Back to Authors

Clendenning, Mark

0000-0001-9852-2103

Mayo Clinic

The University of Melbourne

Citations 19

DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Variant Classification: Evaluating the Utility of Somatic Mutations and Mismatch Repair Deficient Colonic Crypts and Endometrial Glands
Walker, Romy , Mahmood, Khalid , Como, Julia , Joo, Jihoon E. , Georgeson, Peter , Joseland, Sharelle , Preston, Susan , Pope, Bernard J. , Chan, James , Austin, Rachel , Bojadzieva, Jasmina , Campbell, Ainsley , Edwards, Emma, Goodwin, Annabel , Harris, Marion , Ip, Emilia , Kirk, Judy , Mansour, Julia, Fan, Helen Mar , Nichols, Cassandra , Pachter, Nicholas , Ragunathan, Abiramy, Spigelman, Allan D. , Susman, Rachel , Pai, Rish K. , Rosty, Christophe , Winship, Ingrid , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Pope, Bernard J , Chan, James M , Winship, Ingrid M , Buchanan, Daniel D , Rosty, Christophe , Georgeson, Peter , Clendenning, Mark , Gleeson, Margaret A. , Christie, Michael , Jenkins, Mark A. , Macrae, Finlay

Cancers | October 10, 2023 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 20 | Pages: 4925

10.3390/cancers15204925 Get It

Germline pathogenic variants in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes (Lynch syndrome) predispose to colorectal (CRC) and endometrial (EC) cancer. Lynch syndrome specific tumor features were evaluated for their ability to support the ACMG/InSiGHT framework in classifying variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) in the MMR genes. Twenty-eight CRC or EC tumors from 25 VUS carriers (6xMLH1, 9xMSH2, 6xMSH6, 4xPMS2), underwent targeted tumor sequencing for the presence of microsatellite instability/MMR-deficiency (MSI-H/dMMR) status and identification of a somatic MMR mutation (second hit). Immunohistochemical testing for the presence of dMMR crypts/glands in normal tissue was also performed. The ACMG/InSiGHT framework reclassified 7/25 (28%) VUS to likely pathogenic (LP), three (12%) to benign/likely benign, and 15 (60%) VUS remained unchanged. For the seven re-classified LP variants comprising nine tumors, tumor sequencing confirmed MSI-H/dMMR (8/9, 88.9%) and a second hit (7/9, 77.8%). Of these LP reclassified variants where normal tissue was available, the presence of a dMMR crypt/gland was found in 2/4 (50%). Furthermore, a dMMR endometrial gland in a carrier of an MSH2 exon 1-6 duplication provides further support for an upgrade of this VUS to LP. Our study confirmed that identifying these Lynch syndrome features can improve MMR variant classification, enabling optimal clinical care.
Assessment of a Polygenic Risk Score for Colorectal Cancer to Predict Risk of Lynch Syndrome Colorectal Cancer
Lai, John , Makalic, Enes , Win, Aung Ko , Winship, Ingrid , Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Peters, Ulrike , Gallinger, Steven , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Pai, Rish K. , Jenkins, Mark A , Makalic, Enes , Winship, Ingrid M , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Dite, Gillian S. , Clendenning, Mark , Hayes, Richard B. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Newcomb, Polly A. , Church, James M. , Casey, Graham , Hopper, John L.

JNCI Cancer Spectrum | March 5, 2021 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jncics/pkab022 Get It

Abstract It was not known whether the polygenic risk scores (PRSs) that predict colorectal cancer could predict colorectal cancer for people with inherited pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair genes—people with Lynch syndrome. We tested a PRS comprising 107 established single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with colorectal cancer in European populations for 826 European-descent carriers of pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair genes (293 MLH1, 314 MSH2, 126 MSH6, 71 PMS2, and 22 EPCAM) from the Colon Cancer Family Registry, of whom 504 had colorectal cancer. There was no evidence of an association between the PRS and colorectal cancer risk, irrespective of which DNA mismatch repair gene was mutated, or sex (all 2-sided P > .05). The hazard ratio per standard deviation of the PRS for colorectal cancer was 0.97 (95% confidence interval = 0.88 to 1.06; 2-sided P = .51). Whereas PRSs are predictive of colorectal cancer in the general population, they do not predict Lynch syndrome colorectal cancer.
Cohort Profile: The Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort (CCFRC)
Jenkins, Mark A. , Win, Aung Ko , Templeton, Allyson , Angelakos, Maggie S, Buchanan, Daniel D. , Cotterchio, Michelle , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Gallinger, Steven, Lindor, Noralane M. , Haile, Robert W. , Investigators, Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort, Ahnen, Dennis J. , Anton, Kristen , Arnold, Julie, Aronson, Melyssa , Aujard, Kelly, Bapat, Bharati , Barker, Melissa, Bickerstaffe, Adrian , Burnett, Terrilea, Daftary, Darshana, DeRycke, Melissa S. , Dicks, Elizabeth , Diep, Anh, Duggan, Dave , Fisher, Douglass, Fox, Samantha , French, Amy J. , Glanz, Karen, Goldblatt, Jack, Goldberg, Richard M. , Goode, Ellen L. , Greenberg, Cary, Green, Jane , Green, Roger, Grove, John H. , Gryfe, Robert, Harmon, Patricia, Holowaty, Eric J., Holter, Spring, Kim, Hyeja, Kirk, Judy, Lance, Peter , Laurino, Mercy , Leggett, Barbara , Levine, A. Joan, Lowery, Jan T. , Lydum, Laurie, Madlensky, Lisa , Makar, Karen , Maskiell, Judi, McAllister, Pamela K., McGannon, Ellen, McKeown‐Eyssen, Gail, McLaughlin, John, Miller-Pakvasa, Heide, Nguyen, Nathalie , Nigon, Sandy, Parafrey, Patrick, Parry, Susan, Peterson, Susan K. , Phipps, Amanda I. , Redston, Mark , Rogers, Scott O., Schully, Sheri D. , Selander, Teresa, Seminara, Daniella, Shiovitz, Stacey, Siegmund, Kim, Smyrk, Thomas C. , Snazel, Douglas, Stubbs, John, Suthers, Graeme , Thomas, Duncan C. , West, D. P., Woods, Michael O. , Younghusband, Ban, Young, Joanne , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Baron, John A. , Potter, John D. , Hopper, John L. , Casey, Graham , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Newcomb, Polly A. , Investigators, Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort, Cheng, Iona C. , Church, James M. , Church, Timothy R. , Clendenning, Mark , Esplen, Mary Jane , Giles, Graham G. , Grady, William M. , Keogh, Louise Anne , Limburg, Paul J. , Macrae, Finlay , Malen, Rachel C. , McLaughlin, John, Möslein, Gabriela , Pollett, Aaron F. , Sandler, Robert David , Southey, Melissa C. , Tucker, Kathy

International Journal of Epidemiology | January 16, 2018 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 387-388i

10.1093/ije/dyy006 Get It

Targeted sequencing of established and candidate colorectal cancer genes in the Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort
(CCFR), Colon Cancer Family Registry, Rosty, Christophe , Lindor, Noralane M. , Gruber, Stephen B. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Raskin, Leon , (CCFR), Colon Cancer Family Registry, Guo, Yan Ping , Du, Liping , Clendenning, Mark , Buchanan, Daniel D , Rosty, Christophe

Oncotarget | June 21, 2017 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 55 | Pages: 93450-93463

10.18632/oncotarget.18596 Get It

Alcohol Consumption and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer for Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation Carriers
Dashti, S. Ghazaleh , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Jayasekara, Harindra , Ouakrim, Driss Ait , Rosty, Christophe , Winship, Ingrid , Parry, Susan, Haile, Robert W. , Gallinger, Steven , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Lindor, Noralane M. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Win, Aung Ko , Clendenning, Mark , Macrae, Finlay , Giles, Graham G. , Casey, Graham , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Newcomb, Polly A. , Potter, John D. , Baron, John A. , Hopper, John L. , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Rosty, Christophe , Winship, Ingrid M , Jayasekara, Harindra

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | November 4, 2016 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 366-375

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0496 Get It

Abstract Background: People with germline mutation in one of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes have increased colorectal cancer risk. For these high-risk people, study findings of the relationship between alcohol consumption and colorectal cancer risk have been inconclusive. Methods: 1,925 MMR gene mutations carriers recruited into the Colon Cancer Family Registry who had completed a questionnaire on lifestyle factors were included. Weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between alcohol consumption and colorectal cancer. Results: Colorectal cancer was diagnosed in 769 carriers (40%) at a mean (SD) age of 42.6 (10.3) years. Compared with abstention, ethanol consumption from any alcoholic beverage up to 14 g/day and >28 g/day was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.09–2.07 and 1.69; 95% CI, 1.07–2.65, respectively; Ptrend = 0.05), and colon cancer risk (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.27–2.49 and 1.94; 95% CI, 1.19–3.18, respectively; Ptrend = 0.02). However, there was no clear evidence for an association with rectal cancer risk. Also, there was no evidence for associations between consumption of individual alcoholic beverage types (beer, wine, spirits) and colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer risk. Conclusions: Our data suggest that alcohol consumption, particularly more than 28 g/day of ethanol (∼2 standard drinks of alcohol in the United States), is associated with increased colorectal cancer risk for MMR gene mutation carriers. Impact: Although these data suggested that alcohol consumption in MMR carriers was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk, there was no evidence of a dose-response, and not all types of alcohol consumption were associated with increased risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(3); 366–75. ©2016 AACR.
Prevalence and Penetrance of Major Genes and Polygenes for Colorectal Cancer
Win, Aung Ko , Jenkins, Mark A. , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Rosty, Christophe , Ahnen, Dennis J. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Gallinger, Steven , Haile, Robert W., Zheng, Yingye , Lindor, Noralane M. , MacInnis, Robert J. , Haile, Robert W. , Dowty, James G. , Lee, Andrew , Giles, Graham G. , Clendenning, Mark , Casey, Graham , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Potter, John D. , Zheng, Yingye , Newcomb, Polly A. , Hopper, John L. , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Maclnnis, Robert , Rosty, Christophe

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | October 31, 2016 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 404-412

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0693 Get It

Abstract Background: Although high-risk mutations in identified major susceptibility genes (DNA mismatch repair genes and MUTYH) account for some familial aggregation of colorectal cancer, their population prevalence and the causes of the remaining familial aggregation are not known. Methods: We studied the families of 5,744 colorectal cancer cases (probands) recruited from population cancer registries in the United States, Canada, and Australia and screened probands for mutations in mismatch repair genes and MUTYH. We conducted modified segregation analyses using the cancer history of first-degree relatives, conditional on the proband's age at diagnosis. We estimated the prevalence of mutations in the identified genes, the prevalence of HR for unidentified major gene mutations, and the variance of the residual polygenic component. Results: We estimated that 1 in 279 of the population carry mutations in mismatch repair genes (MLH1 = 1 in 1,946, MSH2 = 1 in 2,841, MSH6 = 1 in 758, PMS2 = 1 in 714), 1 in 45 carry mutations in MUTYH, and 1 in 504 carry mutations associated with an average 31-fold increased risk of colorectal cancer in unidentified major genes. The estimated polygenic variance was reduced by 30% to 50% after allowing for unidentified major genes and decreased from 3.3 for age <40 years to 0.5 for age ≥70 years (equivalent to sibling relative risks of 5.1 to 1.3, respectively). Conclusions: Unidentified major genes might explain one third to one half of the missing heritability of colorectal cancer. Impact: Our findings could aid gene discovery and development of better colorectal cancer risk prediction models. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(3); 404–12. ©2016 AACR.
Germline miRNA DNA variants and the risk of colorectal cancer by subtype
Lindor, Noralane M. , DeRycke, Melissa S. , McDonnell, Shannon K. , Baheti, Saurabh , Fogarty, Zachary C. , Win, Aung Ko , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Gallinger, Steven , Jenkins, Mark A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Larson, Melissa C. , Potter, John D. , Clendenning, Mark , Newcomb, Polly A. , Casey, Graham , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Hopper, John L. , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A , Fogarty, Zachary C , McDonnell, Shannon K

Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer | September 16, 2016 | Volume: 56 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 177-184

10.1002/gcc.22420 Get It

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate up to one‐third of all protein‐coding genes including genes relevant to cancer. Variants within miRNAs have been reported to be associated with prognosis, survival, response to chemotherapy across cancer types, in vitro parameters of cell growth, and altered risks for development of cancer. Five miRNA variants have been reported to be associated with risk for development of colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we evaluated germline genetic variation in 1,123 miRNAs in 899 individuals with CRCs categorized by clinical subtypes and in 204 controls. The role of common miRNA variation in CRC was investigated using single variant and miRNA‐level association tests. Twenty‐nine miRNAs and 30 variants exhibited some marginal association with CRC in at least one subtype of CRC. Previously reported associations were not confirmed (n = 4) or could not be evaluated (n = 1). The variants noted for the CRCs with deficient mismatch repair showed little overlap with the variants noted for CRCs with proficient mismatch repair, consistent with our evolving understanding of the distinct biology underlying these two groups. © 2016 The Authors Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Tumor testing to identify lynch syndrome in two Australian colorectal cancer cohorts
Buchanan, Daniel D. , Rosty, Christophe , Eriksen, Stine V , Walsh, Michael D. , Walters, Rhiannon, Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Stewart, Jenna R., Preston, Susan , Win, Aung Ko , Ouakrim, Driss Ait , Boussioutas, Alex , Winship, Ingrid , Southey, Melissa C. , English, Dallas R. , Jenkins, Mark A. , investigators, on behalf of the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study and the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry Cohort, Clendenning, Mark , Flander, Louisa Beyer , Macrae, Finlay , Giles, Graham G. , Hopper, John L. , investigators, on behalf of the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study and the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry Cohort, Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Southey, Melissa C , English, Dallas R , Jenkins, Mark A , Rosty, Christophe , Winship, Ingrid M

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology | June 6, 2016 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 427-438

10.1111/jgh.13468 Get It

AbstractBackground and AimTumor testing of colorectal cancers (CRC) for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is an effective approach to identify carriers of germline MMR gene mutation (Lynch syndrome). The aim of this study was to identify MMR gene mutation carriers in two cohorts of population‐based CRC utilizing a combination of tumor and germline testing approaches.MethodsColorectal cancers from 813 patients diagnosed with CRC < 60 years of age from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (ACCFR) and from 826 patients from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS) were tested for MMR protein expression using immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability (MSI), BRAFV600E somatic mutation, and for MLH1 methylation. MMR gene mutation testing (Sanger sequencing and Multiplex Ligation Dependent Probe Amplification) was performed on germline DNA of patients with MMR‐deficient tumors and a subset of MMR‐proficient CRCs.ResultsOf the 813 ACCFR probands, 90 probands demonstrated tumor MMR deficiency (11.1%), and 42 had a MMR gene germline mutation (5.2%). For the MCCS, MMR deficiency was identified in the tumors of 103 probands (12.5%) and seven had a germline mutation (0.8%). All the mutation carriers were diagnosed prior to 70 years of age. Probands with a MMR‐deficient CRC without MLH1 methylation and a gene mutation were considered Lynch‐like and comprised 41.1% and 25.2% of the MMR‐deficient CRCs for the ACCFR and MCCS, respectively.ConclusionsIdentification of MMR gene mutation carriers in Australian CRC‐affected patients is optimized by immunohistochemistry screening of CRC diagnosed before 70 years of age. A significant proportion of MMR‐deficient CRCs will have unknown etiology (Lynch‐like) proving problematic for clinical management.
Risk of extracolonic cancers for people with biallelic and monoallelic mutations in MUTYH
Win, Aung Ko , Reece, Jeanette C. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Rosty, Christophe , Southey, Melissa C. , Young, Joanne , Cleary, Sean P. , Kim, Hyeja, Tucker, Katherine , Burnett, Terrilea, Haile, Robert W. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Gallinger, Steven , Winship, Ingrid , Lindor, Noralane M. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Tucker, Kathy , Dowty, James G. , Clendenning, Mark , Cotterchio, Michelle , Macrae, Finlay , Baron, John A. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Casey, Graham , Newcomb, Polly A. , Hopper, John L. , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Southey, Melissa C , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Rosty, Christophe , Winship, Ingrid M , Cleary, Sean P

International Journal of Cancer | May 19, 2016 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1557-1563

10.1002/ijc.30197 Get It

Germline mutations in the DNA base excision repair gene MUTYH are known to increase a carrier's risk of colorectal cancer. However, the risks of other (extracolonic) cancers for MUTYH mutation carriers are not well defined. We identified 266 probands (91% Caucasians) with a MUTYH mutation (41 biallelic and 225 monoallelic) from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Mutation status, sex, age and histories of cancer from their 1,903 first‐ and 3,255 second‐degree relatives were analyzed using modified segregation analysis conditioned on the ascertainment criteria. Compared with incidences for the general population, hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for biallelic MUTYH mutation carriers were: urinary bladder cancer 19 (3.7–97) and ovarian cancer 17 (2.4–115). The HRs (95% CI) for monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers were: gastric cancer 9.3 (6.7–13); hepatobiliary cancer 4.5 (2.7–7.5); endometrial cancer 2.1 (1.1–3.9) and breast cancer 1.4 (1.0–2.0). There was no evidence for an increased risk of cancers at the other sites examined (brain, pancreas, kidney or prostate). Based on the USA population incidences, the estimated cumulative risks (95% CI) to age 70 years for biallelic mutation carriers were: bladder cancer 25% (5–77%) for males and 8% (2–33%) for females and ovarian cancer 14% (2–65%). The cumulative risks (95% CI) for monoallelic mutation carriers were: gastric cancer 5% (4–7%) for males and 2.3% (1.7–3.3%) for females; hepatobiliary cancer 3% (2–5%) for males and 1.4% (0.8–2.3%) for females; endometrial cancer 3% (2%–6%) and breast cancer 11% (8–16%). These unbiased estimates of both relative and absolute risks of extracolonic cancers for people, mostly Caucasians, with MUTYH mutations will be important for their clinical management.