Pechauer, Shannon M.

ABSTRACT Background Platelet factor 4‐polyanion enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA‐negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non‐heparin‐based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. Methods Antigen‐based and PF4‐dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinylsulfonate ELISA‐negative platelet‐activating antibodies in HIT‐suspected patients. Results Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4‐polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody screening. All three patients demonstrated PF4‐dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing‐based screening of 500 ELISA‐negative patients identified three additional patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4‐ and FcγRIIa‐dependent manner and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA‐negative HIT patients were re‐exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re‐exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. Conclusions Recognition of ELISA‐negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re‐exposure of these patients to heparin.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Platelet factor 4-polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA-negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non-heparin-based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. METHODS Antigen-based and PF4-dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinyl sulfonate ELISA-negative platelet-activating antibodies in HIT-suspected patients and mice immunized with PF4/heparin. RESULTS Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4-polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody detection. All three patients demonstrated PF4-dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing-based screening of 500 ELISA-negative patients identified three patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4- and FcγRIIa-dependent manner, and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA-negative HIT patients were re-exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re-exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. To advance the study of ELISA-negative HIT antibodies, mice were immunized with PF4/heparin, and functional and antigenic assays were simultaneously used to successfully identify an ELISA-negative, PF4-dependent platelet-activating murine monoclonal antibody that recapitulated the serological characteristics of ELISA-negative HIT patients. CONCLUSIONS Recognition of ELISA-negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re-exposure of these patients to heparin.

We identified a patient with a recently described syndrome, monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS; Blood. 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1772-1776), and three additional patients with high 4Ts scores who were consistently negative in the PF4-polyanion HIT ELISA (Lifecodes PF4 IgG, Immucor). The MGTS patient, with a monoclonal IgG kappa, had recurrent thrombosis, and transient mild thrombocytopenia (nadir in the low 100s) over a period of years, and was noted to have a HIT ELISA optical density (OD) of 0.117. The three HIT patients experienced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis with ELISA ODs of 0.37, 0.18 and 0.20. All patients were positive in platelet-activation (functional) testing demonstrating PF4 dependence and inhibited with both high concentrations of heparin (100U/mL) and the FcγRIIa blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) IV.3, consistent with the presence of anti-PF4 antibodies in the patient samples ( data not shown). Because the serologic profile of these patients suggested a novel HIT subtype characterized by negative HIT ELISA results, we undertook a functional platelet assay screen of 500 consecutive HIT ELISA-negative patients tested in our diagnostic laboratory. Research studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mayo Clinic. Of the 500 patients tested, 20 (4.0%) stimulated platelet activation in the PF4-dependent P-selectin Expression Assay (PEA ≥19%; data not shown). To exclude non-specific activation that can be induced by HLA antibodies, additional testing was performed to evaluate whether platelet activation was PF4-dependent using buffer or PF4-treated platelets. Three patients demonstrated PF4-dependent activation that was inhibited by high heparin concentrations and mAb IV.3, as would be expected for HIT antibodies (ELISA-negative HIT, EN-HIT1-3; Figure 1). On retrospective review, all three patients thus identified had clinical histories and courses consistent with high clinical probability for HIT. To develop tools to study this new class of antibodies, monoclonal HIT antibodies were generated in mice after PF4/heparin immunizations and screened using a novel approach that included simultaneous testing of hybridoma supernatants in the PEA and PF4-polyanion ELISA. This strategy was designed to enabled us to identify mAbs that activated platelets (in the PEA), but that did not bind antigenic targets in the HIT ELISA. A novel mAb 431.4 that was developed using this approach, and the well-characterized HIT-like mAb KKO were evaluated for their abilities to both bind PF4-polyanion targets in ELISA, and to activate PF4-treated platelets in the PEA (Figure 2). In significant contrast to KKO, mAb 431.4 did not bind PF4/polyanion complexes, however, like KKO, strongly activated platelets in a PF4-dependent manner. Activation induced by both KKO and mAb 431.4 was inhibited by high heparin concentrations, as would be expected for HIT antibodies. In vivo murine studies using this novel mAb are pending at this time. In summary, the non-canonical diagnostic profile of HIT ELISA-negative but platelet activation-positive antibodies were found at a relatively high incidence in HIT-suspected patients (0.6%; 3 of 500 ELISA-negative patients). These findings have important diagnostic/management implications and suggest a re-evaluation of ASH's HIT management guidelines as noted in recommendations 2.7 and 2.8 of that document (“In patients with an intermediate (Recommendation 2.7) or high (Recommendation 2.8)-probability 4Ts score and a negative immunoassay, the ASH guideline panel recommends discontinuation of the non-heparin anticoagulant and resumption of heparin, if indicated ”; Blood Adv (2018) 2 (22): 3360-3392). Figure 1. A subset of ELISA-negative HIT-suspected patients harbor anti-PF4 platelet-activating antibodies. Three ELISA-negative (EN) HIT patient samples from a screen of 500 samples demonstrate PF4-dependent platelet activation and inhibition with high heparin concentration and mAb IV.3 incubation. PBS, phosphate buffered saline; IC, isotype control; HDH- high dose heparin (100U/mL). Figure 2. Murine mAb 431.4 serologically mimics pathogenic ELISA-negative HIT/MGTS antibodies. ELISA and PEA testing was performed using the “HIT-like” mAb KKO, novel mAb 431.4, or an isotype control (IC) antibody. PVS-polyvinyl sulfonate (polyanion used in the Immucor IgG ELISA assay).

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening, prothrombotic, antibody-mediated disorder. To maximize the likelihood of recovery, early and accurate diagnosis is critical. Widely available HIT assays, such as the platelet factor 4 (PF4) heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) lack specificity, and the gold-standard carbon 14–labeled serotonin release assay (SRA) is of limited value for early patient management because it is available only through reference laboratories. Recent studies have demonstrated that pathogenic HIT antibodies selectively activate PF4-treated platelets and that a technically simpler assay, the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA), may provide an option for rapid and conclusive results. Based upon predefined criteria that combined 4Ts scores and HIT ELISA results, 409 consecutive adults suspected of having HIT were classified as disease positive, negative, or indeterminate. Patients deemed HIT indeterminate were considered disease negative in the primary analysis and disease positive in a sensitivity analysis. The ability of PEA and SRA to identify patients judged to have HIT was compared using receiver operating characteristic curve statistics. Using these predefined criteria, the diagnostic accuracy of PEA was high (area under the curve [AUC], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.0) and similar to that of SRA (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82-1.0). In sensitivity analysis, the AUCs of PEA and SRA were also similar at 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.96), respectively. The PEA, a technically simple nonradioactive assay that uses ∼20-fold fewer platelets compared with the SRA, had high accuracy for diagnosing HIT. Widespread use of the PEA may facilitate timely and more effective management of patients with suspected HIT.

Abstract Introduction: Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life and limb threatening pro-thrombotic syndrome triggered by antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion complexes. Commonly used screening tests such as the PF4/Heparin ELISA (PF4 ELISA), while easy to perform in the near-patient setting, are highly non-specific. In contrast, more accurate tests such as the serotonin release assay (SRA) are technically complex, require radioactivity and are performed in only a handful of reference laboratories. These diagnostic challenges lead to both unnecessary anticoagulant use as well as avoidable cases of severe bleeding. Recent reports suggest that a relatively simple three-hour flow cytometry-based test that uses PF4-treated normal platelets, the PEA (PF4-dependent p-selectin Expression Assay), is at least as accurate as the SRA for identifying patients who have HIT (Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov 25;114(6):1322-3; Chest. 2016 Sep;150(3):506-15; Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):e77-e80). Here we describe results of a large prospective study designed to compare the accuracy of the SRA and PEA for HIT diagnosis in a clinical setting. Methods: The PEA and SRA were performed on serum samples obtained from adult patients (≥18 yrs.) from 2 large tertiary care academic hospitals from May 2016 to Sep 2017. All inpatients for whom PF4 ELISA testing was ordered were included in the study. The PEA was performed with platelets pretreated with PF4 at 3 concentrations: 30mcg/mL (PEA30), 10mcg/mL (PEA10) and 3mcg/mL (PEA3). Sera were batch-tested in both assays (SRA and PEA) using the same target platelets. The central laboratory was blinded to clinical history and to the results of the PF4 ELISA performed by participating hospitals at the time of diagnosis. Both centers performed IgG-specific PF4 ELISAs and utilized manufacturer-recommended cut-offs for positivity. Predefined "more-stringent" and "less stringent" criteria based on clinical findings (4Ts score) and results of PF4 ELISA testing were used to define the likelihood of a patient having HIT (Table 1A). Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis was performed and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of each assay was calculated to assess their diagnostic accuracy. Since high test specificity was desired, positive cut-offs that maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity in a specificity range of ≥90% and ≥95% were derived. To evaluate non-inferiority of the PEA to the SRA, we assessed whether the lower limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval of the ΔAUC (PEA-SRA) was higher than a non-inferiority margin of 5% and 10%. Results: A total of 440 patient samples were tested with both assays. Seventeen and 28 patients were classified as having true HIT based on the use of the more- and less-stringent criteria, respectively. When classified by more-stringent criteria, the AUC was numerically greater for each of the three PEA tests than for the SRA (Table 1B). All tests had excellent accuracy (AUC>0.90, "excellent" by the Traditional academic point system). Using less-stringent criteria, the PEA30 had the highest AUC estimate followed by the SRA (Table 1C). Positive cut-offs generated at test specificities of ≥90% and ≥95% using data classified by more stringent criteria are shown in Table 1D. PEA3 was non-inferior to the SRA at a 5% non-inferiority margin, and all PEA tests were non-inferior at the 10% margin using the more stringent classification for true HIT (Fig 1A). In the less-stringently classified data set, the PEA30 was non-inferior to the SRA at a 10% margin (Fig 1B). Conclusions: The PEA, a 3-hour, non-radioactive functional HIT assay demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and was non-inferior to the SRA using commonly accepted non-inferiority margins for diagnostic testing (5-10%). The technical advantages of the PEA over the SRA may encourage its widespread adoption as a rapid-turnaround, accurate and near-patient diagnostic for patients with suspected HIT. Disclosures Jones: BloodCenter of Wisconsin: Patents & Royalties. Curtis:Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Bougie:BloodCenter of Wisconsin: Patents & Royalties. Aster:BloodCenter of Wisconsin: Patents & Royalties. Garcia:Shingoi: Consultancy; Retham Technologies LLC: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Padmanabhan:BloodCenter of Wisconsin: Patents & Royalties: Patent/royalties for HIT diagnostic testing; Veralox Therapeutics: Other: Advisory Board; Retham Technologies LLC: Equity Ownership, Other: Retham seeks to develop HITDx(TM), a new assay for HIT diagnosis; TerumoBCT: Consultancy; GE Healthcare: Other: Material support for Clinical Quality Improvement Initiative; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.