Back to Authors

Haile, Robert W

0000-0001-6902-1836

Mayo Clinic

Department of Medicine, Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.

Citations 41

Risk of extracolonic cancers for people with biallelic and monoallelic mutations in MUTYH
Win, Aung Ko , Reece, Jeanette C. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Rosty, Christophe , Southey, Melissa C. , Young, Joanne , Cleary, Sean P. , Kim, Hyeja, Tucker, Katherine , Burnett, Terrilea, Haile, Robert W. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Gallinger, Steven , Winship, Ingrid , Lindor, Noralane M. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Tucker, Kathy , Dowty, James G. , Clendenning, Mark , Cotterchio, Michelle , Macrae, Finlay , Baron, John A. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Casey, Graham , Newcomb, Polly A. , Hopper, John L. , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Southey, Melissa C , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Rosty, Christophe , Winship, Ingrid M , Cleary, Sean P

International Journal of Cancer | May 19, 2016 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1557-1563

10.1002/ijc.30197 Get It

Germline mutations in the DNA base excision repair gene MUTYH are known to increase a carrier's risk of colorectal cancer. However, the risks of other (extracolonic) cancers for MUTYH mutation carriers are not well defined. We identified 266 probands (91% Caucasians) with a MUTYH mutation (41 biallelic and 225 monoallelic) from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Mutation status, sex, age and histories of cancer from their 1,903 first‐ and 3,255 second‐degree relatives were analyzed using modified segregation analysis conditioned on the ascertainment criteria. Compared with incidences for the general population, hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for biallelic MUTYH mutation carriers were: urinary bladder cancer 19 (3.7–97) and ovarian cancer 17 (2.4–115). The HRs (95% CI) for monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers were: gastric cancer 9.3 (6.7–13); hepatobiliary cancer 4.5 (2.7–7.5); endometrial cancer 2.1 (1.1–3.9) and breast cancer 1.4 (1.0–2.0). There was no evidence for an increased risk of cancers at the other sites examined (brain, pancreas, kidney or prostate). Based on the USA population incidences, the estimated cumulative risks (95% CI) to age 70 years for biallelic mutation carriers were: bladder cancer 25% (5–77%) for males and 8% (2–33%) for females and ovarian cancer 14% (2–65%). The cumulative risks (95% CI) for monoallelic mutation carriers were: gastric cancer 5% (4–7%) for males and 2.3% (1.7–3.3%) for females; hepatobiliary cancer 3% (2–5%) for males and 1.4% (0.8–2.3%) for females; endometrial cancer 3% (2%–6%) and breast cancer 11% (8–16%). These unbiased estimates of both relative and absolute risks of extracolonic cancers for people, mostly Caucasians, with MUTYH mutations will be important for their clinical management.
Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer following a primary colorectal cancer: A prospective cohort study
Jayasekara, Harindra , Reece, Jeanette C. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Rosty, Christophe , Dashti, S. Ghazaleh , Ouakrim, Driss Ait , Winship, Ingrid , Boussioutas, Alex , Giles, Graham G. , Ahnen, Dennis J. , Lowery, Jan T. , Haile, Robert W. , Gallinger, Steven, Lindor, Noralane M. , Parry, Susan, Jenkins, Mark A. , Win, Aung Ko , Macrae, Finlay , Casey, Graham , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Newcomb, Polly A. , Hopper, John L. , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Giles, Graham G , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Rosty, Christophe , Winship, Ingrid M , Jayasekara, Harindra

International Journal of Cancer | April 21, 2016 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1081-1090

10.1002/ijc.30153 Get It

Individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) are at risk of developing a metachronous CRC. We examined the associations between personal, tumour‐related and lifestyle risk factors, and risk of metachronous CRC. A total of 7,863 participants with incident colon or rectal cancer who were recruited in the USA, Canada and Australia to the Colon Cancer Family Registry during 1997‐2012, except those identified as high‐risk, for example, Lynch syndrome, were followed up approximately every 5 years. We estimated the risk of metachronous CRC, defined as the first new primary CRC following an interval of at least one year after the initial CRC diagnosis. Observation time started at the age at diagnosis of the initial CRC and ended at the age at diagnosis of the metachronous CRC, last contact or death whichever occurred earliest, or were censored at the age at diagnosis of any metachronous colorectal adenoma. Cox regression was used to derive hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). During a mean follow‐up of 6.6 years, 142 (1.81%) metachronous CRCs were diagnosed (mean age at diagnosis 59.8; incidence 2.7/1,000 person‐years). An increased risk of metachronous CRC was associated with the presence of a synchronous CRC (HR = 2.73; 95% CI: 1.30–5.72) and the location of cancer in the proximal colon at initial diagnosis (compared with distal colon or rectum, HR = 4.16; 95% CI: 2.80–6.18). The presence of a synchronous CRC and the location of the initial CRC might be useful for deciding the intensity of surveillance colonoscopy for individuals diagnosed with CRC.
Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Analysis of Lung, Ovary, Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer Reveals Novel Pleiotropic Associations
Fehringer, Gordon , Kraft, Peter , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Chatterjee, Nilanjan , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Lindström, Sara , Brennan, Paul , Bickeböller, Heike , Houlston, Richard S. , Landi, Maria Teresa , Caporaso, Neil E. , Risch, Angela , Olama, Ali Amin Al , Berndt, Sonja I. , Giovannucci, Edward L. , Grönberg, Henrik , Muir, Kenneth , Stampfer, Meir J. , Stevens, Victoria L. , Goode, Ellen L. , Reid, Brett M. , Brenner, Hermann , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Kocarnik, Jonathan K., Slattery, Martha L. , Adank, Muriel A. , Ahsan, Habibul , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Baglietto, Laura , Blomquist, Carl, Canzian, Federico , Eliassen, A. Heather , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Gaudet, Mia M. , Johnson, Nichola , Hazra, Aditi , Hein, Rebecca, Hofman, Albert , Irwanto, Astrid , Johansson, Mattias , Lichtner, Peter , Liu, Jianjun , Lund, Eiliv , Makalic, Enes , Meindl, Alfons , Müller‐Myhsok, Bertram , Muranen, Taru , Peeters, Petra H., Peto, Julian, Prentice, Ross L. , Sánchez, María‐José , Schmutzler, Rita K. , Southey, Melissa C. , Travis, Ruth C. , Turnbull, Clare , Uitterlinden, André G. , Wang, Zhaoming , Whittemore, Alice S. , Yang, Xiaohong R. , Zheng, Wei , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Casey, Graham , Conti, David V. , Edlund, Christopher K., Gallinger, Steven , Haile, Robert W. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Li, Li , Lindor, Noralene M., Schmit, Stephanie L. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Woods, Michael O. , Rafnar, Þórunn , Guðmundsson, Jūlı́us, Stacey, Simon , Stefánsson, Kāri , Sulem, Patrick , Chen, Y. Ann , Wei, Yongyue , Shen, Hongbing , Hu, Zhibin , Obeidat, Ma’en , Nickle, David C. , Timens, Wim , Freedman, Matthew L. , Seminara, Daniela, Gong, Jian , Peters, Ulrike , Gruber, Stephen B. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Easton, Douglas F. , Hunter, David J. , Haiman, Christopher A. , Henderson, Brian E., Hung, Rayjean J., Batra, Jyotsna , Hung, Rayjean J. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Ma, Jing , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Willett, Walter C. , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Risch, Harvey A. , Bezieau, Stéphane , Chan, Andrew T. , Hudson, Thomas J , Newcomb, Polly A. , Schoen, Robert E. , White, Emily E. , Czene, Kamila , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Hall, Per N , Hopper, John L. , Kaaks, Rudolf , Kibriya, Muhammad Ghulam , Meindl, Alfons , Nevanlinna, Heli , Rahman, Nazneen , Schmidt, Daniel F. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Christiani, David C. , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Shiraishi, Kouya , Takahashi, Atsushi , Bossé, Yohan , Li, Qiyuan , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Amos, Christopher I. , Hung, Rayjean J., Buchanan, Daniel D , Houlston, Richard S , Eeles, Rosalind A , Southey, Melissa C , Jenkins, Mark A , Canzian, Federico , Hung, Rayjean J , Muir, Kenneth , Travis, Ruth C , Haile, Robert W , Wang, Zhaoming , Brenner, Hermann , Muranen, Taru A , García-Closas, Montserrat , Makalic, Enes , Kraft, Peter , Zheng, Wei , Figueroa, Jonine D , Eliassen, A Heather , Conti, David V , Batra, Jyotsna , Johansson, Mattias , Baglietto, Laura , Fletcher, Olivia , Sánchez, Maria-Jose , Risch, Angela , Bickeböller, Heike , Shen, Hongbing , Timens, Wim , Liu, Jing

Cancer Research | April 21, 2016 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 5103-5114

10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-2980 Get It

Abstract Identifying genetic variants with pleiotropic associations can uncover common pathways influencing multiple cancers. We took a two-stage approach to conduct genome-wide association studies for lung, ovary, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer from the GAME-ON/GECCO Network (61,851 cases, 61,820 controls) to identify pleiotropic loci. Findings were replicated in independent association studies (55,789 cases, 330,490 controls). We identified a novel pleiotropic association at 1q22 involving breast and lung squamous cell carcinoma, with eQTL analysis showing an association with ADAM15/THBS3 gene expression in lung. We also identified a known breast cancer locus CASP8/ALS2CR12 associated with prostate cancer, a known cancer locus at CDKN2B-AS1 with different variants associated with lung adenocarcinoma and prostate cancer, and confirmed the associations of a breast BRCA2 locus with lung and serous ovarian cancer. This is the largest study to date examining pleiotropy across multiple cancer-associated loci, identifying common mechanisms of cancer development and progression. Cancer Res; 76(17); 5103–14. ©2016 AACR.
Clinicopathologic Risk Factor Distributions for MLH1 Promoter Region Methylation in CIMP-Positive Tumors
Levine, A. Joan, Phipps, Amanda I. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Ahnen, Dennis J. , Lindor, Noralane M. , Rosty, Christophe , Haile, Robert W. , Weisenberger, Daniel J. , Baron, John A. , Cohen, Stacey A. , Newcomb, Polly A. , Laird, Peter W. , Buchanan, Daniel D , Haile, Robert W , Rosty, Christophe

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | October 28, 2015 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 68-75

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0935 Get It

Abstract Background: The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) is a major molecular pathway in colorectal cancer. Approximately 25% to 60% of CIMP tumors are microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) due to DNA hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene promoter. Our aim was to determine if the distributions of clinicopathologic factors in CIMP-positive tumors with MLH1 DNA methylation differed from those in CIMP-positive tumors without DNA methylation of MLH1. Methods: We assessed the associations between age, sex, tumor-site, MSI status BRAF and KRAS mutations, and family colorectal cancer history with MLH1 methylation status in a large population-based sample of CIMP-positive colorectal cancers defined by a 5-marker panel using unconditional logistic regression to assess the odds of MLH1 methylation by study variables. Results: Subjects with CIMP-positive tumors without MLH1 methylation were significantly younger, more likely to be male, and more likely to have distal colon or rectal primaries and the MSI-L phenotype. CIMP-positive MLH1-unmethylated tumors were significantly less likely than CIMP-positive MLH1-methylated tumors to harbor a BRAF V600E mutation and significantly more likely to harbor a KRAS mutation. MLH1 methylation was associated with significantly better overall survival (HR, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.82). Conclusions: These data suggest that MLH1 methylation in CIMP-positive tumors is not a completely random event and implies that there are environmental or genetic determinants that modify the probability that MLH1 will become methylated during CIMP pathogenesis. Impact: MLH1 DNA methylation status should be taken into account in etiologic studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(1); 68–75. ©2015 AACR.
Lynch syndrome and cervical cancer
Antill, Yoland , Win, Aung Ko , Thompson, Tina , Walsh, Michael D. , Cummings, Margaret C. , Gallinger, Steven , Lindor, Noralane M. , Haile, Robert W. , Tucker, Katherine , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Young, Joanne , Winship, Ingrid , Jenkins, Mark A. , Tucker, Kathy , Dowty, James G. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Hopper, John L. , Newcomb, Polly A. , Church, James M. , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Winship, Ingrid M

International Journal of Cancer | June 15, 2015 | Volume: 137 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2757-2761

10.1002/ijc.29641 Get It

Carriers of germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes are at increased risk of several cancers including colorectal and gynecologic cancers (Lynch syndrome). There is no substantial evidence that these mutations are associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer. A total of 369 families with at least one carrier of a mutation in a MMR gene (133 MLH1, 174 MSH2, 35 MSH6 and 27 PMS2) were ascertained via population cancer registries or via family cancer clinics in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and USA. Personal and family histories of cancer were obtained from participant interviews. Modified segregation analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratio (incidence rates for carriers relative to those for the general population), and age‐specific cumulative risks of cervical cancer for carriers. A total of 65 cases of cervical cancer were reported (including 10 verified by pathology reports). The estimated incidence was 5.6 fold (95% CI: 2.3–13.8; p = 0.001) higher for carriers than for the general population with a corresponding cumulative risk to 80 years of 4.5% (95% CI: 1.9–10.7%) compared with 0.8% for the general population. The mean age at diagnosis was 43.1 years (95% CI: 40.0–46.2), 3.9 years younger than the reported USA population mean of 47.0 years (p = 0.02). Women with MMR gene mutations were found to have an increased risk of cervical cancer. Due to limited pathology verification we cannot be certain that a proportion of these cases were not lower uterine segment endometrial cancers involving the endocervix, a recognized cancer of Lynch syndrome.
Association between Body Mass Index and Mortality for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: Overall and by Tumor Molecular Phenotype
Newton, Christina C. , Phipps, Amanda I. , Ahnen, Dennis J. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Cleary, Sean P. , Farris, Alton B. , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Gallinger, Steven, Green, Roger C., Haile, Robert W. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Makar, Karen W., McLaughlin, John R., Potter, John D. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Win, Aung Ko , Lindor, Noralane M. , Limburg, Paul J. , Campbell, Peter T. , Newcomb, Polly A. , Baron, John A. , Casey, Graham , Cotterchio, Michelle , Hopper, John L. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , McLaughlin, John R., Renehan, Andrew G. , Sinicrope, Frank A. , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Potter, John D , Farris, Alton B , Cleary, Sean P

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | June 3, 2015 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1229-1238

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0094 Get It

Abstract Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF mutation status are associated with colorectal cancer survival, whereas the role of body mass index (BMI) is less clear. We evaluated the association between BMI and colorectal cancer survival, overall and by strata of MSI, BRAF mutation, sex, and other factors. Methods: This study included 5,615 men and women diagnosed with invasive colorectal cancer who were followed for mortality (maximum: 14.7 years; mean: 5.9 years). Prediagnosis BMI was derived from self-reported weight approximately one year before diagnosis and height. Tumor MSI and BRAF mutation status were available for 4,131 and 4,414 persons, respectively. Multivariable hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from delayed-entry Cox proportional hazards models. Results: In multivariable models, high prediagnosis BMI was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality in both sexes (per 5-kg/m2; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06–1.15), with similar associations stratified by sex (Pinteraction: 0.41), colon versus rectum (Pinteraction: 0.86), MSI status (Pinteraction: 0.84), and BRAF mutation status (Pinteraction: 0.28). In joint models, with MS-stable/MSI-low and normal BMI as the reference group, risk of death was higher for MS-stable/MSI-low and obese BMI (HR, 1.32; P value: 0.0002), not statistically significantly lower for MSI-high and normal BMI (HR, 0.86; P value: 0.29), and approximately the same for MSI-high and obese BMI (HR, 1.00; P value: 0.98). Conclusions: High prediagnosis BMI was associated with increased mortality; this association was consistent across participant subgroups, including strata of tumor molecular phenotype. Impact: High BMI may attenuate the survival benefit otherwise observed with MSI-high tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(8); 1229–38. ©2015 AACR.
Mendelian Randomization Study of Body Mass Index and Colorectal Cancer Risk
Gong, Jian , Peters, Ulrike , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Slattery, Martha L. , Locke, Adam E. , Kahali, Bratati , Justice, Anne E. , Pers, Tune H. , Gallinger, Steven , Hayes, Richard B. , Caan, Bette J. , Ogino, Shuji , Berndt, Sonja I. , Casey, Graham , Haile, Robert W. , Du, Mengmeng , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Thornquist, Mark, Duggan, David , Lindor, Noralane M. , Seminara, Daniela, Song, Mingyang , Wu, Kana , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Win, Aung Ko , Jenkins, Mark A. , Potter, John D. , Hoffmeister, Michael , Brenner, Hermann , Thrift, Aaron P. , Rudolph, Anja , Chan, Andrew T. , Baron, John A. , Ogino, Shuji , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Cotterchio, Michelle , Hopper, John L. , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , Newcomb, Polly A. , White, Emily E. , Hsu, Li , Campbell, Peter T. , Win, Aung K , Hoffmeister, Michael , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Harrison, Tabitha A , Potter, John D , Brenner, Hermann , Song, Mingyang , Hayes, Richard B , Caan, Bette J

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | May 14, 2015 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1024-1031

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-1309 Get It

Abstract Background: High body mass index (BMI) is consistently linked to increased risk of colorectal cancer for men, whereas the association is less clear for women. As risk estimates from observational studies may be biased and/or confounded, we conducted a Mendelian randomization study to estimate the causal association between BMI and colorectal cancer. Methods: We used data from 10,226 colorectal cancer cases and 10,286 controls of European ancestry. The Mendelian randomization analysis used a weighted genetic risk score, derived from 77 genome-wide association study–identified variants associated with higher BMI, as an instrumental variable (IV). We compared the IV odds ratio (IV-OR) with the OR obtained using a conventional covariate-adjusted analysis. Results: Individuals carrying greater numbers of BMI-increasing alleles had higher colorectal cancer risk [per weighted allele OR, 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10–1.57]. Our IV estimation results support the hypothesis that genetically influenced BMI is directly associated with risk for colorectal cancer (IV-OR per 5 kg/m2, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13–2.01). In the sex-specific IV analyses higher BMI was associated with higher risk of colorectal cancer among women (IV-OR per 5 kg/m2, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.26–2.61). For men, genetically influenced BMI was not associated with colorectal cancer (IV-OR per 5 kg/m2, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.73–1.92). Conclusions: High BMI was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk for women. Whether abdominal obesity, rather than overall obesity, is a more important risk factor for men requires further investigation. Impact: Overall, conventional epidemiologic and Mendelian randomization studies suggest a strong association between obesity and the risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(7); 1024–31. ©2015 AACR.
GermlineTP53Mutations in Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the Colon Cancer Family Registry
Yurgelun, Matthew B. , Masciari, Serena, Joshi, Victoria A., Mercado, Rowena, Lindor, Noralane M. , Gallinger, Steven , Jenkins, Mark A. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Haile, Robert W. , Kucherlapati, Raju, Hopper, John L. , Newcomb, Polly A. , Potter, John D. , Syngal, Sapna , Buchanan, Daniel D , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W

JAMA Oncology | March 12, 2015 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 214

10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0197 Get It