Back to Authors

Hazra, Aditi

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2563-0239

Mayo Clinic

Harvard University

Citations 5

Abstract 7325: Integration of functional data to classify BRCA1/2 missense variants: An ENIGMA project
Lyra, Paulo C. , Dalcolmo, Lucas, Brito, Samuel Gomes, Nguyen, Nam Phuong N. , Oliveira, Geise de, Siva, Joao Paulo da, Taneja, Tanisha, Rossing, Maria , Hazra, Aditi , Caputo, Sandrine M. , Millot, Gaël A. , Yie, Joanne NgeowYuen, Cline, Melissa , Carlsen, Rachael, Josef, Vijay, Morais Lyra, Paulo Cilas , Parsons, Michael T. , Nepomuceno, Thales C. , Caleca, Laura , Hu, Chunling , Richardson, Marcy E , Martins, Alexandra , Yie, Joanne Ngeow Yuen, Carvalho, Marcelo A. , Radice, Paolo , Mesman, Romy L.S. , Zampiga, Valentina , Villani, Rehan Marie , Sharan, Shyam K. , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Couch, Fergus J. , Vreeswijk, Maaike P.G. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A.

Cancer Research | March 22, 2024 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 6_Supplement | Pages: 7325-7325

10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-7325 Get It

Abstract The success of precision cancer prevention and treatment hinges on accurate discrimination between benign and pathogenic germline alleles in cancer susceptibility genes. Variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) present a challenge for cancer risk assessment and functional data will be essential to resolve many VUS. To address this, we developed a cloud-based environment to collate, curate, integrate and analyze all published functional data related to BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense VUS. Then, functional evidence criteria for pathogenicity were determined for each assay using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) classification guidelines and ClinGen criteria. Our approach involved retrieving published articles reporting one or more functional assays of BRCA1/2 missense variants reporting variant impact on various biochemical and cell biological functions. Functional results were recorded using original authors' thresholds and categories, then converted to ordinal variables to harmonize: [0 = no functional impact], [1 = intermediate impact], and [2 = functional impact]. For BRCA1, we updated our previous published integration (Genet Med. 2021;23:306-315) with 14 additional publications, collating results from 53 instances of functional assays reporting functional data on 3,219 unique missense variants. For BRCA2, 28 publications were identified reporting data from 141 instances of functional assays on 4,759 unique missense variants. Utilizing a panel of 542 and 396 known pathogenic and benign reference variants for BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, and ACMG/AMP odds of pathogenicity for each instance of the assay. The remaining variants were assigned a relevant functional assay code weight for each assay instance. Our study successfully derived ACMG/AMP evidence strength from functional data for 3,040 BRCA1 (94% of 3,219) and 2,704 BRCA2 (57% of 4,759) missense variants. This comprehensive work underscores the utility of functional data in informing classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense VUS. Citation Format: Paulo Lyra, Lucas Dalcolmo, Michael Parsons, Thales Nepomuceno, Samuel Brito, Nam Phuong N. Nguyen, Geise de Oliveira, Joao Paulo da Siva, Laura Caleca, Tanisha Taneja, Chunling Hu, Marcy Richardson, Maria Rossing, Aditi Hazra, Alexandra Martins, Sandrine Caputo, Gael A. Millot, Joanne NgeowYuen Yie, Marcelo A. Carvalho, Melissa Cline, Paolo Radice, Rachael Carlsen, Romy Mesman, Valentina Zampiga, Rehan Villani, Vijay Josef, Shyam Sharan, Kyriaki Michailidou, Amanda B. Spurdle, Fergus Couch, Maaike P.G. Vreeswijk, Alvaro N. Monteiro. Integration of functional data to classify BRCA1/2 missense variants: An ENIGMA project [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7325.
Genetic Variants in Epigenetic Pathways and Risks of Multiple Cancers in the GAME-ON Consortium
Tóth, Réka , Scherer, Dominique , Kelemen, Linda E., Risch, Angela , Hazra, Aditi , Balavarca, Yesilda , Issa, Jean‐Pierre J. , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Ogino, Shuji , Wu, Xifeng , Ye, Yuanqing , Hung, Rayjean J., Goode, Ellen L. , OCAC, on behalf of the, CORECT, TRICL, ELLIPSE, DRIVE, consortia, and GAME-ON, Hung, Rayjean J. , Ogino, Shuji , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , OCAC, on behalf of the, CORECT, TRICL, ELLIPSE, DRIVE, consortia, and GAME-ON, Eeles, Rosalind A , Moreno, Victor , Hung, Rayjean J , Risch, Angela

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 23, 2017 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 816-825

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0728 Get It

Abstract Background: Epigenetic disturbances are crucial in cancer initiation, potentially with pleiotropic effects, and may be influenced by the genetic background. Methods: In a subsets (ASSET) meta-analytic approach, we investigated associations of genetic variants related to epigenetic mechanisms with risks of breast, lung, colorectal, ovarian and prostate carcinomas using 51,724 cases and 52,001 controls. False discovery rate–corrected P values (q values < 0.05) were considered statistically significant. Results: Among 162,887 imputed or genotyped variants in 555 candidate genes, SNPs in eight genes were associated with risk of more than one cancer type. For example, variants in BABAM1 were confirmed as a susceptibility locus for squamous cell lung, overall breast, estrogen receptor (ER)–negative breast, and overall prostate, and overall serous ovarian cancer; the most significant variant was rs4808076 [OR = 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.10–1.19; q = 6.87 × 10−5]. DPF1 rs12611084 was inversely associated with ER-negative breast, endometrioid ovarian, and overall and aggressive prostate cancer risk (OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.91–0.96; q = 0.005). Variants in L3MBTL3 were associated with colorectal, overall breast, ER-negative breast, clear cell ovarian, and overall and aggressive prostate cancer risk (e.g., rs9388766: OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.03–1.08; q = 0.02). Variants in TET2 were significantly associated with overall breast, overall prostate, overall ovarian, and endometrioid ovarian cancer risk, with rs62331150 showing bidirectional effects. Analyses of subpathways did not reveal gene subsets that contributed disproportionately to susceptibility. Conclusions: Functional and correlative studies are now needed to elucidate the potential links between germline genotype, epigenetic function, and cancer etiology. Impact: This approach provides novel insight into possible pleiotropic effects of genes involved in epigenetic processes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(6); 816–25. ©2017 AACR.
Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Analysis of Lung, Ovary, Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer Reveals Novel Pleiotropic Associations
Fehringer, Gordon , Kraft, Peter , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Chatterjee, Nilanjan , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Lindström, Sara , Brennan, Paul , Bickeböller, Heike , Houlston, Richard S. , Landi, Maria Teresa , Caporaso, Neil E. , Risch, Angela , Olama, Ali Amin Al , Berndt, Sonja I. , Giovannucci, Edward L. , Grönberg, Henrik , Muir, Kenneth , Stampfer, Meir J. , Stevens, Victoria L. , Goode, Ellen L. , Reid, Brett M. , Brenner, Hermann , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Kocarnik, Jonathan K., Slattery, Martha L. , Adank, Muriel A. , Ahsan, Habibul , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Baglietto, Laura , Blomquist, Carl, Canzian, Federico , Eliassen, A. Heather , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Gaudet, Mia M. , Johnson, Nichola , Hazra, Aditi , Hein, Rebecca, Hofman, Albert , Irwanto, Astrid , Johansson, Mattias , Lichtner, Peter , Liu, Jianjun , Lund, Eiliv , Makalic, Enes , Meindl, Alfons , Müller‐Myhsok, Bertram , Muranen, Taru , Peeters, Petra H., Peto, Julian, Prentice, Ross L. , Sánchez, María‐José , Schmutzler, Rita K. , Southey, Melissa C. , Travis, Ruth C. , Turnbull, Clare , Uitterlinden, André G. , Wang, Zhaoming , Whittemore, Alice S. , Yang, Xiaohong R. , Zheng, Wei , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Casey, Graham , Conti, David V. , Edlund, Christopher K., Gallinger, Steven , Haile, Robert W. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Li, Li , Lindor, Noralene M., Schmit, Stephanie L. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Woods, Michael O. , Rafnar, Þórunn , Guðmundsson, Jūlı́us, Stacey, Simon , Stefánsson, Kāri , Sulem, Patrick , Chen, Y. Ann , Wei, Yongyue , Shen, Hongbing , Hu, Zhibin , Obeidat, Ma’en , Nickle, David C. , Timens, Wim , Freedman, Matthew L. , Seminara, Daniela, Gong, Jian , Peters, Ulrike , Gruber, Stephen B. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Easton, Douglas F. , Hunter, David J. , Haiman, Christopher A. , Henderson, Brian E., Hung, Rayjean J., Batra, Jyotsna , Hung, Rayjean J. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Ma, Jing , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Willett, Walter C. , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Risch, Harvey A. , Bezieau, Stéphane , Chan, Andrew T. , Hudson, Thomas J , Newcomb, Polly A. , Schoen, Robert E. , White, Emily E. , Czene, Kamila , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Hall, Per N , Hopper, John L. , Kaaks, Rudolf , Kibriya, Muhammad Ghulam , Meindl, Alfons , Nevanlinna, Heli , Rahman, Nazneen , Schmidt, Daniel F. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Christiani, David C. , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Shiraishi, Kouya , Takahashi, Atsushi , Bossé, Yohan , Li, Qiyuan , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Amos, Christopher I. , Hung, Rayjean J., Buchanan, Daniel D , Houlston, Richard S , Eeles, Rosalind A , Southey, Melissa C , Jenkins, Mark A , Canzian, Federico , Hung, Rayjean J , Muir, Kenneth , Travis, Ruth C , Haile, Robert W , Wang, Zhaoming , Brenner, Hermann , Muranen, Taru A , García-Closas, Montserrat , Makalic, Enes , Kraft, Peter , Zheng, Wei , Figueroa, Jonine D , Eliassen, A Heather , Conti, David V , Batra, Jyotsna , Johansson, Mattias , Baglietto, Laura , Fletcher, Olivia , Sánchez, Maria-Jose , Risch, Angela , Bickeböller, Heike , Shen, Hongbing , Timens, Wim , Liu, Jing

Cancer Research | April 21, 2016 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 5103-5114

10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-2980 Get It

Abstract Identifying genetic variants with pleiotropic associations can uncover common pathways influencing multiple cancers. We took a two-stage approach to conduct genome-wide association studies for lung, ovary, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer from the GAME-ON/GECCO Network (61,851 cases, 61,820 controls) to identify pleiotropic loci. Findings were replicated in independent association studies (55,789 cases, 330,490 controls). We identified a novel pleiotropic association at 1q22 involving breast and lung squamous cell carcinoma, with eQTL analysis showing an association with ADAM15/THBS3 gene expression in lung. We also identified a known breast cancer locus CASP8/ALS2CR12 associated with prostate cancer, a known cancer locus at CDKN2B-AS1 with different variants associated with lung adenocarcinoma and prostate cancer, and confirmed the associations of a breast BRCA2 locus with lung and serous ovarian cancer. This is the largest study to date examining pleiotropy across multiple cancer-associated loci, identifying common mechanisms of cancer development and progression. Cancer Res; 76(17); 5103–14. ©2016 AACR.
Abstract 4612: Genetic variants in epigenetic pathways and risk of multiple cancer types in the GAME-ON consortium
Scherer, Dominique , Kelemen, Linda E. , Hazra, Aditi , Goode, Ellen L. , Hung, Rayjean, Tóth, Réka , Risch, Angela , Issa, Jean‐Pierre J. , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Quackenbush, John , Ogino, Shuji , Hung, Rayjean, Ulrich, Cornelia M.

Cancer Research | August 5, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 15_Supplement | Pages: 4612-4612

10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-4612 Get It

Abstract Introduction Epigenetic changes are reversible features of the genome that regulate gene transcription and protein expression on several levels including DNA methylation, histone modification or miRNA expression. We investigated the association between inherited variation in genes of key epigenetic processes and risk of multiple cancers within the GAME-ON consortium. Methods We performed a pathway based meta-analysis using genotypes from more than 50,000 cases of breast, lung, prostate, ovarian and colorectal cancer cases and more than 60,000 controls from various genome wide association studies participating in the GAME-ON consortium to estimate associations with cancer risk. Using the 1000GenomeProject database, we selected 505,702 genotyped and imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms in 551 genes (flanking region +/- 250kb) related to DNA methylation, histone modification or chromatin remodeling based on GO and GeneCard databases. In order to allow variants to be associated with only a subset of traits we used subset based meta-analysis. False-discovery rate (FDR) corrected p-values (q-values) lower than 0.05 were considered significant. Results and Discussion 582 SNPs were significantly associated with risk of at least one cancer. We identified nine major regions that showed significant associations with more than one cancer type. Among the most interesting regions was the region around PHC3 (3q36), which showed associations with prostate and colorectal cancer and clear cell ovarian carcinomas. PHC3 is involved in chromatin remodeling and plays a role in epithelial neoplasms. Significant Odds ratios (ORs) ranged from 0.80 to 1.31. The number of risk and protective alleles in this region was similarly distributed (19 and 18, respectively). One of the strongest associations was observed for rs76925190 (intronic in PRKC1), which increased the risk of colorectal and prostate cancer (q-value 4.28*10-10). Variants in this region were previously associated with prostate cancer. Polymorphisms in the region (19q13) around BABAM1 (RISC and BRCA1 A complex member 1), were associated with lung, breast, ovarian and prostate cancer. BABAM1 is associated with the BRCA1-complex. Its function in histone modification and DNA repair emphasizes its importance in carcinogenesis. Significant ORs ranged from 0.88 to 1.14 with similar distribution of risk and protective alleles in this region (19 and 17, respectively). The strongest association was observed for rs4808076 (intronic in ANKLE1), which increased the risk of squamous lung, serous ovarian and ER- -breast cancer (q-value 2.40*10-6). Variants in this region were previously associated with risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Conclusions This study emphasizes the importance of variants in genes of epigenetic processes on cancer risk and further provides insights into novel, pleiotropic epigenetic mechanisms of cancer development. Citation Format: Dominique Scherer, Reka Toth, Linda Kelemen, Angela Risch, Aditi Hazra, Jean Pierre Issa, Victor Moreno, Rosalind A. Eeles, John Quackenbush, Ellen L. Goode, Shuji Ogino, Rayjean Hung, Cornelia M. Ulrich. Genetic variants in epigenetic pathways and risk of multiple cancer types in the GAME-ON consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4612. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4612
Novel Associations between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Risk-Predicting Mammographic Density Measures
Stone, Jennifer , Thompson, Deborah J. , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Lindström, Sara , Hazra, Aditi , Li, Jingmei , Eriksson, Louise , Jensen, Matt , Cunningham, Julie M. , Purrington, Kristen S. , Brown, Judith, Leyland, Jean, Warren, Ruth , Luben, Robert , Smith, Paula , Jud, Sebastian M. , Heusinger, Katharina, Beckmann, Matthias W. , Douglas, Julie A. , Shah, Kaanan P., Chan, Heang‐Ping , Helvie, Mark A. , Kolonel, Laurence N. , Woolcott, Christy , Haiman, Christopher A. , Giles, Graham G. , Baglietto, Laura , Krishnan, Kavitha , Southey, Melissa C. , Apicella, Carmel, Andrulis, Irene L. , Knight, Julia A. , Ursin, Giske , Alnæs, Grethe I.G., Kristensen, Vessela N. , Børresen‐Dale, Anne‐Lise , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Wang, Qin , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Simard, Jacques , Dunning, Alison M. , Easton, Douglas F. , Fasching, Peter A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Durocher, Francine , Cunningham, Julie, Scott, Christopher G. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Kraft, Peter , Czene, Kamila , Hall, Per N , Olson, Janet E. , Couch, Fergus J. , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Wareham, Nicholas J. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Maskarinec, Gertraud , Gram, Inger Torhild , Dennis, Joe , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Pankratz, V. Shane , Hopper, John L. , Vachon, Celine M. , Luben, Robert N , Giles, Graham G , Southey, Melissa C , Dunning, Alison M , Li, Jingmei , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Simard, Jacques , Stone, Jennifer , Baglietto, Laura , Purrington, Kristen S , Chan, Heang-Ping

Cancer Research | April 10, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2457-2467

10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2012 Get It

Abstract Mammographic density measures adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) are heritable predictors of breast cancer risk, but few mammographic density-associated genetic variants have been identified. Using data for 10,727 women from two international consortia, we estimated associations between 77 common breast cancer susceptibility variants and absolute dense area, percent dense area and absolute nondense area adjusted for study, age, and BMI using mixed linear modeling. We found strong support for established associations between rs10995190 (in the region of ZNF365), rs2046210 (ESR1), and rs3817198 (LSP1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas (all P < 10−5). Of 41 recently discovered breast cancer susceptibility variants, associations were found between rs1432679 (EBF1), rs17817449 (MIR1972-2: FTO), rs12710696 (2p24.1), and rs3757318 (ESR1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas, respectively. There were associations between rs6001930 (MKL1) and both adjusted absolute dense and nondense areas, and between rs17356907 (NTN4) and adjusted absolute nondense area. Trends in all but two associations were consistent with those for breast cancer risk. Results suggested that 18% of breast cancer susceptibility variants were associated with at least one mammographic density measure. Genetic variants at multiple loci were associated with both breast cancer risk and the mammographic density measures. Further understanding of the underlying mechanisms at these loci could help identify etiologic pathways implicated in how mammographic density predicts breast cancer risk. Cancer Res; 75(12); 2457–67. ©2015 AACR.