Pabmanabhan, Anand

Severe COVID-19 is a multisystem condition with thromboinflammation as a significant driver of morbidity and mortality. Cellular components involved in inflammatory and coagulation responses include platelets, endothelium, monocytes, and neutrophils. Thrombotic manifestations, such as arterial thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, and tissue microthrombosis, occur in at least 20% of ICU COVID-19 patients, possibly more based on postmortem studies. This study investigates the presence of prothrombotic antibodies similar to those found in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a condition caused by platelet-activating antibodies targeting platelet factor 4 (PF4) when complexed with heparin (PF4/H). In a study of samples from 130 hospitalized patients collected on average 3.6 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, 80% were found to have IgG antibodies recognizing PF4/H. This percentage is significantly lower than in 22 HIT patients (100%) but higher than in 51 non-COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory symptoms (ARS) (25%) and 12 healthy subjects (0%). Additionally, 41% of the 130 patients had antibodies inducing PF4-dependent P-selectin expression in CpG-treated normal platelets, a rate significantly lower than in 12 HIT patients (100%) but higher than in 51 non-COVID-19 ARS patients (20%) and 12 healthy subjects (0%). Significantly, platelet-activating antibodies in COVID-19 patients were associated with a specific elevation of platelet α-granule proteins in the plasma and correlated with inflammation and tissue damage markers, suggesting these antibodies' functionality in patients. Significantly, unlike HIT, both PF4/H-reactive and platelet-activating antibodies were found in COVID-19 patients regardless of recent heparin exposure, indicating different antigenic stimuli for these antibodies in COVID-19. Notably, certain antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 possessed sequence motifs, RKH and Y5, in the heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3) resembling those in pathogenic HIT antibodies identified in our previous studies, suggesting that these antibodies can activate platelets. Introducing exogenous RBD to COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. Furthermore, immunodepleting RBD-reactive antibodies from COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma using RBD-coated beads significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. These findings demonstrate that some RBD-specific plasma IgG antibodies can activate platelets. To demonstrate the presence of RBD-specific, platelet-activating antibodies at the clonal level, we produced recombinant antibodies from 42 RBD-binding IgG+ B cells, tested their ability to activate platelets, and identified four that could do so. Interestingly, three antibodies possess HCDR3 sequences resembling RKH or Y5 motifs. Additionally, we identified RKH or Y5 motifs in RBD-specific antibodies reported by other groups, produced 15 such antibodies recombinantly, tested their ability to activate platelets, and identified four more that could do so. IgG+ B cells with these HCDR3 motifs were markedly expanded in severe COVID-19 patients, suggesting an expansion of B cells producing platelet-activating antibodies. The demonstration of functional and structural similarities between certain RBD-specific antibodies in COVID-19 patients and pathogenic HIT antibodies suggests a novel mechanism by which RBD-specific antibodies might contribute to thrombosis in COVID-19.

Introduction Intravenous Immunoglobulin G (IVIg) is a pooled antibody Immunoglobulin G product that is used for a large and ever-growing number of medical indications. It is also known to be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications such that the Food and drug administration (FDA) has mandated a “black box” warning alerting physicians to this risk. Particular lots of IVIg preparations have been recalled due to a higher-than-expected rate of thromboembolic adverse events (“Evaluation of the Risk of Thromboembolic Events After Immunoglobulin Administration, 2006-2012”. Sentinel Product Assessment, US FDA, 7/13/2017). While a number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain the thromboembolic risk, platelet activation induced by small amounts of aggregated IgGs in IVIg preparations remains the leading hypothesis. Currently, testing of IVIg lots specifically looking at their ability to induce platelet activation is not routinely performed due to challenges with acquisition of fresh platelets for testing, and lack of availability of technically simple platelet activation endpoints. Recent breakthroughs in platelet storage technology have demonstrated that platelet viability can be preserved for long periods (months-years) by controlled-rate cryopreservation which also allows platelets to retain FcγRIIa-mediated signaling (FcγRIIa is the IgG receptor on platelets). This technology has been successfully leveraged for the detection of platelet-activating heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) antibodies (Blood, 140 (25) 2722-2729, 2022). Goals of the study We hypothesized that long-term stored cryopreserved platelets could be used to detect platelet-activating IVIg preparations using a technically simple ELISA endpoint that measures levels of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), a platelet granule protein, released upon platelet activation. If successful, this tool could help de-risk IVIg from the standpoint of thrombotic adverse reactions. Methods Aggregated IgG was prepared by heat treatment of IVIg (Pel-Freez- Rogers, AR) as previously described (Immunol. Lett. (15) 311-316, 1987). Platelets were cryopreserved as previously described (Blood, 140 (25) 2722-2729, 2022) with minor modifications. Cryopreserved platelets were thawed and treated with heat-aggregated or untreated IVIg at concentrations ranging from 19 to 75mcg/mL. After incubation, supernatants were collected by centrifugation and were assayed for TSP-1 by an antigen capture ELISA which has been shown previously to correlate with platelet activation. Results 10-month-old “off-the-shelf” cryopreserved platelets treated with buffer control displayed minimal platelet activation as measured by the TSP1 ELISA (Optical density, OD: 0.21). Similarly, platelets treated with IVIg (non-aggregated IgG) at concentrations ranging from 19 to 75mcg/mL displayed little-to-no platelet activation in the TSP1 ELISA (OD: 0.22-0.29). In contrast, cryopreserved platelets treated with heat aggregated IVIg demonstrated marked platelet activation in the TSP1 ELISA with ODs in the 0.60-0.82 range, correlating with increasing concentrations of heat-aggregated IVIg in the reaction. Conclusions De-risking IVIg from a prothrombotic standpoint has been challenging due to the need for fresh platelets for testing and the lack of technically simple means to assess platelet activation. Here, we leveraged breakthrough platelet storage technology coupled to a technically simple ELISA endpoint that allowed for rapid and easy identification of platelet activating forms of IVIg. This easy-to-use self-contained test kit could be implemented as a quality control/patient safety tool to de-risk IVIg preparations from the standpoint of platelet activation-mediated thrombosis. Future studies aim to test a large number of IVIg lots, including “problem” lots associated with thromboembolic events to assess the incidence of platelet activating IgG molecules in IVIg preparations. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (C.G.J.: HL147734).

Introduction. Platelet-activating anti-Platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies mediate a number of thrombotic thrombocytopenic syndromes, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and more recently recognized conditions, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), adenovirus-associated thrombotic thrombocytopenia, and monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS). In MGTS (Blood. 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1772-1776), a monoclonal IgG antibody to PF4 mediates a chronic prothrombotic state characterized by recurrent thrombosis. More recent evidence suggests that MGTS may present with negative results in HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serotonin release assay (SRA), and positivity only in PF4-dependent functional assays such as the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA; submitted). The presence of MGUS in patients has long been associated with high risks of thrombotic disease (Blood. 2010 Jun 17;115(24):4991-8), but the mechanism by which they predispose to thrombosis has been relatively unexplored. In this study, we evaluated a cohort of MGUS patients who experience thrombosis for the presence of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies. M ethods. An administrative database search was performed of Mayo Clinic records to identify patients who had a diagnosis of MGUS, and thrombosis. Research samples from 134 MGUS patients with IgG monoclonal protein and thrombosis were obtained from Mayo Clinic's dysproteinemia biobank and subjected to PF4 antigen-based and functional screening. Research studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mayo Clinic. Results. Of the 134 patients, 17 (12.7%) activated platelets in the PEA (≥19%). To exclude non-specific activation (e.g. due to HLA antibodies), secondary PEA testing was performed to assess whether platelet activation was mediated by a HIT-like antibody (i.e., PF4- and IgG-dependent, and inhibitable with high concentrations of heparin). Four patients, hereafter referred to as patients 1-4, were identified as having a HIT-like antibody, as demonstrated by PF4-dependent platelet activation that could be inhibited with high concentrations of heparin (100 U/mL), and blockade of the platelet IgG receptor, FcγRIIa. Patients 1 and 2 had persistent, platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies based on PEA testing of multiple samples obtained several years apart. Patient 1 had a recurrent, multi-year history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), while patient 2 had one DVT episode. Patient 3 demonstrated a HIT antibody-like profile in the PEA in two of three samples available for testing and had a history of thrombotic cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Patient 4 demonstrated a HIT-like platelet-activating antibody in only one of four samples tested, and consistent with this finding, had an MGUS identified on clinical testing at only one time point (“small” IgG lambda, not quantified), 3 months prior to the platelet-activating sample. This patient experienced multiple thrombotic events including DVTs, left atrial thrombus and embolic CVA, pulmonary embolism and acute limb ischemia. All patients tested negative in two FDA-approved antigen-based HIT assays tested (Immucor PF4 IgG and Zymutest HIA IgG), similar to a recent MGTS case (submitted). SRA was negative in both Patients 1 & 2, weakly positive in Patient 3 (33%, with high CV), and positive (72%) in Patient 4. Conclusions. Definitive diagnosis of patients with MGTS provides insight into a mechanism of “unexplained” thrombosis and may offer additional treatment pathways for these patients with recurrent thrombosis (New Eng J of Med, 2024 Aug 8). Serologic testing in two patients correlated strongly with observations of thrombosis, and the study confirmed recent findings that anti-PF4 antibodies may present with unusual serology that is neither HIT- nor VITT-like (with negative results in both ELISA and SRA). The incidence of confirmed/suspected MGTS was 3% (4/134) in this population of MGUS patients with thrombosis. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.

We identified a patient with a recently described syndrome, monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS; Blood. 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1772-1776), and three additional patients with high 4Ts scores who were consistently negative in the PF4-polyanion HIT ELISA (Lifecodes PF4 IgG, Immucor). The MGTS patient, with a monoclonal IgG kappa, had recurrent thrombosis, and transient mild thrombocytopenia (nadir in the low 100s) over a period of years, and was noted to have a HIT ELISA optical density (OD) of 0.117. The three HIT patients experienced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis with ELISA ODs of 0.37, 0.18 and 0.20. All patients were positive in platelet-activation (functional) testing demonstrating PF4 dependence and inhibited with both high concentrations of heparin (100U/mL) and the FcγRIIa blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) IV.3, consistent with the presence of anti-PF4 antibodies in the patient samples ( data not shown). Because the serologic profile of these patients suggested a novel HIT subtype characterized by negative HIT ELISA results, we undertook a functional platelet assay screen of 500 consecutive HIT ELISA-negative patients tested in our diagnostic laboratory. Research studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mayo Clinic. Of the 500 patients tested, 20 (4.0%) stimulated platelet activation in the PF4-dependent P-selectin Expression Assay (PEA ≥19%; data not shown). To exclude non-specific activation that can be induced by HLA antibodies, additional testing was performed to evaluate whether platelet activation was PF4-dependent using buffer or PF4-treated platelets. Three patients demonstrated PF4-dependent activation that was inhibited by high heparin concentrations and mAb IV.3, as would be expected for HIT antibodies (ELISA-negative HIT, EN-HIT1-3; Figure 1). On retrospective review, all three patients thus identified had clinical histories and courses consistent with high clinical probability for HIT. To develop tools to study this new class of antibodies, monoclonal HIT antibodies were generated in mice after PF4/heparin immunizations and screened using a novel approach that included simultaneous testing of hybridoma supernatants in the PEA and PF4-polyanion ELISA. This strategy was designed to enabled us to identify mAbs that activated platelets (in the PEA), but that did not bind antigenic targets in the HIT ELISA. A novel mAb 431.4 that was developed using this approach, and the well-characterized HIT-like mAb KKO were evaluated for their abilities to both bind PF4-polyanion targets in ELISA, and to activate PF4-treated platelets in the PEA (Figure 2). In significant contrast to KKO, mAb 431.4 did not bind PF4/polyanion complexes, however, like KKO, strongly activated platelets in a PF4-dependent manner. Activation induced by both KKO and mAb 431.4 was inhibited by high heparin concentrations, as would be expected for HIT antibodies. In vivo murine studies using this novel mAb are pending at this time. In summary, the non-canonical diagnostic profile of HIT ELISA-negative but platelet activation-positive antibodies were found at a relatively high incidence in HIT-suspected patients (0.6%; 3 of 500 ELISA-negative patients). These findings have important diagnostic/management implications and suggest a re-evaluation of ASH's HIT management guidelines as noted in recommendations 2.7 and 2.8 of that document (“In patients with an intermediate (Recommendation 2.7) or high (Recommendation 2.8)-probability 4Ts score and a negative immunoassay, the ASH guideline panel recommends discontinuation of the non-heparin anticoagulant and resumption of heparin, if indicated ”; Blood Adv (2018) 2 (22): 3360-3392). Figure 1. A subset of ELISA-negative HIT-suspected patients harbor anti-PF4 platelet-activating antibodies. Three ELISA-negative (EN) HIT patient samples from a screen of 500 samples demonstrate PF4-dependent platelet activation and inhibition with high heparin concentration and mAb IV.3 incubation. PBS, phosphate buffered saline; IC, isotype control; HDH- high dose heparin (100U/mL). Figure 2. Murine mAb 431.4 serologically mimics pathogenic ELISA-negative HIT/MGTS antibodies. ELISA and PEA testing was performed using the “HIT-like” mAb KKO, novel mAb 431.4, or an isotype control (IC) antibody. PVS-polyvinyl sulfonate (polyanion used in the Immucor IgG ELISA assay).