Singh, Bandana

AbstractHeparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is suspected much more often than it is confirmed. Technically simple platelet factor 4 (PF4)-polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are sensitive but nonspecific. In contrast, accurate functional tests such as the serotonin release assay, heparin-induced platelet activation assay, and PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay require fresh platelets and have complex assay end points, limiting their availability to specialized reference laboratories. To enable broad deployment of functional testing, we sought to extend platelet viability significantly by optimizing storage conditions and developed a simple functional assay end point by measuring the release of a platelet α-granule protein, thrombospondin-1 (TSP1), in an ELISA format. Platelet cryopreservation conditions were optimized by freezing platelets at controlled cooling rates that preserve activatability. Several-month-old cryopreserved platelets were treated with PF4 or heparin and were evaluated for their ability to be activated by HIT and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) antibodies in the TSP1 release assay (TRA). HIT and spontaneous HIT patient samples induced significantly higher TSP1 release using both PF4-treated (PF4-TRA) and heparin-treated cryopreserved platelets relative to samples from patients suspected of HIT who lacked platelet-activating antibodies. This latter group included several patients that tested strongly positive in PF4-polyanion ELISA but were not platelet-activating. Four VITT patient samples tested in the TRA activated PF4-treated, but not heparin-treated, cryopreserved platelets, consistent with recent data suggesting the requirement for PF4-treated platelets for VITT antibody detection. These findings have the potential to transform the testing paradigm in HIT and VITT, making decentralized, technically simple functional testing available for rapid and accurate in-hospital diagnosis.

Kanack and colleagues analyze anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies from 5 patients with vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) secondary to COVID-19 adenoviral vaccination and antibodies from patients with spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and classical HIT. VITT antibodies are monoclonal or oligoclonal, similar to spontaneous HIT, whereas classical HIT antibodies are polyclonal. Heparin inhibits antibody-induced platelet activation in VITT, suggesting that heparin should be considered for the treatment of VITT.

AbstractRare cases of COVID‐19 vaccinated individuals develop anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies that cause thrombocytopenia and thrombotic complications, a syndrome referred to as vaccine‐induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Currently, information on the characteristics and persistence of anti‐PF4 antibodies that cause VITT after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination is limited, and available diagnostic assays fail to differentiate Ad26.COV2.S and ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19‐associated VITT from similar clinical disorders, namely heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and spontaneous HIT. Here we demonstrate that while Ad26.COV2.S‐associated VITT patients are uniformly strongly positive in PF4‐polyanion enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs); they are frequently negative in the serotonin release assay (SRA). The PF4‐dependent p‐selectin expression assay (PEA) that uses platelets treated with PF4 rather than heparin consistently diagnosed Ad26.COV2.S‐associated VITT. Most Ad26.COV2.S‐associated VITT antibodies persisted for >5 months in PF4‐polyanion ELISAs, while the PEA became negative earlier. Two patients had otherwise unexplained mild persistent thrombocytopenia (140‐150 x 103/µL) 6 months after acute presentation. From an epidemiological perspective, differentiating VITT from spontaneous HIT, another entity that develops in the absence of proximate heparin exposure, and HIT is important, but currently available PF4‐polyanion ELISAs and functional assay are non‐specific and detect all three conditions. Here, we report that a novel un‐complexed PF4 ELISA specifically differentiates VITT, secondary to both Ad26.COV2.S and ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19, from both spontaneous HIT, HIT and commonly‐encountered HIT‐suspected patients who are PF4/polyanion ELISA‐positive but negative in functional assays. In summary, Ad26.COV2.S‐associated VITT antibodies are persistent, and the un‐complexed PF4 ELISA appears to be both sensitive and specific for VITT diagnosis.

Abstract Background: Platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies that cause thrombocytopenia and thrombosis are implicated in Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and, more recently, in a newly recognized entity, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Current frontline PF4-Polyanion ELISAs utilize simple techniques but are highly non-specific. Functional gold-standard assays such as the serotonin-release assay (SRA) and PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA) have limited availability due to technical complexity and the requirement for freshly-drawn normal donor platelets which results in significant delays in diagnosis. Thus, there is an unmet need for near-patient, functional assays for HIT/VITT diagnosis. Aim: To develop a highly sensitive and specific functional assay to detect platelet-activating antibodies associated with HIT and VITT using long-term stored platelets. The assay should be technically simple, avoiding current functional HIT testing endpoints such as aggregometry, radioactivity measurement or flow cytometry. Methods: Platelets were subjected to controlled-rate freezing in a trehalose-based buffer. Cryopreserved platelets were then thawed after variable storage periods, incubated with platelet factor 4 (PF4), and sera from HIT or VITT suspected patients. Thrombospondin-1 (TSP1), a protein highly expressed in platelet α-granules, was quantified from activated platelet supernatants in an ELISA-based assay as a measure of platelet activation. Results: In initial studies, p-selectin expression was induced by platelet-activating HIT antibodies using cryopreserved platelets and the TSP1-release assay (TRA) detected HIT antibody-mediated PF4-dependent cryopreserved platelet activation across 20 different platelet lots (data not shown). A representative study using platelets stored for 11 months is shown in Figure 1A. A cohort of thirty-six HIT-suspected patient sera, half with PF4-dependent platelet-activating antibodies (PEA+) and without (PEA-), were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the TRA (Figure 1B). All 18 PEA+ samples activated platelets strongly with a mean TSP1 concentration of 147 µg/mL measured in the supernatant compared to a mean of 43 µg/mL obtained with non-activating samples. TSP1 release in a subgroup of 7 PEA+/SRA+/ELISA+ and 4 PEA-/SRA-/ELISA+ samples that were matched for ELISA Optical Density was examined (Figure 1C). Results demonstrated that even strong ELISA+ samples that were non-activating (PEA-/SRA-) did not induce platelet activation in the TRA, confirming high specificity of the assay. The TRA was tested for its ability to detect platelet-activating antibodies in four patients who developed VITT after the Janssen vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S). All samples induced high levels of TSP1 release from cryopreserved platelets (Figure 1D). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that cryopreserved platelets stored for several months are viable and capable of degranulation upon activation. Further, we demonstrate that measurement of TSP-1 released from cryopreserved, PF4-treated platelets is highly accurate for detecting platelet-activating HIT and VITT anti-PF4 antibodies. Specificity and sensitivity were both 100% even with samples that were strongly false-positive in the HIT ELISA. Coupling cryopreserved platelet activation to a simple ELISA endpoint, as demonstrated here, precludes the need for fresh platelets and complex testing techniques. Thus, the TRA has the potential to transform the diagnostic testing paradigm in HIT and VITT by making near-patient in-hospital functional testing available for rapid and accurate diagnosis. Figure Legend: Figure 1. TSP-1 quantification of (A) 3 HIT patient samples (closed circles) relative to 3 normal control samples (open circles) after 11-months of frozen platelet storage. (B) Thirty-six HIT-suspected patient samples: 18 PEA+ samples (closed circles), and 18 PEA- samples (open squares). Data are compared using two-tailed, unpaired Student's t test. **** P<0.0001. (C) Eleven high optical density matched HIT ELISA patient sera: 7 PEA+/SRA+ samples (closed circles) and 4 PEA-/SRA- samples (open squares). (D) TSP-1 quantification of VITT patient sera. NC-normal control. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pruthi: Instrumentation Laboratory: Honoraria; HEMA Biologics: Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare AG: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Padmanabhan: Veralox Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Background: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen Johnson & Johnson) vaccines against COVID-19 have been associated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic reactions referred to as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) characterized by the presence of platelet-activating, anti-PF4 antibodies. While VITT shares key clinical features with a similar but separate entity, Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), there appear to be important differences: 1) VITT patients have extremely high thrombosis rates and are very strongly positive in PF4-polyanion ELISAs, and 2) Many patients with VITT frequently present with refractoriness to therapy or have disease recurrence that suggests distinct antibody characteristics due to a strong autoimmune anti-PF4 response. Aims: The goal of this study was to characterize anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT. Methods: Five VITT patients were studied, one after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination and four after Ad26.COV2. Reactivity of VITT anti-PF4 antibodies to uncomplexed PF4, PF4-Polyvinyl sulfonate (PVS), and PF4-heparin targets was evaluated, and the platelet-activating ability of these antibodies was examined in the PF4-dependent P-selectin Expression assay (PEA). Anti-PF4 antibodies were isolated from patient blood samples using PF4-treated heparin sepharose beads, and isolated antibodies were subject to mass spectrometric evaluation (Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry [LC-ESI-QTOF MS]). Results: Antibodies from all VITT patients recognized both uncomplexed and complexed PF4 (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, recognition of PF4 by VITT antibodies was lower if PF4 targets were complexed with polyanions, PVS, or heparin (Fig. 1A). These results contrasted with those obtained in a "classical" HIT patient which showed reactivity to PF4/polyanion complexes, but not to uncomplexed PF4 (Fig 1A). All samples activated platelets in the PEA (data not shown). Mass spectrometric evaluation of anti-PF4 antibodies isolated from VITT patients demonstrated monoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies in three patients, and bi- and tri-clonal antibodies in one patient each (a representative monoclonal antibody anti-PF4 antibody is shown in Fig 1B). Consistent with current dogma, polyclonal anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies were seen in "classical" HIT (Fig 1C). Evaluation of anti-PF4 antibodies in spontaneous HIT, a type of autoimmune HIT seen in pro-inflammatory milieus such as orthopedic surgery and infectious prodromes also demonstrated monoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies (Fig 1D). Eluates from control heparin-sepharose beads did not reveal any immunoglobulins (data not shown). Conclusion: Although development of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies and the thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome seen after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2.S vaccination resembles HIT, these findings demonstrate that clonally restricted anti-PF4 antibodies mediate VITT while polyclonal anti-PF4 antibodies mediate HIT. In addition, we noted clonally-restricted anti-PF4 antibodies in another condition that does not require proximate heparin exposure, spontaneous ("autoimmune") HIT. In VITT, the strong immune response after vaccine administration may result in the activation of a single or few pre-existing anti-PF4 reactive clones, and development of clonally restricted anti-PF4 antibodies with a similar pathophysiology to Spontaneous HIT. It is also likely that high levels of monoclonal/oligoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies cause the severe thrombotic phenotypes seen in VITT and Spontaneous HIT. The high mortality rate and reports of disease refractoriness to therapy in VITT may warrant consideration of additional therapeutic modalities like rituximab and therapeutic plasma exchange in select cases. Figure Legends: (A): VITT (Patient 1-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19; Patients 2-5, Ad26.COV2.S) patient samples were tested in ELISA against uncomplexed PF4 (white), and PF4 in complex with polyvinyl sulfonate (light grey), or unfractionated heparin (dark gray). (B-D) Mass spectrometric evaluation of anti-PF4 antibodies isolated from VITT (B), HIT (C) and spontaneous HIT patient sera (D). "Relative Intensity" refers to abundance of the Ig light chain relative to the polyclonal background. Numbers above Ig light chain peaks depict mass/charge ratios. NC- Normal control. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Murray: Mayo Clinic: Other: Has received patents for the Mass-Fix technology which has been licensed to the Binding Site with potential royalties.. Padmanabhan: Veralox Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.