Wang, Demin

ABSTRACT Background Platelet factor 4‐polyanion enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA‐negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non‐heparin‐based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. Methods Antigen‐based and PF4‐dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinylsulfonate ELISA‐negative platelet‐activating antibodies in HIT‐suspected patients. Results Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4‐polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody screening. All three patients demonstrated PF4‐dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing‐based screening of 500 ELISA‐negative patients identified three additional patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4‐ and FcγRIIa‐dependent manner and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA‐negative HIT patients were re‐exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re‐exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. Conclusions Recognition of ELISA‐negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re‐exposure of these patients to heparin.

Abstract The hallmark of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the presence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) complexes, typically detected by PF4/H enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); thus, negative ELISA results are commonly used to exclude this diagnosis. Here, we report a prevalent yet previously unrecognized subset of antibodies that are undetectable by PF4/H ELISA (ELISA−) but activate platelets in the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA+). In 11 patients with clinically confirmed HIT who tested positive in both PF4/H ELISA and platelet activation assays, ELISA−PEA+ antibodies accounted for 65% ± 19% of total platelet-activating IgG activity and coexisted with ELISA+PEA+ antibodies. Consistent with this finding, single-cell cloning from 7 patients with HIT identified 23 PEA+ antibody-producing B-cell clones, of which 17 were ELISA−, outnumbering the ELISA+ clones. Functionally, ELISA−PEA+ antibodies closely resembled ELISA+PEA+ antibodies: platelet binding and activation required exogenous PF4 and were inhibited by FcγRIIA blockade, high-dose heparin, or Fab fragments made from ELISA+PEA+ antibodies. Importantly, these antibodies induced thrombocytopenia in a humanized mouse model of HIT. Despite lacking PF4/H reactivity in ELISAs, they recognize PF4 on platelets and showed no appreciable binding to neutrophil-activating peptide-2, interleukin-8, or PF4 alone. Structurally, these antibodies were heterogeneous, with a subset sharing heavy-chain features with ELISA+PEA+ antibodies. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that ELISA−PEA+ antibodies are a common, previously unrecognized feature of HIT, with functional relevance, supporting the possibility that they play an important, perhaps even central, role in HIT pathogenesis. Defining their prevalence, kinetics, and clinical impact deserves high priority for further investigation.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Platelet factor 4-polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA-negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non-heparin-based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. METHODS Antigen-based and PF4-dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinyl sulfonate ELISA-negative platelet-activating antibodies in HIT-suspected patients and mice immunized with PF4/heparin. RESULTS Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4-polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody detection. All three patients demonstrated PF4-dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing-based screening of 500 ELISA-negative patients identified three patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4- and FcγRIIa-dependent manner, and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA-negative HIT patients were re-exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re-exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. To advance the study of ELISA-negative HIT antibodies, mice were immunized with PF4/heparin, and functional and antigenic assays were simultaneously used to successfully identify an ELISA-negative, PF4-dependent platelet-activating murine monoclonal antibody that recapitulated the serological characteristics of ELISA-negative HIT patients. CONCLUSIONS Recognition of ELISA-negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re-exposure of these patients to heparin.

Severe COVID-19 is a multisystem condition with thromboinflammation as a significant driver of morbidity and mortality. Cellular components involved in inflammatory and coagulation responses include platelets, endothelium, monocytes, and neutrophils. Thrombotic manifestations, such as arterial thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, and tissue microthrombosis, occur in at least 20% of ICU COVID-19 patients, possibly more based on postmortem studies. This study investigates the presence of prothrombotic antibodies similar to those found in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a condition caused by platelet-activating antibodies targeting platelet factor 4 (PF4) when complexed with heparin (PF4/H). In a study of samples from 130 hospitalized patients collected on average 3.6 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, 80% were found to have IgG antibodies recognizing PF4/H. This percentage is significantly lower than in 22 HIT patients (100%) but higher than in 51 non-COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory symptoms (ARS) (25%) and 12 healthy subjects (0%). Additionally, 41% of the 130 patients had antibodies inducing PF4-dependent P-selectin expression in CpG-treated normal platelets, a rate significantly lower than in 12 HIT patients (100%) but higher than in 51 non-COVID-19 ARS patients (20%) and 12 healthy subjects (0%). Significantly, platelet-activating antibodies in COVID-19 patients were associated with a specific elevation of platelet α-granule proteins in the plasma and correlated with inflammation and tissue damage markers, suggesting these antibodies' functionality in patients. Significantly, unlike HIT, both PF4/H-reactive and platelet-activating antibodies were found in COVID-19 patients regardless of recent heparin exposure, indicating different antigenic stimuli for these antibodies in COVID-19. Notably, certain antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 possessed sequence motifs, RKH and Y5, in the heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3) resembling those in pathogenic HIT antibodies identified in our previous studies, suggesting that these antibodies can activate platelets. Introducing exogenous RBD to COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. Furthermore, immunodepleting RBD-reactive antibodies from COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma using RBD-coated beads significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. These findings demonstrate that some RBD-specific plasma IgG antibodies can activate platelets. To demonstrate the presence of RBD-specific, platelet-activating antibodies at the clonal level, we produced recombinant antibodies from 42 RBD-binding IgG+ B cells, tested their ability to activate platelets, and identified four that could do so. Interestingly, three antibodies possess HCDR3 sequences resembling RKH or Y5 motifs. Additionally, we identified RKH or Y5 motifs in RBD-specific antibodies reported by other groups, produced 15 such antibodies recombinantly, tested their ability to activate platelets, and identified four more that could do so. IgG+ B cells with these HCDR3 motifs were markedly expanded in severe COVID-19 patients, suggesting an expansion of B cells producing platelet-activating antibodies. The demonstration of functional and structural similarities between certain RBD-specific antibodies in COVID-19 patients and pathogenic HIT antibodies suggests a novel mechanism by which RBD-specific antibodies might contribute to thrombosis in COVID-19.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication of heparin therapy, driven by IgG antibodies (Abs) that target platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin, resulting in platelet activation and a pro-thrombotic state. The PF4/Heparin (PF4/H) ELISA is the most commonly used screening assay for HIT due to its wide accessibility and high sensitivity. Despite its limited specificity, resulting in only a small fraction of positive cases progressing to actual HIT, PF4/H ELISA remains a critical tool in initial diagnostics. It is generally believed that HIT patients produce two types of Abs - those that bind to PF4/H and may or may not activate platelets. However, there are documented but rare HIT cases with an atypical profile: Abs testing negative in the PF4/H ELISA (ELISA-) but capable of platelet activation, suggesting the presence of a third type of Abs - those that activate platelets but can't recognize PF4/H complex. Since a PF4/H ELISA- result typically excludes an HIT diagnosis, overseeing these cases could lead to the resumption of heparin, potentially resulting in life-threatening thrombosis. Additionally, in HIT cases with a positive ELISA test profile, or classic HIT cases, levels of platelet-activating Abs and PF4/H-reactive Abs are not always correlated, suggesting the presence of ELISA- platelet-activating Abs. We thus investigated whether ELISA- platelet-activating Abs are present in classic HIT. To identify and characterize ELISA- Abs at the serological level, we firstly purified IgG Abs from the plasma of 5 healthy donors (HD) and 8 HIT patients using protein A beads, followed by the depletion of PF4/H-binding Abs using PF4/H-coated Sepharose beads. The efficiency of IgG purification and PF4/H-specific IgG depletion was confirmed by IgG and PF4/H ELISA. P-selectin expression assay (PEA) was conducted to evaluate the platelet activating ability of purified IgG pre and post depletion of PF4/H-specific Abs. We found that variable, but significant levels of platelet-activating Abs exist in the PF4/H non-reactive IgG portion in all 8 HIT samples, but none of the HD samples. Closely resembling those found in the PF4/H-reactive Abs in HIT patients' plasma, platelet activation induced by post-depletion Abs relied on exogenous PF4 and FcγRIIa and was inhibited by high-dose heparin. These data demonstrate that PF4/H non-reactive IgG Abs coexist with PF4/H-reactive Abs and may contribute to platelet activation in HIT patients. To verify these findings at the clonal level, we conducted single B-cell culture to induce antibody secretion by the cultured B cells from patients experiencing clinical manifestations of HIT. We screened clonal Abs made by 1506 single IgG1+ B cells isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of seven HIT patients and identified 18 clones capable of platelet activation. Of these, 13 were unable to bind to PF4/H. The functionality of these Abs was confirmed by recombinant Abs derived from single B-cell clones. This finding suggests that PF4/H non-reactive platelet-activating Abs exist at a higher frequency than those that bind to PF4/H. Interestingly, even though these Abs tested negative in the PF4/H ELISA, they were able to bind to the surface of PF4-treated platelets, and their platelet activation ability correlated with platelet binding affinity, suggesting a potential method for their detection. In summary, our study identified a novel group of potentially pathogenic Abs in HIT that, while unable to recognize the PF4/H complex, can bind to the PF4-coated platelet surface. These Abs frequently coexist with PF4/H-binding pathogenic Abs and may contribute to HIT pathogenesis. These insights will enrich our understanding of HIT pathogenesis and may pave the way for more advanced diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Abstract Thromboembolic complication is common in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading to an investigation into the presence of prothrombotic antibodies akin to those found in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In a study of samples from 130 hospitalized patients, collected 3.6 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, 80% had immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies recognizing complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4; PF4/H), and 41% had antibodies inducing PF4-dependent P-selectin expression in CpG oligodeoxynucleotide–treated normal platelets. Unlike HIT, both PF4/H-reactive and platelet-activating antibodies were found in patients with COVID-19 regardless of recent heparin exposure. Notably, PF4/H-reactive IgG antibodies correlated with those targeting the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein. Moreover, introducing exogenous RBD to or removing RBD-reactive IgG from COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. RBD-specific antibodies capable of platelet activation were cloned from peripheral blood B cells of patients with COVID-19. These antibodies possessed sequence motifs in the heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3), resembling those identified in pathogenic HIT antibodies. Furthermore, IgG+ B cells having these HCDR3 signatures were markedly expanded in patients with severe COVID-19. Importantly, platelet-activating antibodies present in patients with COVID-19 were associated with a specific elevation of platelet α-granule proteins in the plasma and showed a positive correlation with markers for inflammation and tissue damage, suggesting a functionality of these antibodies in patients. The demonstration of functional and structural similarities between certain RBD-specific antibodies in patients with COVID-19 and pathogenic antibodies typical of HIT suggests a novel mechanism by which RBD-specific antibodies might contribute to thrombosis in COVID-19.

AbstractHeparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious adverse drug reaction characterized by antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4/heparin complexes (PF4/H) and activate platelets to create a prothrombotic state. Although a high percentage of heparin-treated patients produce antibodies to PF4/H, only a subset also makes antibodies that are platelet activating (PA). A close correlation between PA antibodies and the likelihood of experiencing HIT has been demonstrated in clinical studies, but how PA (presumptively pathogenic) and nonactivating (NA) (presumptively benign) antibodies differ from each other at the molecular level is unknown. To address this issue, we cloned 7 PA and 47 NA PF4/H-binding antibodies from 6 patients with HIT and characterized their structural and functional properties. Findings showed that PA clones differed significantly from NA clones in possessing 1 of 2 heavy chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3) motifs, RX1-2R/KX1-2R/H (RKH) and YYYYY (Y5), in an unusually long complementarity-determining region 3 (≥20 residues). Mutagenic studies showed that modification of either motif in PA clones reduced or abolished their PA activity and that appropriate amino acid substitutions in HCDR3 of NA clones can cause them to become PA. Repertoire sequencing showed that the frequency of peripheral blood IgG+ B cells possessing RKH or Y5 was significantly higher in patients with HIT than in patients without HIT given heparin, indicating expansion of B cells possessing RKH or Y5 in HIT. These findings imply that antibodies possessing RKH or Y5 are relevant to HIT pathogenesis and suggest new approaches to diagnosis and treatment of this condition.

Kanack and colleagues analyze anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies from 5 patients with vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) secondary to COVID-19 adenoviral vaccination and antibodies from patients with spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and classical HIT. VITT antibodies are monoclonal or oligoclonal, similar to spontaneous HIT, whereas classical HIT antibodies are polyclonal. Heparin inhibits antibody-induced platelet activation in VITT, suggesting that heparin should be considered for the treatment of VITT.