Trovik, Jone

Abstract Blood lipids have been associated with the development of a range of cancers, including breast, lung and colorectal cancer. For endometrial cancer, observational studies have reported inconsistent associations between blood lipids and cancer risk. To reduce biases from unmeasured confounding, we performed a bidirectional, two‐sample Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the relationship between levels of three blood lipids (low‐density lipoprotein [LDL] and high‐density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, and triglycerides) and endometrial cancer risk. Genetic variants associated with each of these blood lipid levels ( P < 5 × 10 −8 ) were identified as instrumental variables, and assessed using genome‐wide association study data from the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium (12 906 cases and 108 979 controls) and the Global Lipids Genetic Consortium (n = 188 578). Mendelian randomization analyses found genetically raised LDL cholesterol levels to be associated with lower risks of endometrial cancer of all histologies combined, and of endometrioid and non‐endometrioid subtypes. Conversely, higher genetically predicted HDL cholesterol levels were associated with increased risk of non‐endometrioid endometrial cancer. After accounting for the potential confounding role of obesity (as measured by genetic variants associated with body mass index), the association between genetically predicted increased LDL cholesterol levels and lower endometrial cancer risk remained significant, especially for non‐endometrioid endometrial cancer. There was no evidence to support a role for triglycerides in endometrial cancer development. Our study supports a role for LDL and HDL cholesterol in the development of non‐endometrioid endometrial cancer. Further studies are required to understand the mechanisms underlying these findings.

Abstract Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and the sixth most common cause of death from all cancer in women, with an estimated 140,000 deaths per year worldwide. Endometrial cancer (cancer of the uterine lining) is the most commonly diagnosed gynecologic cancer, ranking sixth in incident cancer in women. Ovarian and endometrial cancer share many epidemiologic, histopathologic, and tumor genetic characteristics. Meta-analyses of genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets across etiologically related diseases have successfully been used to increase statistical power and identify novel genetic risk regions. We hypothesised that joint meta-analysis of ovarian and endometrial cancer GWAS datasets would identify novel genetic loci for both cancers. Following quality control, summary statistics for &gt;11 million genetic variants were available from the largest genome-wide association studies performed by the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC, Phelan et al., Nature Genetics 2017) and the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium (ECAC, unpublished). A total of 35,312 cancer cases from all histologic subtypes (22,406 ovarian and 12,906 endometrial cancer cases) and 149,920 controls were included in the analysis. Summary statistics were combined using an inverse-variance, fixed-effects model in METAL and identified ten loci at genome-wide significance (P &lt; 5 x 10-8), of which one locus at 14q23.3 (rs4072776 combined OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.92-0.96; P = 8.0 x 10-9) had not been previously associated with the risk of either cancer. Integration with chromatin conformation data (RNAPolII HiChIP) from the Ishikawa endometrial cancer cell line suggests interaction between the risk signal and the promoter of FUT8. FUT8 encodes a fucosyltransferase and its expression has been implicated in breast, stomach, and melanoma and lung cancer. Interestingly, FUT8 is a downstream target regulated by the loss of PAX2 and mutated p53, which is the earliest known molecular aberration in the progression of the fallopian tissue epithelial to serous ovarian cancer. Further functional evaluation of the 14q23.3 risk region is required to determine the regulatory effect of genetic risk variants on FUT8. Future meta-analyses of datasets, stratifying results by histologic subtypes, will be undertaken. Citation Format: Tracy A. O'Mara, Dylan M. Glubb, Daniel D. Buchanan, Diether Lambrechts, Per Hall, Emma Tham, Jone Trovik, Ellen L. Goode, Peter Fasching, Thilo Dörk, Rodney J. Scott, Paul L. Auer, Roger L. Milne, Graham G. Giles, John Perry, Immaculata de Vivo, Ian Tomlinson, Douglas F. Easton, Deborah J. Thompson, Amanda B. Spurdle, E2C2, BCAC, OCAC, ECAC. Joint genome-wide association study of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer identifies a novel genetic risk region at 14q23.3 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 230.

AbstractEpidemiological, biological, and molecular data suggest links between endometriosis and endometrial cancer, with recent epidemiological studies providing evidence for an association between a previous diagnosis of endometriosis and risk of endometrial cancer. We used genetic data as an alternative approach to investigate shared biological etiology of these two diseases. Genetic correlation analysis of summary level statistics from genomewide association studies (GWAS) using LD Score regression revealed moderate but significant genetic correlation (rg = 0.23, P = 9.3 × 10−3), and SNP effect concordance analysis provided evidence for significant SNP pleiotropy (P = 6.0 × 10−3) and concordance in effect direction (P = 2.0 × 10−3) between the two diseases. Cross‐disease GWAS meta‐analysis highlighted 13 distinct loci associated at P ≤ 10−5 with both endometriosis and endometrial cancer, with one locus (SNP rs2475335) located within PTPRD associated at a genomewide significant level (P = 4.9 × 10−8, OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.07–1.15). PTPRD acts in the STAT3 pathway, which has been implicated in both endometriosis and endometrial cancer. This study demonstrates the value of cross‐disease genetic analysis to support epidemiological observations and to identify biological pathways of relevance to multiple diseases.

Abstract Background: The strongest known risk factor for endometrial cancer is obesity. To determine whether SNPs associated with increased body mass index (BMI) or waist–hip ratio (WHR) are associated with endometrial cancer risk, independent of measured BMI, we investigated relationships between 77 BMI and 47 WHR SNPs and endometrial cancer in 6,609 cases and 37,926 country-matched controls. Methods: Logistic regression analysis and fixed effects meta-analysis were used to test for associations between endometrial cancer risk and (i) individual BMI or WHR SNPs, (ii) a combined weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) for BMI or WHR. Causality of BMI for endometrial cancer was assessed using Mendelian randomization, with BMIwGRS as instrumental variable. Results: The BMIwGRS was significantly associated with endometrial cancer risk (P = 3.4 × 10−17). Scaling the effect of the BMIwGRS on endometrial cancer risk by its effect on BMI, the endometrial cancer OR per 5 kg/m2 of genetically predicted BMI was 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.89–2.21], larger than the observed effect of BMI on endometrial cancer risk (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.44–1.68, per 5 kg/m2). The association attenuated but remained significant after adjusting for BMI (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10–1.39; P = 5.3 × 10−4). There was evidence of directional pleiotropy (P = 1.5 × 10−4). BMI SNP rs2075650 was associated with endometrial cancer at study-wide significance (P &lt; 4.0 × 10−4), independent of BMI. Endometrial cancer was not significantly associated with individual WHR SNPs or the WHRwGRS. Conclusions: BMI, but not WHR, is causally associated with endometrial cancer risk, with evidence that some BMI-associated SNPs alter endometrial cancer risk via mechanisms other than measurable BMI. Impact: The causal association between BMI SNPs and endometrial cancer has possible implications for endometrial cancer risk modeling. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(11); 1503–10. ©2016 AACR.