Yalniz, Fevzi

Brexucabtagene-autoleucel (brexu-cel) produces high rates of measurable residual disease-negative (MRD-) complete response (CR) in adults with Philadelphia-chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); however, subsequent relapses remain frequent. It is unclear whether maintenance with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can enhance remission durability. We evaluated outcomes among adults with relapsed/refractory Ph+ ALL who received commercial brexu-cel and achieved MRD- CR across 19 U.S. institutions. Considering TKI maintenance as a time-varying covariate, we analyzed outcomes based on receipt of subsequent TKI maintenance versus no maintenance. Patients receiving consolidative transplantation or non-TKI maintenance were excluded. Fifty-one patients were included: 20 received TKI maintenance and 31 received no maintenance. The use of TKI maintenance was associated with a significantly lower 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse (HR 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.88; p=0.037) which translated into improved progression-free survival (PFS, HR 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.85; p=0.029) and a trend towards improved overall survival (OS, HR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.07-1.62; p=0.18). There was no difference in non-relapse mortality (NRM, HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.12-5.87; p=0.85). This real-world analysis supports the administration of TKI maintenance in Ph+ ALL following achievement of MRD- CR with brexu-cel as a strategy to improve PFS following chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Abstract The use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is increasing for adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), with 3 CD19 CAR T-cell products commercially available. Several key clinical questions related to best practices for CAR T-cell administration in this population exist, and limited prospective randomized trials have been conducted to fill these knowledge gaps. Thus, to help guide clinical practice, we conducted a modified Delphi study to develop and validate consensus recommendations on the administration of commercially available CAR T-cell therapy for adults with B-ALL. Consensus panelists (n = 9) included principal investigators (PIs) from Real World Outcomes Collaborative of CAR T-Cell Therapy in Adult ALL (ROCCA) consortium sites and were selected based on expertise and CAR T-cell center volume. Final panel consensus recommendations were distributed for rating by the remaining PIs from ROCCA consortium sites, which served as the validation group (n = 27). Consensus topics included patient selection, bridging and pre–CAR T-cell leukemia staging, lymphodepletion, and CAR T-cell treatment setting, specific toxicity prevention and management, post–CAR T-cell response assessment and disease monitoring, and the role of consolidation and/or maintenance therapies after CAR T-cell therapy. Initially, 58 recommendation statements were evaluated for consensus. After 2 panel meetings, a total of 34 statements achieved consensus rating among the expert panel. After rating by the validation group, all but 1 recommendation statement continued to meet consensus, for a total of 33 consensus recommendation statements on the administration of CAR T-cell therapy in adult B-ALL.

Abstract In a real-world analysis of brexucabtagene autoleucel recipients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (N = 278), lack of response to prior blinatumomab correlates with significantly worse following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy outcomes.

Abstract Introduction: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (Brexu-cel) is a CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-)T cell therapy approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-ALL. Brexu-cel's approval was founded on data from the ZUMA-3 trial, in which 78 patients (pts) were treated at the pivotal dose of 1x10e6 CAR-T cells/kg, resulting in a complete remission (CR) rate of 73%. Three-year follow-up from ZUMA-3 demonstrated median relapse-free and overall survival (RFS/OS) of 11.6 and 25.6 months (mos) for all treated pts. Amongst responders, the median OS was 60.4 mos for those who did not receive a subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) (n=43), but only 36.3 months for those who did (n=14). This has led some to conclude that HCT may not be beneficial following brexu-cel therapy for r/r B-ALL; however, it must be noted that 29 (37%) of the pts treated on ZUMA-3 received brexu-cel for post-HCT relapse. T cells collected from individuals who relapse in the post-HCT setting are largely of donor origin, making the CAR-T product comparable to a genetically modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). The immunology at play in this scenario may be different from that in which CAR-T cells are of truly autologous origin. Methods: The Real-World Outcomes Collaborative for CAR-T in ALL (ROCCA) consortium database includes pt characteristics and outcomes of brexu-cel therapy given as standard-of-care across 41 US institutions. We identified pts who achieved an MRD negative (neg) CR by either flow cytometry (minimum sensitivity 10e-4) or NGS following brexu-cel for r/r Ph neg B-ALL and categorized them into three groups with regard to use of HCT: Never HCT, Pre-CAR HCT, or Post-CAR HCT. Pts who received second HCT following brexu-cel for post-HCT relapse (n=9) were excluded. Pt/disease characteristics, RFS, and OS were assessed for each group, landmarked at 73 days after brexu-cel infusion (the median time to consolidative allogeneic HCT). Results: In the ROCCA database we identified 165 pts who achieved MRD neg CR following brexu-cel, amongst whom 69 never underwent HCT, 49 were transplanted pre-CAR (ie, brexu-cel served as a genetically modified DLI), and 47 underwent post-CAR consolidative HCT while in CR. The median follow-up is 373 days. The median age was higher in the Never HCT group (49, range 19-83) in comparison with the Pre-CAR HCT (40, 24-72) and Post-CAR HCT (34, 18-70) groups. Thirty-five percent were >60yo in the Never HCT group vs 20% in the Pre-CAR HCT and 9% in the Post-CAR HCT groups. Ph-like disease was present in 38%, 29%, and 43% of the Never HCT, Pre-CAR HCT, and Post-CAR HCT groups, respectively (p=0.35). No significant differences were observed in pre-apheresis bone marrow blasts, presence of CNS disease at apheresis, prior blinatumomab or inotuzumab treatment, or use of bridging therapy across the groups, though there was a higher prevalence of non-CNS extramedullary disease in the Pre- and Post-CAR HCT groups (32, 39%) vs the Never HCT group (13%) (p=0.004). A minority of pts in all groups were deemed to be in MRD neg CR prior to apheresis (6-20%). Median RFS was 260 days in the Never HCT group and not reached in the Pre- and Post-CAR HCT groups (p=0.002), with respective 1-yr RFS of 38%, 64%, and 67%. Median OS was not reached in any group and was similar for all at 1-yr at 68-79% (p=0.13). Characteristics of those in the Never HCT group who were least likely to relapse included age >60 (OR 0.22, CI 0.07-0.73 vs age 18-39, p=0.024) and those with non-Ph-like B-ALL (OR 0.33, CI 0.12-0.94, vs Ph-like, p=0.037) in univariate analyses. Conclusions: Real-world data regarding outcomes following brexu-cel therapy allow evaluation of the role for consolidative allogeneic HCT, which remains one of the most important unresolved questions in the use of CAR-T therapy for r/r B-ALL. This analysis demonstrates that a first consolidative HCT after achieving MRD neg CR with brexu-cel is associated with a significant decrease in relapse. Additionally, use of brexu-cel for post-HCT relapse is also associated with a significantly lower risk of relapse compared with those who never received an allogeneic HCT. With the current duration of followup, OS is not significantly different across the three groups. These data suggest there is a benefit for relapse-free survival in pts receiving an allogeneic HCT at some point in the course of treatment for r/r Ph neg B-ALL.

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) remains the most effective postremission therapy for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). FMS-like tyrosine kinase3 (FLT3) mutations occur in about 30% of patients with cytogenetically normal AML. FLT3-ITD (internal tandem duplications) mutations are associated with short-lived remissions and poor outcomes. These adverse effects can be offset by allogeneic HCT in first complete remission (CR1). We carried out this study to get a real world perspective on feasibility of allogeneic HCT in CR1 for FLT3-ITD mutant AML patients. Methods: The Mayo Clinic AML database was queried for all patients that had tested positive for the FLT3 ITD, from January 2003 to December 2014. 75 patients were identified, of which 28 (37%) underwent allogeneic HCT in CR1. 12 were excluded as they were transplant ineligible from an age standpoint, 6 patients actually had MDS and 2 were excluded for primary induction failure. Clinical and outcomes data were abstracted retrospectively. Results: 29 patients were included in the final analysis, with a median age of 57 years (range 21-68), 38% males. Median time from diagnosis to last follow up was 339 days. 24(83%) had normal cytogenetics. 26(90%) received treatment with anthracycline + cytarabine based therapy, 3(10%) were enrolled on a clinical trial. 25(87%) patients went on to receive consolidation therapy. 22 (75%) of the patients relapsed after achieving a CR1, with a median time to relapse of 134 days (range 27-1710 days). Only 8 (26%) of the 22 patients were able to achieve a CR2 with salvage chemotherapy, of which 6 (75 %) successfully underwent allogeneic HCT.2 (25%) out of 8 patients received FLT3 inhibitor in 1st relapse. We then assessed the reasons why relapsed patients did not undergo HCT in CR1. The most common being; relapse during evaluation/work up for HCT in 8(27%) patients, 5 (17%) had comorbidities that precluded HCT, 3 (10%) were never referred for HCT due to personal preferences. At last follow up 19(65%) patients were dead. Conclusion: While allogeneic HCT is an effective consolidative strategy for FLT3 ITD mutant AML patients, in the real world, a large number are not transplanted in CR1 due to delays in donor search and transplant scheduling strategies resulting in disease relapse. Effective strategies to avoid delays in scheduling, rapid donor searches and the use of alternative donor sources are much needed for these patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality following allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Corticosteroids are the first line treatment although <50% of patients with severe aGVHD (grades III-IV) achieve durable remissions. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are often used as second line agents for steroid refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) (Patriarca et. al.; 2004). However, data regarding their tolerability and efficacy is retrospective and limited. We carried out this study to assess the clinical outcomes related to mAb therapy (Infliximab and Tocilizumab) for SR-aGVHD. Methods: Patients with SR-aGVHD that received therapy with either Infliximab or Tocilizumab between January 2003 and May 2016 were retrospectively identified. Clinical grading of aGVHD was per the Glucksberg criteria (Glucksberg et. al.; 1974). SR-aGVHD was defined as any grade progression within 3 days or failure to achieve at least one grade improvement within 7 days of initiation of systemic steroids. Infliximab and Tocilizumab were administered intravenously at 10mg/kg and 8mg/kg weekly for a total of 4 doses, respectively. Clinical response was evaluated at 4 weeks and 12 weeks post mAb treatment. Complete response (CR) was defined as sustained resolution of all clinical signs of aGVHD; partial response (PR) was defined as overall improvement of 1 or more grades; no response (NR) was defined as neither improvement nor worsening of the overall aGVHD grade. Overall response (OR) was defined as either CR or PR. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the first day of mAb treatment until death or last available follow up. Results: Forty-three patients (median age 54, range 29-74 years; male 67%) with severe SR- aGVHD were included in the study. Of these, 35 (81%) received Infliximab for a median of 4 (range 1-6) cycles and 8 (19%) received Tocilizumab for a median of 3 (range 1-4) cycles. Both groups were comparable with regards to age, gender, conditioning regimen, graft source, degree of HLA match, ABO blood group, CMV incompatibility, and GVHD prophylaxis regimens. Only differences seen were a higher proportion of unrelated donor (p = 0.004) and cord blood HCT (p = 0.031) in the Tocilizumab group. Twenty (57%) of 35 patients treated with Infliximab and 6 (75%) of 8 patients treated with Tocilizumab had an overall aGVHD grade of IV prior to initiation of mAb therapy (p = 0.44). Organ specific distribution and severity of aGVHD are described in table 1. At 4 weeks post mAb therapy, 17 (40%) patients had an OR, 7 (16%) had no response, and 19 (44%) had died. Twenty-six (60%) patients died at 12 weeks, with OR and no response observed in 9 (21%) and 8 (19%) patients, respectively (table 2). Overall response for Tocilizumab versus Infliximab was comparable at 4 weeks (38% vs. 40%; p = 1.0) and at 12 weeks (38% vs. 17%; p = 0.33). Outcomes per aGVHD grade and gastrointestinal-specific stage at 4 weeks and 12 weeks are shown in figures 1-A and 1-B, with organ specific responses shown in figures 1-C and 1-D, respectively. The estimated median OS was 41 (range 4-3837) days for patients treated with Infliximab and 60 (range 10-756) days for those treated with Tocilizumab (p = 0.48). Disease relapse occurred in 5 (11%) patients treated with Infliximab and in none (0%) treated with Tocilizumab (p = 0.56). Thirty-four (79%) patients had infectious complications during and up to one month after mAb therapy. These included 31 (72%) patients with bacterial blood stream infection and 10 (23%) with invasive fungal infections. Overall, infectious complications were comparable (Infliximab - 83% vs. Tocilizumab - 63%; p = 0.33). CMV reactivation occurred in 11 (31%) and in 2 (25%) patients who were treated with Infliximab and Tocilizumab, respectively (p = 1.0). Given the retrospective nature of the study and the concomitant presence of aGVHD, it was difficult to attribute and grade gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary side effects. Conclusions: The use of anti-inflammatory monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with steroid refractory acute GVHD is associated with significant infectious complications (~80%) and poor response rates (~20% at 12 weeks). Current data, limited by a small sample size, does not show any advantages of using Tocilizumab over Infliximab or vice versa. Prospective clinical trials addressing this question are needed. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

AbstractTherapy related myeloid neoplasms (t‐MN) including therapy related myelodysplastic syndromes (t‐MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (t‐AML) are associated with aggressive disease biologies and poor outcomes. In this large (n = 497) and informative (inclusive of molecular and cytogenetic information) chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) patient cohort, we demonstrate key biological insights and an independent prognostic impact for t‐CMML. T‐CMML was diagnosed in 9% of patients and occurred approximately 7 years after exposure to prior chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. In comparison to de novo CMML, t‐CMML patients had higher LDH levels, higher frequency of karyotypic abnormalities and had higher risk cytogenetic stratification. There were no differences in the distribution of gene mutations and unlike t‐MDS/AML, balanced chromosomal translocations, abnormalities of chromosome 11q23 (1%) and Tp53 mutations (<2%) were uncommon. Molecularly integrated CMML prognostic models were not effective in risk stratifying t‐CMML patients and responses to hypomethylating agents were dismal with no complete responses. Median overall (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) was shorter for t‐CMML in comparison to d‐CMML (Median OS 10.9 vs 26 months and median LFS 50 vs 127 months) and t‐CMML independently and adversely impacted OS (P = .0001 HR 2.1 95% CI 1.4‐3.0). This prognostic impact was retained in the context of the Mayo Molecular Model (P = .001, HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5‐3.7) and the GFM prognostic model (P < .0001, HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.5‐3.7). In summary, we highlight the unique genetics and independent prognostic impact of t‐CMML, warranting its inclusion as a separate entity in the classification schema for both CMML and t‐MN.