Independent Researcher, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Citations 14
Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017
Objectives: Atrial fibrillation is frequently seen in sepsis-related hospitalizations. However, large-scale contemporary data from the United States comparing outcomes among sepsis-related hospitalizations with versus without atrial fibrillation are limited. The aim of our study was to assess the frequency of atrial fibrillation and its impact on outcomes of sepsis-related hospitalizations. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: The National Inpatient Sample databases (2010–2014). Patients: Primary discharge diagnosis of sepsis with and without atrial fibrillation were identified using prior validated International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification codes. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Overall, 5,808,166 hospitalizations with the primary diagnosis of sepsis, of which 19.4% (1,126,433) were associated with atrial fibrillation. The sepsis-atrial fibrillation cohort consisted of older (median [interquartile range] age of 79 yr [70–86 yr] vs 67 yr [53–79 yr]; p < 0.001) white (80.9% vs 68.8%; p < 0.001) male (51.1% vs 47.5%; p < 0.001) patients with an extended length of stay (median [interquartile range] 6 d [4–11 d] vs 5 d [3–9 d]; p < 0.001) and higher hospitalization charges (median [interquartile range] $44,765 [$23,234–$88,657] vs $35,737 [$18,767–$72,220]; p < 0.001) as compared with the nonatrial fibrillation cohort. The all-cause mortality rate in the sepsis-atrial fibrillation cohort was significantly higher (18.4% and 11.9%; p = 0.001) as compared with those without atrial fibrillation. Although all-cause mortality (20.4% vs 16.6%) and length of stay (median [interquartile range] 7 d [4–11 d] vs 6 d [4–10 d]) decreased between 2010 and 2014, hospitalization charges increased (median [interquartile range] $41,783 [$21,430–$84,465] vs $46,251 [$24,157–$89,995]) in the sepsis-atrial fibrillation cohort. The greatest predictors of mortality in the atrial fibrillation-sepsis cohort were African American race, female gender, advanced age, and the presence of medical comorbidities. Conclusions: The presence of atrial fibrillation among sepsis-related hospitalizations is a marker of poor prognosis and increased mortality. Although we observed rising trends in sepsis and sepsis-atrial fibrillation–related hospitalizations during the study period, the rate and odds of mortality progressively decreased.
Reply to “Low prevalence of diabetes with chronic complications in patients with Takotsubo syndrome”
BackgroundObesity can lead to increased oxidative stress which is one of the proposed mechanisms in the etiopathogenesis of takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM).HypothesisThe presence of obesity adversely impacts clinical outcomes in TCM patients.MethodsWe queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2010‐2014) to identify adult patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of TCM with and without obesity. We compared the categorical and continuous variables by Pearson χ2 and Student t test, respectively, in propensity‐score matched cohorts.ResultsThe study cohort comprised 612 obese TCM (weighted n = 3034) and 5696 nonobese TCM (weighted n = 28 186) patients. Obese TCM patients were more often younger and private‐insurance enrollees. Cardiac complications including acute myocardial infarction (9.0% vs 7.4%; P = 0.04), cardiac arrest (2.3% vs. 0.4%; P < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (4.3% vs. 3.2%; P = 0.03), congestive heart failure (5.0% vs. 3.8%; P = 0.02), respiratory failure (12.9% vs. 11.0%; P = 0.021) and use of mechanical hemodynamic support (Impella; 0.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.02) were significantly higher among obese TCM patients. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in all‐cause mortality (1.0% vs. 0.8%; P = 0.35), arrhythmia (24.5% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.123), length of stay (3.7 ±3.5 vs. 3.7 ±3.6 days; P = 0.68), and total hospital charges ($40 780.16 vs. $42 575.14; P = 0.08).ConclusionsObese TCM patients were more susceptible to developing TCM‐related cardiac complications than were nonobese TCM patients, without any impact on all‐cause in‐hospital mortality, LOS, and hospital charges.