Back to Authors

Woolcott, Christy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4606-3125

Mayo Clinic

Capital District Health Authority

Citations 2

Novel Associations between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Risk-Predicting Mammographic Density Measures
Stone, Jennifer , Thompson, Deborah J. , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Lindström, Sara , Hazra, Aditi , Li, Jingmei , Eriksson, Louise , Jensen, Matt , Cunningham, Julie M. , Purrington, Kristen S. , Brown, Judith, Leyland, Jean, Warren, Ruth , Luben, Robert , Smith, Paula , Jud, Sebastian M. , Heusinger, Katharina, Beckmann, Matthias W. , Douglas, Julie A. , Shah, Kaanan P., Chan, Heang‐Ping , Helvie, Mark A. , Kolonel, Laurence N. , Woolcott, Christy , Haiman, Christopher A. , Giles, Graham G. , Baglietto, Laura , Krishnan, Kavitha , Southey, Melissa C. , Apicella, Carmel, Andrulis, Irene L. , Knight, Julia A. , Ursin, Giske , Alnæs, Grethe I.G., Kristensen, Vessela N. , Børresen‐Dale, Anne‐Lise , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Wang, Qin , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Simard, Jacques , Dunning, Alison M. , Easton, Douglas F. , Fasching, Peter A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Durocher, Francine , Cunningham, Julie, Scott, Christopher G. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Kraft, Peter , Czene, Kamila , Hall, Per N , Olson, Janet E. , Couch, Fergus J. , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Wareham, Nicholas J. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Maskarinec, Gertraud , Gram, Inger Torhild , Dennis, Joe , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Pankratz, V. Shane , Hopper, John L. , Vachon, Celine M. , Luben, Robert N , Giles, Graham G , Southey, Melissa C , Dunning, Alison M , Li, Jingmei , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Simard, Jacques , Stone, Jennifer , Baglietto, Laura , Purrington, Kristen S , Chan, Heang-Ping

Cancer Research | April 10, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2457-2467

10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2012 Get It

Abstract Mammographic density measures adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) are heritable predictors of breast cancer risk, but few mammographic density-associated genetic variants have been identified. Using data for 10,727 women from two international consortia, we estimated associations between 77 common breast cancer susceptibility variants and absolute dense area, percent dense area and absolute nondense area adjusted for study, age, and BMI using mixed linear modeling. We found strong support for established associations between rs10995190 (in the region of ZNF365), rs2046210 (ESR1), and rs3817198 (LSP1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas (all P < 10−5). Of 41 recently discovered breast cancer susceptibility variants, associations were found between rs1432679 (EBF1), rs17817449 (MIR1972-2: FTO), rs12710696 (2p24.1), and rs3757318 (ESR1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas, respectively. There were associations between rs6001930 (MKL1) and both adjusted absolute dense and nondense areas, and between rs17356907 (NTN4) and adjusted absolute nondense area. Trends in all but two associations were consistent with those for breast cancer risk. Results suggested that 18% of breast cancer susceptibility variants were associated with at least one mammographic density measure. Genetic variants at multiple loci were associated with both breast cancer risk and the mammographic density measures. Further understanding of the underlying mechanisms at these loci could help identify etiologic pathways implicated in how mammographic density predicts breast cancer risk. Cancer Res; 75(12); 2457–67. ©2015 AACR.
Abstract B25: Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by body weight: A combined analysis of four case-control studies
Koga, Karin, Nagata, Chisato , Vachon, Celine M. , Yaffe, Martin J. , Conroy, Shannon M. , Woolcott, Christy , Pagano, Ian , Byrne, Celia , Ursin, Giske , Vachon, Celine M. , Maskarinec, Gertraud

Cancer Prevention Research | January 10, 2011 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 12_Supplement | Pages: B25-B25

10.1158/1940-6207.prev-10-b25 Get It

Abstract Background. Breast density assessed from mammography is a strong predictor of breast cancer risk, but the strength of the association may vary with adiposity. To examine effect modification by adiposity, we combined data from four case-control studies on breast density that represented an ethnically diverse population with a wide variation in level of adiposity as measured by body mass index (BMI, kg/m2). Methods. We combined data from four case-control studies representing different locations: California, Hawaii and Minnesota in the United States, and Gifu in Japan. All studies included incident breast cancer cases diagnosed between 1994 and 2002 and matched controls representing the underlying case population. One mammographic image per subject was selected, specifically the mammogram at diagnosis for the studies from California, Minnesota, and Japan and the closest prediagnostic mammogram for Hawaii. Percent density was measured by one reader, who was blinded to case status, using a computer-assisted method. Self-reported anthropometric measures were used to classify women as normal, overweight, and obese according to ethnic-specific BMI cut points (<23, 23-27.4, and ≥27.5 for Asian women and <25, 25-29.9, and ≥30 for other ethnic groups). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and to evaluate interactions using the likelihood ratio while adjusting for potential confounders, including age and ethnicity. Heterogeneity across studies was marginally significant as assessed by examining density-by-study interaction (P = 0.09) and, therefore, we also adjusted for study-site. Results. The study included 1,699 cases and 2,422 controls of diverse ethnicity: 45% Caucasian, 40% Asian, 9% African-American, and 7% Other. Of these women, we classified 34% as overweight and19% as obese. Age-adjusted mean percent density was significantly greater for cases than for controls: 31.7% versus 28.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). BMI was inversely associated with breast density; the estimated age-adjusted mean percent density was 36.5%, 26.8%, and 19.3% for normal, overweight, and obese, respectively (Ptrend < 0.001). The overall OR for a 10% higher percent density was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.18) with higher estimates in overweight (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.29) and obese (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.41) than normal BMI (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.18). The effect modification by BMI was statistically significant (Pinteraction = 0.01). Conclusions. Our findings confirm that the elevated risk of breast cancer associated with breast density differs by level of adiposity, with a higher risk for overweight and obese than normal BMI. Further research is needed to understand the underlying biological reasons for these noted differences in association by adiposity. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2010;3(12 Suppl):B25.