Wang, Yalin

Hippocampal segmentation is essential in neuroimaging for evaluating conditions like Alzheimer’s dementia and mesial temporal sclerosis, where small volume changes can significantly impact normative percentiles. However, inaccurate segmentation is common due to the inclusion of non-hippocampal structures such as choroid plexus and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), leading to volumetric overestimation and confounding of functional analyses. Current methods of assessment largely rely on virtual or manual ground truth labels, which can fail to capture these inaccuracies. To address this shortcoming, this study introduces a more direct voxel intensity-based method of segmentation assessment. Using paired precontrast and postcontrast T1-weighted MRIs, hippocampal segmentations were refined by adding marginal gray matter and removing marginal CSF and enhancement to determine a total required correction volume. Six segmentation algorithms—e2dhipseg, HippMapp3r, hippodeep, AssemblyNet, FastSurfer, and QuickNat—were implemented and compared. HippMapp3r and e2dhipseg, followed closely by hippodeep, exhibited the least total correction volumes, indicating superior accuracy. Dedicated hippocampal segmentation algorithms outperformed whole-brain methods.

Introduction: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is an inherited cerebral small vessel disease, yet there is currently no biomarker for early detection. This study aims to identify retinal biomarkers of NOTCH3 carriers using optical coherence tomography (OCT) from the UK Biobank. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, matched case-control study of individuals with or without CADASIL from the UK Biobank between 2006 and 2010. All participants had retinal OCT scan and cognitive assessment. Cases were identified based on pathogenic NOTCH3 mutations and 1:1 matched with healthy controls based on age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking status. Baseline characteristics and cognitive test scores were compared using chi-square or Mann-Whitney-U test appropriately. Macular thickness (central, inner, and outer subfields) (Figure) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Our analysis included 134 participants (67 CADASIL cases, 67 controls) with a mean age of 54±8 years. There were no differences in visual acuity between the two groups. CADASIL performed worse in prospective memory (0.043), verbal and numerical reasoning (p=0.178), visual memory (p=0.227), and processing speed (p=0.101) than matched controls. Participants with CADASIL had significantly thinner macular inner subfield at the superior (p=0.006), temporal (p=0.008), and nasal (p=0.034) quadrants, and significantly thinner RNFL (p=0.008) compared to controls (Table). Conclusion: Individuals with CADASIL have reduced thickness in the inner macular subfield and RFNL relative to matched controls. These retinal group differences were not associated with differences in visual acuity and may reflect early pericyte dysfunction and microvascular ischemia. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the temporal relationship between these retinal changes and disease progression.

AbstractBackgroundCross‐modality translation between MRI and PET presents significant challenges due to the distinct mechanisms underlying those modalities. Currently, the leading method for this translation is CycleGAN. Previous studies have proved a strong correlation between BBBMs and brain amyloid status measured by PET. However, the impact of blood‐based biomarkers (BBBMs) on PET image synthesis has not yet been thoroughly evaluated. In this study, we propose Plasma CycleGAN, a generative model based on CycleGAN to synthesize PET images from MRI, while also incorporating BBBMs and other clinical covariates. We show that Plasma CycleGAN outperforms the state‐of‐the‐art CycleGAN for MRI‐to‐PET translation. Our method is the first to integrate BBBMs in a conditional cross modality translation from MRI to PET.MethodOur model was built on CycleGAN architecture, while the backbone was improved by integrating BBBMs as additional conditions in the input domain. To be specific, we introduce a masked perturbation in the MRI image, whose voxel‐level magnitudes are learnable parameters in the neural network. The dataset we used to evaluate our model is downloaded from the ADNI database. The cohort contains 160 subjects with matching BBBM, T1‐weighted MRI images, amyloid PET, and clinical features, including age, sex, weights, etc. The synthesized PET images are compared with the ground truth PET images for performance evaluation using traditional metrics like structural similarity index (SSIM), peak‐signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR) and mean square error (MSE). In addition, the Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) of the masked SUVR ratios were calculated.ResultWe evaluated the baseline CycleGAN model using MRI input, as well as combined inputs of MRI+BBBM and other clinical features. Our model achieved an SSIM of 0.72±0.16 and PSNR of 22.8±2.3 in PET image synthesis task using MRI+ Aβ42/40, both yielding the best results among all input combinations. MRI+sex achieved the best result using MSE measurement. PCCs of all experimental results ranged from 0.44 to 0.5.ConclusionWe introduce Plasma CycleGAN, the first generative model to integrate BBBMs and clinical features in PET image synthesis from MRI images. In PET image synthesis task, our proposed integrated model outperforms the baseline CycleGAN model.

Accurate prediction of progression in subjects at risk of Alzheimer's disease is crucial for enrolling the right subjects in clinical trials. However, a prospective comparison of state-of-the-art algorithms for predicting disease onset and progression is currently lacking. We present the findings of "The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution" (TADPOLE) Challenge, which compared the performance of 92 algorithms from 33 international teams at predicting the future trajectory of 219 individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease. Challenge participants were required to make a prediction, for each month of a 5-year future time period, of three key outcomes: clinical diagnosis, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subdomain (ADAS-Cog13), and total volume of the ventricles. The methods used by challenge participants included multivariate linear regression, machine learning methods such as support vector machines and deep neural networks, as well as disease progression models. No single submission was best at predicting all three outcomes. For clinical diagnosis and ventricle volume prediction, the best algorithms strongly outperform simple baselines in predictive ability. However, for ADAS-Cog13 no single submitted prediction method was significantly better than random guesswork. Two ensemble methods based on taking the mean and median over all predictions, obtained top scores on almost all tasks. Better than average performance at diagnosis prediction was generally associated with the additional inclusion of features from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). On the other hand, better performance at ventricle volume prediction was associated with inclusion of summary statistics, such as the slope or maxima/minima of patient-specific biomarkers. On a limited, cross-sectional subset of the data emulating clinical trials, performance of the best algorithms at predicting clinical diagnosis decreased only slightly (2 percentage points) compared to the full longitudinal dataset. The submission system remains open via the website https://tadpole.grand-challenge.org, while TADPOLE SHARE (https://tadpole-share.github.io/) collates code for submissions. TADPOLE's unique results suggest that current prediction algorithms provide sufficient accuracy to exploit biomarkers related to clinical diagnosis and ventricle volume, for cohort refinement in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease. However, results call into question the usage of cognitive test scores for patient selection and as a primary endpoint in clinical trials.

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common type of age-related dementia, affecting 6.2 million people aged 65 or older according to CDC data. It is commonly agreed that discovering an effective AD diagnosis biomarker could have enormous public health benefits, potentially preventing or delaying up to 40% of dementia cases. Tau neurofibrillary tangles are the primary driver of downstream neurodegeneration and subsequent cognitive impairment in AD, resulting in structural deformations such as hippocampal atrophy that can be observed in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Objective: To build a surface-based model to 1) detect differences between APOE subgroups in patterns of tau deposition and hippocampal atrophy, and 2) use the extracted surface-based features to predict cognitive decline. Methods: Using data obtained from different institutions, we develop a surface-based federated Chow test model to study the synergistic effects of APOE, a previously reported significant risk factor of AD, and tau on hippocampal surface morphometry. Results: We illustrate that the APOE-specific morphometry features correlate with AD progression and better predict future AD conversion than other MRI biomarkers. For example, a strong association between atrophy and abnormal tau was identified in hippocampal subregion cornu ammonis 1 (CA1 subfield) and subiculum in e4 homozygote cohort. Conclusion: Our model allows for identifying MRI biomarkers for AD and cognitive decline prediction and may uncover a corner of the neural mechanism of the influence of APOE and tau deposition on hippocampal morphology.