools (i.e., CHARGE-AF, CHA2DS2-VASc, mC2HEST, HATCH, and HAVOC) among patients undergoing long-term continuous monitoring with implantable loop recorders (ILRs). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study across three major US academic medical centers, including patients with ILRs and no prior diagnosis or ECG evidence of AF. Clinical variables used to calculate each risk score were extracted from electronic health records. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between each score’s risk categories and incident AF (defined as any episode lasting ≥6 minutes). Calibration was assessed using calibration plots and Brier scores. Results A total of 3,895 patients were included (mean age 61 ± 17 yrs.; 51% male). Incident AF was detected in 879 patients (22%) over a median follow up of 17 months (IQR 8-35). Table 1 presents baseline characteristics and device detected AF event data during follow up. CHARGE-AF had the highest AUC (0.68) but also the highest Brier score (Fig. 1). Failure curves showed clear risk stratification across all tools (Fig. 2). Calibration plots (Fig. 3) demonstrated modest agreement between predicted and observed risk across all models. Using CHARGE-AF as the reference, pairwise comparisons of Brier scores via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed lower calibration accuracy than CHA2DS2-VASc (p = 0.03), mC2HEST (p = 0.001), and HAVOC (p = 0.001), with no significant difference compared to HATCH (p = 0.15). Conclusions In patients undergoing continuous rhythm monitoring with ILRs, commonly used AF prediction scores demonstrated modest discriminatory ability and similar calibration performance. These findings suggest that existing risk models, which were largely developed in cohorts with clinically diagnosed AF, may not optimally translate to continuously monitored populations. Future work is needed to develop and validate AF prediction models specifically in cohorts undergoing long-term continuous cardiac monitoring.Figure 1Figure 2-3
Adult Chronic Pancreatitis Working Group: Goals, Accomplishments and the Path Ahead. A Report From the Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, and Pancreatic Cancer
The adult chronic pancreatitis (CP) working group, formed at the inception of the Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, and Pancreatic Cancer (CPDPC), has developed a robust framework and infrastructure to conduct clinical, translational, and mechanistic studies of CP. At its core is PRO spective Evaluation of C hronic Pancreatitis for E pid E miologic and Translational Stu D ies (PROCEED), the first longitudinal cohort study of CP in US adults, launched in 2017. PROCEED has developed a well-annotated clinical data set of over 2000 deeply-phenotyped participants, a biorepository and an imaging repository. Investigators have published promising data on blood-based and imaging-based biomarkers of CP diagnosis and pain, which are awaiting validation. Clinical observations include classification of patients into mechanism-based pain phenotypes using responses to PROMIS questionnaires, prevalence and predictors of opioid use, prevalence of psychological comorbidity, and osteopathy in CP patients. Pilot clinical trials have evaluated the effect of oral indomethacin on pancreatic fluid prostaglandin E2 levels and Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic pain. Results of pilot trials have led to an ongoing definitive randomized clinical trial for CBT. The rich environment and resources have facilitated mentorship and academic development of many early-stage investigators. Investigators outside of the consortium have opportunities for collaboration. In the next 5 years, the working group plans to further strengthen the research platform, complete primary and key secondary analyses of PROCEED and ancillary studies, continue efforts to develop biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of CP, and complete ongoing clinical trials to address unanswered questions in the field.
Overall survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with venetoclax-obinutuzumab compared to age- and sex-matched general population
Five-year outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement in patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation: results from the Tendyne Expanded Clinical Study
Abstract Aims Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) with the Tendyne Mitral Valve System is a treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) unsuitable for conventional mitral valve surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TMVR through 5-year follow-up. Methods and Results The Tendyne Expanded Clinical Study is a prospective, single-arm, multicentre study that enrolled patients between November 2014 and June 2020. The study enrolled 191 patients (mean age 74.1 ± 8.0 years, 62.8% male, 70.2% New York Heart Association Class (NYHA) class III/IV, 88.5% secondary MR), of whom 186 (97.4%) underwent TMVR with Tendyne. MR grade decreased from ≥3+ in 99.5% patients at baseline to grade ≤1+ in 95.3% at 5 years. In those patients surviving to 5 years (n = 49), durable symptomatic improvement was evidenced by 73.5% patients being in NYHA class I/II at 5 years. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score increased from 48.5 ± 22.5 points at baseline to 67.6 ± 21.5 points at 5 years. Serious adverse events that occurred through 5 years included life-threatening bleeding (11.5%), fatal bleeding (2.6%), renal insufficiency/failure (28.8%), endocarditis (7.3%), device thrombosis (5.8%), and new onset atrial fibrillation (13.1%). No structural device degeneration or device embolism occurred through 5 years. Conclusions The Tendyne TMVR was effective at achieving immediate and sustainable elimination of MR, which was associated with symptomatic improvement and absence of structural valve degeneration in a high-risk cohort over 5 years. These findings support TMVR with the Tendyne System as an alternative for patients with appropriate mitral valve anatomy and symptomatic secondary MR unsuitable for mitral surgery or TEER.
Ex Vivo Liver Perfusion as a Platform for Gene Therapy, Immunotherapy, Pharmacology, and Personalized Medicine
Ex vivo liver perfusion (EVLP) sustains human or large animal livers outside the body under near-physiological conditions, enabling functional monitoring for lactate clearance, bile production, and oxygen consumption and allowing targeted therapeutic interventions. Originally developed to optimize donor grafts for transplantation, EVLP has evolved into a powerful translational research platform bridging preclinical discovery and early clinical translation. This review discusses EVLP as a platform for gene therapy, immunotherapy, pharmacology, and personalized medicine, with particular emphasis on gene- and immune-based interventions as mechanistically mature exemplars. We consolidate advances in pharmacological testing and toxicity modeling, viral and non-viral gene delivery, genome engineering, and immunomodulation using perfused livers. We further describe emerging applications, including autologous EVLP pathways for organ-confined therapy, ex vivo liver surgery, and bioengineering strategies such as biliary organoid repair, RNA interference, and mitochondrial transfer. We highlight how these applications align with a paradigm shift in biomedical research, including the NIH’s recent initiative to prioritize human-based experimental models over animal-only studies. By leveraging transplant-declined or surgically resected organs that would otherwise be unused, ex vivo perfusion bridges the gap between pre-clinical testing and clinical practice, enabling real-time evaluation of interventions in functional human tissue. We discuss both the scientific opportunities afforded by EVLP and the technical, biosafety, and ethical challenges that must be addressed to enable responsible clinical translation.
Posterior lumbar facet arthroplasty versus fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis: 3-year results from the Total Posterior Spine System investigational device exemption study
OBJECTIVE The optimal surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) remains controversial. Posterior lumbar facet arthroplasty preserves motion after decompression and may address some of the limitations of fusion techniques. The Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS) investigational device exemption trial compared decompression with facet arthroplasty to decompression plus fusion (open with interbody). This study reports the 3-year outcomes from this trial. METHODS This randomized, controlled, multicenter trial enrolled 321 patients with LSS and grade I DS across 37 sites (2:1 randomization of arthroplasty to fusion). Eligible patients were 35–80 years old, had failed ≥ 6 months of nonsurgical treatment, and met thresholds for disability and leg pain. The primary endpoint was a composite clinical success score at 36 months, defined by four criteria: 1) no reoperation or lumbar injection, 2) no major device adverse events, 3) ≥ 15-point improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 4) no new/progressive neurological deficit. Secondary outcomes included the ODI score, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), device-related adverse events, and reoperations. RESULTS One hundred seventy-nine patients in the arthroplasty (TOPS) group and 74 in the fusion group were eligible for the 36-month analysis. The composite clinical success achievement rate was significantly higher in the arthroplasty group (76.0%) than in the fusion group (56.8%; p = 0.0038). The rate of reoperation or lumbar injection was significantly lower for the arthroplasty group (14.0%) compared to the fusion group (25.3%; p = 0.0222). Arthroplasty was associated with a significantly higher minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rate for VAS back pain score compared with fusion (85.2% vs 72.2%; p = 0.041). Although there was no significant difference in ODI score, VAS leg pain score, or ZCQ component scores between groups, the arthroplasty group trended toward higher MCID achievement rates across all patient-reported outcome measures. There was no significant difference in reoperation failure rates between groups (5.8% for arthroplasty vs 9.5% for fusion; p = 0.329). CONCLUSIONS Decompression and dynamic stabilization with lumbar facet arthroplasty was associated with statistically significantly superior clinical outcomes and lower rates of secondary invasive procedures, including reoperations and injections, compared with decompression and fusion. Long-term follow-up is critical in defining the role of lumbar facet arthroplasty for the treatment of DS.
Standardized Knee Meniscus MRI Reporting: An Interdisciplinary Delphi Consensus
Through a Delphi process, all 33 panelists reached consensus on topics relating to MRI reporting of knee meniscus lesions, demonstrating that interdisciplinary and multi-institutional standardization is possible.