Brufsky, Adam

LBA500 Background: The primary endpoint of NSABP B-35, a phase III trial comparing 1 mg/day anastrozole to 20 mg/day tamoxifen, each given for 5 years, was breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), defined as the time from randomization to any breast cancer (BC) event including local, regional, or distant recurrence or contralateral disease, invasive or DCIS. Methods: Postmenopausal women with ER-receptor or PgR-receptor positive (by IHC analysis) DCIS and no invasive BC who had undergone a lumpectomy with clear resection margins were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mg/day tam or 1 mg/day A (blinded) for 5 years. Stratification was by age (<60 v ≥60). Results: From 1/6/2003 to 6/15/2006, 3,104 pts were entered and randomized (1552 in groups tam and A each). As of 2/28/15, follow-up information was available on 3,083 pts for OS and on 3,077 pts for all other disease-free endpoints, with mean time of follow-up of 8.6 years. There were 198 BCFI events, 114 in the tam group and 84 in the A group (HR, 0.73; p=0.03). 10-year point estimates for BCFI were 89.2% for tam and 93.5% for A. A significant time-by-treatment interaction (p=0.02) indicated that the effect was not evident until later in the study. There was a significant interaction between treatment and age group (p=0.04); benefit of A is only in women <60 years old. As to secondary endpoints, there were 495 DFS events, 260 in the tam group and 235 in the A group (HR, 0.89; p=0.21). 10-year point estimates for DFS were 77.9% for tam and 82.7% for A. There were 186 deaths, 88 in the tam group and 98 in the A group (HR, 1.11; p=0.48). 10-year point estimates for OS were 92.1% for tam, 92.5% for A. There were 8 deaths due to breast cancer in the tam group and 5 in the A group. There were 63 cases of invasive breast cancer in the tam group and 39 in the A group (HR, 0.61; p=0.02). There was a non-significant trend for a reduction in breast second primary cancers with A (HR, 0.68; p=0.07). Conclusions: Anastrozole provided a significant improvement compared to tamoxifen for BCFI, which was seen later in the study, primarily in women <60 years. Support: CA12027, 37377, 69651, 69974; 180868, 180822, 189867 196067, 114732; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. Clinical trial information: NCT00053898.

Abstract Background The clinical results of NSABP B-35, phase III trial comparing 1 mg/day A to 20 mg/day tam, each given for 5 years, were reported at ASCO 2015. B-35 demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in breast cancer free interval for women assigned to A, primarily in women &lt;60 years. A secondary endpoint of B-35 was quality of life (QOL) and symptom (SX) outcomes in the two treatment groups. The primary hypotheses of the PRO study were that there would be no differences in QOL between the two treatments, and that patients receiving A would report higher rates of hot flashes compared to patients receiving tam. Other SX comparisons were secondary endpoints. Methods QOL and SX were assessed at baseline (prior to randomization), and every 6 months thereafter for 5 years of treatment and in the following 12 months. QOL was measured with the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). SX were measured with selected scales from the BCPT symptom-checklist, and other standardized instruments. Stratification was by age (&lt;60 v ≥60) as in the main trial. Study hypotheses and endpoints were examined by comparing PROs in the two treatment arms using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis with adjustment for the baseline scores, time point and age category, using an intention-to-treat principle and including only patients who completed the baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. Patients with protocol events were censored. Only data through 60 months are reported here. The accrual goal for the sub-study was 1,150 consecutive patients. Results Between January 6, 2003 and June 15, 2006, a total of 3,104 patients were entered and randomly assigned to NSABP Protocol B-35. Accrual to the PRO study of B-35 closed on December 28, 2004, at which time 1,275 patients were entered, with 1,193 patients included in this analysis. There were no medical or demographic differences between patients assigned to A or tam in the PRO sub-study, and they reflected the characteristics of the parent trial. Adherence to data collection across the 60 months was 87%. There were no significant differences in QOL outcomes by treatment for the PCS (p=0.16) or the MCS (p=0.38). SX subscales: hot flash scale was greater in tam group and this difference varied over time (p=0.001); musculoskeletal pain was significantly greater in A group for time points 6-24 months (all p&lt;.001); vaginal problems were greater in A group (p=0.03). Hot flash and vaginal problems were significantly worse in women &lt;60 years. Additional SX outcomes (depression, fatigue, sexual function) will be reported at presentation. Conclusion In this large, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing A to tam in patients with DCIS, there was no significant difference in QOL between the two treatments. However, there were important treatment differences in SX outcomes, which should be considered as part of treatment decision-making discussions, along with the clinical breast cancer outcome results. Support: CA-180868, 180822, 189867, 196067, 114732; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. Citation Format: Ganz PA, Cecchini RS, Julian TB, Margolese RG, Costantino JP, Vallow LA, Albain KS, Whitworth PW, Cianfrocca ME, Brufsky A, Gross HM, Soori GS, Hopkins JO, Fehrenbacher L, Sturtz K, Wozniak TF, Seay TE, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) results, NRG Oncology/NSABP B-35: A clinical trial of anastrozole (A) vs tamoxifen (tam) in postmenopausal patients with DCIS undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-04.

Abstract Introduction: Small studies have indicated a possible correlation between a HER2 gene polymorphism at codon 655 and trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity. Association between a synonymous coding variant rs7853758 within the SLC28A3 gene and anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity has also been reported. This study aimed to validate these correlations and assess for any relationship with prognosis. Methods: Genomic DNA was isolated from 666 patients enrolled in a large trial of adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 amplified early breast cancer (BCIRG 006). Genotyping was conducted using Sequenom MassARRAY System for HER2 G-&gt;A polymorphism at amino acid codon 655 (rs1136201) and variant rs7853758 (L461L) within the SLC28A3 gene. Results: Of the 666 patients analyzed, 216 patients were treated with anthracycline based therapy, 226 with trastuzumab based therapy, and 224 with regimens containing both an anthracycline and trastuzumab. Compared with the overall results of the BCIRG006 study (N=3,222), in the subset of patients genotyped in this analysis, a less robust improvement in disease free survival (DFS) was observed for the trastuzumab arms than control arm (HR, 0.821). When stratified for prognostic features, the hazard ratio in favor of trastuzumab was consistent with that of the overall study (HR, 0.674). Samples from 662 patients were successfully genotyped for rs1136201. Of these, 424 (64%) were AA, 30 (4.5%) were GG, 208 (31%) were AG genotype. Samples from 665 patients were successfully genotyped for rs7853758. Of these, 19 (3%) were AA, 475 (71%) were GG, and 171 (26%) were AG genotype. There was no correlation seen between mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and HER2 genotype at codon 655 in patients treated with trastuzumab. Of patients tested for the HER2 polymorphism, cardiac dysfunction [defined as &gt; 10% decline in LVEF or clinical congestive heart failure (CHF)] developed in 16% of patients with AA, 17% of patients with GG and 20% of patients with AG. There was also no correlation between mean LVEF and variant rs7853758 in patients treated with anthracyclines. The percentage of patients who developed cardiac dysfunction was 13%, 17% and 21% in AA, GG, and AG genotypes respectively. No correlation between disease free survival and any of the genotypes was seen. Conclusion: In the largest analysis to date to evaluate for relationship between cardiac toxicity and HER2 polymorphism, we did not find a correlation with rs1136201 HER2 polymorphism and trastuzumab induced cardiac toxicity. Our study also did not show a correlation between variant rs7853758 (L461L) and anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity. Neither polymorphism correlated with prognosis. Citation Format: Peddi PF, Hurvitz SA, Fasching PA, Wang L, Cunningham J, Weinshilboum RM, Liu D, Quinaux E, Fourmanoir H, Robert NJ, Valero V, Crown J, Falkson C, Brufsky A, Pienkowski T, Eiermann W, Martin M, Bee V, Slamon DJ. Genetic polymorphism and correlation with treatment induced cardiotoxicity and prognosis in HER2 amplified early breast cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-03-09.

Abstract Background: The Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) is a prospective trial evaluating the role of endocrine therapy or chemoendocrine therapy in patients 18-75 years of age with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, a primary tumor between 0.6-5.0 cm, and negative axillary nodes, a population for whom chemotherapy is typically recommended or least considered based on National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network (NCCN) guidelines. Methods: The trial was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of endocrine therapy compared with chemoendocrine therapy in the randomized group with an Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) of 11-25. Patients with a low RS &lt; 11 were assigned to endocrine therapy alone and with a high RS &gt; 25 assigned to chemoendocrine therapy, and both groups were followed in a prospective registry. The definition of an intermediate RS differed in this trial (RS 11-25) from the original reports (RS 18-30) in order to reduce the risk of chemotherapy undertreatment in patients with a mid-range or low RS (Sparano & Paik. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:721-728). Results: The trial enrolled 10,273 patients between April 2006 and October 2010, of whom 6907 patients (67.2%) had a mid-range RS of 11-25, 1737 (16.9%) had a high RS &gt; 25, and 1639 (15.9%) had a low RS of &lt; 11. At the fourth planned interim analysis, the ECOG-ACRIN data monitoring committee recommended that the study continue as planned for the randomized group with a RS 11-25, and that the results be released to the investigators for the low risk group with a RS &lt;11. The characteristics of the low risk registry population are as follows: age 50 or less (27%), 51-60 (35%), &gt; 60 (39%); tumor size &lt; 1 cm (8%), 1-2 cm (61%), &gt; 2 cm (31%); histologic grade low (34%), intermediate (59%), high (7%); breast conservation (68%) or mastectomy (32%). Initial endocrine therapy included tamoxifen in 35%, aromatase inhibitors in 59%, ovarian function suppression in 3%, and unspecified therapy in 3%; 5 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (1 of whom relapsed). Five-year rates (and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for low RS group were 99.2% (98.5, 99.6%) for distant relapse free interval, 98.5% (97.7, 99.1%) for relapse-free interval, 93.7% (92.2, 94.9%) for invasive disease free survival, and 98.2% (97.3, 98.7%) for overall survival. Information regarding ER, PR, and HER2 RNA expression will be presented. Conclusions: Despite meeting guidelines for recommending or at least considering adjuvant chemotherapy based on classical clinicopathologic features, the risk of recurrence was very low at 5 years in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer and a low RS of &lt; 11 treated with endocrine therapy alone without chemotherapy. Citation Format: Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer Jr CE, Dees EC, Perez EA, Olson Jr JA, Zujweski J, Keane MM, Gomez Moreno HL, Reddi RP, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Atkins JN, Berenberg JL, Sledge Jr GW. Prospective trial of endocrine therapy alone in patients with estrogen receptor positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: Results of the TAILORx low risk registry. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-01.

Abstract Background NSABP B-36 compares 6 cycles of FEC-100 with 4 cycles of standard AC in pts with node-negative breast cancer. As reported separately, no significant differences between the two treatment arms were observed in the primary endpoint of disease-free survival or in the secondary endpoints of overall survival, recurrence-free, or distant recurrence-free intervals. Greater toxicity was reported in pts who received FEC compared to AC. We present here the results of the QOL and MH studies obtained prospectively in conjunction with the treatment study. We hypothesized that pts on FEC would experience greater treatment toxicity in the first 12 months of the study, and would have greater rates of amenorrhea at 18 months compared to pts on AC. Methods Among the 1,357 pts enrolled in the QOL study, 1,332 (675 AC, 657 FEC) submitted the baseline form and had QOL follow-up (fup) information. Pts completed: 1) the FACT-B instrument; 2) a symptom checklist; and 3) the SF-36 Vitality Scale, all at baseline, day 1 of cycle 4, and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after random assignment. FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (TOI), symptom severity, and vitality scores were compared between the two treatment arms using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis with adjustment for the baseline scores, type of surgery, and hormone receptor status, examining the first 12 months and the later time points separately. Menstrual status was collected at baseline for all enrolled pts, with subsequent assessments on day 1 of cycle 4, and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months for pts with menstrual bleeding within 12 months prior to random assignment and not having had a hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy (1, 096 pts). Post-chemotherapy amenorrhea was defined as the lack of menstrual periods during the 12 months preceding the 18-month fup evaluation. Data from 921 pts (475 AC, 446 FEC) were available for analysis. Logistic regression, adjusted for type of surgery and hormone receptor status, was used to test for association of amenorrhea status and treatment. Results Both TOI and vitality scores were worse for pts on FEC compared to those on AC at 6 months (p&lt;0.01) with no significant difference at 12 months and beyond. No significant differences in symptom severity between the two treatment arms were observed. The rates of post-chemotherapy amenorrhea were significantly different between FEC and AC (66.8% vs. 58.7%, p=0.01) with positive hormone receptor status as an independent risk factor (p=0.03). Conclusions Women receiving FEC had diminished QOL at 6 months after random assignment, but no difference at 12 months or later. Premenopausal women receiving FEC experienced a higher rate of post-chemotherapy amenorrhea than women receiving AC. Support NCI grants U10-CA-12027, -37377, -69974, -69651 and -44066-26, and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, a subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc. Citation Format: Patricia A Ganz, John W Wilson, Hanna Bandos, André Robidoux, Alexander HG Paterson, Johnathan Polikoff, Luis Baez-Diaz, Adam M Brufsky, Louis Fehrenbacher, Aroop Mangalik, Patrick J Ward, Louise Provencher, John T Hamm, Philip J Stella, Robert L Carolla, Richard G Margolese, Henry R Shibata, Edith A Perez, Norman Wolmark. Impact of treatment on quality of life (QOL) and menstrual history (MH) in the NSABP B-36: A randomized phase III trial comparing six cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) to four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-01.

Abstract Bisphosphonates reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events (fractures, pain, hypercalcemia) in patients (pts) with bone metastases from breast cancer. By inhibiting osteoclast function and subsequent bone turnover they may inhibit the growth of bone (and other) metastases. Their role in preventing or delaying the development of bone (or other) metastases in pts with early breast cancer is uncertain. Three previous trials of oral clodronate have given mixed results. The largest trial (placebo-controlled) and a smaller open-label trial suggested that oral clodronate benefitted pts with improved bone metastases-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS), but a third open-label study showed no benefit with an apparent detrimental effect on survival. Studies of IV zoledronate in open-label trials in early breast cancer have also shown mixed results: the AZURE trial in pts with node positive breast cancer showed no benefit in disease-free survival (DFS) or OS with a possible effect in pts aged over 60. The ABCSG-12 trial in GnRH (plus tamoxifen or anastrozole) treated women with early breast cancer showed a small DFS benefit for those receiving IV zoledronate but no BMFS or OS benefit. Methods: B-34 is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial in pts with stage 1, 2 or 3 breast cancer assessing oral clodronate 1600mg daily for 3 years compared to placebo given alone or in addition to adjuvant chemo- or hormone therapy. Stratification is by age (&lt;50, +50), number of positive nodes (0, 1–3, 4+) and ER/PR status. The primary end-point is DFS. Secondary endpoints are the incidence of skeletal metastases, OS, relapse-free survival, incidence of non-skeletal metastases, and incidence of skeletal morbid events. Results: 3323 patients were accrued — 1662 in Group A and 1661 in Group B. As of March 31, 2011, 54 pts were declared ineligible: 23 in Group A and 31 in Group B. The average time on study is 101.3 months. Patient characteristics were evenly distributed throughout both groups. Approximately 75% of pts in each group had negative axillary lymph nodes and some 78% in each group were ER and/or PR positive. About 64% of pts were age 50 or over. Oral clodronate was generally tolerable, toxicities observed being mainly due to the concomitant systemic chemotherapy. One pt in Group A had a 1 mm area of osteonecrosis on the palatal taurus. Compliance, as expected with trials of oral medications, has been a problem. 1910 pts completed 3 years of therapy. Event rates were slower than anticipated. This final analysis assesses a total of 598 events in the two arms. Conclusions: This trial is the largest placebo-controlled study of an oral bisphosphonate in patients with early breast cancer and will provide further information on the role of bisphosphonates in breast cancer management. Supported for NSABP by NCI U10CA12027, −37377, 69651, 69974; and Bayer Schering Pharma Oy; for ECOG by U10CA021115; for NCCTG by U10CA25224; for SWOG by U10CA38926. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S2-3.

Purpose This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy regimens versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to chemotherapy + bevacizumab or to chemotherapy + placebo. Before random assignment, investigators chose capecitabine, a taxane (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or docetaxel), gemcitabine, or vinorelbine. Dosing for bevacizumab or placebo was 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, depending on chemotherapy regimen. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, PFS by chemotherapy cohort, objective response rate (ORR), duration of objective response, 1-year survival rate, and safety. Results RIBBON-2 enrolled 684 patients (225, chemotherapy + placebo; 459, chemotherapy + bevacizumab). The combination of bevacizumab with chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant benefit. Median PFS increased from 5.1 to 7.2 months (stratified hazard ratio for PFS, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93; P = .0072). The 10% improvement in ORR between the placebo- and bevacizumab-containing arms (39.5% v 29.6%; P = .0193), although not statistically significant, was consistent with previous trials. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) related to bevacizumab treatment were hypertension (9.0%) and proteinuria (3.1%). There was an increased number of AEs leading to study discontinuation in the chemotherapy + bevacizumab arm compared with the chemotherapy + placebo arm (13.3% v 7.2%). Conclusion The combination of bevacizumab with commonly used chemotherapies improved PFS in the second-line treatment of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, with a safety profile comparable with that in prior phase III studies.

Purpose This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) when combined with several standard chemotherapy regimens versus those regimens alone for first-line treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned in 2:1 ratio to chemotherapy plus BV or chemotherapy plus placebo. Before random assignment, investigators chose capecitabine (Cape; 2,000 mg/m 2 for 14 days), taxane (Tax) -based (nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m 2 , docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m 2 ), or anthracycline (Anthra) -based (doxorubicin or epirubicin combinations [doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, or fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide]) chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. BV or placebo was administered at 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), 1-year survival rate, objective response rate, duration of objective response, and safety. Two independently powered cohorts defined by the choice of chemotherapy (Cape patients or pooled Tax/Anthra patients) were analyzed in parallel. Results RIBBON-1 (Regimens in Bevacizumab for Breast Oncology) enrolled 1,237 patients (Cape cohort, n = 615; Tax/Anthra cohort, n = 622). Median PFS was longer for each BV combination (Cape cohort: increased from 5.7 months to 8.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84; log-rank P < .001; and Tax/Anthra cohort: increased from 8.0 months to 9.2 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.80; log-rank P < .001). No statistically significant differences in OS between the placebo- and BV-containing arms were observed. Safety was consistent with results of prior BV trials. Conclusion The combination of BV with Cape, Tax, or Anthra improves clinical benefit in terms of increased PFS in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, with a safety profile comparable to prior phase III studies.

Abstract BackgroundRIBBON-1, a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with previously untreated MBC was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab (B) to chemotherapy regimens including capecitabine (Cape; n=615); a taxane (T; n=307), or an anthracycline (Anth; n=315) compared with chemotherapy alone. Pre-specified analyses of progression-free survival PFS) in the Cape and pooled T/Anth cohorts, the primary endpoints of the study were increased upon addition of B. In the Cape cohort, median PFS increased from 5.7 to 8.6 mo (HR=0.69, p-value=0.0002) and in the T/Anth cohort, it increased from 8.0 to 9.2 mo (HR=0.64; p-value&lt;0.0001).MethodsRECIST was used to determine objective response rate (ORR). Patients without a post-baseline tumor assessment were considered non-responders. The primary analysis for the ORR and the duration of response was performed using only patients with measurable disease at baseline. ORR was formally compared between the two treatment arms using the Mantel-Haenszel Chi-squared test, using the randomization stratification factors. Fisher's exact test was also performed. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete or partial response or with stable disease at Week 24. Exploratory analyses of CBR and time to response are provided here. Summary statistics of time to response at Week 9 will be presented as will the final analysis of the secondary endpoint of overall survival.ResultsAnalyses of ORR and CBR are provided in the following table. CapeTaxaneAnth PL (n=206)B (n=409)PL (n=104)B (n=203)PL (n=103)B (n=212)Patients with measurable disease, n (%)161 (78.2)325 (61.1)85 (81.7)161 (79.3)92 (89.3)184 (86.8)ORR, %23.635.435.350.340.252.2CR, n (%)1 (0.6)7 (2.2)3 (3.5)4 (2.5)2 (2.2)3 (1.6)PR, n (%)37 (23.0)108 (33.2)27 (31.8)77 (47.8)35 (38.0)93 (50.5)Difference between arms, %11.815.012.0p-value, unstratified0.00940.030.073Duration of ORMedian, mo7.29.28.68.46.08.1HR (95% CI)0.61 (0.39–0.96)0.75 (0.45–1.27)0.53 (0.34–0.83)Log-rank p-value0.03260.2840.0047Clinical benefit rate*, %47.164.365.471.969.980.7p-value, unstratified&lt;0.00010.240.04CR+PR at Week 9, %20.229.438.354.544.451.1B=bevacizumab, cape=capecitabine, CI=confidence interval, HR=hazard ratio, OR=objective response, PL=placebo, T/Anth=taxane/anthracycline.*For randomized patients.ConclusionsIn patients with HER2-negative MBC, the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine, taxane or anthracycline chemotherapy induces more responses and those responses occur more rapidly. For capecitabine and anthracycline the addition of bevacizumab leads to objective responses that last longer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 6084.