Thompson, Deborah J.

Abstract Background: Accumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. We aimed to identify joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci by performing a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from these two cancers. Methods: Using LDScore regression, we explored the genetic correlation between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e., inverse-variance meta-analysis, colocalization, and M-values) and performed analyses stratified by subtype. Candidate target genes were then prioritized using functional genomic data. Results: Genetic correlation analysis revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10−5). We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (PBonferroni < 2.4 × 10−9). In addition, four novel subgenome-wide regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12, and 11q13.3 were identified (P < 5 × 10−7). Promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and ovarian cell lines and expression quantitative trait loci data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation. Conclusions: Using cross-cancer GWAS meta-analysis, we have identified several joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci and candidate target genes for future functional analysis. Impact: Our research highlights the shared genetic relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Further studies in larger sample sets are required to confirm our findings.

Abstract Blood lipids have been associated with the development of a range of cancers, including breast, lung and colorectal cancer. For endometrial cancer, observational studies have reported inconsistent associations between blood lipids and cancer risk. To reduce biases from unmeasured confounding, we performed a bidirectional, two‐sample Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the relationship between levels of three blood lipids (low‐density lipoprotein [LDL] and high‐density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, and triglycerides) and endometrial cancer risk. Genetic variants associated with each of these blood lipid levels ( P < 5 × 10 −8 ) were identified as instrumental variables, and assessed using genome‐wide association study data from the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium (12 906 cases and 108 979 controls) and the Global Lipids Genetic Consortium (n = 188 578). Mendelian randomization analyses found genetically raised LDL cholesterol levels to be associated with lower risks of endometrial cancer of all histologies combined, and of endometrioid and non‐endometrioid subtypes. Conversely, higher genetically predicted HDL cholesterol levels were associated with increased risk of non‐endometrioid endometrial cancer. After accounting for the potential confounding role of obesity (as measured by genetic variants associated with body mass index), the association between genetically predicted increased LDL cholesterol levels and lower endometrial cancer risk remained significant, especially for non‐endometrioid endometrial cancer. There was no evidence to support a role for triglycerides in endometrial cancer development. Our study supports a role for LDL and HDL cholesterol in the development of non‐endometrioid endometrial cancer. Further studies are required to understand the mechanisms underlying these findings.

Abstract Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and the sixth most common cause of death from all cancer in women, with an estimated 140,000 deaths per year worldwide. Endometrial cancer (cancer of the uterine lining) is the most commonly diagnosed gynecologic cancer, ranking sixth in incident cancer in women. Ovarian and endometrial cancer share many epidemiologic, histopathologic, and tumor genetic characteristics. Meta-analyses of genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets across etiologically related diseases have successfully been used to increase statistical power and identify novel genetic risk regions. We hypothesised that joint meta-analysis of ovarian and endometrial cancer GWAS datasets would identify novel genetic loci for both cancers. Following quality control, summary statistics for &gt;11 million genetic variants were available from the largest genome-wide association studies performed by the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC, Phelan et al., Nature Genetics 2017) and the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium (ECAC, unpublished). A total of 35,312 cancer cases from all histologic subtypes (22,406 ovarian and 12,906 endometrial cancer cases) and 149,920 controls were included in the analysis. Summary statistics were combined using an inverse-variance, fixed-effects model in METAL and identified ten loci at genome-wide significance (P &lt; 5 x 10-8), of which one locus at 14q23.3 (rs4072776 combined OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.92-0.96; P = 8.0 x 10-9) had not been previously associated with the risk of either cancer. Integration with chromatin conformation data (RNAPolII HiChIP) from the Ishikawa endometrial cancer cell line suggests interaction between the risk signal and the promoter of FUT8. FUT8 encodes a fucosyltransferase and its expression has been implicated in breast, stomach, and melanoma and lung cancer. Interestingly, FUT8 is a downstream target regulated by the loss of PAX2 and mutated p53, which is the earliest known molecular aberration in the progression of the fallopian tissue epithelial to serous ovarian cancer. Further functional evaluation of the 14q23.3 risk region is required to determine the regulatory effect of genetic risk variants on FUT8. Future meta-analyses of datasets, stratifying results by histologic subtypes, will be undertaken. Citation Format: Tracy A. O'Mara, Dylan M. Glubb, Daniel D. Buchanan, Diether Lambrechts, Per Hall, Emma Tham, Jone Trovik, Ellen L. Goode, Peter Fasching, Thilo Dörk, Rodney J. Scott, Paul L. Auer, Roger L. Milne, Graham G. Giles, John Perry, Immaculata de Vivo, Ian Tomlinson, Douglas F. Easton, Deborah J. Thompson, Amanda B. Spurdle, E2C2, BCAC, OCAC, ECAC. Joint genome-wide association study of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer identifies a novel genetic risk region at 14q23.3 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 230.

Abstract Background: Radiologically dense area (DA) on a mammogram represents the stromal and epithelial tissue in the breast, while non-dense area (NDA) represents adipose tissue. Quantitative measurements of DA, NDA as well as the proportion of dense area in the breast (percent density, PD) adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) have all been associated with breast cancer (BC) risk. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified genetic loci that show association with both mammographic density (MD) phenotypes and BC, but little is known about the genome-wide and local genetic correlation between MD phenotypes and BC. Methods: We estimated the genome-wide and local genetic correlation between MD phenotypes adjusted for age and BMI and BC, leveraging GWAS summary statistics for MD phenotypes based on 12,866 women (MODE consortium) and for BC based on 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls (BCAC consortium). We also conducted partitioned heritability analysis to identify specific functional annotations that contribute to MD heritability. Results: We observed a negative genetic correlation between DA and NDA (-0.62, p=0.002). Both DA and PD showed positive genetic correlations with overall BC (DA: rg=0.24, p=0.004; PD: rg=0.27, p=0.0001), estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC (DA: rg=0.23, p=0.005; PD: rg=0.23, p=0.001), and ER- BC (DA: rg=0.26, p=0.01; PD: rg=0.32, p=0.0006). In contrast, NDA showed a nonsignificant negative genetic correlation with BC (rg=-0.11, p=0.21). Local genetic correlation analyses between MD phenotypes and BC reflected known findings including positive correlation at 10q21 region between both PD and DA and BC (both p&lt;5x10-7), negative correlation at 22q13.1 between DA and BC (p=4.6x10-6), and positive correlation at 8p11.23 between NDA and BC (p=2.8x10-6). Two known BC regions that have not previously been associated with MD showed suggestive genetic correlations between BC and DA: 1q21.2 (negative genetic correlation, p=1.3x10-4) and 12q21.31 (positive genetic correlation, p=6.7x10-4). In exploratory analyses estimating the genome-wide genetic correlation between MD and hormone-related phenotypes in UK Biobank (n=337,199), we observed nominally significant positive genetic correlations between PD and benign mammary dysplasia (rg=0.45, p=0.01), NDA and endometriosis (rg=0.45, p=0.02), and negative genetic correlation between NDA and menstrual cycle length (rg=-0.30, p=0.05). We identified multiple functional annotations that contribute to MD heritability including histone mark H3K27ac that marks active enhancers (~2,5-fold enrichment in heritability for both DA and NDA) and DNAsel Hypersensitive Sites (DHS, 9.1-fold enrichment in heritability for DA). Conclusion: Our results provide evidence of shared genetic basis between mammographic density and breast cancer. Citation Format: Hongjie Chen, Julie Douglas, William Gordon, Deborah Thompson, Fergus Couch, Peter Fasching, Per Hall, John Hopper, Gertraud Maskarenic, Marina Pollan, Jennifer Stone, Rulla Tamimi, Sara Lindstroem. Evidence for a shared genetic basis between breast cancer and mammographic density phenotypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 224.

AbstractEpidemiological, biological, and molecular data suggest links between endometriosis and endometrial cancer, with recent epidemiological studies providing evidence for an association between a previous diagnosis of endometriosis and risk of endometrial cancer. We used genetic data as an alternative approach to investigate shared biological etiology of these two diseases. Genetic correlation analysis of summary level statistics from genomewide association studies (GWAS) using LD Score regression revealed moderate but significant genetic correlation (rg = 0.23, P = 9.3 × 10−3), and SNP effect concordance analysis provided evidence for significant SNP pleiotropy (P = 6.0 × 10−3) and concordance in effect direction (P = 2.0 × 10−3) between the two diseases. Cross‐disease GWAS meta‐analysis highlighted 13 distinct loci associated at P ≤ 10−5 with both endometriosis and endometrial cancer, with one locus (SNP rs2475335) located within PTPRD associated at a genomewide significant level (P = 4.9 × 10−8, OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.07–1.15). PTPRD acts in the STAT3 pathway, which has been implicated in both endometriosis and endometrial cancer. This study demonstrates the value of cross‐disease genetic analysis to support epidemiological observations and to identify biological pathways of relevance to multiple diseases.

Abstract Background: Common cancers develop through a multistep process often including inherited susceptibility. Collaboration among multiple institutions, and funding from multiple sources, has allowed the development of an inexpensive genotyping microarray, the OncoArray. The array includes a genome-wide backbone, comprising 230,000 SNPs tagging most common genetic variants, together with dense mapping of known susceptibility regions, rare variants from sequencing experiments, pharmacogenetic markers, and cancer-related traits. Methods: The OncoArray can be genotyped using a novel technology developed by Illumina to facilitate efficient genotyping. The consortium developed standard approaches for selecting SNPs for study, for quality control of markers, and for ancestry analysis. The array was genotyped at selected sites and with prespecified replicate samples to permit evaluation of genotyping accuracy among centers and by ethnic background. Results: The OncoArray consortium genotyped 447,705 samples. A total of 494,763 SNPs passed quality control steps with a sample success rate of 97% of the samples. Participating sites performed ancestry analysis using a common set of markers and a scoring algorithm based on principal components analysis. Conclusions: Results from these analyses will enable researchers to identify new susceptibility loci, perform fine-mapping of new or known loci associated with either single or multiple cancers, assess the degree of overlap in cancer causation and pleiotropic effects of loci that have been identified for disease-specific risk, and jointly model genetic, environmental, and lifestyle-related exposures. Impact: Ongoing analyses will shed light on etiology and risk assessment for many types of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 126–35. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Background: The strongest known risk factor for endometrial cancer is obesity. To determine whether SNPs associated with increased body mass index (BMI) or waist–hip ratio (WHR) are associated with endometrial cancer risk, independent of measured BMI, we investigated relationships between 77 BMI and 47 WHR SNPs and endometrial cancer in 6,609 cases and 37,926 country-matched controls. Methods: Logistic regression analysis and fixed effects meta-analysis were used to test for associations between endometrial cancer risk and (i) individual BMI or WHR SNPs, (ii) a combined weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) for BMI or WHR. Causality of BMI for endometrial cancer was assessed using Mendelian randomization, with BMIwGRS as instrumental variable. Results: The BMIwGRS was significantly associated with endometrial cancer risk (P = 3.4 × 10−17). Scaling the effect of the BMIwGRS on endometrial cancer risk by its effect on BMI, the endometrial cancer OR per 5 kg/m2 of genetically predicted BMI was 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.89–2.21], larger than the observed effect of BMI on endometrial cancer risk (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.44–1.68, per 5 kg/m2). The association attenuated but remained significant after adjusting for BMI (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10–1.39; P = 5.3 × 10−4). There was evidence of directional pleiotropy (P = 1.5 × 10−4). BMI SNP rs2075650 was associated with endometrial cancer at study-wide significance (P &lt; 4.0 × 10−4), independent of BMI. Endometrial cancer was not significantly associated with individual WHR SNPs or the WHRwGRS. Conclusions: BMI, but not WHR, is causally associated with endometrial cancer risk, with evidence that some BMI-associated SNPs alter endometrial cancer risk via mechanisms other than measurable BMI. Impact: The causal association between BMI SNPs and endometrial cancer has possible implications for endometrial cancer risk modeling. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(11); 1503–10. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers are hormone-related and may have a shared genetic basis, but this has not been investigated systematically by genome-wide association (GWA) studies. Meta-analyses combining the largest GWA meta-analysis data sets for these cancers totaling 112,349 cases and 116,421 controls of European ancestry, all together and in pairs, identified at P &lt; 10−8 seven new cross-cancer loci: three associated with susceptibility to all three cancers (rs17041869/2q13/BCL2L11; rs7937840/11q12/INCENP; rs1469713/19p13/GATAD2A), two breast and ovarian cancer risk loci (rs200182588/9q31/SMC2; rs8037137/15q26/RCCD1), and two breast and prostate cancer risk loci (rs5013329/1p34/NSUN4; rs9375701/6q23/L3MBTL3). Index variants in five additional regions previously associated with only one cancer also showed clear association with a second cancer type. Cell-type–specific expression quantitative trait locus and enhancer–gene interaction annotations suggested target genes with potential cross-cancer roles at the new loci. Pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment of death receptor signaling genes near loci with P &lt; 10−5 in the three-cancer meta-analysis. Significance: We demonstrate that combining large-scale GWA meta-analysis findings across cancer types can identify completely new risk loci common to breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. We show that the identification of such cross-cancer risk loci has the potential to shed new light on the shared biology underlying these hormone-related cancers. Cancer Discov; 6(9); 1052–67. ©2016 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 932

Abstract Mammographic density measures adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) are heritable predictors of breast cancer risk, but few mammographic density-associated genetic variants have been identified. Using data for 10,727 women from two international consortia, we estimated associations between 77 common breast cancer susceptibility variants and absolute dense area, percent dense area and absolute nondense area adjusted for study, age, and BMI using mixed linear modeling. We found strong support for established associations between rs10995190 (in the region of ZNF365), rs2046210 (ESR1), and rs3817198 (LSP1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas (all P &lt; 10−5). Of 41 recently discovered breast cancer susceptibility variants, associations were found between rs1432679 (EBF1), rs17817449 (MIR1972-2: FTO), rs12710696 (2p24.1), and rs3757318 (ESR1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas, respectively. There were associations between rs6001930 (MKL1) and both adjusted absolute dense and nondense areas, and between rs17356907 (NTN4) and adjusted absolute nondense area. Trends in all but two associations were consistent with those for breast cancer risk. Results suggested that 18% of breast cancer susceptibility variants were associated with at least one mammographic density measure. Genetic variants at multiple loci were associated with both breast cancer risk and the mammographic density measures. Further understanding of the underlying mechanisms at these loci could help identify etiologic pathways implicated in how mammographic density predicts breast cancer risk. Cancer Res; 75(12); 2457–67. ©2015 AACR.