Scherer, Dominique

Salicylic acid (SA) has observationally been shown to decrease colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, that rapidly deacetylates to SA) is an effective primary and secondary chemopreventive agent. Through a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, we aimed to address whether levels of SA affected CRC risk, stratifying by aspirin use. A two-sample MR analysis was performed using GWAS summary statistics of SA (INTERVAL and EPIC-Norfolk, N = 14,149) and CRC (CCFR, CORECT, GECCO and UK Biobank, 55,168 cases and 65,160 controls). The DACHS study (4410 cases and 3441 controls) was used for replication and stratification of aspirin-use. SNPs proxying SA were selected via three methods: (1) functional SNPs that influence the activity of aspirin-metabolising enzymes; (2) pathway SNPs present in enzymes’ coding regions; and (3) genome-wide significant SNPs. We found no association between functional SNPs and SA levels. The pathway and genome-wide SNPs showed no association between SA and CRC risk (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.84–1.27 and OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.86–1.34, respectively). Results remained unchanged upon aspirin use stratification. We found little evidence to suggest that an SD increase in genetically predicted SA protects against CRC risk in the general population and upon stratification by aspirin use.

Abstract Background: Evidence for aspirin's chemopreventative properties on colorectal cancer (CRC) is substantial, but its mechanism of action is not well-understood. We combined a proteomic approach with Mendelian randomization (MR) to identify possible new aspirin targets that decrease CRC risk. Methods: Human colorectal adenoma cells (RG/C2) were treated with aspirin (24 hours) and a stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) based proteomics approach identified altered protein expression. Protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) from INTERVAL (N = 3,301) and expression QTLs (eQTLs) from the eQTLGen Consortium (N = 31,684) were used as genetic proxies for protein and mRNA expression levels. Two-sample MR of mRNA/protein expression on CRC risk was performed using eQTL/pQTL data combined with CRC genetic summary data from the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR), Colorectal Transdisciplinary (CORECT), Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer (GECCO) consortia and UK Biobank (55,168 cases and 65,160 controls). Results: Altered expression was detected for 125/5886 proteins. Of these, aspirin decreased MCM6, RRM2, and ARFIP2 expression, and MR analysis showed that a standard deviation increase in mRNA/protein expression was associated with increased CRC risk (OR: 1.08, 95% CI, 1.03–1.13; OR: 3.33, 95% CI, 2.46–4.50; and OR: 1.15, 95% CI, 1.02–1.29, respectively). Conclusions: MCM6 and RRM2 are involved in DNA repair whereby reduced expression may lead to increased DNA aberrations and ultimately cancer cell death, whereas ARFIP2 is involved in actin cytoskeletal regulation, indicating a possible role in aspirin's reduction of metastasis. Impact: Our approach has shown how laboratory experiments and population-based approaches can combine to identify aspirin-targeted proteins possibly affecting CRC risk.

Abstract Background: Epigenetic disturbances are crucial in cancer initiation, potentially with pleiotropic effects, and may be influenced by the genetic background. Methods: In a subsets (ASSET) meta-analytic approach, we investigated associations of genetic variants related to epigenetic mechanisms with risks of breast, lung, colorectal, ovarian and prostate carcinomas using 51,724 cases and 52,001 controls. False discovery rate–corrected P values (q values < 0.05) were considered statistically significant. Results: Among 162,887 imputed or genotyped variants in 555 candidate genes, SNPs in eight genes were associated with risk of more than one cancer type. For example, variants in BABAM1 were confirmed as a susceptibility locus for squamous cell lung, overall breast, estrogen receptor (ER)–negative breast, and overall prostate, and overall serous ovarian cancer; the most significant variant was rs4808076 [OR = 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.10–1.19; q = 6.87 × 10−5]. DPF1 rs12611084 was inversely associated with ER-negative breast, endometrioid ovarian, and overall and aggressive prostate cancer risk (OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.91–0.96; q = 0.005). Variants in L3MBTL3 were associated with colorectal, overall breast, ER-negative breast, clear cell ovarian, and overall and aggressive prostate cancer risk (e.g., rs9388766: OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.03–1.08; q = 0.02). Variants in TET2 were significantly associated with overall breast, overall prostate, overall ovarian, and endometrioid ovarian cancer risk, with rs62331150 showing bidirectional effects. Analyses of subpathways did not reveal gene subsets that contributed disproportionately to susceptibility. Conclusions: Functional and correlative studies are now needed to elucidate the potential links between germline genotype, epigenetic function, and cancer etiology. Impact: This approach provides novel insight into possible pleiotropic effects of genes involved in epigenetic processes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(6); 816–25. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Introduction Epigenetic changes are reversible features of the genome that regulate gene transcription and protein expression on several levels including DNA methylation, histone modification or miRNA expression. We investigated the association between inherited variation in genes of key epigenetic processes and risk of multiple cancers within the GAME-ON consortium. Methods We performed a pathway based meta-analysis using genotypes from more than 50,000 cases of breast, lung, prostate, ovarian and colorectal cancer cases and more than 60,000 controls from various genome wide association studies participating in the GAME-ON consortium to estimate associations with cancer risk. Using the 1000GenomeProject database, we selected 505,702 genotyped and imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms in 551 genes (flanking region +/- 250kb) related to DNA methylation, histone modification or chromatin remodeling based on GO and GeneCard databases. In order to allow variants to be associated with only a subset of traits we used subset based meta-analysis. False-discovery rate (FDR) corrected p-values (q-values) lower than 0.05 were considered significant. Results and Discussion 582 SNPs were significantly associated with risk of at least one cancer. We identified nine major regions that showed significant associations with more than one cancer type. Among the most interesting regions was the region around PHC3 (3q36), which showed associations with prostate and colorectal cancer and clear cell ovarian carcinomas. PHC3 is involved in chromatin remodeling and plays a role in epithelial neoplasms. Significant Odds ratios (ORs) ranged from 0.80 to 1.31. The number of risk and protective alleles in this region was similarly distributed (19 and 18, respectively). One of the strongest associations was observed for rs76925190 (intronic in PRKC1), which increased the risk of colorectal and prostate cancer (q-value 4.28*10-10). Variants in this region were previously associated with prostate cancer. Polymorphisms in the region (19q13) around BABAM1 (RISC and BRCA1 A complex member 1), were associated with lung, breast, ovarian and prostate cancer. BABAM1 is associated with the BRCA1-complex. Its function in histone modification and DNA repair emphasizes its importance in carcinogenesis. Significant ORs ranged from 0.88 to 1.14 with similar distribution of risk and protective alleles in this region (19 and 17, respectively). The strongest association was observed for rs4808076 (intronic in ANKLE1), which increased the risk of squamous lung, serous ovarian and ER- -breast cancer (q-value 2.40*10-6). Variants in this region were previously associated with risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Conclusions This study emphasizes the importance of variants in genes of epigenetic processes on cancer risk and further provides insights into novel, pleiotropic epigenetic mechanisms of cancer development. Citation Format: Dominique Scherer, Reka Toth, Linda Kelemen, Angela Risch, Aditi Hazra, Jean Pierre Issa, Victor Moreno, Rosalind A. Eeles, John Quackenbush, Ellen L. Goode, Shuji Ogino, Rayjean Hung, Cornelia M. Ulrich. Genetic variants in epigenetic pathways and risk of multiple cancer types in the GAME-ON consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4612. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4612

Abstract Inflammation is a facilitating process for multiple cancer types. It is believed to affect cancer development and progression through several etiologic pathways, including increased levels of DNA adduct formation, increased angiogenesis, and altered antiapoptotic signaling. This review highlights the application of inflammatory biomarkers in epidemiologic studies and discusses the various cellular mediators of inflammation characterizing the innate immune system response to infection and chronic insult from environmental factors. Included is a review of six classes of inflammation-related biomarkers: cytokines/chemokines, immune-related effectors, acute-phase proteins, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, prostaglandins and cyclooxygenase-related factors, and mediators such as transcription factors and growth factors. For each of these biomarkers, we provide a brief overview of the etiologic role in the inflammation response and how they have been related to cancer etiology and progression within the literature. We provide a discussion of the common techniques available for quantification of each marker, including strengths, weaknesses, and potential pitfalls. Subsequently, we highlight a few under-studied measures to characterize the inflammatory response and their potential utility in epidemiologic studies of cancer. Finally, we suggest integrative methods for future studies to apply multifaceted approaches to examine the relationship between inflammatory markers and their roles in cancer development. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(9); 1729–51. ©2014 AACR.