Aster, Richard H.

ABSTRACT Background Platelet factor 4‐polyanion enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA‐negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non‐heparin‐based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. Methods Antigen‐based and PF4‐dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinylsulfonate ELISA‐negative platelet‐activating antibodies in HIT‐suspected patients. Results Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4‐polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody screening. All three patients demonstrated PF4‐dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing‐based screening of 500 ELISA‐negative patients identified three additional patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4‐ and FcγRIIa‐dependent manner and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA‐negative HIT patients were re‐exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re‐exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. Conclusions Recognition of ELISA‐negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re‐exposure of these patients to heparin.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Platelet factor 4-polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA-negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non-heparin-based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. METHODS Antigen-based and PF4-dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinyl sulfonate ELISA-negative platelet-activating antibodies in HIT-suspected patients and mice immunized with PF4/heparin. RESULTS Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4-polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody detection. All three patients demonstrated PF4-dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing-based screening of 500 ELISA-negative patients identified three patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4- and FcγRIIa-dependent manner, and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA-negative HIT patients were re-exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re-exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. To advance the study of ELISA-negative HIT antibodies, mice were immunized with PF4/heparin, and functional and antigenic assays were simultaneously used to successfully identify an ELISA-negative, PF4-dependent platelet-activating murine monoclonal antibody that recapitulated the serological characteristics of ELISA-negative HIT patients. CONCLUSIONS Recognition of ELISA-negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re-exposure of these patients to heparin.

Severe COVID-19 is a multisystem condition with thromboinflammation as a significant driver of morbidity and mortality. Cellular components involved in inflammatory and coagulation responses include platelets, endothelium, monocytes, and neutrophils. Thrombotic manifestations, such as arterial thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, and tissue microthrombosis, occur in at least 20% of ICU COVID-19 patients, possibly more based on postmortem studies. This study investigates the presence of prothrombotic antibodies similar to those found in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a condition caused by platelet-activating antibodies targeting platelet factor 4 (PF4) when complexed with heparin (PF4/H). In a study of samples from 130 hospitalized patients collected on average 3.6 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, 80% were found to have IgG antibodies recognizing PF4/H. This percentage is significantly lower than in 22 HIT patients (100%) but higher than in 51 non-COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory symptoms (ARS) (25%) and 12 healthy subjects (0%). Additionally, 41% of the 130 patients had antibodies inducing PF4-dependent P-selectin expression in CpG-treated normal platelets, a rate significantly lower than in 12 HIT patients (100%) but higher than in 51 non-COVID-19 ARS patients (20%) and 12 healthy subjects (0%). Significantly, platelet-activating antibodies in COVID-19 patients were associated with a specific elevation of platelet α-granule proteins in the plasma and correlated with inflammation and tissue damage markers, suggesting these antibodies' functionality in patients. Significantly, unlike HIT, both PF4/H-reactive and platelet-activating antibodies were found in COVID-19 patients regardless of recent heparin exposure, indicating different antigenic stimuli for these antibodies in COVID-19. Notably, certain antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 possessed sequence motifs, RKH and Y5, in the heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3) resembling those in pathogenic HIT antibodies identified in our previous studies, suggesting that these antibodies can activate platelets. Introducing exogenous RBD to COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. Furthermore, immunodepleting RBD-reactive antibodies from COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma using RBD-coated beads significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. These findings demonstrate that some RBD-specific plasma IgG antibodies can activate platelets. To demonstrate the presence of RBD-specific, platelet-activating antibodies at the clonal level, we produced recombinant antibodies from 42 RBD-binding IgG+ B cells, tested their ability to activate platelets, and identified four that could do so. Interestingly, three antibodies possess HCDR3 sequences resembling RKH or Y5 motifs. Additionally, we identified RKH or Y5 motifs in RBD-specific antibodies reported by other groups, produced 15 such antibodies recombinantly, tested their ability to activate platelets, and identified four more that could do so. IgG+ B cells with these HCDR3 motifs were markedly expanded in severe COVID-19 patients, suggesting an expansion of B cells producing platelet-activating antibodies. The demonstration of functional and structural similarities between certain RBD-specific antibodies in COVID-19 patients and pathogenic HIT antibodies suggests a novel mechanism by which RBD-specific antibodies might contribute to thrombosis in COVID-19.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication of heparin therapy, driven by IgG antibodies (Abs) that target platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin, resulting in platelet activation and a pro-thrombotic state. The PF4/Heparin (PF4/H) ELISA is the most commonly used screening assay for HIT due to its wide accessibility and high sensitivity. Despite its limited specificity, resulting in only a small fraction of positive cases progressing to actual HIT, PF4/H ELISA remains a critical tool in initial diagnostics. It is generally believed that HIT patients produce two types of Abs - those that bind to PF4/H and may or may not activate platelets. However, there are documented but rare HIT cases with an atypical profile: Abs testing negative in the PF4/H ELISA (ELISA-) but capable of platelet activation, suggesting the presence of a third type of Abs - those that activate platelets but can't recognize PF4/H complex. Since a PF4/H ELISA- result typically excludes an HIT diagnosis, overseeing these cases could lead to the resumption of heparin, potentially resulting in life-threatening thrombosis. Additionally, in HIT cases with a positive ELISA test profile, or classic HIT cases, levels of platelet-activating Abs and PF4/H-reactive Abs are not always correlated, suggesting the presence of ELISA- platelet-activating Abs. We thus investigated whether ELISA- platelet-activating Abs are present in classic HIT. To identify and characterize ELISA- Abs at the serological level, we firstly purified IgG Abs from the plasma of 5 healthy donors (HD) and 8 HIT patients using protein A beads, followed by the depletion of PF4/H-binding Abs using PF4/H-coated Sepharose beads. The efficiency of IgG purification and PF4/H-specific IgG depletion was confirmed by IgG and PF4/H ELISA. P-selectin expression assay (PEA) was conducted to evaluate the platelet activating ability of purified IgG pre and post depletion of PF4/H-specific Abs. We found that variable, but significant levels of platelet-activating Abs exist in the PF4/H non-reactive IgG portion in all 8 HIT samples, but none of the HD samples. Closely resembling those found in the PF4/H-reactive Abs in HIT patients' plasma, platelet activation induced by post-depletion Abs relied on exogenous PF4 and FcγRIIa and was inhibited by high-dose heparin. These data demonstrate that PF4/H non-reactive IgG Abs coexist with PF4/H-reactive Abs and may contribute to platelet activation in HIT patients. To verify these findings at the clonal level, we conducted single B-cell culture to induce antibody secretion by the cultured B cells from patients experiencing clinical manifestations of HIT. We screened clonal Abs made by 1506 single IgG1+ B cells isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of seven HIT patients and identified 18 clones capable of platelet activation. Of these, 13 were unable to bind to PF4/H. The functionality of these Abs was confirmed by recombinant Abs derived from single B-cell clones. This finding suggests that PF4/H non-reactive platelet-activating Abs exist at a higher frequency than those that bind to PF4/H. Interestingly, even though these Abs tested negative in the PF4/H ELISA, they were able to bind to the surface of PF4-treated platelets, and their platelet activation ability correlated with platelet binding affinity, suggesting a potential method for their detection. In summary, our study identified a novel group of potentially pathogenic Abs in HIT that, while unable to recognize the PF4/H complex, can bind to the PF4-coated platelet surface. These Abs frequently coexist with PF4/H-binding pathogenic Abs and may contribute to HIT pathogenesis. These insights will enrich our understanding of HIT pathogenesis and may pave the way for more advanced diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Abstract Thromboembolic complication is common in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading to an investigation into the presence of prothrombotic antibodies akin to those found in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In a study of samples from 130 hospitalized patients, collected 3.6 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, 80% had immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies recognizing complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4; PF4/H), and 41% had antibodies inducing PF4-dependent P-selectin expression in CpG oligodeoxynucleotide–treated normal platelets. Unlike HIT, both PF4/H-reactive and platelet-activating antibodies were found in patients with COVID-19 regardless of recent heparin exposure. Notably, PF4/H-reactive IgG antibodies correlated with those targeting the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein. Moreover, introducing exogenous RBD to or removing RBD-reactive IgG from COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. RBD-specific antibodies capable of platelet activation were cloned from peripheral blood B cells of patients with COVID-19. These antibodies possessed sequence motifs in the heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3), resembling those identified in pathogenic HIT antibodies. Furthermore, IgG+ B cells having these HCDR3 signatures were markedly expanded in patients with severe COVID-19. Importantly, platelet-activating antibodies present in patients with COVID-19 were associated with a specific elevation of platelet α-granule proteins in the plasma and showed a positive correlation with markers for inflammation and tissue damage, suggesting a functionality of these antibodies in patients. The demonstration of functional and structural similarities between certain RBD-specific antibodies in patients with COVID-19 and pathogenic antibodies typical of HIT suggests a novel mechanism by which RBD-specific antibodies might contribute to thrombosis in COVID-19.

AbstractHeparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious adverse drug reaction characterized by antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4/heparin complexes (PF4/H) and activate platelets to create a prothrombotic state. Although a high percentage of heparin-treated patients produce antibodies to PF4/H, only a subset also makes antibodies that are platelet activating (PA). A close correlation between PA antibodies and the likelihood of experiencing HIT has been demonstrated in clinical studies, but how PA (presumptively pathogenic) and nonactivating (NA) (presumptively benign) antibodies differ from each other at the molecular level is unknown. To address this issue, we cloned 7 PA and 47 NA PF4/H-binding antibodies from 6 patients with HIT and characterized their structural and functional properties. Findings showed that PA clones differed significantly from NA clones in possessing 1 of 2 heavy chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3) motifs, RX1-2R/KX1-2R/H (RKH) and YYYYY (Y5), in an unusually long complementarity-determining region 3 (≥20 residues). Mutagenic studies showed that modification of either motif in PA clones reduced or abolished their PA activity and that appropriate amino acid substitutions in HCDR3 of NA clones can cause them to become PA. Repertoire sequencing showed that the frequency of peripheral blood IgG+ B cells possessing RKH or Y5 was significantly higher in patients with HIT than in patients without HIT given heparin, indicating expansion of B cells possessing RKH or Y5 in HIT. These findings imply that antibodies possessing RKH or Y5 are relevant to HIT pathogenesis and suggest new approaches to diagnosis and treatment of this condition.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious reaction to heparin treatment characterized by antibodies that recognize a complex formed between heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4/H) and are capable of activating platelets and inducing a pro-thrombotic state. Although a high percentage of heparin-treated patients produce antibodies to PF4/H, only a subset of these antibodies are platelet-activating (pathogenic) and capable of causing HIT. We previously reported that we cloned B cells from six patients experiencing HIT and identified two types of PF4/H-binding antibodies: seven platelet-activating (PA) and 48 non-activating (NA). Comparison of the structural features in the PA, NA, and non PF4/H-binding (NB) clones showed that the length and the number of basic amino acid and tyrosine residue in the heavy chain complementarity determining region 3 (HCDR3) were significantly different, and was in the order of PA>NA>NB. Most significantly, the seven platelet-activating antibodies each have one of the two pathogenic motifs: RX1-2 R/KX1-2 R/H and YYYYY in an unusually long HCDR3 (≥ 20 residues). In the current study, we attempt to understand the origin of the B cells that produce the PA and NA antibodies and the nature of the immune response in HIT through analyzing somatic hypermutation and biological property of such antibodies. Longer HCDR3 and more basic Aas and Tyr residues in the HCDR3 are features of autoreactive and polyreactive antibodies. With this in mind, we tested PA and NA clones in a standard antinuclear antibody (ANA) assay and found that these clones were significantly more reactive than NB antibodies, and the plasma of HIT patients were significantly more reactive than normal plasma (Figure1). We then compared reactions of PA, NA and NB clones against a group of self and foreign antigens commonly used in polyreactivity assays: dsDNA, ssDNA, LPS, insulin, and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). About 90% of PA and NA clones were reactive to at least two antigens, this was true of only 20% of the NB clones, and the latter is consistent with the frequency of polyreactive clones in the IgG+ B cells (Figure2). Taken together, these data indicate that PA and NA antibodies are largely polyreactive. We then investigated the development of the PA and NA B cells through analyzing somatic hypermutation in the antibodies. Through analyzing the HCDR3 nucleotide insertion, trimming and VDJ segment usage, we found that longer HCDR3 typical of PF4/H-binding clones and the RKH and Y5 motifs identified in PA clones were the result of original recombination not somatic hypermutation. Consistently, the average number of nucleotide mutations in the VH genes of the binding clones was lower (PA and NA, 9.4 ± 9.5) compared to that of peripheral blood IgG+ memory B cells in healthy subjects (~18) (Figure3). Total mutation frequency in the VH and Vk CDRs of the PF4/H-binding PA and NA clones was comparable to that of the framework regions. This finding contrasts with findings made in peripheral blood IgG+ memory B cells of healthy subjects showing that the mutation frequencies are much higher in the CDRs than in the FRs of VH. Taken together, these findings suggest that affinity maturation plays a limited role in the evolution PF4/H-binding antibodies during the immune response that leads to HIT. In this study, we showed thay PF4/H-binding PA and NA IgGs are largely polyreactive antibodies and contain lower levels of mutations compared to IgG+ memory B cells. B1 and MZ B cells are innate B cells that are main producers of polyreactive natural antibodies and can respond to toll-like receptor signaling, quickly differentiate into antibody-secreting cells, and undergo IgG class switch extrafollicularly. Polyreactivity identified in the PF4/H-binding PA and NA IgGs supports the possibility that human B cells producing PF4/H-binding antibodies are innate B cells akin to MZ B cells shown to be a source of PF4/H antibodies in mice. A mutation rate lower than that of IgG+ memory cells in the PF4/H-binding IgGs is also consistent with an extrafollicular response typical of innate B cells. These observations would help to improve our understanding of the immunological responses and B cell origin in HIT patients. Disclosures Padmanabhan: Retham Technologies: Current equity holder in private company; Veralox Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Versiti Blood Research Institute: Patents & Royalties.

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening, prothrombotic, antibody-mediated disorder. To maximize the likelihood of recovery, early and accurate diagnosis is critical. Widely available HIT assays, such as the platelet factor 4 (PF4) heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) lack specificity, and the gold-standard carbon 14–labeled serotonin release assay (SRA) is of limited value for early patient management because it is available only through reference laboratories. Recent studies have demonstrated that pathogenic HIT antibodies selectively activate PF4-treated platelets and that a technically simpler assay, the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA), may provide an option for rapid and conclusive results. Based upon predefined criteria that combined 4Ts scores and HIT ELISA results, 409 consecutive adults suspected of having HIT were classified as disease positive, negative, or indeterminate. Patients deemed HIT indeterminate were considered disease negative in the primary analysis and disease positive in a sensitivity analysis. The ability of PEA and SRA to identify patients judged to have HIT was compared using receiver operating characteristic curve statistics. Using these predefined criteria, the diagnostic accuracy of PEA was high (area under the curve [AUC], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.0) and similar to that of SRA (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82-1.0). In sensitivity analysis, the AUCs of PEA and SRA were also similar at 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.96), respectively. The PEA, a technically simple nonradioactive assay that uses ∼20-fold fewer platelets compared with the SRA, had high accuracy for diagnosing HIT. Widespread use of the PEA may facilitate timely and more effective management of patients with suspected HIT.

Abstract Introduction: Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life and limb threatening pro-thrombotic syndrome triggered by antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion complexes. Commonly used screening tests such as the PF4/Heparin ELISA (PF4 ELISA), while easy to perform in the near-patient setting, are highly non-specific. In contrast, more accurate tests such as the serotonin release assay (SRA) are technically complex, require radioactivity and are performed in only a handful of reference laboratories. These diagnostic challenges lead to both unnecessary anticoagulant use as well as avoidable cases of severe bleeding. Recent reports suggest that a relatively simple three-hour flow cytometry-based test that uses PF4-treated normal platelets, the PEA (PF4-dependent p-selectin Expression Assay), is at least as accurate as the SRA for identifying patients who have HIT (Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov 25;114(6):1322-3; Chest. 2016 Sep;150(3):506-15; Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):e77-e80). Here we describe results of a large prospective study designed to compare the accuracy of the SRA and PEA for HIT diagnosis in a clinical setting. Methods: The PEA and SRA were performed on serum samples obtained from adult patients (≥18 yrs.) from 2 large tertiary care academic hospitals from May 2016 to Sep 2017. All inpatients for whom PF4 ELISA testing was ordered were included in the study. The PEA was performed with platelets pretreated with PF4 at 3 concentrations: 30mcg/mL (PEA30), 10mcg/mL (PEA10) and 3mcg/mL (PEA3). Sera were batch-tested in both assays (SRA and PEA) using the same target platelets. The central laboratory was blinded to clinical history and to the results of the PF4 ELISA performed by participating hospitals at the time of diagnosis. Both centers performed IgG-specific PF4 ELISAs and utilized manufacturer-recommended cut-offs for positivity. Predefined "more-stringent" and "less stringent" criteria based on clinical findings (4Ts score) and results of PF4 ELISA testing were used to define the likelihood of a patient having HIT (Table 1A). Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis was performed and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of each assay was calculated to assess their diagnostic accuracy. Since high test specificity was desired, positive cut-offs that maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity in a specificity range of ≥90% and ≥95% were derived. To evaluate non-inferiority of the PEA to the SRA, we assessed whether the lower limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval of the ΔAUC (PEA-SRA) was higher than a non-inferiority margin of 5% and 10%. Results: A total of 440 patient samples were tested with both assays. Seventeen and 28 patients were classified as having true HIT based on the use of the more- and less-stringent criteria, respectively. When classified by more-stringent criteria, the AUC was numerically greater for each of the three PEA tests than for the SRA (Table 1B). All tests had excellent accuracy (AUC>0.90, "excellent" by the Traditional academic point system). Using less-stringent criteria, the PEA30 had the highest AUC estimate followed by the SRA (Table 1C). Positive cut-offs generated at test specificities of ≥90% and ≥95% using data classified by more stringent criteria are shown in Table 1D. PEA3 was non-inferior to the SRA at a 5% non-inferiority margin, and all PEA tests were non-inferior at the 10% margin using the more stringent classification for true HIT (Fig 1A). In the less-stringently classified data set, the PEA30 was non-inferior to the SRA at a 10% margin (Fig 1B). Conclusions: The PEA, a 3-hour, non-radioactive functional HIT assay demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and was non-inferior to the SRA using commonly accepted non-inferiority margins for diagnostic testing (5-10%). The technical advantages of the PEA over the SRA may encourage its widespread adoption as a rapid-turnaround, accurate and near-patient diagnostic for patients with suspected HIT. Disclosures Jones: BloodCenter of Wisconsin: Patents & Royalties. Curtis:Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Bougie:BloodCenter of Wisconsin: Patents & Royalties. Aster:BloodCenter of Wisconsin: Patents & Royalties. Garcia:Shingoi: Consultancy; Retham Technologies LLC: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Padmanabhan:BloodCenter of Wisconsin: Patents & Royalties: Patent/royalties for HIT diagnostic testing; Veralox Therapeutics: Other: Advisory Board; Retham Technologies LLC: Equity Ownership, Other: Retham seeks to develop HITDx(TM), a new assay for HIT diagnosis; TerumoBCT: Consultancy; GE Healthcare: Other: Material support for Clinical Quality Improvement Initiative; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.